Re[2]: Effective Immediately

2000-08-11 Thread Deryk Lister
Hi Curtis, On Thursday 10/08/2000 at 23:04, you wrote: Living dangerously Joe? :-/ Didn't you read the Moderators post earlier. Now is *definitely* not the time. Quite an entertaining pair those two... But even I'm getting bored of it now :) Here are two filters that some people may find

Re: Effective Immediately

2000-08-11 Thread Tom Plunket
SL But, of course, don't take my word for it, chances are I'm just yanking SL your chain. JF Steve, I wouldn't take your word for *anything.* JF Not if it was chipped in granite, gilded in gold, or just scribbled JF on the wall of an outdoor crapper somewhere. C Living dangerously Joe? :-/

Re: Effective Immediately

2000-08-11 Thread Curtis
On Fri, 11 Aug 2000 09:07:35 -0500, Tom Plunket wrote: TP These are mostly the old-timers, and while I haven't been TP around for as long as Steve Lamb or Allie "Curtis" Martin, That's Allie Curtis Martin. No need to include the quotes. My middle name is Curtis. I chose to use it on-list to

Re: Effective Immediately

2000-08-11 Thread Steve Lamb
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Friday, August 11, 2000, 7:07:35 AM, Tom wrote: Steve's posts amuse me these days. He tries so hard to be offensive, I find it hard not to laugh. Actually, I don't try to be offensive at all. I am what I am and have long since grown tired of

Effective Immediately

2000-08-10 Thread Leif Gregory
Hello users, Over the last few days, Marck and I have received a flood of e-mail concerning the flame wars on the TB lists. New list rule in effect as of right now! Marck, Wolfgang and I are the list moderators-- the *only* list moderators. It is our job to ensure that things run smoothly

Re: Effective Immediately

2000-08-10 Thread Joe Finocchiaro
Thursday, August 10, 2000, 8:19:02 AM, Leif Gregory, wrote: [...] From now on, if a message is deemed outside of the bounds by the moderators (and only the moderators), the poster will receive a warning via private e-mail. [...] Using the above snippet as as an example, I'd like to ask if

Re[2]: Effective Immediately

2000-08-10 Thread Deryk Lister
Hi Joe, On Thursday 10/08/2000 at 20:27, you wrote: snip I think the program is arbitrarily inserting that quote code "" in there, but I can't figure out why. It's not a quote, and I don't think Leif typed that "". So why do these things keep popping up in so many of my messages? Odd, it

Re[2]: Effective Immediately

2000-08-10 Thread Istvn Szendr
Hello Joe Finocchiaro, Thursday, August 10, 2000, 9:27:31 PM, you wrote: snip Must be something on your end, although I don't have a clue as to what. Here is the quote from the message I received: From now on, if a message is deemed outside of the bounds by the moderators (and only the

Re: Effective Immediately

2000-08-10 Thread Oliver Sturm
Hi Deryk Lister, On Thursday, August 10, 2000 at 9:44:06 PM you wrote: Hi Joe, On Thursday 10/08/2000 at 20:27, you wrote: snip I think the program is arbitrarily inserting that quote code "" in there, but I can't figure out why. It's not a quote, and I don't think Leif typed that "".

Re[3]: Effective Immediately

2000-08-10 Thread Joe Finocchiaro
Thursday, August 10, 2000, 3:12:36 PM, István Szendrõ, wrote: IS Hello Joe Finocchiaro, IS Thursday, August 10, 2000, 9:27:31 PM, you wrote: IS snip IS Must be something on your end, although I don't have a clue as to IS what. Here is the quote from the message I received: From now on, if a

Re[2]: Effective Immediately

2000-08-10 Thread Joe Finocchiaro
Thursday, August 10, 2000, 3:43:04 PM, Steve Lamb, wrote: SL Thursday, August 10, 2000, 12:27:31 PM, Joe wrote: Does it happen to everyone else? Please check that message you recently received from Leif and let me know if that "" appeared in your copy. SL Well, see, this is where us,

Re: Effective Immediately

2000-08-10 Thread Curtis
On Thu, 10 Aug 2000 16:53:38 -0500, Joe Finocchiaro wrote: SL But, of course, don't take my word for it, chances are I'm just yanking SL your chain. JF Steve, I wouldn't take your word for *anything.* JF Not if it was chipped in granite, gilded in gold, or just scribbled JF on the wall of

Re[2]: Effective Immediately

2000-08-10 Thread Joe Finocchiaro
Thursday, August 10, 2000, 5:04:59 PM, Curtis, wrote: C On Thu, 10 Aug 2000 16:53:38 -0500, Joe Finocchiaro wrote: SL But, of course, don't take my word for it, chances are I'm just yanking SL your chain. JF Steve, I wouldn't take your word for *anything.* JF Not if it was chipped in granite,

Re: Effective Immediately

2000-08-10 Thread Steve Lamb
On Thu, Aug 10, 2000 at 05:49:01PM -0500, Joe Finocchiaro wrote: Apparently he can't write a message without being sarcastic. Odd, I've written about a dozen today without sarcasm. Maybe you can't read my messages without sarcasm? to one of my posts (no, I don't need nor want his help),

Re: Effective Immediately

2000-08-10 Thread Curtis
On Thu, 10 Aug 2000 17:49:01 -0500, Joe Finocchiaro wrote: JF I thought my reply was well within bounds, Curtis, I rewrote it JF several times, in fact, to get it there. JF The above is *sarcasm,* sarcasm in direct response to Lamb's own sarcasm, and JF I thought sarcasm was allowed? JF If not,

Re: Effective Immediately

2000-08-10 Thread Steve Lamb
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Thursday, August 10, 2000, 5:08:04 PM, Joe wrote: Thanks, everyone out there who gave me a lot of help, and there were quite a few of you! You're most welcome. - -- Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your