-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Douglas,
On Saturday, June 30, 2001 at 21:37:24 -0600, Douglas Hinds [DH] wrote
concerning 'Poco means Not Much':
Maybe a dumb question but why are you still using TB! version 1.42?
Why didn't you upgrade to the latest version?
- --
Best
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi David,
On 30 June 2001 at 11:24:51 +0200 (which was 10:24 where I live)
David van Zuijlekom wrote to Douglas Hinds on TBUDL and made these
points:
DvZ Maybe a dumb question but why are you still using TB! version 1.42?
DvZ Why didn't you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 2 Nov 2000 00:22:41 -0600, Douglas Hinds wrote these
comments about 'Copying filters to another account upgrading from v. 1.42':
DH One down, one to go: What about copying filters to another account?
DH Any way to do that? A default filter
functioning just fine).
One more thing: Is there any real reason to upgrade from v. 1.42?
Thanks in advance.
Douglas Hinds
--
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 1 Nov 2000 20:37:07 -0600, Douglas Hinds wrote these
comments about 'Copying filters to another account upgrading from v. 1.42':
DH One more thing: Is there any real reason to upgrade from v. 1.42
Hello A. Curtis other fellow TB! Users,
Wednesday, November 01, 2000, you clearly identified the new
features in v. 1.47 (I should have checked the Ritlabs site, but
thanks for delivering that).
One down, one to go: What about copying filters to another account?
Any way to do that? A default
Hi, fellow batmen,
To keep long story short (and not harass you with details how I've
installed and re-installed 1.42) - is there any way to MANUALLY restructure
message base in 1.42?
Thanxxx for any insight!
--
Greetz, Arunas Norvaisa - Little Guy, The Masses Inc.
Composed
Hello Arunas,
On Monday, May 08, 2000 at 05:42:25 GMT +0200 (which was 8:42 PM
where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
Hi, fellow batmen,
To keep long story short (and not harass you with details how I've
installed and re-installed 1.42) - is there any way to MANUALLY
Hi Allie,
On Fri, 5 May 2000 14:54:19 -0500, you wrote:
Am I the first to have noticed that 1.42 Final is out?
^
What means final, no more bug fixes???
I am downloading it right now!
AM That nasty compression of the executable is back
Hello all,
Sunday, May 07, 2000, Dirk Heiser wrote:
Hi Allie,
On Fri, 5 May 2000 14:54:19 -0500, you wrote:
Am I the first to have noticed that 1.42 Final is out?
^
What means final, no more bug fixes???
In new betaversions, I hope. Maybe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello All,
[*] "Alternative URL start" can be invoked with the Shift key
depressed
What does that mean? I tried both with and without shift, and I saw no
difference.
- --
Best regards,
Lionel mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
e made any grievous errors or omissions.
Hope that helps a little.
--
Thanks for writing,
Januk Aggarwal
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using The Bat! 1.42
under Windows 98 4.10 Build A
--
--
View the TBUDL archi
Hello Januk,
Saturday, May 06, 2000, 9:22:08 AM, you wrote:
JA If you are using any browser other than IE, holding shift will
JA open the URL in a new browser window. No shift means it will open
JA in the last open window.
Ah, I confused it with the latest betas: In the latest betas, no
th The Bat! 1.42
under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998
using an Intel Celeron 366Mhz, 128MB RAM
--
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
mai
Hello, the Bat! list recipients,
Saturday, May 06, 2000, Thomas Fernandez wrote to Januk Aggarwal on TBUDL about
shft-dblClick on URL (was: Re: Some of 1.42 new features):
[*] "Alternative URL start" can be invoked with the Shift key
depressed
JA There should only be two wi
he same OS and version of NN at home
and TB open new window there. I don't know, where are changes :-(
--
Bye
Marek Mikus
Using the best The Bat! 1.42 reg
under the worst Windows 95 4.0 Build B
Intel Celeron 266 MHz, 32 MB
--
--
View
. An alimentary canal with a big appetite at
one end and no sense of responsibility at the other."
- Ronald Reagan
---
Using The Bat! 1.42 under Windows 95 4.0 Build 950 on a Pentium 133 with 88MB RAM.
--
--
View the T
Hi TBUDL guys,
Am I the first to have noticed that 1.42 Final is out?
I am downloading it right now!
-- Best regards, Pim Slim
Pim Slim, [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Friday, May 05, 2000 18:58:08
using The Bat! 1.42 Beta/21 under
Hello Listmembers,
On Fri, 5 May 2000 at 19:00:41 [GMT +0200] Pim Slim wrote:
Am I the first to have noticed that 1.42 Final is out?
No :-)
Regards
Dieter
|Running TheBat! 1.42 [2E7F60DA] on |
|Windows NT v4 Build 1381 Service Pack 6 |
Registering The Bat! [German]:
mailto:[EMAIL
Friday, May 05, 2000, 10:00:41 AM, Pim wrote:
Am I the first to have noticed that 1.42 Final is out?
Nah, we've been running it for a few years now, just had to hide the fact
that we had time travel for that long from people like you. Enjoy, but look
out for that pesky macro bug
On Fri, 5 May 2000 19:00:41 +0200, Pim Slim wrote:
Am I the first to have noticed that 1.42 Final is out?
I am downloading it right now!
That nasty compression of the executable is back. :-(
--
© 2000 Allie Martin /*\ Using TB! v1.42 Beta/21 on Win2k Pro
---
Urghm
All,
I am trying TB! 1.42 and have a problem. TB! installed just fine,
contacted the IMAP server appropriately, found all my folders
properly, but will ONLY show me unread messages in the view pane. In
fact, it will not even display folder names that do not contain unread
messages.
I would
Hello Sam,
On Sat, 29 Apr 2000 at 08:20:15 [GMT -0400], you wrote:
SS I am trying TB! 1.42 and have a problem. TB! installed just fine,
SS contacted the IMAP server appropriately, found all my folders
SS properly, but will ONLY show me unread messages in the view pane.
SS In fact
], you wrote:
SS I am trying TB! 1.42 and have a problem. TB! installed
just fine,
SS contacted the IMAP server appropriately, found all my folders
SS properly, but will ONLY show me unread messages in the
view pane.
SS In fact, it will not even display folder names that do
not contain
SS
Hello, the Bat! list recipients,
Sunday, April 23, 2000, Allie Martin wrote to Paula Ford on TB!UDL about
1.42?:
AM On Sat, 22 Apr 2000 17:20:14 -0400, Paula Ford wrote:
No way! :-) 1.42 is a magic version number for our products. It
should be read as "one of the best" :-)
Is
On Thursday, April 20, 2000, Alexander V. Kiselev wrote:
New features are great indeed;-) ... The number of betas is perfectly
understandable: this gonna be a _major_ upgrade (to say nothing of the
upcoming ver. 2;-)) ... So, stay tuned;-) It's a _different_ Bat;-)
A "major upgrade" would
Morning Paula,
A "major upgrade" would seem to warrant releasing it as version 1.5?
Quote from a TBBETA message from Stefan:
PS with all this big improvements in the Beta 1.42 series (new message
PS base, many long standing bugs corrected), there is perhaps the time
PS for a
On Saturday, April 22, 2000, Jast wrote:
A "major upgrade" would seem to warrant releasing it as version 1.5?
Quote from a TBBETA message from Stefan:
PS with all this big improvements in the Beta 1.42 series (new message
PS base, many long standing bugs corrected), there
Morning Paula,
No way! :-) 1.42 is a magic version number for our products. It
should be read as "one of the best" :-)
Is he serious?
Sounds that way... Whether or not the magical character of the version
number has something to do with The Hitchhikers Guide to the Galax
On Sat, 22 Apr 2000 17:20:14 -0400, Paula Ford wrote:
No way! :-) 1.42 is a magic version number for our products. It
should be read as "one of the best" :-)
Is he serious?
I don't see why not. Remember that you're using an application called The
Bat! (hey, don't forget the e
Hi there!
On 21 Apr 00, at 1:00, Dirk Heiser wrote
about "Re: 1.42?":
On Fri, 21 Apr 2000 01:57:01 +0400, you wrote:
AVK Why? This is quite simple indeed: TB is capable of deleting attachment from
AVK messages, right? Further, the attached MSG file is just a va
Hi there,
I'm not on TBBETA, so I'd like to ask here: Does anyone know when 1.42
will be available? I've noticed there must have been at least 17 betas
out yet and the announcements for new features looked great. So I'm
eagerly waiting ;)
Thanks!
Oliver Sturm
--
Oops, signature error
Hi there!
On 20 Apr 00, at 18:59, Oliver Sturm wrote
about "1.42?":
I'm not on TBBETA, so I'd like to ask here: Does anyone know when 1.42
will be available? I've noticed there must have been at least 17 betas
out yet and the announcements for new features looked gre
Hi Oliver,
OS I'm not on TBBETA, so I'd like to ask here: Does anyone know when 1.42
OS will be available? I've noticed there must have been at least 17 betas
OS out yet and the announcements for new features looked great. So I'm
OS eagerly waiting ;)
Betas are really cool! Personally I feel
On Thu, 20 Apr 2000 22:06:44 +0400, Alexander V. Kiselev wrote:
New features are great indeed;-) Stefan has announced lately, that he's
not going to implement anymore new features for 1.42, right now they
seem to be involved in bugfixing only. Therefore you may expect 1.42 to
be officially
Hi there!
On 20 Apr 00, at 13:24, Allie Martin wrote
about "Re: 1.42?":
You left out another major enhancement. Improved MIME digest support where
it creates a virtual folder for MIME attached messages. :-)
Nope, I don't like the way it works;-( Besides, it's a bit buggy: tr
st regards,
--
Michael Heydekamp
AIR TRAFFIC Euro Charter GmbH
eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.airtraffic.de
*-*
Using The Bat! 1.42 Beta/17 under Windows 98 4.10 Build A
on a PIII/450, 128MB RAM, 10GB Harddisk
in a Ne
On Thu, 20 Apr 2000 22:35:55 +0400, Alexander V. Kiselev wrote:
You left out another major enhancement. Improved MIME digest support
where it creates a virtual folder for MIME attached messages. :-)
Nope, I don't like the way it works;-( Besides, it's a bit buggy: try
clicking either of the
Hi Alexander V. Kiselev,
On Thursday, April 20, 2000 at 8:06:44 PM you wrote:
Hi there!
So, stay tuned;-) It's a _different_ Bat;-)
I will, certainly. It's just that I don't like using potentially
unstable versions for something as important to me as email.
Especially the
Hi there!
On 20 Apr 00, at 20:32, Michael Heydekamp wrote
about "Re: 1.42?":
AD I believe release will appear soon since no crashes and ugly bugs
AD have been found at the moment.
Not sure. See my recent posting "Message base corrupted?".
Have you tried my sugges
On Thu, 20 Apr 2000 22:35:55 +0400, Alexander V. Kiselev wrote:
You left out another major enhancement. Improved MIME digest support
where it creates a virtual folder for MIME attached messages. :-)
Nope, I don't like the way it works;-( Besides, it's a bit buggy: try
clicking either of the
Hi there!
On 20 Apr 00, at 15:50, Allie Martin wrote
about "Re: 1.42?":
Nope, I don't like the way it works;-( Besides, it's a bit buggy: try
clicking either of the buttons "delete and move" when browsing MIME
digest;-)
I've noted as well that TB! stil
store this not in
message bodys.
AVK message, so theoretically on "move" from MIME digest TB should do the
AVK following:
AVK 1. Import the specified message file to the specified folder;
AVK 2. Delete the corresponding attachment from the original digest message.
cu,
Dirk
--
Using The
43 matches
Mail list logo
