Hello Gerard,
On Wed, 22 May 2002 22:38:19 +0200GMT (22-5-02, 22:38 +0200GMT, where
I live), you wrote:
G As for BCC's not showing up in the kludges, have a look, it's there.
Depends on on your ISP, the servers the message passes, etc. I've got
accounts at four ISP's and only one of them
Replying to your message of Wednesday, May 22, 2002, 1:24:02 PM:
I have another thought for filtering. Maybe this can be covered but I
haven't found how. Why isn't there and option to create a rule when your
name is in the CC box? All I find is when you are the recipient
--
ON Wednesday, May 22, 2002, 9:38:48 PM, you wrote:
DE how about [CC: David Elliott [EMAIL PROTECTED]] in the kludge.
Hi David,
I don't think you need to be a regex expert but it needs some
adjustment.
CC: your name will not catch it if you are the second or third cc'ed
person. So I think
Hello Pete,
On Wed, 22 May 2002 13:35:48 -0600GMT (22-5-02, 21:35 +0200GMT, where
I live), you wrote:
PM I have another thought for filtering. Maybe this can be covered but I
PM haven't found how. Why isn't there and option to create a rule when your
PM name is in the CC box? All I find is
Hello Gerard,
On Wed, 22 May 2002 21:53:46 +0200 GMT (23/05/02, 02:53 +0700 GMT),
Gerard wrote:
G Your name - recipient - NO
G Your name - kludes- Yes
G I wonder if this would catch BCC's.
It should, if you use the email address instead of the name.
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
Moderator
Hello Gerard,
On Wed, 22 May 2002 21:53:46 +0200GMT (22-5-02, 21:53 +0200GMT, where
I live), you wrote:
G Your name - recipient - NO
G Your name - kludes- Yes
G I wonder if this would catch BCC's.
This would catch neither bcc's nor cc's, since cc's are counted as
recipients and bcc's
Hello Roelof,
On Wed, 22 May 2002 22:13:32 +0200 GMT (23/05/02, 03:13 +0700 GMT),
Roelof Otten wrote:
RO bcc's aren't found in the receiving kludges, that's the whole part
RO of them being blind.
Hmm. How do they find you then?
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner
ON Wednesday, May 22, 2002, 10:13:32 PM, you wrote:
RO Hello Gerard,
RO On Wed, 22 May 2002 21:53:46 +0200GMT (22-5-02, 21:53 +0200GMT, where
RO I live), you wrote:
G Your name - recipient - NO
G Your name - kludes- Yes
G I wonder if this would catch BCC's.
RO This would catch
ON Wednesday, May 22, 2002, 10:08:02 PM, you wrote:
TF Hello Gerard,
TF On Wed, 22 May 2002 21:53:46 +0200 GMT (23/05/02, 02:53 +0700 GMT),
TF Gerard wrote:
G Your name - recipient - NO
G Your name - kludes- Yes
G I wonder if this would catch BCC's.
TF It should, if you use the
Hello Thomas,
On Thu, 23 May 2002 03:21:14 +0700GMT (22-5-02, 22:21 +0200GMT, where
I live), you wrote:
RO bcc's aren't found in the receiving kludges, that's the whole part
RO of them being blind.
TF Hmm. How do they find you then?
They're in the smtp-envelope, but that's not something that
ON Wednesday, May 22, 2002, 10:52:49 PM, you wrote:
JA Why do you say that? Are the people in the CC also not recipients of
JA the email?
It depend on your interpretation. The CC's receive the mail but it is not
directed at them specificly. I would like a CC option next to
recipient in the
Hello Pete,
On Wed, 22 May 2002 13:46:56 -0600GMT (22-5-02, 21:46 +0200GMT, where
I live), you wrote:
DE how about [CC: David Elliott [EMAIL PROTECTED]] in the kludge.
PM So you mean to tell me if I create a rule that if I am in the CC:, I
PM can have it trashed immediately?
Or saved for your
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hail Pete
On 22 May 2002 at 13:35:48 -0600 (which was 20:35 where I live) Pete Milne
wrote and made these points
I have another thought for filtering. Maybe this can be covered but I
haven't found how. Why isn't there and option to create a
Hello Pete,
On Wed, 22 May 2002 14:27:36 -0600GMT (22-5-02, 22:27 +0200GMT, where
I live), you wrote:
RO The above filter only works when you're the only cc-recipient.
PM I am glad of that because you lost me on your first suggestion!
Let's rephrase it. The filter that was quoted in my message
On Wednesday, May 22, 2002, Gerard wrote...
I have tried it and yes your right if your email address is in the
cc's it is caught by the recipient selection in the filter. Maybe
this isn't a bug but at least I would call it a bad implementation.
Why do you say that? Are the people in
On Wednesday, May 22, 2002, Gerard wrote...
ON Wednesday, May 22, 2002, 10:52:49 PM, you wrote:
JA Why do you say that? Are the people in the CC also not recipients
JA of the email?
It depend on your interpretation. The CC's receive the mail but it
is not directed at them specificly. I
Hello Thomas,
On Thu, 23 May 2002 03:21:14 +0700 GMT (23/05/02, 03:21 +0700 GMT),
Thomas F wrote:
RO bcc's aren't found in the receiving kludges, that's the whole part
RO of them being blind.
TF Hmm. How do they find you then?
Ups. It depends on the ISP. At GMX, I always get a header
17 matches
Mail list logo
