Hello Thomas!
On Friday, November 22, 2002 at 6:19:31 AM you wrote:
The author's assessment that res is a Latin expression meaning in
the matter of is wrong, res is just a female noun meaning thing
or matter. Whether Re: stands for res (in which case I wonder
why we exchange the last s with
Hi,
I have a special question.
When I send a mail with an attachment p.e. an exe-file, many firewalls
notice it as an unknown file. The security mechanism replaced the file
with text and bounced it with following text:
Attachment file name: example.exe - application/x-msdownload.
Can anybody
Hello James Senick,
On Tue, 19 Nov 2002 21:38:41 -0500 GMT your local time,
which was Wednesday, November 20, 2002, 9:38:41 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
James Senick wrote:
Hello Daniel,
On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, at 22:52:11 [GMT +0100] (which was 4:52:11
PM in NY, USA) Daniel Dekany wrote:
Friday, November 22, 2002
Hello tbudl,
One can put aa password on a mail account so that downloaded mail
cannot be read (easily) by someone else.
However unless I see it wrong when aa mailrun is done it also doesnt
download / send mail from password protected accounts...
I donot even
On Friday, November 22, 2002, 11:53, tracer wrote:
One can put aa password on a mail account so that downloaded mail
cannot be read (easily) by someone else. However unless I see it
wrong when aa mailrun is done it also doesnt download / send mail
from password protected accounts...
* Thomas Fernandez [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Simon wrote:
In a recent discussion with a friend I was _told_ ;) that 'Re:' used in the
subject line of an email was an abbreviation for 'Reply'
Anyhow, after thinking about it, I can understand that using Re: in a *new
message* to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
'Lo Thomas,
On Fri, 22 Nov 2002 12:19:31 +0700 your time, you said:
but I am still uncertain whether there is an actual proper or accepted
usage of 'Re:' in email messages.
TF Re: stands for Reply.
Is that your assessment in relation to TB!?
Hello Simon!
On Friday, November 22, 2002 at 2:27:31 PM you wrote:
I'm not altogether convinced, and please don't take that as a personal
remark as that isn't what is intended. However, I do accept that in clients
like TB! the use of Re: means 'Reply'.
Thought my research presented
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
'Lo Dierk,
On Fri, 22 Nov 2002 14:38:37 +0100 your time, you said:
I'm not altogether convinced, and please don't take that as a personal
remark as that isn't what is intended. However, I do accept that in
clients like TB! the use of Re:
Friday, November 22, 2002
9:00:13 AM
RE: (SOT) Use of Re: in the subject line
Greetings Simon,
On Friday, November 22, 2002, 8:27:31 AM, you wrote:
TF Re: stands for Reply.
S Yes, of course, but stating that Re: MAY be used *in a reply* doesn't
S necessarily define Re:, and that is
Friday, November 22, 2002
9:26:25 AM
RE: What's up with the list?
Greetings,
Twice in the past 2 days I have responded to a message here and it
appears the list is hacking apart my messages.
Any ideas because it appears to me that it's adding the list info on
the bottom but raising hell with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
'Lo DG,
On Fri, 22 Nov 2002 09:06:08 -0500 your time, you said:
DRS I was always of the belief that RE: in correspondence indicated
DRS reference. I am probably wrong but when I send a memo or business
DRS correspondence utilizing RE:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi DG,
@22-Nov-2002, 09:29 -0500 (14:29 UK time) DG Raftery Sr. said:
Twice in the past 2 days I have responded to a message here and it
appears the list is hacking apart my messages.
That's just not possible. The way traffic is processed by the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Friday, November 22, 2002
10:17:31 AM
RE: What's up with the list?
Greetings Marck,
On Friday, November 22, 2002, 10:09:14 AM, you wrote:
MDP I'd question the ELM [version 2.4 PL23] mail client. The last
MDP message you sent signed a blank line at
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi DG,
@22-Nov-2002, 10:20 -0500 (15:20 UK time) DG Raftery Sr. said:
MDP I'd question the ELM [version 2.4 PL23] mail client.
I'll have to take a gander Marck and errr ... BTW I am not using
Elm. I am utilizing The_Bat! v1.62/B7.
LOL! You got
Hello Simon,
On Fri, 22 Nov 2002 13:27:31 + GMT (22/11/02, 20:27 +0700 GMT),
Simon wrote:
The absence of 'Re:' then in a reply Subject line would seem to
indicate that the presence of 'Re:' wasn't necessary to indicate
that a message was a reply. Therefore, adding 'Re:' to the subject
Hello Anke,
On Fri, 22 Nov 2002 09:51:53 +0100 GMT (22/11/02, 15:51 +0700 GMT),
Anke Eschker wrote:
Attachment file name: example.exe - application/x-msdownload.
Can anybody explain why Bat send unkown files and why the firewalls
send application/x-msdownload ?
The recipient's firewall is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday, November 22, 2002, Simon wrote...
DRS I was always of the belief that RE: in correspondence indicated
DRS reference. I am probably wrong but when I send a memo or
DRS business correspondence utilizing RE: it indicates that I am
DRS
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Friday, November 22, 2002
11:23:02 AM
RE: (SOT) Use of Re: in the subject line
Greetings Thomas,
On Friday, November 22, 2002, 10:24:07 AM, you wrote:
TF @DG Raftery: I also use the abbreviation Re: meaning Regarding in
TF office memos. It used to
ON Friday, November 22, 2002, 4:26:36 PM, you wrote:
TF The recipient's firewall is set so that it rejects files ending in
TF .exe. Have your recipient talk to his system administrator.
...or compress it into a zip file ;-)
--
Best regards,
Gerard
Hello DG,
On Fri, 22 Nov 2002, at 11:33:26 [GMT -0500] (which was 11:33:26
AM in NY, USA) DG Raftery Sr. wrote:
Again, and I'm sure this subject will hit the dead topic instruction
soon, I would not consider Re: being utilized in a business
correspondence nor memo as Regarding. My reasoning?
Hello Simon!
On Friday, November 22, 2002 at 2:47:14 PM you wrote:
??? I must have missed your reply Dierk ??? Sorry. Yes, can you post it
again please?
Yes, res means literally a thing. From your clear statement in
this paragraph I am sure you are a Latin scholar with deep historic
Anke-
If not expressly forbidden by your ISP and/or firewalls or mail
handlers along the way, it's considered bad form to attach executable
files, considering the spate of virus attachments. Try zipping the exe
file and attaching it - you shouldn't have any trouble that way.
-Mark Wieder
Using
Hello Simon,
Friday, November 22, 2002, 1:57:04 AM, you wrote:
S -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
S Hash: SHA1
S 'Lo Chiropter Operators,
S In a recent discussion with a friend I was _told_ ;) that 'Re:' used in the
S subject line of an email was an abbreviation for 'Reply' and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday, November 22, 2002, Barry2 wrote...
As the foreign student found when taking a trip to the UK to improve
his English ... and the first thing he saw when exiting the train
station was HAIR pronounced SUCCESS ... and promptly gave up
Hello Jonathan!
On Friday, November 22, 2002 at 8:49:18 PM you wrote:
grins and apparently American's spell Cheese 'KRAFT'... ;) So it's
no real wonder people are always confused ;)
ghote = Shavian for ...
The answer I will publish later, for those not familiar with his
(another answer I
Hallo Peter,
On Fri, 22 Nov 2002 02:36:54 +0100GMT (22-11-02, 2:36 +0100GMT, where
I live), you wrote:
PF TheBat-users,
PF I have a problem.
PF I have a company (Account A) and all customers are automatically added
PF to an address book group, let's call it X.
PF I have some friends in
Hallo Peter,
On Fri, 22 Nov 2002 02:36:54 +0100GMT (22-11-02, 2:36 +0100GMT, where
I live), you wrote:
PF When I reply to friends (in AB Y) who are _also_ customers (in AB X),
PF the account automatically changes to B, although account A is active.
PF This makes perfect sense.
Set an AB
Hi The Bat! user,
After reading peoples comments on MailWasher, I decided to give it a go.
I know you can do lots of the stuff using the Mail Dispatcher, but just
wanted to try mailwasher myself and to try it out for a friend with a
Hotmail account. On that note, quick question, I can't remember
In reply to Chris's message 'Receive Mail Password.' on Fri, 22 Nov
2002 16:12:20 -0800 from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Chris,
CW The problem is, I can't remember my receive mail password and I
CW can't copy and paste it from TB! to mailwasher, as TB! doesn't
CW allow the copying of the
In reply to Simon's message '(SOT) Use of Re: in the subject line' on
Fri, 22 Nov 2002 01:57:04 + from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Simon,
S In a recent discussion with a friend I was _told_ ;) that 'Re:'
S used in the subject line of an email was an abbreviation for
S 'Reply' and _not_
Hello Dierk,
Tuesday, November 19, 2002, 12:54:23 AM, you wrote:
DH Hello Jos!
DH On Monday, November 18, 2002 at 10:37:00 AM you wrote:
in: Krung Thep Mahanakhon Amon Rattanakosin Mahinthara Ayuthaya
Mahadilok Phop Noppharat Ratchathani Burirom Udomratchaniwet
Mahasathan Amon Piman Awatan
Hello Chris,
On Fri, 22 Nov 2002 16:12:20 -0800 GMT (23/11/02, 07:12 +0700 GMT),
Chris Weaven wrote:
After reading peoples comments on MailWasher, I decided to give it a go.
I know you can do lots of the stuff using the Mail Dispatcher, but just
wanted to try mailwasher myself and to try it
Hello Daniel,
On Sat, 23 Nov 2002 12:07:42 +1100 GMT (23/11/02, 08:07 +0700 GMT),
Daniel Hirning wrote:
I haven't tried it with TB, or used it for a few years, but it saved
my butt a few times a couple of years ago... Give it a go, hope it
helps.
It does work with TB. (Do I need to
Hello Dierk,
On Fri, 22 Nov 2002 20:55:33 +0100 GMT (23/11/02, 02:55 +0700 GMT),
Dierk Haasis wrote:
ghote = Shavian for ...
The answer I will publish later, for those not familiar with his
(another answer I provide later) famous fight against English
spelling.
The suspense is killing me.
Hello Daniel,
On Sat, 23 Nov 2002 12:14:13 +1100 GMT (23/11/02, 08:14 +0700 GMT),
Daniel Hirning wrote:
What else is going to be in a subject field, if its not what the email
is regarding
The internal file number of the sender. ;-)
Seriously, in my last company, this was the usage they
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday, November 22, 2002, Thomas Fernandez wrote...
After reading peoples comments on MailWasher, I decided to give it
a go. I know you can do lots of the stuff using the Mail
Dispatcher, but just wanted to try mailwasher myself and to try it
Hello Chris,
Saturday, November 23, 2002, 12:12:20 AM, you wrote:
CW The problem is, I can't remember my receive mail password and I can't
CW copy and paste it from TB! to mailwasher, as TB! doesn't allow the
CW copying of the password.
Oooops !! Snadboy's Revelation is a good one to use as
Hello Dierk
Thank you for your email dated Friday, November 22, 2002, 7:55:33 PM,
in which you wrote:
DH ghote = Shavian for ...
Fish. Or should it be trout?
--
Regards
William
www.residues.info
Flying with The Bat! www.ritlabs.com/the_bat
Windows 2000 Pro 2195 Service Pack 2
39 matches
Mail list logo
