Hi Ralph,
On 28/3/2005 3:06 PM +0200, you wrote:
i also tried out IMAP now and i'm confused, since there is no option
to search, not even in the mail headers...
Did i miss something or is that not possible with TB!
What do you mean no option to search. You have all searching options at
your
Allie Martin wrote on Monday, March 28, 2005 3:30:23 PM (687 Beats):
Actually, no. It'll just work, but it wouldn't be as fast as if you had
all message bodies locally cached.
Well, the only search method that works for me, is the alt-click-method
(how do i return from those search results to
Allie Martin wrote on Monday, March 28, 2005 3:30:23 PM (687 Beats):
Actually, no. It'll just work, but it wouldn't be as fast as if you had
all message bodies locally cached.
Well, the only search method that works for me, is the alt-click-method
(how do i return from those search results to
And finally, i see you can sign your messages. However, PGP doesn't seem
to work when i chose my IMAP account as my sending account in templates...
--
Regards,
Ralph|mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] |PGP Key ID: 0x5F1A33E3
Running The Bat! 3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1.2600 SP2
Ralph Inselsbacher wrote on Monday, March 28, 2005 3:50:15 PM (701 Beats):
And finally, i see you can sign your messages. However, PGP doesn't seem
to work when i chose my IMAP account as my sending account in templates...
Oops. It sometimes works and sometimes doesn't...
--
Regards,
Hi Ralph,
On 28/3/2005 3:46 PM +0200, you wrote:
Well, the only search method that works for me, is the
alt-click-method (how do i return from those search results to normal
view). The other two don't work.
Hmmm. Current TB! IMAP is such that I really can't speak with
confidence about what you
Hi Ralph,
On 28/3/2005 3:50 PM +0200, you wrote:
And finally, i see you can sign your messages. However, PGP doesn't
seem to work when i chose my IMAP account as my sending account in
templates...
BTW, I see that you're running a beta version, and a beta version that
I simply couldn't use for
Allie Martin wrote on Monday, March 28, 2005 3:58:04 PM (706 Beats):
Hmmm. Current TB! IMAP is such that I really can't speak with
confidence about what you should be experiencing. It may very well be
that the search isn't working for you since, for message body searches,
TB! queries the
Allie Martin wrote on Monday, March 28, 2005 4:00:35 PM (708 Beats):
BTW, I see that you're running a beta version, and a beta version that
I simply couldn't use for IMAP.
AFAIK, my version was is the latest release version... confused now...
--
Regards,
Ralph|mailto:[EMAIL
Hi Ralph,
On 28/3/2005 4:16 PM +0200, you wrote:
That's a pity, because Thunderbird and Outlook 2003 really seem to
cache the mails because one can search.
For IMAP, you don't need to cache mail bodies to search. You shouldn't
have to do that. ThunderBird doesn't cache mail bodies for
Allie Martin wrote on Monday, March 28, 2005 4:26:03 PM (726 Beats):
For IMAP, you don't need to cache mail bodies to search. You shouldn't
have to do that. ThunderBird doesn't cache mail bodies for searching.
It queries the server. Same for Mulberry, the client I'm currently
using most
Hi Ralph,
On 28/3/2005 4:20 PM +0200, you wrote:
AFAIK, my version was is the latest release version... confused now...
Don't be. I'm the one confused. You're right!!! Sorry. :)
IMAP is always changing. It's like a sinus wave of improvements and
setbacks.
I'd say IMAP was at a peak with the
Hi Ralph,
On 28/3/2005 4:48 PM +0200, you wrote:
As for bandwith: i use a 2mbit line, so that shouldn't be
the bottleneck, i guess.
That depends on the throughput your IMAP server allows. Bandwidth
throttling may be there. However, if you are getting a 2Mbit connection
then it shouldn't be a
13 matches
Mail list logo
