Re[2]: firewall software and TB, was Re: blah!

2003-08-25 Thread Vishal
Hi Roelof Sunday, August 24, 2003, 5:49:34 PM, you wrote: RO> Yep, until the next time ZA's config got corrupted. Happened quite a RO> few times for me. Most of the time creating problems with other RO> programs than TB, since TB only connects local on my system. (Local RO> mailserver.) I see. I

Re: firewall software and TB, was Re: blah!

2003-08-24 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Vishal, On Sun, 24 Aug 2003 17:35:27 -0400GMT (24-8-03, 23:35 +0200, where I live), you wrote: RO>> The problems I had were easily solved by deleting the RO>> config and start ZA again and after a day or two all necessary RO>> programs had been entered again. V> Interesting. I'm using ZA an

Re[2]: firewall software and TB, was Re: blah!

2003-08-24 Thread Vishal
Hi Roelof Saturday, August 23, 2003, 8:30:35 PM, you wrote: RO> The problems I had were easily solved by deleting the RO> config and start ZA again and after a day or two all necessary RO> programs had been entered again. Interesting. I'm using ZA and having problems too, but I've learned to li

Re[2]: blah! (No need to post this)

2003-08-24 Thread Stan Robins
On Friday, August 22, 2003, at 9:43:45 PM, I received a message in which you wrote: (Text not relevant to my reply may have been snipped.) > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > Hi Stan, > @22-Aug-2003, 20:58 -0500 (02:58 UK time) Stan Robins [SR] in > mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said t

Re[2]: blah!

2003-08-24 Thread DG Raftery Sr.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Sunday, August 24, 2003 7:20:42 AM (GMT -05:00) RE: "blah!" Greetings io219, On Friday, August 22, 2003, 7:55:26 PM, you wrote: io219> Regardless, when I read that, I just sighed. I guess it's funny in a satanic io219> sorta

Re: firewall software and TB, was Re: blah!

2003-08-24 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo danger, On Sat, 23 Aug 2003 08:10:51 -0400GMT (23-8-03, 14:10 +0200, where I live), you wrote: dh> Excuse me but what problems does ZA have with The Bat? I am using ZA dh> here. ZA can cause problems for TB by disabling Internet access for TB. Most people experiencing ZA vs TB problems wer

Re: firewall software and TB, was Re: blah!

2003-08-23 Thread Allie Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Danger H, [DH] wrote: DH> Excuse me but what problems does ZA have with The Bat? I am using ZA DH> here. ZA is particularly notorious for cause connectivity problems with TB!. The reports are many and I had my own personal experience with it and ende

Re: firewall software and TB, was Re: blah!

2003-08-23 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Krister, @23-Aug-2003, 14:00 +0200 (13:00 UK time) Krister Ekstrom [KE] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck: MDP>> Any AV software or firewall software in use locally? KE> Please reply off-list if you feel this begins to drift off into KE> the

Re[2]: firewall software and TB, was Re: blah!

2003-08-23 Thread Bill Blinn Technology Editor
At 8:10 AM on 8/23/2003, danger h typed ... d> Excuse me but what problems does ZA have with The Bat? I am using ZA d> here. So am I, but I've occasionally seen a problem. TB will try to check mail and ZA will begin using 99.9% of system resources. Occasionally the ZA process can be killed, but o

Re: firewall software and TB, was Re: blah!

2003-08-23 Thread danger h
Hello Krister, -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Saturday, August 23, 2003, 8:00:22 AM, you wrote: KE> Please reply off-list if you feel this begins to drift off into the KE> OT-zone, but are there other firewall software besides ZA that is known KE> to cause problems with TB? KE>

firewall software and TB, was Re: blah!

2003-08-23 Thread Krister Ekstrom
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Marck, In a message with mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 22 Aug 2003 23:52:21 (my local time 23 aug 2003 00:52:21), you typed: MDP> Any AV software or firewall software in use MDP> locally? Please reply off-list if you feel this begins to drift off into

Re: blah!

2003-08-23 Thread Carsten Thönges
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > --> Friday, August 22, 2003, 5:27:42 PM, you wrote: >> * [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >> You are absolutely right, this should be fixed. But how? IIRC Rit >> had problems reproducing this bug. > You know of this problem? Yes. > You were somehow involved in attempting

Re: blah!

2003-08-23 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo io219, On Fri, 22 Aug 2003 14:53:42 -0500GMT (22-8-03, 21:53 +0200, where I live), you wrote: icn> 2) keyboard shortcuts are not being saved, wah! Did you per chance restore your TB-accounts from a CD-ROM archive after some when installing TB again? When the file shortcut.cfg has the read-

Re: blah!

2003-08-22 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Stan, @22-Aug-2003, 20:58 -0500 (02:58 UK time) Stan Robins [SR] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck: SR> No doubt asked and answered before, but could you give an SR> example of a macro that puts the link to the original message SR> into the r

Re[2]: blah!

2003-08-22 Thread Stan Robins
Mark: On Friday, August 22, 2003, at 3:43:38 PM, I received a message in which you wrote: (Text not relevant to my reply may have been snipped.) > @22-Aug-2003, 14:59 -0500 (20:59 UK time) [EMAIL PROTECTED] [I] in > mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: No doubt asked and answered before, but could you

Mod: (was: blah!)

2003-08-22 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Io219, @22-Aug-2003, 18:30 -0500 (00:30 UK time) [EMAIL PROTECTED] [I] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: >> I think an anonymous coward like you... I> ... f*** you too b***. Such flagrant flouting of the list rules has only one response. Bye-bye

Re: blah!

2003-08-22 Thread io219
--> Friday, August 22, 2003, 6:36:56 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I>>> No, one is my ISP, comcast, MDP>> Do they have any technical support that could give you a log of a MDP>> failed download session? > Hahahahaha! Excuse my laughing Marck, but Comcast, according to my US > friends, probably

Re[2]: blah!

2003-08-22 Thread Bill Blinn Technology Editor
At 7:30 PM on 8/22/2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed ... >> I think an anonymous coward like you, [EMAIL PROTECTED], should not >> try to classify anyone as a »sucking« one. Next time you try flaming >> please make sure that you filled in your real name into the >> appropriate field of your mail progr

Re: blah!

2003-08-22 Thread Greg Strong
Hello Carsten, >> I am sick and tired of having to kill the TB process. This has >> happened in most/all versions I have ever used and I reported it many >> times. Oddly, the support personnel I have always been in contact >> with suck. > I think an anonymous coward like you, [EMAIL PROTECTED], s

Re: blah!

2003-08-22 Thread malexander
Hello Marck, Friday, August 22, 2003, 11:52:21 PM, you wrote: I>> No, one is my ISP, comcast, MDP> Do they have any technical support that could give you a log of a MDP> failed download session? Hahahahaha! Excuse my laughing Marck, but Comcast, according to my US friends, probably can't even

Re: blah!

2003-08-22 Thread io219
--> Friday, August 22, 2003, 5:27:42 PM, you wrote: > * [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >> I am sick and tired of having to kill the TB process. This has happened in >> most/all versions I have ever used and I reported it many times. Oddly, the >> support personnel I have always been in contact with s

Re: blah!

2003-08-22 Thread io219
--> Friday, August 22, 2003, 5:52:21 PM, you wrote: > Do they have any technical support that could give you a log of a > failed download session? I don't even know if it is failing. The Bat! does, and others have experience the same. What should I do which does not involve any of my ISP's next

Re: blah!

2003-08-22 Thread io219
--> Friday, August 22, 2003, 5:21:19 PM, you wrote: > On August 22, 5:12 pm you wrote: >>> No, just courteous. TB is able to trace the original message in a >>> folder by clicking on that link. >> >> Guess I'll have to upgrade to 2.0, but it's still strangely distracting. > You shouldn't need

Re: blah!

2003-08-22 Thread Carsten Thönges
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > I am sick and tired of having to kill the TB process. This has happened in > most/all versions I have ever used and I reported it many times. Oddly, the > support personnel I have always been in contact with suck. I think an anonymous coward like you, [EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: blah!

2003-08-22 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Io219, @22-Aug-2003, 17:12 -0500 (23:12 UK time) [EMAIL PROTECTED] [I] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: >> No, just courteous. TB is able to trace the original message in a folder >> by clicking on that link. I> Guess I'll have to upgrade to 2.0, b

Re: blah!

2003-08-22 Thread Jonathan Angliss
On August 22, 5:12 pm you wrote: >> No, just courteous. TB is able to trace the original message in a >> folder by clicking on that link. > > Guess I'll have to upgrade to 2.0, but it's still strangely distracting. You shouldn't need 2.0 to get that feature... it's been in there for a while. J

Re: blah!

2003-08-22 Thread io219
--> Friday, August 22, 2003, 4:40:01 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > No, just courteous. TB is able to trace the original message in a folder > by clicking on that link. Guess I'll have to upgrade to 2.0, but it's still strangely distracting. > Are these your own mail servers? Do you have access

Re: blah!

2003-08-22 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Io219, @22-Aug-2003, 15:55 -0500 (21:55 UK time) [EMAIL PROTECTED] [I] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: >> @22-Aug-2003, 14:59 -0500 (20:59 UK time) [EMAIL PROTECTED] [I] in >> mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: I> ^- bored? No, just courteo

Re: blah!

2003-08-22 Thread io219
--> Friday, August 22, 2003, 3:43:38 PM, you wrote: > @22-Aug-2003, 14:59 -0500 (20:59 UK time) [EMAIL PROTECTED] [I] in > mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: ^- bored? >>> I am sick and tired of having to kill the TB process. This has >>> happened in most/all versions I have ever used and

Re: blah!

2003-08-22 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Io219, @22-Aug-2003, 14:59 -0500 (20:59 UK time) [EMAIL PROTECTED] [I] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: >> I am sick and tired of having to kill the TB process. This has >> happened in most/all versions I have ever used and I reported it >> many tim

Re: blah!

2003-08-22 Thread MikeD (3)
Hello Tomi, Friday, August 22, 2003, 2:53:42 PM, you wrote: icn> I am sick and tired of having to kill the TB process. This has happened in icn> most/all versions I have ever used and I reported it many times. Oddly, the icn> support personnel I have always been in contact with suck. I used to h

Re: blah!

2003-08-22 Thread io219
--> Friday, August 22, 2003, 2:53:42 PM, you wrote: > I am sick and tired of having to kill the TB process. This has happened in > most/all versions I have ever used and I reported it many times. Oddly, the > support personnel I have always been in contact with suck. One more thing, killing the

blah!

2003-08-22 Thread io219
I am sick and tired of having to kill the TB process. This has happened in most/all versions I have ever used and I reported it many times. Oddly, the support personnel I have always been in contact with suck. They told me to turn off folder compression, so I did, and it had no effect, but damn I