Hallo rich,
On Sat, 14 Aug 2004 18:15:38 -0400GMT (15-8-2004, 0:15 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
RG How, in your third line above, did you enter the 2 handles to begin
RG with?
handle1 comma space handle2 tab (tab to go to the next header)
RG Did you use ANY keystroke(s) at all to indicate
Hallo Critter,
On Sat, 14 Aug 2004 15:38:40 -0400GMT (14-8-2004, 21:38 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
C I know there is a keyboard shortcut F4 to quote selected text in a
C reply, but I do not see there is one for quoting and replying to all.
C Is there a way to add a keyboard shortcut or is
Hello Critter,
Saturday, August 14, 2004, 10:38:40 PM, you wrote (possibly edited):
Is there a way to add a keyboard shortcut or is there one?
Shift-Ctrl-F5 = Reply to all
--
Best regards,
Costas
Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL'
Hello Claude Renaud,
14-Aug-2004 13:58, you wrote:
I just did a search on google about the panda antivirus plugin. The only
plugin I found is the 0.1 test version which seems to work with the
latest panda antivirus software. Does someone know if a more recent
version has been realeased ?
I
I use the address book groups very heavily. It acts as my contact manager and the
fields for Internet links will link to local files also. I don't let it hide entries
that are included in a group, so that the default always shows the whole lot. In a
couple of years I have hammered it and it has
On Sun 15 August 2004, 5:31:45 +1000, Critter wrote:
In the address book, you can put additional email addresses, one per
line, but is there a way to access the second, third email addresses
while creating a new message w/o having to click on the To: and have
the secondary address to to the
Hello TBUDL,
on Sun, 15. Aug 2004 at 07:19:14 +0200 Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
I tried Bayesfilter, but somehow it did not learn as fast as BayesIt.
However, I'm using PopFile now and use Virtual Folders to reflect the
bucket classification of PopFile (except for spam, of course).
But you
Hello dAniel hAhler,
15-Aug-2004 11:55, you wrote:
I thought you were using another Bayesian Filter, but you're using
POPFile, too.. :)
I'd vote for integrating something like POPfile into TB, of course. ;-)
--
Best regards,
Alexander
Gumperson's Law: The probability of anything happening
Hello DZ-Jay,
On 14 Aug 2004 at 14:42:17 -0400 GMT [20:42 CEST] you wrote:
DJ That makes sense. But do you know how the weight is
DJ calculated? I can assume it is the product of its initial
DJ probability by the regarding threshold value, is that true?
I don't program the thing. For specific
Hello MikeD,
On 14 Aug 2004 at 14:47:24 -0500 GMT [21:47 CEST] you wrote:
M I have been following this thread since I have been having some
M problems too. I was using the old version (0.4gm) until I upgraded to
M the current version of TB.
M The settings I used to use don't seem to work any
Some time around 08/14/2004 22:24:58, I think I heard MikeD (3) say:
What settings are you using? Under the old version (0.4gm) I had it
trained and was getting most spam caught, no false positives with a
Move message setting of 10. Now I have gone down as low as 1 and as
high as 99 without
Some time around 08/14/2004 23:28:14, I think I heard Thomas Fernandez say:
DJ That makes sense. But do you know how the weight is calculated?
Check out for a mathematician called Bayes. 19th century, IIRC.
Have you read at all the entire thread, or did you just decided to come in and offer
Some time around 08/15/2004 07:43:05, I think I heard Andre Wichartz say:
Hello DZ-Jay,
On 14 Aug 2004 at 14:42:17 -0400 GMT [20:42 CEST] you wrote:
DJ That makes sense. But do you know how the weight is
DJ calculated? I can assume it is the product of its initial
DJ probability by the
Hello Andre,
Sunday, August 15, 2004, 6:44:17 AM, you wrote:
AW Hello MikeD,
AW On 14 Aug 2004 at 14:47:24 -0500 GMT [21:47 CEST] you wrote:
AW Have you deleted you spam and non-spam dictionary files when you
AW upgraded?
Funny, that. When I first upgraded I did not and it seemed to work
Hello DZ-Jay,
Sunday, August 15, 2004, 8:12:23 AM, you wrote:
DJ Some time around 08/14/2004 22:24:58, I think I heard MikeD (3) say:
What settings are you using? Under the old version (0.4gm) I had it
trained and was getting most spam caught, no false positives with a
Move message setting
Hello DZ-Jay,
On Sun, 15 Aug 2004 09:20:41 -0400 GMT (15/08/2004, 20:20 +0700 GMT),
DZ-Jay wrote:
DJ That makes sense. But do you know how the weight is calculated?
Check out for a mathematician called Bayes. 19th century, IIRC.
DJ Have you read at all the entire thread, or did you just
DJ
Some time around 08/15/2004 09:28:42, I think I heard Thomas Fernandez say:
DJ What is not that simple? The bayesian algorithm or how the
DJ regarding threshold is used by the plugin?
The Bayesian algorithms. Your question, to which I answered, could be
understood this way, so I don't feel I
Some time around 08/15/2004 09:24:56, I think I heard MikeD (3) say:
DJ I started with the move message setting at 40 and continued
DJ to lowered it without noticing any effect. That's when I checked
DJ the BAYESIT.LOG file and realized that all messages are marked
DJ with either 100/99 % or 0%
Some time around 08/15/2004 09:23:46, I think I heard MikeD (3) say:
Hello Andre,
Sunday, August 15, 2004, 6:44:17 AM, you wrote:
AW Have you deleted you spam and non-spam dictionary files when you
AW upgraded?
Funny, that. When I first upgraded I did not and it seemed to work
fine ...
Hello DZ-Jay,
15-Aug-2004 15:12, you wrote:
I checked the BAYESIT.LOG file and realized that all messages are
marked with either 100/99 % or 0% probability, which means that no matter
how low I set the parameter, it will continue working the same. I don't
understand how come there is no
Some time around 08/15/2004 10:20:47, I think I heard Alexander S. Kunz say:
I just checked my POPfile bucket pages and found it very interesting that,
despite spam is only 5.8% of my messages (lucky me, hu?), the distinct
word count for those spam messages is by far the highest (only messages
Alexander S. Kunz, [ASK] wrote:
I just wonder if it is really necessary to have an antivirus plugin for
(any) email program.
I wouldn't say that it's absolutely necessary because once a realtime,
system scanner is running, the infected attachment will be detected
before you run it or save it
Sunday, August 15, 2004, 7:44:17 AM, you wrote:
AW Hello MikeD,
AW On 14 Aug 2004 at 14:47:24 -0500 GMT [21:47 CEST] you wrote:
AW Have you deleted you spam and non-spam dictionary files when you
AW upgraded?
What are their names and where are they?
--
Hello all,
Sunday, August 15, 2004, Allie Martin wrote:
The current challenge with using a plug-in is that they often don't
work from TB! version to TB! version, and they often don't work across
anti-virus versions. Each time DrWeb released an upgrade, it broke the
plug-in and you'd have to
Some time around 08/15/2004 10:52:14, I think I heard Pete Holsberg say:
Sunday, August 15, 2004, 7:44:17 AM, you wrote:
AW Hello MikeD,
AW On 14 Aug 2004 at 14:47:24 -0500 GMT [21:47 CEST] you wrote:
AW Have you deleted you spam and non-spam dictionary files when you
AW upgraded?
What are
Some time around 08/15/2004 09:24:56, I think I heard MikeD (3) say:
DJ I was too. I just upgraded yesterday to 0.5.9 and I haven't
DJ noticed a difference. It does provide a white/black list, which I
DJ don't care to use because it defeats the purpose of a Bayesian
DJ filter (there's huge
Hello DZ-Jay,
Sunday, August 15, 2004, 9:25:14 AM, you wrote:
DJ However, I recently noticed why some obviously spam messages
DJ are given a probability of 0%: Apparently the analysis engine is
DJ regarding a few empty tokens with a value of 0%, which
DJ unspamifies the final value, for example,
Hello,
As SO ask for using 2 plugins at the same time for blocking spam, is it possible
for anti virus plugins ? Because my Grisoft plugin (not free version 6, but
registered version 7) sometimes doesn't see viruses within archives !
Any Suggestion for the 2nd plugin if I can use 2 model ?
Hello,
I've seen in a previous subject that SO spoke about monaco.ttf ? I can't find this
subject again in archive... SO can remember me the link for get this police ?
Thanks,
--
WilWilWil (France)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TB 2.12.00
Windows XP
Service Pack 1
Hello WilWilWil,
15-Aug-2004 17:26, you wrote:
I've seen in a previous subject that SO spoke about monaco.ttf ? I can't find this
subject again in archive... SO can remember me the link for get this police ?
Police? ...anyway... :-)
Some time around 08/15/2004 11:13:49, I think I heard Stuart Cuddy say:
What is Graham?
What is Spam-grade?
AFAIK, spam-grade would be the probability of it being spam, and Graham, I suppose,
means the probability of it being not-spam (I suppose, non-spam-grade ham-grade
graham ?)
==Original message text===
From: WilWilWil [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sunday, August 15, 2004, 5:26:00 PM
Subject: Monaco TTF Police ?
W Hello,
W I've seen in a previous subject that SO spoke about monaco.ttf ? I can't find this
W subject again in
Some time around 08/15/2004 11:13:49, I think I heard Stuart Cuddy say:
I am not seeing the empty tokens, but the following message is being
received without being caught. I sent it again to myself about 5 or
6 times and marked it as junk each time. The values do not seem to
change at
hello,
how to all address (to/cc/bcc) including sender's
to address book ?
any suggestions !
pk roy
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
;-)
TB v2.12.0 / W2K SP4
Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
Sunday, August 15, 2004, 11:11:00 AM, you wrote:
DJ Some time around 08/15/2004 10:52:14, I think I heard Pete Holsberg say:
Sunday, August 15, 2004, 7:44:17 AM, you wrote:
AW Hello MikeD,
AW On 14 Aug 2004 at 14:47:24 -0500 GMT [21:47 CEST] you wrote:
AW Have you deleted you spam and
Some time around 08/15/2004 11:57:15, I think I heard Pete Holsberg say:
Sunday, August 15, 2004, 11:11:00 AM, you wrote:
DJ Some time around 08/15/2004 10:52:14, I think I heard Pete Holsberg say:
DJTB! installation dir\BayesIt\base
DJ or
DJTB! installation dir\MAIL\BayesIt\base
???
Hello pk,
Sunday, August 15, 2004, 10:58:56 AM, you wrote:
pr how to all address (to/cc/bcc) including sender's
pr to address book ?
pr any suggestions !
You can right click on the appropriate header in the Header bar and
select Add to address book. I believe it then gives you the option to
add
Hello Stuart,
pr how to all address (to/cc/bcc) including sender's
pr to address book ?
pr any suggestions !
You can right click on the appropriate header in the Header bar and
select Add to address book. I believe it then gives you the option to
add all other recipients to same address
Hello pk,
Sunday, August 15, 2004, 11:20:02 AM, you wrote:
pr how to all address (to/cc/bcc) including sender's
pr to address book ?
pr any suggestions !
You can right click on the appropriate header in the Header bar and
select Add to address book. I believe it then gives you the option to
DZ-Jay wrote:
DJ Some time around 08/15/2004 11:13:49, I think I heard Stuart Cuddy say:
What is Graham?
What is Spam-grade?
DJ AFAIK, spam-grade would be the probability of it being spam, and
DJ Graham, I suppose, means the probability of it being not-spam (I
DJ suppose, non-spam-grade
Hi WilWilWil,
on Sun, 15 Aug 2004 17:24:06 +0200GMT, you wrote:
W As SO ask for using 2 plugins at the same time for blocking spam, is it possible
W for anti virus plugins ? Because my Grisoft plugin (not free version 6, but
W registered version 7) sometimes doesn't see viruses within
Marek Mikus, [MM] wrote:
did You tested first beta version of plugin for NOD32 v2? It was
created by Maxim some weeks ago and works with last beta of NOD32,
which has file nod32api.dll included. We have found only one issue
yet, system must be restarted after installing beta of NOD and
Peter Meyns, [PM] wrote:
You should not run two virus scanners at the same time. They are very
likely to disturb each other. At least that is what I learned. :-)
Since the plugin interface will determine how each antivirus checks
the incoming message, using 2 may actually be possible. I'm
Hello Stuart,
Sunday, August 15, 2004, 11:28:50 AM, Stuart Cuddy wrote:
pr how to all address (to/cc/bcc) including sender's
pr to address book ?
... snip
You can right click on the appropriate header in the Header bar and
select Add to address book.
... snip
pr this is one way.. a
Some time around 08/15/2004 12:35:29, I think I heard George Mitchell say:
It might be coincidence, but Paul Graham has written much about
Bayesian filtering. I'd guess it has something to do with his
methodology. Even if I'm wrong, there's some interesting reading at:
Hallo pk,
On Sun, 15 Aug 2004 21:28:56 +0530GMT (15-8-2004, 17:58 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
PR how to all address (to/cc/bcc) including sender's
PR to address book ?
Incoming filter
'Rule' tab
String: .
Location: Kludges
Present: Yes
'Advanced' tab
Check 'Addresses must not be in
Hello,
I was looking through my sent folder and noticed that my emails with
image attachments showed the name of the attachment and the type but
the size reads as 0 bytes and cant be opened. Is this normal?
--
Darrin
WinXP Home Service Pack 1
Tbat! 2.12.00
This message transmitted on
Hello Darrin!
On Sunday, August 15, 2004, 5:29 PM, you wrote:
DR I was looking through my sent folder and noticed that my emails with
DR image attachments showed the name of the attachment and the type but
DR the size reads as 0 bytes and cant be opened. Is this normal?
Not here. The
On 8/15/2004 5:09 PM my time, Mary wrote:
MB Not here. The last attachment I sent (just today), a small jpeg to my
MB sister, says under the icon when I pass my cursor over it, in the sent
MB mail, the name of the file and its size, 63,165 bytes.
Hi Mary,
Thanks for looking into it. Ill have
is that a possibility?
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-[ Ctz Consulting ]-=
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-[ http://ctzconsulting.com ]-=
Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
Hello Critter,
On Sun, 15 Aug 2004 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
C is that a possibility?
Would Filter\Actions\save copy in another folder work. Not tried it
but just an idea.
--
Regards,
Richard
| Using The Bat! 2.12.03 SpamPal
| Windows XP (build 2600), version 5.1 Service Pack 1
Hallo Darrin,
On Sun, 15 Aug 2004 15:29:20 -0700GMT (16-8-2004, 0:29 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
DR I was looking through my sent folder and noticed that my emails with
DR image attachments showed the name of the attachment and the type but
DR the size reads as 0 bytes and cant be
52 matches
Mail list logo
