Hi NickOhare,
Thursday, June 12, 2008, 5:30:08 PM, you wrote:
> Hi All,
> Firstly thank you Alto and Stuart for your advice.
> Is there an email client anyone can recommend that plays nice with
> IMAP? Please don't say Outlook. Thunderbird? Eudora? Anything?
Here is a link about IMAP Mail Se
On Thursday, June 12, 2008, 6:30:08 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Is there an email client anyone can recommend that plays nice with
> IMAP?
I have no problems with TB.
--
Dwight A. Corrin
316.303.9385 phone ahead to fax
dcorrin at fastmail.fm
photo galleries at http://dcorrin.smugmug.com
Us
Hi All,
Firstly thank you Alto and Stuart for your advice.
Is there an email client anyone can recommend that plays nice with
IMAP? Please don't say Outlook. Thunderbird? Eudora? Anything?
Best regards,
Nick
Current version is 4.0.24.0 | 'U
Hello Peter,
On Wed, 11 Jun 2008 20:58:19 +0200 GMT (12/06/2008, 01:58 +0700 GMT),
Peter Meyns wrote:
JP>> I have deleted several folder from my message base but chose the
JP>> option to "Keep the message base files intact." I want some of these
JP>> back in my folder structure, but cannot find a
Hello NickOhare,
A reminder of what [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed on:
Wednesday, June 11, 2008 at 18:22:17 GMT -0400
NZc> Can I still use TB! as the client. I've been a TB! user since version
NZc> 1.x (maybe early 2.x) and consider it the best POP client available,
NZc> but I do remember a few thre
Can anyone offer some suggestions for this Bat! user? He seems to be
using version 1.61. I've forwarded him the list subscription details,
so he'll probably be joining soon, but I just wanted to get the ball
rolling for him ...
"Hello omega-list,
I know there are several on the
Hello Roman,
On Wed, 11 Jun 2008 20:09:16 +0200 GMT (12/06/2008, 01:09 +0700 GMT),
Roman Katzer wrote:
RK> I'm trying to block any host in imageshack.us as it's the source for
RK> most of the tracking images (and other semi-decent imagery) in my spam
RK> emails. So far, the URL manager doesn't se
Hi,
> [IMAP]
> Can I still use TB! as the client.
That depends on your level of tolerance. If you have a feasable
alternative, take it.
> but I do remember a few threads on this list years ago discussing
> its IMAP limitations. And when I say a few years ago it may of been
> 4 or 5 years ag
8 matches
Mail list logo