Re: More problems - and serious!

2004-01-28 Thread Deborah W
On Tuesday, January 27, 2004, 9:34:45 PM, MAU wrote: I must admit if I weren't already committed to TB this would be enough to send me running towards...oh, Pegasus or something. I nearly put Incredimail there, but then I thought, nah, never LOL M Incredimail ?!?! Why would a beautiful young

Re[2]: upgrade: WARNING!

2004-01-28 Thread Jean Site
Hello Marck, is may indeed work, but make sure you switch the accounts to POP3 first and backup the messages you want to keep safe from any IMAP accounts. you switch the accounts to POP3 first! How can I do that? Thanks for help. -- Best regards, Jean

Test for Allie - Please Ignore

2004-01-28 Thread shemming
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 A quick test of Allie's new filters. - -- Stuart Using The Bat! v2.03 Beta/45 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Aided by BayesIt! 0.4gm PGP Key available from ldap://keyserver.pgp.com Change is inevitable, except from a vending machine.

Re: upgrade: WARNING!

2004-01-28 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Dear Jean, @28-Jan-2004, 10:50 +0100 (28-Jan 09:50 UK time) Jean Site [JS] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck: is may indeed work, but make sure you switch the accounts to POP3 first and backup the messages you want to keep safe from any IMAP accounts. JS you switch the accounts to POP3

Moving a thread?

2004-01-28 Thread jwayne
How does one move an entire thread to another folder? Everything I try with dragging just moves the top-most message. jon -- Jonathan Wayne [EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information:

Re: Moving a thread?

2004-01-28 Thread Leif Gregory
Hello jwayne, Wednesday, January 28, 2004, 7:56:51 AM, you wrote: j How does one move an entire thread to another folder? Everything I j try with dragging just moves the top-most message. The only thing I can think of is to Highlight the topmost message in the thread, press CTRL * to expand

Re: Moving a thread?

2004-01-28 Thread Steve Mulhall
Hi Jon How does one move an entire thread to another folder? Everything I try with dragging just moves the top-most message. I just expand the thread and highlight all the messages then drag and drop that lot. Don't know if it's the most efficient way of doing this but it works. -- Steve

Re: Moving a thread?

2004-01-28 Thread Stuart Hemming
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 j How does one move an entire thread to another folder? Everything I try with j dragging just moves the top-most message. Highlight the root message, press Ctrl+Shift+V, select the destination, /et voila/. - -- Stuart Using The Bat! v2.03 Beta/45

Re: Moving a thread?

2004-01-28 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo jwayne, On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 09:56:51 -0500GMT (28-1-04, 15:56 +0100, where I live), you wrote: j How does one move an entire thread to another folder? Everything I try with j dragging just moves the top-most message. Select the root message Right mouse click Thread Move or Select the

Re: Moving a thread?

2004-01-28 Thread Stuart Hemming
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 SM I just expand the thread and highlight all the messages then drag and SM drop that lot. Don't know if it's the most efficient way of doing this SM but it works. Indeed it does, but the Ctrl+Shift+V method has the advantage of not requiring you to

Keyboard shortcut

2004-01-28 Thread P.Johnson
Hello, I have forgotten how to configure a keyboard shortcut-- could someone please help with this? I would like if possible to combine the ALT + L command (which I use a lot) into one stroke. Thanks in advance. -- Pat A Canadian in Houston Using The Bat! v2.02.3 CE on Windows XP 5.1 Build

Re: Keyboard shortcut

2004-01-28 Thread MAU
Hello P.Johnson, I have forgotten how to configure a keyboard shortcut-- could someone please help with this? I would like if possible to combine the ALT + L command (which I use a lot) into one stroke. Try Alt+F12 -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat!

Re: Problems Installing K9

2004-01-28 Thread Doug Weller
Hi dAniel, Monday, January 26, 2004, 12:22:40 AM, you wrote: on Sun, 25 Jan 2004 21:17:10 + Doug Weller wrote: DW My wife is trying to install K9 on 1.63. It looks set up correctly, DW but she gets the message 'Cannot connect to server'. DW Any suggestions as to where we may have

Re: upgrade: WARNING!

2004-01-28 Thread ken green
Jonathan Angliss wrote: I can give you hope Thank you for your post. I have come to a workable solution for now, while I anxiously await the stability and feature set that The Bat's potential hints at. -- Ken Green Using The Bat! v1.62r on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4

my solution

2004-01-28 Thread ken green
Well my saga, as Marck so aptly described it, is coming to an end. I realized that upgrading my main account - that I depend on for business - wasn't the best idea on my part. I knew there were issues with IMAP and tried it anyway. I gotta take responsibility for that. I have reverted back to

Address book reliability

2004-01-28 Thread Peter Ballantyne
Greetings, If I have posted this several times please accept my apologies. I have had no reply, and I suspect I may have done something wrong and (whisper) unspeakable, like (tiny whisper) trying to post in html. I am posting the same message, but this time, I hope, in good ol' plain text.

New spam plugin

2004-01-28 Thread tb
I'm fed up with all the crap and have decided to write a spam plugin today. Where's the SDK? And, why is the SDK download so well hidden? -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information:

Re: New spam plugin

2004-01-28 Thread Leif Gregory
Hello tb, Wednesday, January 28, 2004, 2:08:00 PM, you wrote: tko I'm fed up with all the crap and have decided to write a spam tko plugin today. Where's the SDK? Don't any of the existing solutions work for you? -- Leif (TB list moderator and fellow end user). Using The Bat! 2.03.47 under

Re: New spam plugin

2004-01-28 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Dear Tb, @28-Jan-2004, 15:08 -0600 (28-Jan 21:08 UK time) [EMAIL PROTECTED] [T] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: T I'm fed up with all the crap and have decided T to write a spam plugin today. Where's the SDK? T And, why is the SDK download so well hidden? Wrong list. Please refer to the

Re: New spam plugin

2004-01-28 Thread Thomas Martin
Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED], on Wednesday, 28. January 2004, at 15:08:00 [GMT -0600] you wrote: I'm fed up with all the crap and have decided to write a spam plugin today. A new Spam Plugin? There are several which work perfectly. By the way, IMO the list for Plugin development is TheBat! DEV

From column format

2004-01-28 Thread tb
At one point, I seem to recall having changed the From column in the message list listview so that it did not display anything but [EMAIL PROTECTED] How do I do this, or is my memory mistaking another client? Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using

To, BCC, basics

2004-01-28 Thread tb
Aside from using BCC, which is stripped by the server, in what other instances might there be no To: header in a delivered e-mail message? Can anyone think of anything? -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL

Re: New spam plugin

2004-01-28 Thread tb
-- Wednesday, January 28, 2004, 3:11:07 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello tb, Wednesday, January 28, 2004, 2:08:00 PM, you wrote: tko I'm fed up with all the crap and have decided to write a spam tko plugin today. Where's the SDK? Don't any of the existing solutions work for you? Almost

Re: To, BCC, basics

2004-01-28 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo tb, On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 16:09:38 -0600GMT (28-1-04, 23:09 +0100, where I live), you wrote: tko Aside from using BCC, which is stripped by the server, in what other tko instances might there be no To: header in a delivered e-mail message? You could use a CC:, that'll show in the delivered

Re: To, BCC, basics

2004-01-28 Thread tb
-- Wednesday, January 28, 2004, 5:01:35 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 16:09:38 -0600GMT (28-1-04, 23:09 +0100, where I live), you wrote: tko Aside from using BCC, which is stripped by the server, in what other tko instances might there be no To: header in a delivered e-mail

Re: New spam plugin

2004-01-28 Thread Chris
On Wednesday, January 28, 2004 at 5:43:03 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in the message New spam plugin mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: This is further complicated by a bug I recently discovered in filtering, allowing some spam authors to author spam in such a way as to trip up TB's Kludge tokenization.

Re: New spam plugin

2004-01-28 Thread tb
-- Wednesday, January 28, 2004, 6:02:24 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wednesday, January 28, 2004 at 5:43:03 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in the message New spam plugin mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: This is further complicated by a bug I recently discovered in filtering, allowing some spam

Re: To, BCC, basics

2004-01-28 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo tb, On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 17:22:25 -0600GMT (29-1-04, 0:22 +0100, where I live), you wrote: tko Telnet to port 25, or whatever you like, and send me a message without a tko To/CC/BCC header. I want to see what the headers of this message look like. Okay, I'll try it telnetting --

Re: To, BCC, basics

2004-01-28 Thread Chris
On Wednesday, January 28, 2004 at 5:09:38 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in the message To, BCC, basics mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Aside from using BCC, which is stripped by the server, in what other instances might there be no To: header in a delivered e-mail message? Using telnet to access the SMTP

Re: To, BCC, basics

2004-01-28 Thread Jonathan Angliss
On Wednesday, January 28, 2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote... Telnet to port 25, or whatever you like, and send me a message without a To/CC/BCC header. I want to see what the headers of this message look like. As a note... if you're seeing emails with a BCC header appearing, then the sending

Test

2004-01-28 Thread shemming
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 A test for Allie. - -- Stuart Using The Bat! v2.03 Beta/45 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Aided by BayesIt! 0.4gm PGP Key available from ldap://keyserver.pgp.com The biggest problem with the younger generation these days is that I

Re: Bayesit: Sound on sucessful catch of Junk

2004-01-28 Thread Stuart Hemming
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Thanks for that. I think that it it the fact that is the error sound that bothers me. - -- Stuart Using The Bat! v2.03 Beta/45 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Aided by BayesIt! 0.4gm PGP Key available from ldap://keyserver.pgp.com

Re: Conflict in new version of Vet with POPFile and TheBat

2004-01-28 Thread Gordon Woolf
A couple of days ago I wrote of a conflict between the new version of Vet anti-virus amd the POPFile and TheBat programs. I just received an email from Vet support in Australia (they are the Computer Associates company which produces the eTrust software among others) to say that as I was using

Passwords

2004-01-28 Thread Robin H.
I am still trying to figure out TheBat! I like to password protect my email accounts. I selected the select access password, but it only asks me for my password if I am downloading mail from my first account, not for my others. I also noticed if I select download all, it doesn't ask me for my

Automatically retrieving email

2004-01-28 Thread Robin H.
I have checked the box in preferences to automatically check for email upon startup, but I always have to manually check. What am I doing wrong? Thanks -- Robin Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information:

Re: Automatically retrieving email

2004-01-28 Thread Greg Strong
Hello Robin, Wednesday, January 28, 2004, 9:26:28 PM, Robin H. wrote: RH I have checked the box in preferences to automatically check for email RH upon startup, but I always have to manually check. What am I doing RH wrong? Account | Properties (Shft+Ctrl+P) | Options | select Periodical

Re[2]: Automatically retrieving email

2004-01-28 Thread Robin H.
Wednesday, January 28, 2004, 10:40:52 PM, you wrote: GS Hello Robin, GS Wednesday, January 28, 2004, 9:26:28 PM, Robin H. wrote: RH I have checked the box in preferences to automatically check for email RH upon startup, but I always have to manually check. What am I doing RH wrong? GS Account

Re: To, BCC, basics

2004-01-28 Thread Chris
On Wednesday, January 28, 2004 at 6:22:25 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in the message To, BCC, basics mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: I could send you a message without a To: header and it'll still be delivered. Nor would I need a CC or a BCC, I couldn't do it with TB, but that's not the issue here.

Re: Passwords

2004-01-28 Thread Chris
On Wednesday, January 28, 2004 at 10:23:39 PM, Robin H. wrote in the message Passwords mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: I am still trying to figure out TheBat! I like to password protect my email accounts. I selected the select access password, but it only asks me for my password if I am downloading

Re: Automatically retrieving email

2004-01-28 Thread Chris
On Wednesday, January 28, 2004 at 10:50:19 PM, Robin H. wrote in the message Automatically retrieving email mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: I have that checked. It isn't the periodic checking that isn't working, it is when I startup. I have the box checked to get email on startup but it does not

Re[2]: upgrade: WARNING!

2004-01-28 Thread Paul Berger
Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED], Thursday, January 29, 2004, 6:04:02 AM, you wrote: kg Jonathan Angliss wrote: I can give you hope snip Anyone know where I can download v1.62r? I inadvertently kept 1.61 and discarded 1.62r -- Paul

Re: upgrade: WARNING!

2004-01-28 Thread ken green
Paul Berger wrote: Anyone know where I can download v1.62r? I inadvertently kept 1.61 and discarded 1.62r http://www.thegoat.net/public/TheBat/ (I assume this is OK since all require registration keys) -- Ken Green Using The Bat! v1.62r on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4

Re: upgrade: WARNING!

2004-01-28 Thread ETM
Anyone know where I can download v1.62r? I inadvertently kept 1.61 and discarded 1.62r http://www.thegoat.net/public/TheBat/ Also at http://www.ritlabs.com/the_bat/download.html Elaine Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL

Re: disable parallel mail catchup of all accounts

2004-01-28 Thread ken green
dAniel hAhler wrote: thebat should put all accounts into the connection center stack and process it account by account. Wouldn't that go against one of TheBat's main features over other clients (fast multi-threading)? When you say should do you mean give the user an option to do this?