Hello all,
Saturday, December 16, 2000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This file contains MTX virus. If You have not The Bat! 1.47 and older
(which has ability to block starting files with PIF extension). DON'T
RUN THIS FILE.
--
Bye
Marek Mikus
Using the best The Bat! 1.48d
under the worst Windows
bject
MDP> of "No Subject warning":
>> my (censored) TEXT to say "" then that is what I want. I don't want
>> a NAG SCREEN, or something MODIFYING MY (censored) MESSAGES!
MDP> I have to say something moderatorial here about profanity and shouting
MDP&g
Hi phil,
On 16 May 2000 at 00:57:31 GMT -0700 (which was 08:57 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject
of "No Subject warning":
> my (censored) TEXT to say "" then that is what I want. I don't want
> a NAG SCREEN, or something M
phil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>BTW-I don't see you in there. As of 9-DEC-1999
Yeah, I come and stay just long enough to see what the cray-zees are up
to. \^^/
Get a life, dude.
--
John De Hoog, Tokyo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Japanese email software: http://dehoog.org/html/j-email.html
--
-
p> -=-=-=-=-=-=- Better RE-THINK this FALSE STATEMENT -=-=-=-=-=-=-
p> "Gaping, gap-toothed presence"
p> -=-=-=-=-=-=- Better RE-THINK this FALSE STATEMENT -=-=-=-=-=-=-
Damn, what an embarassment. Glad I have the *plomlk* key ready, even
if it doesn't sound quite right...
-tom!
--
Hopin' th
Hi Tom,
On 16 May 2000 at 23:57:31 GMT -0700 (which was 07:57 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject
of "No Subject warning":
JDH>> I wonder what the Good Net Keeping Seal of Approval (GNKSA)
JDH>> recommendations say about this.
Greetings John!
Well the Good Net Keeping Seal of Approval, does not set the internet
Standards, the RFC's do. Which if you look up RFC 822, you see that
the Subject is treated as a TEXT STRING. And to FORCE your BS on my
MESSAGE is not what the RFC's SAY. The GNKSA is the BS-DOO-DOO-GNKSA
as far
Greetings Jast!
On Monday, May 15, 2000 at 07:13:04 GMT +0200 (which was 10:13 PM where you think I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
J> Morning John De Hoog,
>> Ordinary users don't oppose it. Ritlabs needs to listen to ordinary
>> users, else it will find itself with a shrinking piece of a g
Greetings John!
First I had to TRACK DOWN "(No Subject)" and which technically *IS* a
subject. If it really was NO SUBJECT then there would be
Subject=""
Which still isn't the case. Which is why
Okay man, I got 5:870 messages with "(No Subject) in TBUDL.
That's FIVE out of EIGHTHUNDRED A
JDH> I wonder what the Good Net Keeping Seal of Approval (GNKSA)
JDH> recommendations say about this.
I can't find it but I'm pretty sure that it requires a warning for a
blank subject and recommends not allowing it at all, but this is for
Usenet afterall...
-tom!
--
Hopin' this said *somethin
Jast <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Ordinary users don't oppose it. Ritlabs needs to listen to ordinary
>> users, else it will find itself with a shrinking piece of a growing pie.
>
> Gee, howcome this topic seems to be every-ones favorite debate area?
>
> Anyway, as it came up moths ago, I sugges
Morning John De Hoog,
> Ordinary users don't oppose it. Ritlabs needs to listen to ordinary
> users, else it will find itself with a shrinking piece of a growing pie.
Gee, howcome this topic seems to be every-ones favorite debate area?
Anyway, as it came up moths ago, I suggested putting some
phil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>TP> User configurability is the key.
>Where have I heard that before? Yes, user configurable, right now it
>*IS* configurable, you type in the subject/or lack of subject, and off
>you go.
There are several users of this list who could have been saved the
embarr
13 matches
Mail list logo
