Hi Krister,
On Thu, 21 Sep 2000 16:10:09 +0200GMT (21/09/2000, 22:10 +0800GMT),
Krister Ekstrom wrote:
KE Hmm... Not quite sure i understood that... and why does my editor act
KE up on me? Here, this message looks awfully strange...
This is indeed weired; I haven't seen it before. Wild guess:
On 22-09-2000, 02:02:53 +0200, Karin Spaink wrote:
IMHO this type of address based filtering can be accomplished in an
easier and more convenient way by using the Address Book as a filter
source.
That's quite a pearl. Thank you! Not because I want to filter out
spam this way - addresses change
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi!
on Wednesday, September 20, 2000 22:28:50, our bat friend ztrader typed:
z I'm not sure I understand why you are objecting to having an option
z that would not affect you in any way, unless you choose to use it.
But i'm not objecting to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Karin,
On Wednesday, September 20, 2000, Karin Spaink wrote:
After reading this I was wondering:
to just add the latest intruder to the existing spam filter?
KS Yes, by adding it's characteristic trait in the filter,
KS using the
On 21-09-2000 at 19:14, Marcel kindly wrote:
On Wednesday, September 20, 2000, Karin Spaink wrote:
to just add the latest intruder to the existing spam filter?
KS by adding its characteristic trait in the filter,
KS using the "Alternatives"tab (I just learnt this myself). It
KS adds rules,
On Thursday, September 21, 2000, 2:11:15 PM, you wrote:
KS I'm not so sure that it's a good idea to add a rule for each and
KS every spam address: there are simply to many addresses from which
True - I currently have a filtering list of 3081 addresses, and it
still misses some :-).
ztrader
--
On 22-09-2000 at 01:34, Arjan de Groot kindly wrote:
On 21-09-2000, 23:11:15 +0200, Karin Spaink wrote:
But the trick is simple. Imagine that you have a filter that sends
incoming mail straight to trash, based on an address (e.g. you want
to send all my mail right to the bin), here's how
Hello ztrader,
Wednesday, September 20, 2000, 7:23:35 AM, you wrote:
z I don't believe it is reasonable to expect this level of
z performance with the simple filtering in TB.
z But, when TB allows external filter scripts... can't wait :-).
Let's hope they will never come, or if they
Hello A,
Wednesday, September 20, 2000, 4:47:55 AM, you wrote:
ACM Just out of interest, how are you going about creating the spam filter
ACM rules? To what string are you filtering to because spam artists rarely
ACM ever send spam using the same name or from address. Creating filters to
ACM
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 20 Sep 00, at 13:12, Krister Ekstrom wrote:
Let's hope they will never come, or if they do, that it's so
simplistic that even a total idiot when it comes to programming in any
shape or form like me can use it. heck i can't
On 20-09-2000 at 04:03, Januk Aggarwal kindly wrote:
Karin Spaink typed:
Yes, do check it on other filters as well. Having it
unchecked means that once this particular filter has been
invoked, TB stops filtering -- while you a\want it to go on
to the next mail and the next filter.
I think
On Wednesday, September 20, 2000, 4:12:35 AM, you wrote:
z But, when TB allows external filter scripts... can't wait :-).
KE Let's hope they will never come, or if they do, that it's so
KE simplistic that even a total idiot when it comes to programming in any
KE shape or form like
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 20 Sep 2000 12:49:49 +0200, Krister Ekstrom wrote:
KE If i might go in here, one way to do it is to make a rule based on
KE the incoming message which is considered as spam and uncheck the
KE sender and recipient boxes and check the subject
Hello ztrader,
Wednesday, September 20, 2000, 4:57:58 PM, you wrote:
z But, consider another possibility - suppose scripts were available.
z This list would be a perfect place to cooperatively develop some VERY
z effective spam filtering scripts - people could do parts and add them,
z
On Wednesday, September 20, 2000, 9:54:42 AM, you wrote:
z But, consider another possibility - suppose scripts were
z available. This list would be a perfect place to cooperatively
z develop some VERY effective spam filtering scripts - people could
z do parts and add them, updates could be done
Hello Krister Ekstrom,
On Wed, 20 Sep 2000 13:12:35 +0200 GMT your local time,
which was Wednesday, September 20, 2000, 6:12:35 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Krister Ekstrom wrote:
Hello ztrader,
Wednesday, September 20, 2000, 7:23:35 AM, you wrote:
z I don't believe it is reasonable to
First question in what has become an email Jihad.
I can't seem to figure out how the filters work in TB. So-far I
haven't been able to direct any email to any folder reliably. I
switched from Agent to Eudora and had the same problem with Eudora
4.32 as here.NOTHING seems to
On Tuesday, September 19, 2000, 2:54:42 PM, jbelk wrote:
I want ALL mail that does NOT have my address in the To: or CC:
fields to be filed in trash.
Destination folder (Move messages to): Trash
String LocationPresence
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Recipient No
If you
On 19-09-2000 at 23:54, jbelk kindly wrote:
First question in what has become an email Jihad.
I plead guilty ;-)
I want ALL mail that does NOT have my address in the To: or CC: fields
to be filed in trash. I want email with TBUDL in the Subject line to
go to the TBUDL folder.
Take great
Hey Karin,
Tuesday, September 19, 2000, 4:30:54 PM, you wrote:
Karin If you'd have the third filter as number one, _everything_
Karin that is not strict;y addressed to you will immediatel go to
Karin Trash, and that you certainly don't want.
Judging by what I usually receive it wouldn't be a
On 20-09-2000 at 02:38, jbelk kindly wrote:
Hey Karin,
Karin If you'd have the third filter as number one, _everything_
Karin that is not strictly addressed to you will immediately go to
Karin Trash, and that you certainly don't want.
Judging by what I usually receive it wouldn't be a lick
Hello Karin,
On Tuesday, September 19, 2000 at 03:17:16 GMT +0200 (which was 6:17 PM
where I live) witnesses say Karin Spaink typed:
Yes, do check it on other filters as well. Having it
unchecked means that once this particular filter has been
invoked, TB stops filtering -- while you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 19 Sep 2000 18:38:21 -0600, jbelk wrote:
Karin Go to the Options tab and tick Continue Processing With Other
Karin Folders.
I personally have never had reason to use this option.
j First, I've heard of this. It seems to not be the default
Thank you Januk,
I'm a good bit more confused now than I was when I was really lost.
I think I understand that this program is WY more than I need to
write email and send a picture or text file every now and then.
I explain technical nuances of fairly complicated mechanical devices
to
Thanks Curtis,
I'm going to study this some more. After having to use this weird
text editor I'm not at all sure I'll stay with this program. I've
never seen anything so clumsy to write with...and I mean that
literally. I read the threads on this board concerning the
On Tuesday, September 19, 2000, 8:28:29 PM, you wrote:
j That's all I want to do. Sort through the mail just exactly like I
j do it with snail mail.
It sounds easy, and humans do it with little apparent effort, but it
is actually a complex problem. You want to do what I, and many others,
want
26 matches
Mail list logo
