Hello Roelof, 15 Apr 2002, 13:10:59, you wrote:
> X-NCC-RegID: is a standardized header (according to rfc822 > user-defined headers have to start with X- ) > In a network of trekkies an NCC-RegID would make sense and so would > the wish for formal headers. Now, this doesn't have anything to do with Star Trek in any form... :-) The acronym NCC in my case stands for Network Coordination Centre and I use that header to communicate with RIPE NCCs database (and staff). RIPE is the European IP authority, similar to ARIN in the US and APNIC in the Asia-Pacific region. They're all regional parts of IANA (Internet Assigned Numbers Authority). > When filtering on such a header it wouldn't make any difference for TB > whether it's a formal header or included in a comment, because you'd > filter on the presence of X-NCC-RegID: in the kludges. But when you're > running a mailing list that only allows messages with an X-NCC-RegID: > header it makes an essential difference. (No, I don't know why Per > thinks he needs it.) I need it to reference which Local Internet Registry I represent whenever I communicate, both when talking to automated services and to regular people. And to get back on topic - I just tested it and their software requires the exact header to be present so the comment thing won't work. Yours, Per G�tterup -- Per G�tterup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> � PGP: 0xBAD47FA5 � ICQ: 9042837 Systems Administrator NetGroup A/S � Store Kongensgade 40H � DK-1264 Copenhagen K � Denmark Phone: +45 33130055 � Fax: +45 33130066 � Web: www.netgroup.dk Technical Account Manager N|G|D|C NetGroup Data Center � Sydvestvej 100 � DK-2600 Glostrup � Denmark Phone: +45 70274555 (24/7) � Web: www.ngdc.net / www.ngdc.dk He who laughs last probably didn't get the joke. ________________________________________________________ Current Ver: 1.60c FAQ : http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
