Re: Pop/Smtp authentication

2002-05-21 Thread Per Goetterup
Hello Thomas, 21 May 2002, 08:45:21, you wrote: Workaround: set TB so that it checks your work email every 5 minutes. AFAIK a POP check leaves the SMTP server open for 10 minutes, so whenever you want to send anything, a POP check has just occurred within the time frame. That would work,

Re: Pop/Smtp authentication

2002-05-21 Thread Per Goetterup
Hello Allie, 21 May 2002, 12:11:31, you wrote: Per Goetterup [PG] wrote: ... PG Still we get a lot of customers with problems... All due to the PG stupid Microsoft programs insisting on sending mail before PG checking mail... :-( POP before SMTP authentication is something you have

Additional headers?

2002-04-15 Thread Per Goetterup
Is it possible to insert an extra header in ones outgoing mails using TB? I've looked around but can't find anything. I need to be able to add a header when sending to specific addresses or at least when using a specific account. Can it be done? Yours, Per Gøtterup -- Per Gøtterup [EMAIL

Re: Additional headers?

2002-04-15 Thread Per Goetterup
Hello Luc, 15 Apr 2002, 11:08:06, you wrote: Good morning Per, It was foretold that on 15-4-2002 @ 10:38:31 GMT+0200 (which was 10:38:31 where I live) Per Goetterup wrote and spread these wise comments on Additional headers?: snipped a bit PG Is it possible to insert an extra header

Re: Additional headers?

2002-04-15 Thread Per Goetterup
Hello Roelof, 15 Apr 2002, 11:49:43, you wrote: Hello Per, On Mon, 15 Apr 2002 11:22:17 +0200GMT (15-4-02, 11:22 +0200GMT, where I live), you wrote: PG Some of the way I think... I need to be able add a very specific header like PG this: X-NCC-RegID: ... Can that be done this way?

Re: Additional headers?

2002-04-15 Thread Per Goetterup
Hello Luc, 15 Apr 2002, 12:36:41, you wrote: Good afternoon Roelof, It was foretold that on 15-4-2002 @ 11:49:43 GMT+0200 (which was 11:49:43 where I live) Roelof Otten wrote and spread these wise comments on Additional headers?: snipped a bit RO Look into my headers, I've done it

Re: Additional headers?

2002-04-15 Thread Per Goetterup
Hello Roelof, 15 Apr 2002, 13:10:59, you wrote: X-NCC-RegID: is a standardized header (according to rfc822 user-defined headers have to start with X- ) In a network of trekkies an NCC-RegID would make sense and so would the wish for formal headers. Now, this doesn't have anything to do

Re: Additional headers?

2002-04-15 Thread Per Goetterup
Hello Roelof, 15 Apr 2002, 14:03:53, you wrote: Hello Per, On Mon, 15 Apr 2002 13:38:59 +0200GMT (15-4-02, 13:38 +0200GMT, where I live), you wrote: PG And to get back on topic - I just tested it and their software PG requires the exact header to be present so the comment thing won't PG

Re: Additional headers?

2002-04-15 Thread Per Goetterup
Hello Roelof, 15 Apr 2002, 14:48:07, you wrote: Indeed. With MDaemon here, I could add header lines easily. PG Tell me more! :-) Check for instance for Comments: This is my secret code to get an X-NCC-RegID-header inserted You can add that even with TB. ;-) Delete it and insert

Filtering READ messages?

2002-01-08 Thread Per Goetterup
This may sound as a stupid question but when are READ messages filtered/processed? I've created several read filters, which work just fine using manual re-filtering (no, I did not check the 'manual only' checkbox in the sorting office for these rules) but when I just read on, nothing happens to