Re[2]: Filter string question (v2.12)

2006-02-01 Thread rich gregory
MM The regex is correct, tested, confirmed, works like most MM skilled... Oh. :( Now I see that the regex is NOT working. I did do tests and it worked then BUT real life (non-test) messages are getting thru. Below I have copied the filter (with a couple of security edits) as TB! sees

Re: Filter string question (v2.12)

2006-02-01 Thread Mica Mijatovic
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 ***^\ ._)~~ ~( __ _o Was another beautiful day, Wed, 1 Feb 2006, @ @ at 16:27:55 -0600, when rich gregory wrote: MM The regex is correct, tested, confirmed, works like most MM skilled... Oh. :( Now I see that the regex

Re: Filter string question (v2.12)

2006-01-29 Thread Mica Mijatovic
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 ***^\ ._)~~ ~( __ _o Was another beautiful day, Thu, 26 Jan 2006, @ @ at 23:53:13 -0500, when rich gregory wrote: MM The regex is correct, tested, confirmed, works like most skilled MM mistress, knowing many charming and even

Re[2]: Filter string question (v2.12)

2006-01-26 Thread rich gregory
How do I to tell the selective download filters that any email 1) containing [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the header 2) AND MISSING the correct real name is to be deleted. MM This regular expression... MM (?!correct_real_name) [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- 8 --- snip, snip --- [edited for brevity] MM The

Re[3]: Filter string question (v2.12)

2006-01-26 Thread rich gregory
How do I to tell the selective download filters that any email 1) containing [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the header 2) AND MISSING the correct real name is to be deleted. MM This regular expression... MM (?!correct_real_name) [EMAIL PROTECTED] RG --- 8 --- snip, snip --- [edited for brevity]

Re[4]: Filter string question (v2.12)

2006-01-26 Thread rich gregory
How do I to tell the selective download filters that any email 1) containing [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the header 2) AND MISSING the correct real name is to be deleted. MM This regular expression... MM (?!correct_real_name) MM [EMAIL PROTECTED] RG --- 8 --- snip, snip --- [edited for brevity]

Re: Filter string question (v2.12)

2006-01-25 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo rich, On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 21:30:18 -0500GMT (25-1-2006, 3:30 +0100, where I live), you wrote: RG I would think that if I need 2 filters I would take *ALL* mail RG addressed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and FIRST send it to the spam RG bucket THEN filter the spam folder for correct_name RG [EMAIL

Re: Filter string question (v2.12)

2006-01-25 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello rich gregory everyone else, on 25-Jan-2006 at 03:51 you (rich gregory) wrote: DAC you lost me there. filter the mail you want to keep. put it whereever DAC you want it. then all that's left is spam in the inbox, Well, I'd prefer not to leave spam in the inbox. Of course not. Lets take

Re: Filter string question (v2.12)

2006-01-25 Thread Dwight A Corrin
On Tuesday, January 24, 2006, 8:51:37 PM, rich gregory wrote: Well, I'd prefer not to leave spam in the inbox. I assumed you were going to delete it. DAC maybe b can be to flag the message or some such, and just leave DAC it in the inbox, I'd prefer to have the filter do more work than just

Re[2]: Filter string question (v2.12)

2006-01-25 Thread rich gregory
DAC On Tuesday, January 24, 2006, 8:51:37 PM, rich gregory wrote: Well, I'd prefer not to leave spam in the inbox. DAC I assumed you were going to delete it. After I sent that mssg I wanted to take it back. I thought my statement above might come off as rude. Sorry. I have some other replies

Re[2]: Filter string question (v2.12)

2006-01-25 Thread rich gregory
RG I would think that if I need 2 filters I would take *ALL* mail RG addressed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and FIRST send it to the spam RG bucket THEN filter the spam folder for correct_name RG [EMAIL PROTECTED] and return these to the pending orders RG folder. RO This account of yours, is that an

Re: Re[2]: Filter string question (v2.12)

2006-01-25 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 16:12:49 +0100, rich gregory [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I get hundreds of bogus aliases daily that are all spam. Occasionally the alias is correct, then it is an order. Here is the example: Good: Correct_name [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bad : Bogus random name or blank [EMAIL

Re: Filter string question (v2.12)

2006-01-25 Thread Dwight A Corrin
On Wednesday, January 25, 2006, 8:53:42 AM, rich gregory wrote: I thought my statement above might come off as rude. Sorry. no offense taken. -- Dwight A. Corrin 928 S Broadway Wichita KS 67211 316.303.1411 fax 316.265.7568 dcorrin at fastmail.fm Using IMAP with The Bat! 3.65.04 on Windows

Re[4]: Filter string question (v2.12)

2006-01-25 Thread rich gregory
Below, corrected: [TO A SINGLE EMAIL ADDRESS] I get hundreds of bogus [EMAILS] daily that are all spam. Occasionally [TO THE SAME EMAIL ADDRESS I GET EMAILS THAT ARE NOT SPAM]. Here is the example: Good: Correct name [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bad : Bogus name [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bad : [EMAIL

Re: Filter string question (v2.12)

2006-01-25 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello rich gregory everyone else, on 25-Jan-2006 at 22:49 you (rich gregory) wrote: NOW I just need to know : How do I to tell the selective download filters that any email 1) containing [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the header 2) AND MISSING the correct real name is to be deleted. I'm very sorry

Re: Filter string question (v2.12)

2006-01-25 Thread Mica Mijatovic
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 ***^\ ._)~~ ~( __ _o Was another beautiful day, Wed, 25 Jan 2006, @ @ at 16:49:37 -0500, when rich gregory wrote: NOW I just need to know : How do I to tell the selective download filters that any email 1) containing [EMAIL

Re[2]: Filter string question (v2.12)

2006-01-25 Thread rich gregory
NOW I just need to know : How do I to tell the selective download filters that any email 1) containing [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the header 2) AND MISSING the correct real name is to be deleted. MM This regular expression... MM (?!correct_real_name) [EMAIL PROTECTED] MM .should detect the

Re: Filter string question (v2.12)

2006-01-25 Thread Mica Mijatovic
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 ***^\ ._)~~ ~( __ _o Was another beautiful day, Wed, 25 Jan 2006, @ @ at 19:44:39 -0500, when rich gregory wrote: NOW I just need to know : How do I to tell the selective download filters that any email 1) containing [EMAIL

Re: Filter string question (v2.12)

2006-01-24 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello rich gregory everyone else, on 24-Jan-2006 at 04:27 you (rich gregory) wrote: It's still 2 filters then: 1 to get the junk to the junk and the other to put the good ones back. Of course. The spam filter is usually the last filter in the list of filters, so that it has the lowest

Re[2]: Filter string question (v2.12)

2006-01-24 Thread rich gregory
It's still 2 filters then: 1 to get the junk to the junk and the other to put the good ones back. ASK Of course. The spam filter is usually the last filter in the list of ASK filters, so that it has the lowest priority. First you sort out the good ASK ones, then the spam filter takes care of

Re: Filter string question (v2.12)

2006-01-24 Thread Dwight A Corrin
On Tuesday, January 24, 2006, 8:30:18 PM, rich gregory wrote: I would think that if I need 2 filters I would take *ALL* mail addressed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and FIRST send it to the spam bucket THEN filter the spam folder for correct_name [EMAIL PROTECTED] and return these to the pending

Re[2]: Filter string question (v2.12)

2006-01-24 Thread rich gregory
I would think that if I need 2 filters I would take *ALL* mail addressed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and FIRST send it to the spam bucket THEN filter the spam folder for correct_name [EMAIL PROTECTED] and return these to the pending orders folder. DAC you lost me there. filter the mail you want to

Re: Filter string question (v2.12)

2006-01-23 Thread Mica Mijatovic
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 ***^\ ._)~~ ~( __ _o Was another beautiful day, Sun, 22 Jan 2006, @ @ at 23:52:51 -0500, when rich gregory wrote: Random tagline: The only difference between a rut and a grave is the depth. That's very sad thought. - --

Re[2]: Filter string question (v2.12)

2006-01-23 Thread rich gregory
I was *hoping* for a magic bullet filter. As _ALL_ the spam emails DO NOT have 'real_name' in the TO: field. It *sounds* like an easy filter for someone who hows where/what to click to get the desired results. (Just that's not me!) DAC why not filter everything with the RIGHT NAME, then you

Re: Filter string question (v2.12)

2006-01-22 Thread MFPA
Hi On Thursday 19 January 2006 at 3:26:05 PM, in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], rich gregory wrote: I have an email address that attracts a lot of spam, however any mail that goes to that address AND IS NOT spam is a PayPal notification of a payment and, therefore very important, an order that needs

Re: Filter string question (v2.12)

2006-01-22 Thread Mica Mijatovic
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 ***^\ ._)~~ ~( __ _o Was another beautiful day, Thu, 19 Jan 2006, @ @ at 10:26:05 -0500, when rich gregory wrote: Hello Bat-Folk! I have an email address that attracts a lot of spam, however any mail that goes to that

Re: Filter string question (v2.12)

2006-01-22 Thread Dwight A Corrin
On Sunday, January 22, 2006, 10:52:51 PM, rich gregory wrote: I was *hoping* for a magic bullet filter. As _ALL_ the spam emails DO NOT have 'real_name' in the TO: field. It *sounds* like an easy filter for someone who hows where/what to click to get the desired results. (Just that's not