Re[2]: Sewcurity

2000-08-29 Thread Christian Dysthe
Hello Thomas, Tuesday, August 29, 2000, 12:39:09 AM, you wrote: TF Hi Christian, TF On Mon, 28 Aug 2000 19:22:38 -0500GMT (29/08/2000, 08:22 +0800GMT), TF Christian Dysthe wrote: CD as soon as I have something worth protecting other than my trivial CD mail I will also want security over

Re: Sewcurity

2000-08-29 Thread Steve Lamb
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tuesday, August 29, 2000, 9:18:18 AM, Christian wrote: Btw, if you like I can send you some of my love letters. If you've seen one you have seen them all anyway.. ;) Please, darling, next time more duct tape on the hamster and 10W-40 would be

Sewcurity

2000-08-28 Thread ztrader
A major reason I got TB was to avoid security problems with Micro$oft. It make me nervous to see so much cheeering for adding features that require tight 'integration' in Windows. This could open up holes, and I would hope that there is very careful consideration given to the security aspect of

Re: Sewcurity

2000-08-28 Thread ztrader
On Monday, August 28, 2000, 4:46:38 PM, you wrote: Hmmm... "Sewcurity" - one of these days I'll even learn to spell :-). ztradermailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- -- View the TBUDL archi

Re: Sewcurity

2000-08-28 Thread Christian Dysthe
Hello ztrader, as soon as I have something worth protecting other than my trivial mail I will also want security over convenience. What I won't have is security forced on me. I mean, I have for instance disabled MS Scripting Host, so I do not necessarily need The Bat! to be "my Dad" and warn me

Re[2]: Sewcurity

2000-08-28 Thread ztrader
On Monday, August 28, 2000, 5:22:38 PM, you wrote: CD Hello ztrader, CD as soon as I have something worth protecting other than my trivial CD mail I will also want security over convenience. Some of us have things on the machine that we'd prefer stay there :-). It would not be convenient to

Re: Sewcurity

2000-08-28 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hi Christian, On Mon, 28 Aug 2000 19:22:38 -0500GMT (29/08/2000, 08:22 +0800GMT), Christian Dysthe wrote: CD as soon as I have something worth protecting other than my trivial CD mail I will also want security over convenience. What I won't have is CD security forced on me. I mean, I have for