Hi Tom,
On 16 May 2000 at 23:57:31 GMT -0700 (which was 07:57 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject
of "No Subject warning":
JDH>> I wonder what the Good Net Keeping Seal of Approval (GNKSA)
JDH>> recommendations say about this.
> I can't find it but I'm pretty sure that it requires a warning for a
> blank subject and recommends not allowing it at all, but this is for
> Usenet afterall...
Nope. The "Subject" header is one of the RFC "optional" ones. Anyway -
I believe the point has been made in many different ways and
directions. Also, it's all been said before. If the programmers want
it different, they've heard the arguments and will do what *they*
consider best.
SO - I wheel out the demised equine and solemnly pronounce this topic
a DEAD HORSE.
--
Cheers,
.\\arck
Marck D. Pearlstone, Consultant Software Engineer
Moderator TBUDL / TBBETA
www: http://www.silverstones.com
PGP key: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Body=GET%20MARCKKEY>
*-----------------------------------------------
| Using The Bat! 1.42f S/N 14F4B4B2
| under Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998
*-----------------------------------------------
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------
You are subscribed as : [email protected]
