Re[2]: Another This posting violated the list rules regarding top posting?!?

2004-01-09 Thread Jack Morrison
Wednesday, October 1, 2003, 2:40:22 PM, you wrote: Hello Jack, Wednesday, October 1, 2003, 1:10:28 PM, you wrote: JM If I had a third thumb, you'd get that one, too. Thanks... grin JM Keep up the great work, guys! You'll never make everyone 100% JM happy, but you're getting close enough for

Re[3]: Another This posting violated the list rules regarding top posting?!?

2004-01-09 Thread Jack Morrison
Wednesday, October 1, 2003, 2:25:03 PM, you wrote: Wednesday, October 1, 2003, 2:40:22 PM, you wrote: Hello Jack, Wednesday, October 1, 2003, 1:10:28 PM, you wrote: JM If I had a third thumb, you'd get that one, too. Thanks... grin JM Keep up the great work, guys! You'll never make

Re: Another This posting violated the list rules regarding top posting?!?

2004-01-09 Thread Peter Meyns
Hi Jack, on Wed, 1 Oct 2003 15:25:03 -0500GMT (01.10.03, 22:25 +0200GMT here), you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : JM Delivery-date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 21:57:11 +0100 JM Received: from . JM . for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 09 Jan 2004 12:50:29 -0800 JM Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2003 15:25:03 -0500

Re[2]: Another This posting violated the list rules regarding top posting?!?

2004-01-09 Thread Jack Morrison
Friday, January 9, 2004, 3:13:54 PM, you wrote: Hi Jack, on Wed, 1 Oct 2003 15:25:03 -0500GMT (01.10.03, 22:25 +0200GMT here), you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : JM Delivery-date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 21:57:11 +0100 JM Received: from . JM . for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 09 Jan 2004

Re[2]: Another This posting violated the list rules regarding top posting?!?

2003-10-02 Thread Dennis W. Greer
Hello Marck, On Wed, 01 Oct 2003 02:16:02 +0100 GMT (9/30/2003, 6:16 PM +0700 GMT), Marck D Pearlstone wrote: snip MDP The third explanation is that we're just a bunch power hungry MDP megalomaniacs who love to see our admonishments hurled around the MDP planet in the form of irate electrons.

Re[2]: Another This posting violated the list rules regarding top posting?!?

2003-10-02 Thread Dennis W. Greer
Hello Leif, On Wed, 01 Oct 2003 08:10:41 -0600 GMT (10/1/2003, 7:10 AM +0700 GMT), Leif Gregory wrote: snip LG Alas, what Marck said also is most true... We just like to hear LG ourselves talk. ;-) And so we return to JFW. :) -- Best regards, Dennis - HCI: Helping Criminals,

Re: Another This posting violated the list rules regarding top posting?!?

2003-10-01 Thread Jonathan Angliss
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday, September 30, 2003, Marck D Pearlstone wrote... BB The problem with lists is that when people see something done BB wrong and no correction is issued on the list, the lesson learned BB is that the inappropriate behavior is correct and

Re: Another This posting violated the list rules regarding top posting?!?

2003-10-01 Thread Leif Gregory
Hello Clive, Wednesday, October 1, 2003, 12:28:29 AM, you wrote: CT Maybe some of us need to be reminded about the list rules CT constantly. For example, the message about inserting a sig CT delimiter doesn’t seem to have reached you yet :( *Exactly* the point! There are boatloads of lurkers on

Re[2]: Another This posting violated the list rules regarding top posting?!?

2003-10-01 Thread Jack Morrison
Wednesday, October 1, 2003, 9:10:41 AM, you wrote: [] I've had this same conversation with Yuki off-list. Marck, Allie and I have been moderating the TB lists for ages now. We've just about tried every form and fashion of moderation known to mankind, and we stick with what works for us over

Re: Another This posting violated the list rules regarding top posting?!?

2003-10-01 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Jack, On Wed, 1 Oct 2003 14:10:28 -0500GMT (1-10-03, 21:10 +0200, where I live), you wrote: JM I've frequented a *lot* of help lists over the years (because I usually JM need a *LOT* of help), and this one could, or should, be the prototype on JM how to run one efficiently. Okay, admit

Re: Another This posting violated the list rules regarding top posting?!?

2003-10-01 Thread Leif Gregory
Hello Jack, Wednesday, October 1, 2003, 1:10:28 PM, you wrote: JM If I had a third thumb, you'd get that one, too. Thanks... grin JM Keep up the great work, guys! You'll never make everyone 100% JM happy, but you're getting close enough for government work. Since I work for the gov't that

Re[2]: Another This posting violated the list rules regarding top posting?!?

2003-10-01 Thread Bill Blinn Technology Editor
At 3:52 PM on 10/1/2003, Melissa Reese typed ... M By the way...shouldn't this thread be moved to TBOT? ;-) No thread praising the administrators should moved anywhere. -- Bill Blinn Technology Editor ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) - 10/1/2003 at 4:20 PM Technology Editor, Newsradio 610 WTVN, Columbus,

Re[2]: Another This posting violated the list rules regarding top posting?!?

2003-10-01 Thread Jack Morrison
Wednesday, October 1, 2003, 2:43:24 PM, you wrote: Hallo Jack, On Wed, 1 Oct 2003 14:10:28 -0500GMT (1-10-03, 21:10 +0200, where I live), you wrote: JM I've frequented a *lot* of help lists over the years (because I usually JM need a *LOT* of help), and this one could, or should, be the

OT: Another This posting violated the list rules regarding top posting?!?

2003-10-01 Thread Leif Gregory
Hello Melissa, Wednesday, October 1, 2003, 1:52:30 PM, you wrote: MR When it comes to typing, some of us are all thumbs...so I'll add MR my extra thumbs to yours! :-) MR By the way...shouldn't this thread be moved to TBOT? ;-) True enough Not that I think anybody would like to move to

Re[2]: Another This posting violated the list rules regarding top posting?!?

2003-10-01 Thread Jack Morrison
Wednesday, October 1, 2003, 2:40:22 PM, you wrote: JM Keep up the great work, guys! You'll never make everyone 100% JM happy, but you're getting close enough for government work. Since I work for the gov't that makes it just fine! ;-) I should probably quit while I'm ahead, eh? :) -- Best

Re: OT: Another This posting violated the list rules regarding top posting?!?

2003-10-01 Thread St - Musaic.Net
This thread is moving into the Off-Topic realm. Please continue this on TBOT (this message has been CC'd to the TBOT list to maintain threading.) Point taken - but to those who don't follow TBOT, I'd like to say: Please spank me no more! Weeeny! I am a repentant! Have Mercy! :) --

Re: OT: Another This posting violated the list rules regarding top posting?!?

2003-10-01 Thread Leif Gregory
Hello St, Wednesday, October 1, 2003, 3:05:47 PM, you wrote: SMN Point taken - but to those who don't follow TBOT, I'd like to SMN say: Please spank me no more! Weeeny! I am a repentant! Have SMN Mercy! :) Sorry, gotta do it one more time... The sig delimiter is: dash dash space It looks

Another This posting violated the list rules regarding top posting?!?

2003-09-30 Thread St - Musaic.Net
Why is it that each time someone violated the list rules regarding top posting then the rest of us are punished with that extra error message that apparently was meant for mr. Don T. Feelsingledout?!? Why these repetitve instructions?!? / St

Re: Another This posting violated the list rules regarding top posting?!?

2003-09-30 Thread Bill Blinn Technology Editor
At 8:38 PM on 9/30/2003, the otherwise nameless St at Musaic.Net typed ... S Why these repetitve instructions?!? I do not speak for the list owners of this list, but I think I understand where they're coming from. As a list owner, there is one thing I never, ever, do -- and that is question

Re: Another This posting violated the list rules regarding top posting?!?

2003-09-30 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Hi Bill, @30-Sep-2003, 20:48 -0400 (01-Oct 01:48 UK time) Bill Blinn Technology Editor [BB] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to St: BB The problem with lists is that when people see something done BB wrong and no correction is issued on the list, the lesson BB learned is that the inappropriate