Re: TB and spam filters

2006-06-19 Thread Andre Wichartz
Hello Marten, Sunday, June 18, 2006, 10:47:30 PM, you wrote: PopFile is the only fully-configurable and adjustable spam filtering system that works properly with TB Don't think this has to do with tb! but it is the only usable spam filter for me. Now if there just weren't these crashes... --

TB and spam filters

2006-06-18 Thread Marten Gallagher
I propoase the theory: PopFile is the only fully-configurable and adjustable spam filtering system that works properly with TB Discuss please... Background: I have now tried all the various options - having become concerned about PopFile producing endless Sql zero byte files in my temp folder

Re: TB and spam filters

2006-06-18 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Marten, On Sun, 18 Jun 2006 21:47:30 +0100GMT (18-6-2006, 22:47 , where I live), you wrote: MG PopFile is the only fully-configurable and adjustable spam filtering system MG that works properly with TB MG Discuss please... I don't agree with that. I'm using the spam filtering engine in

Re: TB and spam filters

2006-06-18 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello Marten Gallagher everyone else, on 18-Jun-2006 at 22:47 you (Marten Gallagher) wrote: PopFile is the only fully-configurable and adjustable spam filtering system that works properly with TB If your only goal is spam filtering, SpamPal and K9 work just as well and are lighter on the

Re[2]: TB and spam filters

2006-06-18 Thread Marten Gallagher
If your only goal is spam filtering, SpamPal and K9 work just as well and are lighter on the resources than PopFile (and much faster). OK have got K9 on the strength of that thought and I have to say I like the interface and the configurability of it... Thanks for the tip... -- Marten