-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Bat! people!
When i'm making a template using the template editor, it seems that
only a part of the editor is visible, that is lines get cut off so i
can't see what i'm writing. Is there any way to sort of resize the
template editor? I've tried
Hello, the Bat! list recipients,
Wednesday, October 11, 2000, Krister Ekstrom wrote to tbuDL about
Half visible editor:
KE When i'm making a template using the template editor, it seems that
KE only a part of the editor is visible, that is lines get cut off so i
KE can't see what i'm writing.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Nick,
On 11 October 2000 at 20:23:26 GMT -0700 (which was 04:23 where I
live) Nick Andriash wrote and made these points on the subject
of "Encrypting Messages with PGP":
IOW's the box seems to pop up only when there is some uncertainty
as to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Krister,
On 11 October 2000 at 09:13:05 GMT +0200 (which was 08:13 where I
live) Krister Ekstrom wrote and made these points on the subject
of "Half visible editor":
KE When i'm making a template using the template editor, it seems
KE that only
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi!
on Wednesday, October 11, 2000 02:21:04, our bat friend Marck D. Pearlstone typed:
NA Can someone please verify that for me, and if that is the case, I
NA want to put in a feature request to Stef and Max. PGP is designed
NA to give you that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 11 Oct 2000 11:24:48 +0200, Krister Ekstrom wrote:
KE I have similar problems as Nick describes with pgp v6.5.8. I've just
KE switched to the ckt build of pgp 6.5.8 and have yet to post a
KE message which is encrypted to see if i have the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On October 11, 2000 Marck D. Pearlstone Wrote:
That's it - and I always get (and always have got) the key selection
box when encrypting messages. This comes up before the pass-phrase
entry window IIRC.
Well that seems strange, because that was
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 11 Oct 2000 07:04:51 -0700, Nick Andriash wrote:
NA You make a good point there Allie, but what if you have more than
NA one Public Key associated with a given recipient... will TB!/6.5.8
NA produce the dialogue box giving you a choice of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On October 11, 2000 Marck D. Pearlstone Wrote:
I don't think it's a bug - I think it is how it is supposed to work.
After further reading Marck, I have to agree with you and Allie on this.
Apparently, if you want to force the PGP Recipient
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 11 Oct 2000 15:28:53 +0100, Marck D. Pearlstone wrote:
NA Well that seems strange, because that was not my experience when
NA using TB! and 6.5.8 I can't see anything in your setup that was
NA any different in how I had PGP's options set.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 11 Oct 2000 07:27:45 -0700, Nick Andriash wrote:
NA After further reading Marck, I have to agree with you and Allie on
NA this. Apparently, if you want to force the PGP Recipient Dialogue
NA box to appear, hold down the SHIFT key while
Hello TBUDL,
As I await (nervously) either notification that my payment has been
received in the States or my trial period finishes, I sit and wonder
how people make some wonderful opening lines to their replies. I also
wonder if the templates could be modified to include all names in the
On October 11, 2000 Ming-Li Wrote:
Ok, I was asking because you mentioned in your first message that:
In addition, when I try to forward a message, all I receive is a
blank message, with no address included nor forwarded text.
Yes, that happened to me because I had initially deleted all of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello A!
On Wednesday, October 11, 2000 at 4:08:03 AM you wrote:
TB! wraps its message text before sending. There's no need for PGP to be
re-wrapping the text again.
Just a thought: Since I just about 3 or 4 weeks ago unchecked the PGP
On Wednesday, October 11, 2000, 8:13:32 AM, Nick wrote:
2. Copy the AB template (not the actual template file, but the
one line template in the AB) and paste it to the account
template, and see how it goes. (This is to make sure it's indeed
the account template which is in effect.)
Yes,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 11 Oct 2000 17:40:19 +0200, Dierk Haasis wrote:
DH Just a thought: Since I just about 3 or 4 weeks ago unchecked the PGP
DH option but never before got some comment about bad reflow ... could
DH another "solution" be to have TB!
Hello Batlisters.
In a post time stamped 09:25:32 -0700 re: Address Book Templates?
Ming-Li wrote:
ML 2. Create a new AB (I'm calling it "Test" here), and in its
ML properties check the "Use this book as default for ADD/DELETE
ML operations" option. Now, from the Inbox of
On Wednesday, October 11, 2000, 10:02:24 AM, Jan wrote:
Ming-Li, dont' know if you noticed how "strange
happenings" thread was resolved but it was a somewhat similar
situation. You might want to look @ this thread to see if it
offers any clues.
Yes, I've been watching both
Hello Batlisters.
In a post time stamped 10:16:57 -0700 re: Address Book Templates?
Ming-Li wrote:
ML Though I don't see much similarities, it's still worthwhile for Nick
ML to try your solution. The hard question is which entries to delete
ML and recreate, for it seems
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Batlisters.
In a post time stamped 21:08:03 -0500 re: strange
happernings A. Curtis Martin wrote:
JR denominator. So I deleted the two addresses which were
JR filtered for the folder in question.
ACM To
On October 11, 2000, at 9:25:32 AM, Ming-Li Wrote:
Then I would suggest the following:
1. Put some non-macro words (any words) in the AB template, and see
if they show up in your reply. This is to tell if TB has trouble
dealing with your AB template as a whole, or with macros only.
I put
On October 11, 2000, at 9:25:32 AM, Ming-Li Wrote:
2. Create a new AB (I'm calling it "Test" here), and in its
properties check the "Use this book as default for ADD/DELETE
operations" option. Now, from the Inbox of the newly created account
(you didn't delete it, did you?), select the
The bat of happiness fluttered its wings and whispered to me that
David Bevington said on Wednesday, October 11, 2000:
Hello TBUDL,
As I await (nervously) either notification that my payment has been
received in the States or my trial period finishes, I sit and wonder
how people make some
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 11 Oct 2000 14:31:51 -0500
"Rev. Bob 'Bob' Crispen" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rev. Funnily enough, once I had committed payment I began to doubt. Company
Rev. standard is Pegasus (which i don't like), but should I have tried
Rev. Calypso?
Hello bat people
On Mon, 9 Oct 2000 11:24:02 +0800, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
TF On Sun, 8 Oct 2000 14:54:24 -0700GMT (09/10/2000, 05:54 +0800GMT),
TF Michael S. Greenbaum wrote:
MSG Is there a way to change the order of TO and From on a new message?
MSG I would prefer to see the person to whom
Hello TBUDL,
What is the best way to implement a junk mail filter?
Is it possible to move all incoming messages where the sender is in
my address book to a folder like "known senders"?
--
Best regards,
Rainfall mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Hallo Peter,
On Wed, 11 Oct 2000 22:17:59 +0200 GMT (12/10/00, 04:17 +0800 GMT),
Peter Steiner wrote:
PS The other thing: i don't remember the RFC822 requiring an order in the
PS header fields. There is the UNIX mbox format, where messages start
PS with a "From " line, but that is not the
Hello Jan,
On Tuesday, October 10, 2000, 2:51:45 PM, you wrote:
JR Mark, I use IE (Internet Explorer) but downloaded
JR Netscape for testing/compatibility purposes. It looks to
JR me that I did not download the address book module.
Jan, did you download Netscape Navigator instead
Hello Peter Steiner,
Responding to your article on Wed, 11 Oct 2000 at 22:17:59 GMT +0200
(which was 12/10/2000 3:17 GMT +0700 my Local Time) :
MSG Is there a way to change the order of TO and From on a new
MSG message?
MSG I would prefer to see the person to whom I am sending the
29 matches
Mail list logo
