Re[3]: Bayesian filtering products roundup: WAS Re[3]: Fwd: Re: Spam

2003-09-30 Thread Terry
On Monday, September 29, 2003 at 11:03 PM, David wrote: I would be happy to supply a lot of spam messages to folks who need some samples for training purposes! ;-) Thanks for the offer, but I get enough myself. :) With all the talk about spam on the list lately, I thought I'd share some

Re: Bayesian filtering products roundup: WAS Re[3]: Fwd: Re: Spam

2003-09-30 Thread MAU
Hello Terry, Of course, I could be wrong about this as it is my interpretation of Graham's writings. If I am, I hope someone will let me know. I think your interpretation is correct. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v2.00.6 Winamp OFF:

Re[2]: Bayesian filtering products roundup: WAS Re[3]: Fwd: Re: Spam

2003-09-30 Thread Terry
Hi Miguel, I think your interpretation is correct. Cool! I'll have to save this to show to my significant other. I'm not often correct. vbg -- Regards, Terry Using The Bat! v1.62r on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 3 Current version

Re: Bayesian filtering products roundup: WAS Re[3]: Fwd: Re: Spam

2003-09-30 Thread MAU
Hello Terry, Cool! I'll have to save this to show to my significant other. I'm not often correct. vbg Hey! I can say you are correct as many times as you wish. And for free, I won't even ask for a beer ;-) -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v2.00.6 Winamp

Bayesian filtering products roundup: WAS Re[3]: Fwd: Re: Spam

2003-09-29 Thread David R. Austen
Hello, Miguel, Paul John and Mark: Thank you, all, for your help with the filtering roundup I had proposed. I want to implement Bayesian filtering and am looking for best practices and products. of course that's always going to be somewhat subjective. So these are the solutions mentioned which

Re: Bayesian filtering products roundup: WAS Re[3]: Fwd: Re: Spam

2003-09-29 Thread Mogens Holst
Hello David, Monday, September 29, 2003, 17:11, you wrote: DRA Any other final thoughts or suggestions, anybody else? This is my 3rd day with BayesIt, it is effective - and kind of fun to use. I actually look forward to spam so I can train the filter! -- Regards, Mogens Using The Bat!

Re[2]: Bayesian filtering products roundup: WAS Re[3]: Fwd: Re: Spam

2003-09-29 Thread David R. Austen
Hello, Mogens: Monday, September 29, 2003, 11:15:53 AM, you wrote: MH This is my 3rd day with BayesIt, it is effective - and kind of fun MH to use. I actually look forward to spam so I can train the filter! Thank you for this reminder. Others seems to recommend BayesIt too, and I don't know how

Re: Bayesian filtering products roundup: WAS Re[3]: Fwd: Re: Spam

2003-09-29 Thread Andre Wichartz
Hello David, On 29 Sep 2003 at 15:25:29 -0400 GMT [21:25 CEST] you wrote: DRA Thank you for this reminder. Others seems to recommend BayesIt too, DRA and I don't know how I forgot to put it on my list. You are using v1.62i. Antispam plugins are only saupported since 2.0. So unless you intent to

Re: Bayesian filtering products roundup: WAS Re[3]: Fwd: Re: Spam

2003-09-29 Thread Keith Russell
Hello, fellow Bat-lovers. On Monday, September 29, 2003, 4:46:01 AM, David wrote: So these are the solutions mentioned which are working well for some of you: Popfile, SpamPal, K9 and the Bat's Known filter approach. Any other final thoughts or suggestions, anybody else? David, I missed

Re[2]: Bayesian filtering products roundup: WAS Re[3]: Fwd: Re: Spam

2003-09-29 Thread David R. Austen
Hello, Andre: Monday, September 29, 2003, 5:11:24 PM, you wrote: AW You are using v1.62i. Antispam plugins are only saupported since AW 2.0. So none of these are usable until I upgrade: BayesIt, Popfile, SpamPal, K9, and the Bat's Known filter approach. Correct? Thank you. -- Best wishes,

Re[2]: Bayesian filtering products roundup: WAS Re[3]: Fwd: Re: Spam

2003-09-29 Thread David R. Austen
Hello, Keith: Monday, September 29, 2003, 5:33:27 PM, you wrote: (snip) KRI Just switched from PopFile KR to SpamBayes (snip) KR(http://spambayes.sourceforge.net/ ). It's been kind KR of (snip) KRa pain to set up--for me, at least--but I finally got it KR KRworking today and it has great

Re: Bayesian filtering products roundup: WAS Re[3]: Fwd: Re: Spam

2003-09-29 Thread Deborah W
On Monday, September 29, 2003, 5:46:17 PM, David R. Austen wrote: DRA So none of these are usable until I upgrade: DRA BayesIt, Popfile, SpamPal, K9, and the Bat's Known filter approach. DRA Correct? Thank you. I can't speak for the others, but Popfile works fine here with 1.62, with earlier

Re: Bayesian filtering products roundup: WAS Re[3]: Fwd: Re: Spam

2003-09-29 Thread ETM
I also was using K9 with the lower version of TB! Elaine Current version is 2.00.6 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Bayesian filtering products roundup: WAS Re[3]: Fwd: Re: Spam

2003-09-29 Thread Andre Wichartz
Hello David, On 29 Sep 2003 at 17:46:17 -0400 GMT [23:46 CEST] you wrote: DRA So none of these are usable until I upgrade: DRA BayesIt, Popfile, SpamPal, K9, and the Bat's Known filter approach. DRA Correct? Thank you. No, incorrect. Of these only BayesIt is a Plugin. Popfile, Spampal and K9

Re[3]: Bayesian filtering products roundup: WAS Re[3]: Fwd: Re: Spam

2003-09-29 Thread Granville Cousins
Hello David, Monday, September 29, 2003, 11:03:19 PM, you wrote: DRA Hello, Keith: DRA Monday, September 29, 2003, 5:33:27 PM, you wrote: DRA (snip) KRI Just switched from PopFile KR to SpamBayes (snip) KR(http://spambayes.sourceforge.net/ ). It's been kind KR of (snip) KRa pain to set

Fwd: Re: Spam

2003-09-27 Thread Granville Cousins
This is a forwarded message From: Granville Cousins [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thursday, September 4, 2003, 1:21:12 AM Subject: Spam ===8==Original message text=== Hello Mailing List, I am receiving allot of spam. When the messages arrive which I do not

Re: Fwd: Re: Spam

2003-09-27 Thread MAU
Hello Granville, Can the Bat! deal with this kind of Spam or is it necessary to get another programme to do this work. Many of us use POPFile (http://popfile.sourceforge.net/), but there are others. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v2.00.6 Winamp OFF:

Re: Fwd: Re: Spam

2003-09-27 Thread David R. Austen
Hello, Granville: Saturday, September 27, 2003, 5:41:36 AM, you wrote: (snip) GC Can the Bat! deal with this kind GC of Spam or is it necessary to GC get another programme to do this GC work. My dear Batters, could we have a concise, succinct roundup of helpful advice on solutions

Re: Fwd: Re: Spam

2003-09-27 Thread Paul Berger
You will probably receive better solutions from others. But my simple approach is to filter all Welcome mail into folders, leaving the unknown-unwelcome mail in the general InBox. Filter for specific known items into appropriate folders, followed by the last filter, being The Bat's Known filter

Re: Fwd: Re: Spam

2003-09-27 Thread John Phillips
Hi Michael, On Sat, 27 Sep 2003, at 12:40:17 [GMT+0200] (which was 20:40:17 Australian Eastern Time) you wrote: Many of us use POPFile (http://popfile.sourceforge.net/), but there are others. I find that SpamPal, after a couple of days training, is picking up almost 100% of the spam.

Mod: Top Posting (was: Fwd: Re: Spam)

2003-09-27 Thread Allie Martin
Paul Berger, [PB] wrote: PB This leaves everything else to sit in the InBox. Here you can giv it PB a quick glance before deleting the lot. moderator Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not just to the person being replied to, even if their post may have instigated

Re[2]: Fwd: Re: Spam

2003-09-27 Thread Mark Partous
Hello John, Saturday, September 27, 2003, 1:41:59 PM, you wrote: Many of us use POPFile (http://popfile.sourceforge.net/), but there are others. JP I find that SpamPal, after a couple of days training, is picking up JP almost 100% of the spam. JP www.spampal.org Finally started using K9