Hello Simon,
No, I think "Oh gracious founders and terraformers of all that is
TB'ness, I humbly ask for your great wisdom and insight into my mortal
problem." would suffice! :^)
On Thu, 16 Mar 2000 at 17:28:34 [GMT +], you wrote:
S> Hello elite one. So you lot are our forefathers then e
Hello Simon,
This needs to go to TBBETA. TBUDL is for official releases. When we
start mixing the two, people get really confused as to whether it is
an official or beta feature. Believe me, it has happened quite a bit.
Thanks.
On Thu, 16 Mar 2000 at 22:44:00 [GMT +], you wrote:
S> TB! 1.
Hello!
Friday, March 17, 2000, 2:31, Michael Wieczorek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
MW> I'm insecure what I can say... :-)
Why you think you are insecure?
MW> On Thu, 16 Mar 2000 03:20:00 +0300 GMT, Alexander V. Kiselev wrote:
MW> (at my local time: 16.03.2000, 01:20:00 +0100 GMT)
AVK>> No
Sashka, dia duit!
On Friday 17/03/2000 you posted the following comments to Vincent @
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
OOpppsss. Forgot to add: ALT+SPACEBAR+N will minimise to tray
Slán anois,
Simon send private mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usin' TB! version: 1.42 Beta
Sashka, dia duit!
On Friday 17/03/2000 you posted the following comments to Vincent @
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
VDE>> I find it quite annoying, that The Bat isn't minimizing to system
VDE>> tray, when hitting Win+M ... anybody else?
S> and it shouldn't minimize there :) only few crazy applications
Hello,
Thursday, March 16, 2000, 7:43:00 PM, you wrote:
VDE> Hi Co-Batties,
VDE> I find it quite annoying, that The Bat isn't minimizing to system
VDE> tray, when hitting Win+M ... anybody else?
and it shouldn't minimize there :) only few crazy applications
minimazing in tray by hitting Win+D o
Hi Co-Batties,
I find it quite annoying, that The Bat isn't minimizing to system
tray, when hitting Win+M ... anybody else?
Cheers,
Vince
--
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list m
Need help filter mail with attachments. I use the free fax service
JFAX.COM and have tryied to filter messages from jfax.com to be moved
but nothing I do works. The last filter I tryied looked for jfax,com
anywhere in message but still nothing happens. Each message has a
.tiff attachment --- is t
On Thursday 16 March 2000 Justin D. Paine wrote:
> of course.. but RBL requires that a spammer actually exploits a server
> before it is blacklisted.. for inclusion in ORBS, a server just has to
> be open to relaying.. Makes no matter if it's ever been used for spam,
> the mere fact that "it could
Paul, dia duit!
Thursday, March 16, 2000, 9:52:49 PM, you wrote:
P> Thank you Simon & Co You fresh faced darlings.
You're very welcome sweet chunks ;-) LOL
Slán go fóill.
Sín Breathnach mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lhomme est bien insensé. Il ne saurait forg
On Thu, 16 Mar 2000, you wrote:
> Hello Listmembers,
>
> On Thu, 16 Mar 2000 at 12:01:53 [GMT +] Tony Boom wrote:
>
> > Just a quickie.
>
> Hey...hehe... a QUICKIE? Via email? I remember that it was kinda
> different ages ago :-)
>
>
> Regards
> Dieter
No, it still has the same
Hello!
On Fri, 17 Mar 2000 00:23:55 +0100 GMT, I wrote:
(at my local time: 17.03.2000, 00:23:55 +0100 GMT)
I have (had) a problem... ;-)
--
Bye, Michael
TheBat 1.41 [reg] - Windows NT 4.0 Build 1381 Service Pack 5
_
Hello Alexander!
I'm insecure what I can say... :-)
(A) if the reply-address (entered in "Edit User"-General) is different
from my send address respectivly my From-Address, TB set the
"Return-Path:" to the reply-address resp. "Reply-To:"
Example:
---8<-
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hello Alexander!
On Thu, 16 Mar 2000 01:06:42 +0300 GMT, Alexander V. Kiselev wrote:
(at my local time: 15.03.2000, 23:06:42 +0100 GMT)
AVK> Hi there!
AVK> On 15 Mar 00, at 22:17, Stefan Tanurkov wrote
AVK> about "Re: Using Macros for header (%RETUR":
>> MW> Using the macro
>> MW> %RETURNP
A Chairde,
TB! 1.42 Beta/2 a bit dodgy. DON'T try and drag folders into other folders
whilst holding down the ALT key else your message base gets mighty cocked
up. Also, deleting/emptying folders causes temporary freeze.
My advice, *bak up* everything. BTW.
Slán anois,
Simon s
Hello Dieter,
Thursday, March 16, 2000, 10:18:18 AM, you wrote:
DH> It would be helpful to put the file which normally inform us about the
DH> changes a new version has undergone, as 'descript.ion' or 'index.txt' or
DH> 'index' into the same ftp directory as the executable or zipped beta.
Hello Jast,
Thursday, March 16, 2000, 7:35:17 PM, you wrote:
J> Morning Simon,
>> Hello elite one. So you lot are our forefathers then eh! So should we
>> address you as 'Sire' when we post to TBUDL i future? ;-)
J> He shall not address us as "Sire" but as "313373" and use the pluralis
J> m
Thursday, March 16, 2000
Hi folks,
I've got TB 1.41 now and I don't know if this problem ( or "problem" )
existed with my 1.39 version as well. So...
What are the rules in the settings for the addresses in the address book ,
so that TB would complete the email address every time I start
Morning Simon,
> Hello elite one. So you lot are our forefathers then eh! So should we
> address you as 'Sire' when we post to TBUDL i future? ;-)
He shall not address us as "Sire" but as "313373" and use the pluralis
majestatis. This is the only way he could show enough respect to the
elders
Hello TBUDL!
for those of you who use IE5 and W2K, the following should be
interesting:
http://cnn.com/2000/TECH/computing/03/16/ie.win2k.lockout.idg/index.html
--
Ciao,
Thomas mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Generated with The Bat! 1.41
under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build 1
Jast, dia duit!
On Thursday 16/03/00 you posted the following comments to Tony @
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
J> Simple. The people who have no Addition to the version number such as
J> Personal, Business, or Educational have registered their Bat a rather long
J> time ago (some 1.5 years or so), whe
Marck, dia duit!
On Thursday 16/03/00 you posted the following comments to Simon @
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
As I can't see an your email address for off-list correspondence, I would
beg your indulgence further and ask you to please extend your abounding
graciousness for a little while longer and al
Morning Tony,
> I've noticed that in the message headers under Mailer some people are
> displayed as using The Bat!(v1.4)
>
> In my own e-mail I am displayed as using The Bat!(v1.4) Personal.
>
> My copy is registered, I assume everyone else is, so why the
> difference? Is
hallo Roel!
on Thursday, March 16, 2000, 4:06:39 PM, you wrote:
R> Hi Patrick
R> On Thu, 16 Mar 2000 16:00:22 +0100GMT
R>(which was 16/03/2000, 16:00 +0100GMT for me),
R> you wrote:
PE>> hallo TBUDL!
PE>> is it possible to view gifs with the (windows-)associated program, in
PE>> this ca
Hi Patrick
On Thu, 16 Mar 2000 16:00:22 +0100GMT
(which was 16/03/2000, 16:00 +0100GMT for me),
you wrote:
PE> hallo TBUDL!
PE> is it possible to view gifs with the (windows-)associated program, in
PE> this case acdsee, by doubleclicking it? i just can't find an option...
go to the 'optio
hallo TBUDL!
is it possible to view gifs with the (windows-)associated program, in
this case acdsee, by doubleclicking it? i just can't find an option...
PAT
--
vcard/LDAP/PGP: http://dresden-online.com/~perler/identity.html
PGP fingerprint: DAC6 2FDA 1ED7 AD55 BD1F 5142 3D5F 72BF
--
-
Hello Simon,
On Thu, 16 Mar 2000 12:02:15 + GMT your local time,
which was Thursday, March 16, 2000, 7:02:15 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Simon wrote:
> Seems to be an unfavourable side effect of ISPs/Buisnesses that get "too
> big" and then outgrow their customers. Having to speak to someon
Hello Listmembers,
On Thu, 16 Mar 2000 at 12:01:53 [GMT +] Tony Boom wrote:
> Just a quickie.
Hey...hehe... a QUICKIE? Via email? I remember that it was kinda
different ages ago :-)
Regards
Dieter
|Running TheBat! 1.41 [2E7F60DA] on |
|Windows NT v4 Build 1381 Service Pac
Hello Tony,
Basically, anyone whose mailer info does not include the "personal"
etc. stuff after the version, means that they registered their copy of
TB before RITLabs changed their registration keys to include this
information.
You have the same version as the rest of us, it's just that we
re
Marck, dia duit!
On Thursday 16/03/2000 you posted the following comments to Simon @
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
M> I will allow this transgression since I actually have an answer ;-).
You have my gratitude for your abounding grace ;-)
M> This was one of the 3 reasons for which I moved the hos
Hello TBUDL,
Just a quickie.
I've noticed that in the message headers under Mailer some people are
displayed as using The Bat!(v1.4)
In my own e-mail I am displayed as using The Bat!(v1.4) Personal.
My copy is registered, I assume everyone else is, so why the
difference
Hello Listmembers,
On Wed, 15 Mar 2000 at 20:50:51 [GMT +] Simon wrote:
> really. However, for users who visually check FTP for the file, then perhaps
> a plaintext file named with the current version number could be placed in
> the folder so that everyone can identify the release. Beyond th
I give up!
I cannot figure out why some people cannot open .eml files with TB!'s
internal viewer while others can.
My thanks to everyone who provided information about their setup. Here
is a compilation of the information you provided:
The following people can open .eml file attachments with TB
Hi Simon,
On 16 March 2000 at 06:08:39 GMT + (which was 06:08 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points:
> This maybe a bit off TBUDL topics, but nonetheless, I shall
> endeavour to impose on some of you and your knowledge if you are
> agreeable.
I will al
34 matches
Mail list logo
