Leif,
Can you get me off this list? Since subscribing I'm getting
far too much email. Did not realise that this would happen, and
sometimes I have to pick up my mail using a palmtop and a very expensive 9600 bps
cellphone connection.
Thanks,
Frank Schweppe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
--
Hello Steve,
Tuesday, May 02, 2000, 4:51:45 PM, you wrote:
> Monday, May 01, 2000, 10:57:53 PM, Eberhard wrote:
> There was also this great guy called Bill Gates who put everything that
> people wanted into a large, monolithic application. It is now unwieldy,
> bloated, difficult to use an
S>> So I think the title bar should at least say something like - View
S>> Folder Bat of ServNet Sorted by Receive Time (Ascending)
TF> ServNet - Bat View Folder (...)
TF> Why not mention the name fo the folder first, as Netscape mentions the
TF> name of the web site first? This way, you don'
On Tuesday, May 02, 2000 at 19:03:38 GMT -0400 (EDT)
(which was 7:03 PM where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
Hello Max,
> Hi,
> I'm looking for a way to setup filters to bounce spam and send a CC
> to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Should a message template starting with this
> work?
> %rexexpb
Hi Alberto,
On Tue, 2 May 2000 20:31:31 +0200GMT (03/05/2000, 02:31 +0800GMT),
Alberto Almagioni wrote:
AA> I see an option in the "sorting office/filters" about the screen saver
AA> status: is this working also on screen-energy-save-option? I don't use
AA> screensaver but if this works (or coul
Hi List,
this thread makes me wonder if I have a "delete thread on server"
option in the message dispatcher. I certainly don't want to download
this thread at NT$ 60/hour, average about 1K/min, when I get home.
Thanks.
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
Message reply created with The Bat! 1.41
under Chine
Hello Allie,
On Tue, 2 May 2000 at 12:58:42 [GMT -0500], you wrote:
AM> I just tried it Steve. I am using beta 20. In thread view
AM> deletes single messages with no other messages
AM> attached. I'm not smoking anything. I'm not hallucinating. :-) I'm
AM> using TB! version 1.42b20 in Win2K.
G
Hello Jast,
On Tuesday, May 02, 2000 at 15:14:55 GMT +0200 (which was 6:14 AM
where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
> Morning Januk,
> How is it annoying? I have one account set to check mail every minute.
> When I'm online it does just that. When I'm off, I am not bothered.
> Possibl
Hello All;
Well it finally happened. the "autoformat" topic went over
the edge. Not only has it wasted a lot of bandwidth but it has
also shown that if a topic is discussed long enough that it will
eventually bring out the worst side of us. Hm!!
SUGGESTION:
On Tue, 2 May 2000 14:48:06 -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
8<
> Simple. The block which is a paragraph is the one defined with a hard CR
> and the one that is not is defined with a soft CR. How TB! defines those is
> up to the internal logic which is, as I demonstrated, not limited to the logic
Hi Allie,
On Tuesday, May 02, 2000, 7:37:56 PM, you wrote in part about "auto-format is too
robotic isn't it?":
A> OK, I understand what you were saying and see that it will indeed
A> work though in a limited fashion. It was a problem with the wording
A> of what you had said.
Personally, I thi
On Wed, 3 May 2000 01:25:04 +0400, Alexander V. Kiselev wrote:
8<
> In my previous message I suggested that the indented line should be
> considered as the paragraph _boundary_, note further that I suggested
> this only as a quick fix to what we have right now (see also below).
> This would me
AVK> Mistake #1 on your side: you think plain ASCII is a limitation of some
AVK> (unknown to me) sort, whereas _I_ think ASCII is a _power_, a well-thought
AVK> standard that those guys who invented "soft returns" and things alike (read:
AVK> M$ with its Word and heaps of others) just plain spo
Hi there!
On 2 May 00, at 15:38, Steve Lamb wrote
about "Re: auto-format is too robotic isn't it?":
Okay, this has been my last message to this list. I'm sick and tired of those
AMERICAN IDIOTS over here who can only shout, can only be unnecessarily
rude to others. The next my message will
>> My suggestion would be, never to cancel hard returns. This should solve
>> everything.
AVK> Allie, will you please understand that within plain/text medium there is no way
AVK> for the program to distinguish between _your_ hard returns and the hard
AVK> returns inserted by the line-wrapping
Hi,
I'm looking for a way to setup filters to bounce spam and send a CC
to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Should a message template starting with this
work?
%rexexpblindmatch=%ofromaddr
%setpattregexp=".*(@.*)"
%cc=postmaster%subpatt=1
Thanks,
Max
+-+
| Max Kessler +--
Tuesday, May 02, 2000, 3:14:59 PM, Alexander wrote:
> Mistake #1 on your side: you think plain ASCII is a limitation of some
> (unknown to me) sort, whereas _I_ think ASCII is a _power_, a well-thought
> standard that those guys who invented "soft returns" and things alike (read:
> M$ with its Wor
Hi there!
On 2 May 00, at 14:48, Steve Lamb wrote
about "Re: auto-format is too robotic isn't it?":
> Mistake #1. You're thinking that there are only lines. I see only data
> which can be represented any number of ways. Let's just say that just
> because the limitation exists when tra
Tuesday, May 02, 2000, 2:25:04 PM, Alexander wrote:
> Allie, no personal offence, please! I didn't mean to insult you, just wanted
> to stress the idea that if we stay on the grounds of _plain_text_ medium, we
> need to take into account that there is _no_ paragraph concept applicable to
> this me
Hi there!
On 2 May 00, at 14:57, Allie Martin wrote
about "Re: auto-format is too robotic isn't it?":
> > Allie, will you please understand that within plain/text medium there is
> > no way for the program to distinguish between _your_ hard returns and
> > the hard returns inserted by the l
Hello The Bat! users,
Jast wrote at 5/2/2000, 3:14 PM
>> Not really. Just have each account set to check mail every few
>> minutes. If you have a permanent connection that works like a charm.
>> If you don't have a permanent connection, it still works pretty well,
>> except that TB doesn't
On Tue, 2 May 2000 16:32:46 +0400, Alexander V. Kiselev wrote:
> Allie, will you please understand that within plain/text medium there is
> no way for the program to distinguish between _your_ hard returns and
> the hard returns inserted by the line-wrapping algorithm?
Pardon my slowness for ma
Morning Januk,
> Not really. Just have each account set to check mail every few
> minutes. If you have a permanent connection that works like a charm.
> If you don't have a permanent connection, it still works pretty well,
> except that TB doesn't have an offline mode. That is a little
>
Hi there!
On 1 May 00, at 19:40, Allie Martin wrote
about "Re: auto-format is too robotic isn'":
> My suggestion would be, never to cancel hard returns. This should solve
> everything.
Allie, will you please understand that within plain/text medium there is no way
for the program to disti
On Tue, 2 May 2000 14:26:39 +0200, Ralf Buschmann wrote:
AM>> The quick brown fox, before making a great howling noise, jumps over
AM>> the lazy dog.
I just applied Alt+L to the line and see above.
Alt+L removes the initial
Tuesday, May 02, 2000, 11:25:13 AM, Allie wrote:
> Oh, so there are other reasons. :-)
Major reasons. How would you like a thread to be broken up into 5 parts
and you completely lose your place because of it? :/
The backend works, the interface is beyond the normal TB! quirkiness into
On Wed, 3 May 2000 01:36:25 +0800GMT (02/05/2000,
19.36 +0100GMT),
Thomas Fernandez wrote:
AM>> I don't know about the others, but I don't understand what it is you are
AM>> asking. :-( Would you expand?
> He wants TB! to send him him notification of each email he receives. I
> guess he did t
On Tue, 2 May 2000 11:09:12 -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
>> Anyway, TB! does it here. Each beta has at the bottom "And some
>> minor cosmetic fixes". I see from your message headers, that you're
>> using beta18. Could this be the reason why you think that I may be
>> smoking? :-) I suggest that
Tuesday, May 02, 2000, 10:58:42 AM, Allie wrote:
> Anyway, TB! does it here. Each beta has at the bottom "And some minor
> cosmetic fixes". I see from your message headers, that you're using
> beta18. Could this be the reason why you think that I may be smoking? :-)
> I suggest that you chec
On Wed, 3 May 2000 02:00:08 +0800GMT (02/05/2000,
20.00 +0100GMT),
Thomas Fernandez wrote:
AA>> In few words I have a filter on principals accounts that redirect the
AA>> messages on my GSM phone through SMS, but I'd like that this filter
AA>> works only when TheBat! check these accounts automaic
On Wed, 3 May 2000 01:36:25 +0800, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
AM>> I don't know about the others, but I don't understand what it is you
AM>> are asking. :-( Would you expand?
> GSM = Global System for Mobile Communication = digital mobile
> (cellular) phone system most popular everywhere in the wor
Hallo Alberto,
On Tue, 2 May 2000 19:48:53 +0200 GMT (03.05.2000, 01:48 +0800 GMT),
Alberto Almagioni wrote:
AA> In few words I have a filter on principals accounts that redirect the
AA> messages on my GSM phone through SMS, but I'd like that this filter
AA> works only when TheBat! check these a
On Tue, 2 May 2000 10:34:00 -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
> Yes because Shift-CNTL-Del doesn't delete a single message. You're
> missing the point. When I read in Mutt in threaded display to delete
> both single messages and threads I use one key. CNTL-D. That's it. I
> don't have to decide "
On Tue, 2 May 2000 19:29:50 +0200GMT (02/05/2000,
19.29 +0100GMT),
Roel wrote:
> Hi Allie
> On Tue, 2 May 2000 12:21:13 -0500GMT
>(which was 2/05/00, 19:21 +0100GMT for me),
> you wrote:
AM>> I don't know about the others, but I don't understand what it is
AM>> you are asking. :-( Would y
Hallo Allie,
On Tue, 2 May 2000 12:21:13 -0500 GMT (03.05.2000, 01:21 +0800 GMT),
Allie Martin wrote:
>> I'm trying to make a filter that send to my gsm via sms the principals
>> headers of filtered e-mail: i need to know if it's possible to set
>> the filter to automatically send the mail
Tuesday, May 02, 2000, 10:18:20 AM, Allie wrote:
> TB!'s threading is useless to you for that single reason?! Especially
> since deletes the message?
> delete message
> Delete whole thread.
Yes because Shift-CNTL-Del doesn't delete a single message. You're
missing the point. When I rea
Hi Allie
On Tue, 2 May 2000 12:21:13 -0500GMT
(which was 2/05/00, 19:21 +0100GMT for me),
you wrote:
AM> I don't know about the others, but I don't understand what it is
AM> you are asking. :-( Would you expand?
he's talking about the auto-reply-function...
(filters - actions - send auto-
On Tue, 2 May 2000 12:29:23 +0200, Alberto Almagioni wrote:
> I'm trying to make a filter that send to my gsm via sms the principals
> headers of filtered e-mail: i need to know if it's possible to set
> the filter to automatically send the mail.
> Thank you.
I don't know about the other
On Tue, 2 May 2000 09:57:29 -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
> Problem is that TB! doesn't intuitively delete threads, either. Let
> me give you an example. Select a message that has no other messages on
> it, press CNTL-DEL. Nothing happens because it isn't a thread.
> No, fire up mutt and,
Tuesday, May 02, 2000, 9:06:47 AM, Alexander wrote:
> Nah, I don't think TB's threading is so bad. It could be made much better
> when the _usability_ is concerned, but technically it's implemented very
> well
Agreed. See previous message.
>> *whistles innocently in the background.*
>
Tuesday, May 02, 2000, 9:18:51 AM, Allie wrote:
> Deleting messages therefore no longer collapse threads as easily and also
> deleting a message doesn't no longer collapsed the thread.
Problem is that TB! doesn't intuitively delete threads, either. Let me
give you an example. Select a messa
On Tue, 2 May 2000 11:18:51 -0500, Allie Martin wrote:
beta paragraph quoted:
> I can far more easily follow threads in this way. I can easily recheck the
> comments I made to properly reply to your post here. There are a number of
> reasons why I've returned to threading after a long absence. F
Hi there!
On 2 May 00, at 7:51, Steve Lamb wrote
about "Re: TB! WishList":
> There was also this great guy called Bill Gates who put everything that
> people wanted into a large, monolithic application. It is now unwieldy,
> bloated, difficult to use and understand.
That's true.
>
Hi there!
On 2 May 00, at 7:48, Steve Lamb wrote
about "Re: TB! WishList":
> > Have you thought of using the 'total' and 'total unread' columns in the
> > message list? It can easily tell you how many messages are in each thread
> > and how many messages in each thread are unread. You can th
On Tue, 2 May 2000 07:48:05 -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
>> Have you thought of using the 'total' and 'total unread' columns in the
>> message list? It can easily tell you how many messages are in each
>> thread and how many messages in each thread are unread. You can
>> therefore get the exact infor
Monday, May 01, 2000, 7:07:10 PM, Allie wrote:
> Have you thought of using the 'total' and 'total unread' columns in the
> message list? It can easily tell you how many messages are in each thread
> and how many messages in each thread are unread. You can therefore get the
> exact information that
Monday, May 01, 2000, 10:57:53 PM, Eberhard wrote:
> Thanks for your kindness. I guess I will stick to TB! despite of what
> you say. Thank God you don't seem to be the programmer. We had a great
> mailer at its time on Amiga - it was called Voodoo. On the respective
> mailing list the author was
Dear Allie,
you wrote on Tuesday, May 02, 2000, 02:40:35:
[snip]
AM> I write:
AM> The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog.
AM> The line above is not to be auto-formatted. I then decide to re-edit and
AM> insert some extra words.
AM> The quick brown fox, before making a gr
I'm so sorry... I didn't see the option...
Now it works perfectly.
Ciao
Al
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://i.am/atoms
pgp public key: http://www.geocities.com/Paris/Louvre/8338/key.html
Fingerprint: 23A0 44F1 8D3B 5C78 0054 4E25 8D0A D73E 4664 8E0F
--
I'm trying to make a filter that send to my gsm via sms the principals
headers of filtered e-mail: i need to know if it's possible to set
the filter to automatically send the mail.
Thank you.
Ciao
Al
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://i.am/atoms
pgp public key: http://www.geocities.com
Hi Cristian,
On 02 May 2000 at 03:43:42 GMT +0300 (which was 01:43 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject
of "TB! WishList":
>>That's a question of (English) terminology, so I cannot comment it
>>further.
> The programmer of PMMail is an US citizen. I trust
51 matches
Mail list logo