Ok, WHERE do the PGP dll files go??
--
Best regards,
Almailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Current Ver: 1.60k
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives : http
Hello Al Lowe,
On Friday, May 17 2002 at 07:08 AM PDT, you wrote:
Ok, WHERE do the PGP dll files go??
In TB's main directory.
--
Nick Andriash
Courtenay, B.C. Canada
Current Ver: 1.60k
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Al Lowe [AL] wrote:
...
AL Ok, WHERE do the PGP dll files go??
Either in the TB! installation directory or in any directory that's in
your system path.
- --
-=Allie C Martin=-
List Moderator | TB! v1.60k | Windows XP Pro
PGP/GPG Public Key: mailto
Hi Gary,
On 30 June 2000 at 22:25:03 GMT -0500 (which was 04:25 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject
of "PGP DLL Version Number?":
Hey, you think this editor is rough, you should play with Emacs.
:-)
t I donot and neither did I play with ed
Hello Jamie Dainton,
On Wed, 28 Jun 2000 22:48:53 +0100 GMT your local time,
which was Thursday, June 29, 2000, 4:48:53 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Jamie Dainton wrote:
Hello tracer,
Wednesday, June 28, 2000, 12:08:21 PM, you wrote:
I don't recommend TB! to anyone outside of power users.
Hi tracer,
may I recommend not eating soup near your computer, they arent
soup proof (g)
Accepted. I'll remember that.
On second thought, I'll take my chances. :-;
Add to that one of my all-time wishes (which is all but
guaranteed not to happen): Agent 2.0.
I think it will...
Really?
Hello Tom,
Thursday, June 29, 2000, 1:25:15 AM, you wrote:
TP I think that it was a joke. I could be wrong, but the lead-in
TP paragraph seemed to indicate "when I get things like this..."
Great idea for a lead in. The only problem is that I do get many
e-mails like that.
--
From
Hello Gary,
Thursday, June 29, 2000, 12:29:26 AM, you wrote:
G Hi Jamie,
G On Wednesday, June 28, 2000, 4:48:53 PM, you wrote in part about "PGP DLL Version
Number?":
J the whole idea of having a table for me is so that i could have a border How
J have I managed
J to put them of
Hi Jamie,
On Thursday, June 29, 2000, 12:38:19 PM, you wrote in part about "PGP
DLL Version Number?":
J I've double checked and it is set to wrap at 70 chars. The problem
J may have been when I pasted the lamer section in. That's teh
J only bat thing that really bugs me.
Hi Tom,
On Thursday, June 29, 2000, 2:37:09 PM, you wrote in part about "PGP
DLL Version Number?":
T Notwithstanding the great reformatting options available for Emacs,
T the other bonus going for it (if you can program Lisp) is that you
T can actually remap the keys.
Yep, do it al
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Gary,
On Thursday 06/29/2000 at 19:16, you wrote:
Hey, you think this editor is rough, you should play with Emacs.
:-)
shudder
Or vi
To much Linux... think *nice* thoughts...
- --
Deryk Lister [ICQ] 25869912
On Thu, 29 Jun 2000 13:16:01 -0500, Gary wrote:
G Another way to accomplish paragraph reformatting is to just put your
G cursor above the paragraph, hit delete and the paragraph will move up
G already formatted for you.
This is with auto-format enabled. :-)
G I also like having the
Morning Allie Martin,
Great! But with it I have to get chummy with the Home and
End keys. Worth-while trade-off to me.:-) Of course others think
otherwise ...
That's not the problem for myself. The only real annoyance with the
editor is that a paragraph reformat places the cursor
On Fri, 30 Jun 2000 00:32:04 +0200, Jast wrote:
J That's not the problem for myself. The only real annoyance with the
J editor is that a paragraph reformat places the cursor at the very
J beginning.
... if you don't use the auto-format feature. :-)
J Inconvinient for keyboard editing.
Morning Allie Martin,
... if you don't use the auto-format feature. :-)
... which isn't flexible and controllable enough for me.
This is a wish, right? :-/
Correct :-)
--
.. Jast ... mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
: using TB 1.45 Beta/1
: with AMD K6-2, 64MB RAM
:. on
Hello Gary,
On Thu, 29 Jun 2000 13:16:01 -0500 GMT your local time,
which was Friday, June 30, 2000, 1:16:01 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Gary wrote:
Hey, you think this editor is rough, you should play with Emacs. :-)
I donot and neither did I play with edlin (g).
when I saw Edlin we
Hi Deryk,
I've looked. I've searched far and wide... and the next best thing I
can find, of all the options, is MS LookOut Suxpress :)
I almost spurt my soup on the screen upon reading this. :-D
It's not because you're making a ridiculous statement, though I
won't exactly put MS OE at no.2.
Hello Deryk Lister,
On Wed, 28 Jun 2000 00:31:47 +0100 GMT your local time,
which was Wednesday, June 28, 2000, 6:31:47 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Deryk Lister wrote:
Hi Tom,
On Tuesday 27/06/2000 at 20:49, you wrote:
I don't recommend TB! to anyone outside of power users. It's just
not
Hello Ming-Li,
On Wed, 28 Jun 2000 03:28:48 -0700 GMT your local time,
which was Wednesday, June 28, 2000, 5:28:48 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Ming-Li wrote:
Hi Deryk,
I've looked. I've searched far and wide... and the next best thing I
can find, of all the options, is MS LookOut Suxpress
On Tuesday, June 27, 2000 at 12:09 AM or thereabouts, Nick Andriash
wrote the following about PGP DLL Version Number?:
Nick Can someone help me out here, and tell me why TB! uses 6.5i as
Nick the identifying version of PGP (external), regardless of what
Nick someone may have on their system
CM I've been hanging around, as well, for the long-dangled v2.x, but
CM I'm beginning to look around now for alternatives.
There is no alternative to TB! It's simply The Best!
--
--
View the TBUDL archive at
Hi Nick, Chuck, and bbe,
CM I've been hanging around, as well, for the long-dangled v2.x, but
CM I'm beginning to look around now for alternatives.
There is no alternative to TB! It's simply The Best!
I can relate to Nick and Chuck completely. Committing to
something and then not seeing it
On Tuesday, June 27, 2000 at 10:23 AM or thereabouts, Ming-Li wrote
the following about PGP DLL Version Number?:
Ming-Li I can relate to Nick and Chuck completely. Committing to
Ming-Li something and then not seeing it progress the way we expect
Ming-Li it to is disheartening. As a programmer
CM As a programmer, though, would you think it prudent to release new
CM versions (betas) without including any info whatsoever with that beta,
CM such as what has been changed, added, removed, etc.?
What has prudent got to do with any of it? Whenever we release new
versions of our software,
Hi Chuck,
As a programmer, though, would you think it prudent to release new
versions (betas) without including any info whatsoever with that beta,
such as what has been changed, added, removed, etc.? For the longest
time we never got any of that info; eventually, we started getting
*some*
Hello Tom,
Tuesday, June 27, 2000, you wrote:
I don't recommend TB! to anyone outside of power users. It's just not
worth the effort for most people.
-tom!
I don't agree with you here.
I am far from a power user but I found the software useful from the
beginning. In a very short
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Chuck,
On Tuesday 27/06/2000 at 11:47, you wrote:
I've been hanging around, as well, for the long-dangled v2.x, but
I'm beginning to look around now for alternatives.
I've looked. I've searched far and wide... and the next best thing I
can
On Monday, June 26, 2000, 10:09:51 PM, Nick Andriash wrote:
NA Can someone help me out here, and tell me why TB! uses 6.5i as the
NA identifying version of PGP (external), regardless of what someone may
NA have on their system? It makes no sense to me whatsoever.
I can see that my original post
Hello Terry,
On Tuesday, June 27, 2000 at 14:02:40 GMT -0700 (which was 2:02 PM
where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
I am far from a power user but I found the software useful from the
beginning. In a very short period of time (less than a week) TB! was
ahead of anything else I
if that meant TB! wasn't using his
newly purchased PGP Desktop Security 6.5.3? I said no, and that the PGP
version number identified in the PGP DLL was hard coded into the DLL,
but I could not give him a better explanation.
Can someone help me out here, and tell me why TB! uses 6.5i
30 matches
Mail list logo
