Hello MAU,
On 4 Sep 2004 at 16:52:30 +0200 GMT [16:52 CEST] you wrote:
M Traditionally on the net, asterisks mean *bold*, underscores mean
M _underlined_, slashes mean /italics/, etc.
I know. :) And my text is either naked or underlined.
--
Cheers, The Bat! 2.12.00 on
Andre
Hello Mary,
On 3 Sep 2004 at 10:57:06 -0500 GMT [17:57 CEST] you wrote:
MB :grin: Okay. 4 * * 1
MB But, Andre, I use *asterisks* to indicate emphasis,
I don't. And for exactly for that reason. If I need to show emphasis
which is seldom enough i use underscores.
I realize I'm not coming
Hello Andre!
On Saturday, September 04, 2004, 8:29 AM, you wrote:
MB :grin: Okay. 4 * * 1
MB But, Andre, I use *asterisks* to indicate emphasis,
AW I don't. And for exactly for that reason. If I need to show
AW emphasis which is seldom enough i use underscores.
Well, I think I had noticed
Hello Andre,
MB But, Andre, I use *asterisks* to indicate emphasis,
I don't. And for exactly for that reason. If I need to show emphasis
which is seldom enough i use underscores.
Traditionally on the net, asterisks mean *bold*, underscores mean
_underlined_, slashes mean /italics/, etc.
--
Hello Andre Wichartz,
04-Sep-2004 15:29, you wrote:
g
Sorry to jump in here, I just tested a little bit - here (v2.12) the smiley
interpreter doesn't interpret anything in chevrons ... no g no
nothing, it just appears as-is...
In addition, it only interprets smileys if they aren't following
Hello Alexander!
On Saturday, September 04, 2004, 10:42 AM, you wrote:
MB g
ASK ... the smiley interpreter doesn't interpret anything in ,,,
This is how it has always been. Take a look at the .msl files in The
Bat!/Images. TB! will only call the image as a text replacement for
the handle,
Hello Mary Bull,
04-Sep-2004 18:08, you wrote:
MB g
ASK ... the smiley interpreter doesn't interpret anything in ,,,
This is how it has always been. Take a look at the .msl files in The
Bat!/Images. TB! will only call the image as a text replacement for
the handle, which you can read in
Hello Alexander!
On Saturday, September 04, 2004, 11:19 AM, you wrote:
ASK ... the smiley interpreter doesn't interpret anything in ,,,
...
ASK I mean - I placed g as a handle there. Including the
ASK chevrons aka pointed brackets. Placing *g* is interpreted,
ASK however.
Ah. I see. I
Hello Mary!
On Saturday, September 04, 2004, 11:46 AM, you wrote:
ASK Dunno - I just created my own smiley theme, and it contains a
ASK :-) handle, of course! ;-)
MB That explains why I don't see it--neither in the default.msl nor
MB in the pcwsmileys.msl as downloaded (default with TB!,
Friday, September 3, 2004, 6:28:38 AM, you wrote:
MB Therefore, if it's okay, let's have a poll:
MB 1) For Smiley handles enclosed in colons : :
MB 2) For Smiley handles enclosed in brackets
Smileys in colons would probably be easier for me to
implement ..
TBv.2.12.00
NT5 SP4
--
Hello Lynn!
On Saturday, September 04, 2004, 1:20 PM, you wrote:
MB Therefore, if it's okay, let's have a poll:
MB 1) For Smiley handles enclosed in colons : :
MB 2) For Smiley handles enclosed in brackets
L Smileys in colons would probably be easier for me to implement ..
Enclosed in
Saturday, September 4, 2004, 11:32:31 AM, you wrote:
MB Thanks for answering. :)
No problem .. had I not got so far behind with my email,
due to being gone yesterday, I'd have seen the previous
posts describing the situation.
Lynn
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]* * *Aun Aprendo
I'd rather
Lynn, [L] wrote:
I'd rather be WARP'ed* * *Team OS/2
I'm a long time OS/2 user. I stopped using it in mid 1999.
How's it going now with that OS. Is it still viable in that apps are
being still actively developed for it?
--
-= Allie =-
The Bat! v3.0 · Windows XP Pro (Service Pack 2)
Allie_M, [AM] wrote:
I'm a long time OS/2 user. I stopped using it in mid 1999.
How's it going now with that OS. Is it still viable in that apps are
being still actively developed for it?
Shucks! My booboo. I guess it could have been worse, but this was
intended as an off-list message. I
Hallo Mary,
On Fri, 3 Sep 2004 07:31:32 -0500GMT (3-9-2004, 14:31 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
MB This is the reason that all the handles on the Smileys page are
MB enclosed in colons. I hope that 9Val will soon edit the default.msl
MB file to enclose all handles in colons there.
Oh no, not
Hello Roelof!
On Friday, September 03, 2004, 7:48 AM, you wrote:
MB This is the reason that all the handles on the Smileys page are
MB enclosed in colons. I hope that 9Val will soon edit the
MB default.msl file to enclose all handles in colons there.
RO Oh no, not colons, I'd prefer (don't
Hello Allen!
On Friday, September 03, 2004, 8:43 AM, you wrote:
MB As Keeper of the Smileys, I can easily edit every handle of the
MB PCWize Smileys Smileys page to have a brackets ( ) enclosure
MB rather than a colons enclosure. It would be a bit time-consuming,
MB but I can do that, and I have
Hello Mary,
On Fri, 3 Sep 2004 08:28:38 -0500 GMT (03/09/2004, 20:28 +0700 GMT),
Mary Bull wrote:
MB 2) For Smiley handles enclosed in brackets
I would like this better.
I understand Allen's caveat about HTML tags, I'm just uttering a wish
as a (plain text) user. *are* quite common,
Hello Thomas!
On Friday, September 03, 2004, 9:24 AM, you wrote:
MB 2) For Smiley handles enclosed in brackets
TF I would like this better.
Okay, including Roelof, this makes 2 openly expressing this preference
so far. Thanks so much for responding.
TF I understand Allen's caveat about
Hello Allen!
On Friday, September 03, 2004, 10:00 AM, you wrote:
AD As for :: v. , I really don't care either way. ...
MB That was the impression I had in regard to many who are using
MB Plain Text View, when the discussion took place on tbbeta.
AD Right--from plain-text side, it
Hello Mary Bull,
03-Sep-2004 15:58, you wrote:
Thank you so very much for your kind offer. Let's see how many would
truly prefer a change from colon enclosures, and I'll get back to you.
Count me in as a pointed-bracket-preferer. :)
--
Best regards,
Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ
Hello Alexander!
On Friday, September 03, 2004, 10:33 AM, you wrote:
ASK Count me in as a pointed-bracket-preferer. :)
Okay, that puts the count at 4. Thanks a bunch for your response. :)
--
Best regards,
Mary
The Bat! 3.0 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 2
Hello Mary,
On 3 Sep 2004 at 08:28:38 -0500 GMT [15:28 CEST] you wrote:
MB Therefore, if it's okay, let's have a poll:
MB 1) For Smiley handles enclosed in colons : :
MB 2) For Smiley handles enclosed in brackets
I vote for * * :p
--
Cheers, The Bat! 2.12.00 on
Andre
Hello Andre!
On Friday, September 03, 2004, 10:49 AM, you wrote:
MB Therefore, if it's okay, let's have a poll:
MB 1) For Smiley handles enclosed in colons : :
MB 2) For Smiley handles enclosed in brackets
AW I vote for * * :p
:grin: Okay. 4 * * 1
But, Andre, I use *asterisks* to
Hæ!
Friday, September 3, 2004, 17:49, Andre Wichartz wrote:
I vote for * * :p
Me too. ;)
--
Kveðja!
Thorvald Neumann | aesir media
http://www.aesir.de/
[The Bat! v2.12.03 without BayesIt on Windows 2000 Service Pack 4]
Listening to: DeutschlandRadio Berlin
On Fri, 3 Sep 2004 17:33:55 +0200 GMT(03/09/2004, 16:33
+ GMT), Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
ASK Hello Mary Bull,
ASK 03-Sep-2004 15:58, you wrote:
Let's see how many would truly prefer a change from
colon enclosures, and I'll get back to you.
ASK Count me in as a pointed-bracket-preferer.
Hello Eric!
On Friday, September 03, 2004, 1:38 PM, you wrote:
MB Let's see how many would truly prefer a change from
MB colon enclosures, and I'll get back to you.
ASK Count me in as a pointed-bracket-preferer. :)
E And me.
So that's:
5 for pointed-brackets, or angle-brackets,
1
27 matches
Mail list logo
