Joseph N. [EMAIL PROTECTED] @ 25-Apr-2004 11:52:01 PM
Deleting HTML Attachment in 2.10.01 mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Prior to the current version, 2.10.01, TB! would gray out the
'delete' option when right-clicking on an HTML attachment when the
associated e-mail message was sent only in HTML, not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Roland Burger !
On Sun, 15 Apr 2001 13:29:30 +0200 GMT your local time,
which was 15.04.2001, 13:29 (GMT+0200) where I live, you wrote:
Hmmm, I'm a bit lit in this thread (Happy Easter)!! but I gues you
would like to have something that
Hi Gerd,
on Mon, 16 Apr 2001 11:23:30 +0200 GMT (which was 16.04.2001, 11:23
+0100 GMT where I live) Gerd Ewald wrote:
%TO=""%TO='"%OFROMNAME on %ABoreplyNAME" %OREPLYADDR'
I use a macro that uses a regex (I know, wrong group, that's why I'm
not going to explain it!)
one long line
Hi David,
on Sat, 14 Apr 2001 18:05:33 +0100 GMT (which was 14.04.2001, 19:05
+0100 GMT where I live) David Elliott wrote:
%TO=""%TO='"%OFROMNAME on %ABoreplyNAME" %OREPLYADDR'
I tried this with all lists, but with my German lists I don't have
success with it!
--
Best regards,
Roland
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Roland,
On 15 April 2001 at 13:01:00 +0200 (which was 12:01 where I live)
Roland Burger wrote to David Elliott on TBUDL and made these points:
RB on Sat, 14 Apr 2001 18:05:33 +0100 GMT (which was 14.04.2001, 19:05
RB +0100 GMT where I live)
Hi Marck,
on Sun, 15 Apr 2001 12:21:17 +0100 GMT (which was 15.04.2001, 13:21
+0100 GMT where I live) Marck D. Pearlstone wrote:
On 15 April 2001 at 13:01:00 +0200 (which was 12:01 where I live)
Roland Burger wrote to David Elliott on TBUDL and made these points:
RB on Sat, 14 Apr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Thomas,
On 14 April 2001 at 13:43:06 +0800 (which was 06:43 where I live)
Thomas wrote to Marck D. Pearlstone on TBUDL and made these points:
MDP Of course.
T Seeing the rest of your message, I believe you mean "of course
T not", as otherwise
Hallo Marck,
On Sat, 14 Apr 2001 10:48:06 +0100 GMT (14/04/2001, 17:48 +0800 GMT),
Marck D. Pearlstone wrote:
MDP While I understand that you're saying that it possibly *could* exist,
MDP /I'm/ saying that making it do so would constitute the kind of
MDP interference that TB shuns. I'm only
Hello Thomas others on this TB! list following this thread,
Friday, April 13, 2001, you asked whether:
T Has anybody ever been able to delete the HTML part of a message with a
T content-type text/html?
DH This is what I do:
DH I redirect the message
T ... several months ago, I suggested
Hello Marck others on this TB! list following this thread,
(I'll take the opportunity to ask: How does one generate the "on
TBUDL or on TBTech add on automatically - i.e. via the reply
template? I tried including "on %Reply-to" with less than the
desired results).
In the interest of clarity,
Hi Douglas,
on Sat, 14 Apr 2001 08:33:17 -0600 GMT (which was 14.04.2001, 16:33
+0100 GMT where I live) Douglas Hinds wrote:
Hello Marck others on this TB! list following this thread,
(I'll take the opportunity to ask: How does one generate the "on
TBUDL or on TBTech add on
Hi Thomas,
@ 4:16:25 AM on 4/13/2001, Thomas wrote:
...
T It seems the attachment extension depends on the machine. I jsut
T received another HTML message, the attachment is also called
T "message.shtml", but the content-type is multipart/alternative
T (followed by a boundary), and I have no
Hallo Douglas,
On Sat, 14 Apr 2001 07:50:54 -0600 GMT (14/04/2001, 21:50 +0800 GMT),
Douglas Hinds wrote:
T I just want to know where we are, is this by design, is it a flaw, is
T it only me? ...
DH My vote sides w/ your suggestion, but what counts is whether or not
DH you forwarded that to
Hi Thomas,
On Fri, 13 Apr 2001, at 16:16:25 +0800 you wrote:
Has anybody ever been able to delete the HTML part of a message
with a content-type text/html?
I think that a message with content type text/html contains
*only* a html part and that's the reason why TB! is unable to
delete that
Hi Lars,
On Fri, 13 Apr 2001 10:28:35 +0200GMT (13/04/2001, 16:28 +0800GMT),
Lars Geiger wrote:
LG I think that a message with content type text/html contains
LG *only* a html part
Correct.
LG and that's the reason why TB! is unable to delete that part.
TB should keep the text it generates,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Thomas,
On 13 April 2001 at 16:16:25 +0800 (which was 09:16 where I live)
Thomas wrote to Lars Geiger on TBUDL and made these points:
LG On my machine, the attachment is shown as "message.html", not
LG .shtml and its content type is text/html.
Hello Thomas others on this TB! list following this thread,
Friday, April 13, 2001, you asked:
T Has anybody ever been able to delete the HTML part of a message with a
T content-type text/html?
This is what I do:
I redirect the message using Crtl+F6, addressing it to the same
address it
Hallo Marck,
On Fri, 13 Apr 2001 10:20:19 +0100 GMT (13/04/2001, 17:20 +0800 GMT),
Marck D. Pearlstone wrote:
T Has anybody ever been able to delete the HTML part of a message
T with a content-type text/html?
MDP Of course.
Seeing the rest of your message, I believe you mean "of course not",
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Assad
You wrote:
AT Does anyone know how I could automate the deletion of HTML
AT attachment? I was thinking of using the external filter rule to
AT delete email with HTML attachments but I don't know how I should
AT input the
19 matches
Mail list logo
