Hi Anne
Monday, September 22, 2003, 2:32:27 AM, you wrote:
A Even when I don't try and read it it makes me feel yuck just by
A seeing the movement scrolling... is daft to have to take Kwells
A to be able to read my e-mail! ;-)
The most irritating thing I find about it is trying to decide where
Hi Anne
Monday, September 15, 2003, 5:48:57 PM, you wrote:
A I thought he was subbed to this list also so would have seen the
A message as well, but if not he's def subbed to TBBETA list, you
A can find him through there. :-)
Ok thanks. I do remember seeing posts from him here..or maybe it was
Hi Anne
Monday, September 15, 2003, 5:46:00 PM, you wrote:
A I'd still like to know why the auto checking won't work by
A itself, but that may take more experimentation!
Me too. I suspect only the developers will really be able to give us an answer.
Cheers,
-Vishal
Hi Allie
Saturday, September 13, 2003, 7:09:45 AM, you wrote:
AM Delete always deletes only that message you're viewing. It's the message
AM that you're next taken to that's dependent on your list sorting. Why is
AM that disastrous?
Yep, my mistake :) I must have lost my train of thought for
Hi Allie
Saturday, September 13, 2003, 7:02:23 AM, you wrote:
AM You run no other little shell applications? WindowBlinds, clipboard
AM extenders, spam filters etc?
Nope.
AM I'd therefore start checking by running TB! only with nothing else
AM enabled.
I did. It doesn't work unless I use the
Hi Allie
Wednesday, September 10, 2003, 8:34:32 PM, you wrote:
AM I'm wondering if it's ZA at all. :/
You're right..it's not. I posted earlier that automatic checks don't work even
with no firewall in place.
AM What other software are you running. Are you running anti-virus software
AM that
Hi Julian
Wednesday, September 10, 2003, 3:31:34 AM, you wrote:
JBL Is it something to do with the settings under Options|Network and
JBL Administration.
I thought of that. But I don't see how there could be. There's only one option
when you're on a permanent connection as I am. Nothing
Hi Allie
Wednesday, September 10, 2003, 7:53:11 AM, you wrote:
AM When I say the formatting is preserved, I mean that the line breaks are
AM preserved etc.
Agreed. That helps.
AM Try using the alternative editor. If you use it, while
AM composing, your message will be nicely wrapped at your
Hi Anne
Thursday, September 11, 2003, 10:28:36 PM, you wrote:
A Daniel also on TBBETA is using Win 2000 +Service Pack 4 Build
A 2195 and his auto checking is working fine... s. the next
A question is... what Service Pack/s have you installed with your Win
A 2000? If it's SP3 then perhaps
Hi Anne
Wednesday, September 10, 2003, 9:35:01 PM, you wrote:
A Thursday, September 11, 2003, 1:34:32 AM, Allie wrote:
AM I'm wondering if it's ZA at all. :/
A Allie and Vishal,
A Over on TBBETA Marek has just advised Melvyn who has this same
A problem to try using the Scheduler to do the
Hi Anne
Wednesday, September 10, 2003, 9:35:01 PM, you wrote:
A Perhaps if Vishal tries
A this also and then lets Marek know - he's doing some kind of
A feedback for devs about this.
How do I let Marek know? Do you think you could forward the mail I just sent
about it working? I'd really like
Hello All: I use the bat 1.62,zone alarm (#4 engine build029) AVG 7.0
(still canot make it work with the bat,yes I have tried kaspersky just
now getting back up will never use this product again) McAfee 7 pro.
Seems to me if you go into msconf and 'kill' the task manger on bootup
and tell
Hi Julian
Wednesday, September 10, 2003, 3:35:32 AM, you wrote:
JBL Application protection scanning was slow,
Yes, I have complaints with that too. I don't even like the idea of using my
existing system as a baseline. Even though I take great care with all my
software, this still leaves me
Hi Anne
Wednesday, September 10, 2003, 9:35:01 PM, you wrote:
A Allie and Vishal,
A Over on TBBETA Marek has just advised Melvyn who has this same
A problem to try using the Scheduler to do the auto downloading and
A Melvyn tried it and he says it worked. Perhaps if Vishal tries
A this also and
Hi Allie
Thursday, September 4, 2003, 4:57:25 AM, you wrote:
AM The thing with TB! is that if you wish for it to behave just like some
AM of the mainstream clients, you'll get frustrated and think it's flaky.
Partly. My main reason to consider it so is the bugs I've experienced and the
Hi Thomas
Tuesday, September 9, 2003, 12:49:19 AM, you wrote:
TF Hello Vishal,
TF On Tue, 9 Sep 2003 00:34:14 -0400 GMT (09/09/2003, 11:34 +0700 GMT),
TF Vishal wrote:
It can check email automatically? No need to press Alt+F2? It looks like
everyone who can do this properly is not
Hi Daniel
Tuesday, September 9, 2003, 10:40:14 AM, you wrote:
Now *that* I find really interesting. How do you do this - by having different
quick templates for different signatures?
DR Yes.
If so, doesn't remembering all those
keyboard combinations get to be a pain after a while?
DR
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tuesday, September 09, 2003
1:56:15 PM (GMT -05:00)
RE: zonealarm and automatic mail checks - works for anyone?
Greetings Thomas,
On Tuesday, September 9, 2003, 1:31:19 PM, you wrote:
TF Account / Properties / Options / Periodical Check every xx
Hi Thomas
Tuesday, September 9, 2003, 1:31:19 PM, you wrote:
TF Isn't that an indicator that ZA has outlived its usefulness?
Perhaps. I'm reluctant though. I've already voiced my thoughts on this in
previous replies to Marck and Allie. But I did try uninstalling it and replacing
it with
Hi Anne
Tuesday, September 9, 2003, 1:23:17 PM, you wrote:
V Are you using Win98/Me?
A Yes Win98SE, and the ZoneAlarm is ZA Pro v4.0.123.012
I thought you might. Anyone not on Win2K seems to be working fine.
V Yep. I even tried adding my mail servers to the Trusted zone but it didn't work.
Hi Anne
Tuesday, September 9, 2003, 1:13:59 PM, you wrote:
A Yes this is no longer the case in ZA4 - internet connections go in the
A Internet zone not the Trusted zone -
Oh, I know they go in the Internet zone. I really meant to ask whether you had
to put the connection in the Trusted zone in
Hi Thomas
Tuesday, September 9, 2003, 1:31:19 PM, you wrote:
TF Isn't that an indicator that ZA has outlived its usefulness?
Perhaps. I'm reluctant though. I've already voiced my thoughts on this in
previous replies to Marck and Allie. But I did try uninstalling it and replacing
it with
Hi Marck
Tuesday, September 9, 2003, 10:40:15 PM, you wrote:
MDP Try is a very interesting word to use in this context. The
MDP un-install procedure for ZA is less simple than it appears. Allie
MDP can tell you more of this. ZA is insidious and merely disabling or
MDP uninstalling it the obvious
Hi Anne
Tuesday, September 9, 2003, 11:38:13 PM, you wrote:
A S'ok ;-) No, all that's in my Trusted zone is our own network.
Ok. Well I'm not sure what's wrong then. I'll keep looking Anne, thanks for your
suggestions :)
Cheers,
-Vishal
Hi Anne
Tuesday, September 9, 2003, 11:35:43 PM, you wrote:
A Just as a thought, is it perhaps anything to do with admin
A permissions on Win 2K? (scratching my head for suggestions as to
A the cause here).
It shouldn't be a problem. The same firewall rules are in place no matter which
account
Hi Anne
Wednesday, September 3, 2003, 8:12:59 PM, you wrote:
A Yes Vishal I have - it works fine for me.. (I did reply earlier but
A you maybe didn't see it).
Lucky you :( Oh yes, I actually did reply to you earlier. But I included my
reply in a reply to Robyn. I referred to you as
Hi Anne
Thursday, September 4, 2003, 4:09:29 PM, you wrote:
A Thursday, September 4, 2003, 6:22:01 AM, Vishal wrote:
V For the person who Robyn replied to (sorry I only know your initial is 'A'), I
V don't seem to have received your message from the list. Could you let me know
V the same?
Sorry for the chopped response masks, they got lost and I am on the
last day of my unpaidv2... Now paid and waiting for the keys, thanks
Thomas...
Anyway, Zonealarm on my machine, with lots of crap loaded, using the
bat, running for many hours at a time, often all night using Kazaa, I
havent seen
Hi Marck
Tuesday, September 2, 2003, 9:29:41 AM, you wrote:
MDP Yes.
MDP Many have.
So could you suggest someone who has? It would be a big help.
MDP A *significantly* larger proportion have *not*.
Yep, I'm aware of this.
V I'd rather not shift to Kerio yet as ZA is otherwise an excellent
V
Hi,
V So could you suggest someone who has? It would be a big help.
A I used TB! 1.62 with ZA Pro 2.6 until recently using automatic mail
A checking on one mail account and it worked fine. I've now switched to
A TB! 2 and ZA Pro 4 and it still works just fine.
I use TB! 2 (and v1.62 before
Hi Allie
Interesting to read about your experiences. I haven't faced anything like as
severe the problems that you have. It is only TB that misbehaves with ZA. For
you TB is irreplaceable, but I have yet to start using the advanced features
like Quick templates that everyone keeps raving about on
Hi Allie
Wednesday, September 3, 2003, 7:33:23 AM, you wrote:
AM Vishal, [V] wrote:
V So could you suggest someone who has? It would be a big help.
AM I've had problems. When I did, the problems weren't restricted to just
AM TB!, though t
snip
By the way, your signature doesn't validate
Hi DG
Tuesday, September 2, 2003, 2:07:50 PM, you wrote:
DRS What do have layered between ZoneAlarm and The_Bat!?
I have Symantec Antivirus, latest version. This used to be known as NAV
Corporate Edition. I remember reading somewhere that NAV uses port 110 for its
email scanning, but that may
33 matches
Mail list logo
