Hi
On Thursday 8 July 2010 at 8:39:37 PM, in
, Melissa Reese wrote:
> Perhaps I should start a new, more specific thread for
> this,
The TBUDL list rules say you should. It's also more likely to be seen
and answered, since TB! is a threading mail client.
> I receive a PGP/
On Sat, 12 Jan 2008 at 03:57:33 +0100, Henk wrote:
>> I get an invalid signature and an unknown signature format here.
>
> Something went wrong, but I think I have found the solution?
No, I get the same result. However I was using the internal support
(RFC-1991). When I searched out my copy of PGP
On Sat, 12 Jan 2008, at 10:07:21 [GMT +1100] (which was 0:07 where I
live) Robin Anson wrote:
Robin,
> On Fri, 11 Jan 2008 at 09:04:12 +0100, Henk wrote:
>> testing pgp/mime
> I get an invalid signature and an unknown signature format here.
Something went wrong, but I think I ha
Henk
On Fri, 11 Jan 2008 at 09:04:12 +0100, Henk wrote:
> testing pgp/mime
I get an invalid signature and an unknown signature format here.
--
Robin
Using The Bat! v3.99.25
Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
Popfile v0.2
On Fri, 11 Jan 2008, at 12:25:45 [GMT +0100] (which was 12:25 where I
live) Roelof Otten wrote:
Hallo Roelof,
> On Fri, 11 Jan 2008 09:04:12 +0100GMT (11-1-2008, 9:04 +0100, where I
> live), you wrote:
HMD>> testing pgp/mime
>
> As you're testing something with an al
Hi Henk M. de Bruijn,
On Fri, 11 Jan 2008 09:04:12 +0100
"Henk M. de Bruijn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello TBUDL,
>
> testing pgp/mime
>
gpg: armor header: Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Msys/MingW32) - GPGrelay v0.959
gpg: Signature made 01/11/08 08:04:14 using RS
Hallo Henk,
On Fri, 11 Jan 2008 09:04:12 +0100GMT (11-1-2008, 9:04 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
HMD> testing pgp/mime
As you're testing something with an alpha, you might consider doing
that on tbbeta...
--
Groetjes, Roelof
Atari computers make great boat anch
Hallo Henk,
On Fri, 11 Jan 2008 09:20:52 +0100GMT (11-1-2008, 9:20 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
HMD> Both working now?
Yep.
--
Groetjes, Roelof
What garlic is to salad, insanity is to art.
http://www.voormijalleen.nl/
The Bat! 4.0.0.9 (ALPHA)
Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
3 pop
On Fri, 11 Jan 2008, at 09:12:22 [GMT +0100] (which was 9:12 where I
live) Henk M. de Bruijn wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Jan 2008, at 09:04:12 [GMT +0100] (which was 9:04 where I
> live) Henk M. de Bruijn wrote:
>> testing pgp/mime
> sig delimiter not working :-(
Both working
On Fri, 11 Jan 2008, at 09:04:12 [GMT +0100] (which was 9:04 where I
live) Henk M. de Bruijn wrote:
> testing pgp/mime
> --
> Henk M. de Bruijn
> __
> The Bat! E-Mail System version 3.99.29 Pro on Windows XP SP2
&
Hello TBUDL,
testing pgp/mime
--
Henk M. de Bruijn
__
The Bat! E-Mail System version 3.99.29 Pro on Windows XP SP2
AntispamSniper for the Bat! 2.7.1.5
Thawte notary, CAcert assurer, GSWoT introducer
Gossamer Spider Web of Trust
HdB>> my keyring to sign messages without using gpgshell.
DC> I'm not seeing that problem in 1.4.0a either, just the sig delimiter
DC> thing. How'd you get around the UTF-8 to CP0 problem on stock
DC> unpatched gnupg 1.4.x though? I had to use the patched on to get that
Hello Anthony G. Atkielski & everyone else
18-Okt-2004 05:56, you wrote:
> Are there any other widely used clients (other than TB itself) that
> support PGP/MIME well?
Mutt is probably very common in the Linux/BSD world, it supports PGP/MIME.
--
Best regards,
Alexa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Anthony G. Atkielski @ 2004-Oct-17 11:56:38 PM
"How many e-mail clients use PGP/MIME?" <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Are there any other widely used clients (other than TB itself) that
> support PGP/MIME well?
Outlook 2003 doe
I rather like the idea of being able to sign messages with PGP in a
realtively transparent way using PGP/MIME, which TB 3.x supports very
nicely, but I'm wondering how well other e-mail clients support it. In
order to use it with any regularly (such as in templates), a fairly
large number
Michael L. Wilson @ 2004-Sep-8 2:26:05 PM
"pgp/mime test" <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Let's see if it works with my new key
It does. If you are going to use this new key, you should revoke the
old one.
--
Chris
Quoting when replying to this message is good for your karma.
Hello Michael,
Wednesday, September 8, 2004, 3:47:30 PM, you wrote:
PC>> nice, you can also add lines to a template, maybe something like this:
PC>> %CLEARSIGN
PC>> %SIGNCOMPLETE
PC>> %NORCPTCONFIRM
PC>> %NOUSESMIME
MLW> I'm testing this QT that I named "sign", so let's see
pgp verified just f
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Paul,
On Wed, 8 Sep 2004, Paul mused about "pgp/mime test" (at least in
part):
PC> Hello Michael,
MLW>> Let's see if it works with my new key
PC> nice, you can also add lines to a template, maybe something l
Hello Michael,
MLW> Let's see if it works with my new key
nice, you can also add lines to a template, maybe something like this:
%CLEARSIGN
%SIGNCOMPLETE
%NORCPTCONFIRM
%NOUSESMIME
--
Best regards,
Paul
Current ve
Hi Michael and list,
On Wednesday, September 8, 2004 at 11:26:05 GMT -0700 (which was 20:26
where I live) Michael L. Wilson wrote (at least in parts) and made
these valuable points on the subject of "pgp/mime test":
> Hi,
> Let's see if it works with my new key
Works ok!
Hi,
Let's see if it works with my new key
--
Michael L. Wilson, MBA
Ecclesiastic Philosopher
Critic
Teacher
:einsteinyoyo:
==
Using The Bat! 3.0.0.8
Windows XP 5.1 (2600-Service Pack 2)
Ponder this: Laugh alone and the world thinks you're an
On 29 липня 2004 р., 17:04:25, Kevin Coates wrote:
KC> error message above. I can't even recall the last time I experienced
KC> any problems with this combination of software.
- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(reason: 553 sorry, your envelo
Hello Robert Golovniov,
28-Jul-2004 13:29, you wrote:
> gpg: can't open `C:\Program Files\The Bat!\batD3F2.tmp'
> gpg: decrypt_message failed: file open error
> If I switch to PGP 8.1, pressing the button does nothing at all.
Hmmm. I'm using neither GPG nor PGP8.1 - I'm on PGP 8.0.3 and it just
On 29 липня 2004 р., 17:04:25, Kevin Coates wrote:
KC> I'm sorry Robert, but I missed most of this thread. I have been using
KC> GPGrelay with The Bat! for quite some time and have never seen the
KC> error message above. I can't even recall the last time I experienced
KC> any problems with this co
en error
RG> I am wondering whether this behavior is the result of using
RG> GPGrelay. Anyone has experience with GPGrelay-The Bat!-PGP/MIME?
I'm sorry Robert, but I missed most of this thread. I have been using
GPGrelay with The Bat! for quite some time and have never seen the
error
Thursday, July 29, 2004, 6:20:12 AM, Robert wrote:
P>> This message produces a bad signature.
Robert> So, this is because of the Cyrillic characters in the date. And what
Robert> is the regex to automatically use the English date instead of
Robert> Ukrainian? (This one should have bad s
cause for this message I had The Bat! + GnuPG do the signing,
> and it used PGP/MIME. Let's try to repeat the trick.
gpg: Signature made 07/29/04 14:05:03 using DSA key ID 633F6D07
gpg: Good signature from "Robert Golovniov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
gpg: aka
is message I had The Bat! + GnuPG do the signing,
and it used PGP/MIME. Let's try to repeat the trick.
--
Warm regards,
:Robert_Golovniov:
The Bat! v2.12.00
Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195
Service Pack 4
pgpj8ak6bUWZy.pgp
Description: PGP signature
__
Hi Robert,
on Thursday, July 29, 2004 at 12:20 you wrote in message
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
among others:
> So, this is because of the Cyrillic characters in the date. And what
> is the regex to automatically use the English date instead of
> Ukrainian? (This one should have bad sig also
On 28 липня 2004 р., 17:43:30, Plan9 wrote:
P> This message produces a bad signature.
So, this is because of the Cyrillic characters in the date. And what
is the regex to automatically use the English date instead of
Ukrainian? (This one should have bad sig also, I assume...)
--
Warm
; gpg: can't open `C:\Program Files\The Bat!\batD3F2.tmp'
RG> gpg: decrypt_message failed: file open error
I am wondering whether this behavior is the result of using GPGrelay.
Anyone has experience with GPGrelay-The Bat!-PGP/MIME?
- --
Warm regards,
:Robert_Golovniov:
The Bat!
the
>>> message?
>> %PGPMIME sets the PGP/MIME option to "on" for the current message to
>> ensure that the PGJP/MIME format is used when the message is signed OR
>> encrypted. Obviously, if you want to use PGP/MIME, you want to sign your
>> messages. Yes?
Hi Alexander,
on Wed, 28 Jul 2004 17:56:22 +0200GMT, you wrote:
ASK> Not everyone whom I exchange mails with privately has and/or uses PGP.
ASK> For those that are not using it, I don't want to be bothered by requesters
ASK> that tell me no key can be found (thats why I was asking if %PGPMIME
AS
Hello Kevin Amazon,
28-Jul-2004 17:43, you wrote:
>> I always thought that this would automatically sign and/or crypt the
>> message?
> %PGPMIME sets the PGP/MIME option to "on" for the current message to
> ensure that the PGJP/MIME format is used when the mess
Hi Alexander S. Kunz
-
On Wed, 28 Jul 2004, at 17:32:20 [GMT +0200] (which was 8:32 AM where
I live) you wrote:
> I always thought that this would automatically sign and/or crypt the
> message?
%PGPMIME sets the PGP/MIME option to "on"
Hello Kevin Amazon,
28-Jul-2004 16:27, you wrote:
>> My constant annoyance is that apparently there's no way to tell TB to
>> ALWAYS use PGP/MIME (the switch defaults to "auto" but I want it "on").
> You could put %pgpmime in your templates.
I always th
Wednesday, July 28, 2004, 10:17:47 AM, Robert wrote:
Robert> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Robert> Hash: SHA1
Robert> On July 28, 2004, 15:55:57, Plan9 wrote:
P>> Robert, when I look at my PGPLog file, under the "Signed" column it
P>> says that your key has a bad signature.
Robert> You ar
Wednesday, July 28, 2004, 10:17:07 AM, Robert wrote:
Robert> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Robert> Hash: SHA1
Robert> On 28 eeiiy 2004 ?., 15:55:57, Plan9 wrote:
P>> Robert, when I look at my PGPLog file, under the "Signed" column it
P>> says that your key has a bad signature.
Robert> You
Hi Alexander S. Kunz
-
On Wed, 28 Jul 2004, at 12:39:58 [GMT +0200] (which was 3:39 AM where
I live) you wrote:
> My constant annoyance is that apparently there's no way to tell TB to
> ALWAYS use PGP/MIME (the switch defaults to "aut
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 28 eeiiy 2004 ?., 15:55:57, Plan9 wrote:
P> Robert, when I look at my PGPLog file, under the "Signed" column it
P> says that your key has a bad signature.
You are right. Perhaps that is because of the encoding problems. As I
type this message,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On July 28, 2004, 15:55:57, Plan9 wrote:
P> Robert, when I look at my PGPLog file, under the "Signed" column it
P> says that your key has a bad signature.
You are right. Perhaps that is because of the encoding problems. As I
type this message, I
Wednesday, July 28, 2004, 7:29:09 AM, Robert wrote:
ASK>> What is your problem with it?
Robert> When I get such a message, I press the encryption button in the right
Robert> corner and get the dialog box asking me to enter the passphrase. I do
Robert> and get something like this:
Robert> gpg:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 28 eeiiy 2004 ?., 13:39:58, Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
ASK> What is your problem with it?
When I get such a message, I press the encryption button in the right
corner and get the dialog box asking me to enter the passphrase. I do
and get something
Hi Robert,
on Wed, 28 Jul 2004 12:13:09 +0300GMT, you wrote:
RG> Can anybody share with me his success story of reading PGP/MIME
RG> signed and encrypted messages?
It works the same as inline encrypted messages, provided both
correspondents use PGP/MIME capable clients. I'll
Hi Alexander,
on Wed, 28 Jul 2004 12:39:58 +0200GMT, you wrote:
ASK> My constant annoyance is that apparently there's no way to tell TB to
ASK> ALWAYS use PGP/MIME (the switch defaults to "auto" but I want it "on").
For this you can use the macro %USEPGP in yo
Hello Robert Golovniov,
28-Jul-2004 11:13, you wrote:
> Can anybody share with me his success story of reading PGP/MIME signed
> and encrypted messages?
What is your problem with it?
My constant annoyance is that apparently there's no way to tell TB to
ALWAYS use PGP/MIME (the swit
Hello!
Can anybody share with me his success story of reading PGP/MIME
signed and encrypted messages?
--
Warm regards,
:Robert_Golovniov:
The Bat! v2.12.00
Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195
Service Pack 4
Current version is 2.12.00 | '
Hello Bobi,
Saturday, June 12, 2004, 2:30:25 AM, you wrote:
Charles>> I use PGP 8.0. Which options should I select? I can select options from
Charles>> within TB, and once again from within the PGP popup.
BJ> When you compose your mail, enable Privacy->Enable OpenPGP while disable
Privacy->>Enab
Hello Charles,
On Friday, June 11, 2004, at 02:26:09[GMT [EMAIL PROTECTED] (which was 17:26
where I live) Charles wrote:
Charles> I use PGP 8.0. Which options should I select? I can select options from
Charles> within TB, and once again from within the PGP popup.
When you compose your mail, enabl
Hello Martin,
Saturday, June 12, 2004, 12:35:33 AM, you wrote:
MW> On 11 June 2004, 15:04 +0200 (14:04 local time) Charles M. Gerungan
MW> [CMG] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
CMG>> I'm trying to get the PGP signature as an attachment, but how do I do
CMG>> that? When I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Charles,
On 11 June 2004, 15:04 +0200 (14:04 local time) Charles M. Gerungan
[CMG] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
CMG> I'm trying to get the PGP signature as an attachment, but how do I do
CMG> that? When I select PGP/MIME TheBa
I'm trying to get the PGP signature as an attachment, but how do I do
that? When I select PGP/MIME TheBat! tells me that there is no
certificate.
--
Regards, Charles.
Current version is 2.11.02 | 'Using TBUDL' in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi B,
on Thu, 22 Apr 2004 15:03:58 -0400GMT, you wrote:
BRiaNS> Every time i make a new message, i check the tab "Privacy" and see
BRiaNS> PGP/MIME and is checked in "auto" , by default.
BRiaNS> how i disable that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thursday, April 22, 2004 2:54 PM
How i disable PGP-MIME?
Every time i make a new message, i check the tab "Privacy" and see
PGP/MIME and is checked in "auto" , by default.
how i disable that thing?
greeting
Hi Darrin,
@1-Nov-2003, 20:08 -0800 (02-Nov 04:08 UK time) Darrin [D] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
D> ... please explain to me the difference between S/MIME and
D> PGP/MIME?
S/MIME uses x509 cryptography standards which are only ever MIME
encoded. Message signatures are added as attac
Saturday, November 01, 2003
8:07:10 PM
Hi,
I know this was talked about before, but can someone please explain to
me the difference between S/MIME and PGP/MIME?
Thanks
--
Darrin
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Current version is
h :) Nonetheless, TB!
could handle these problems more gracefully than it does. I was surprised
that access violation boxes appeared simply because the PGP/MIME message
couldn't be sent. And then a complete hang requiring a CTRL+ALT+DEL to kill
TB! via Task Manager. Bit extreme.
Tha
4
encoding correctly. Try switching to QP encoding for 8 bit character
handling in account properties. It may work better.
> Nonetheless,PGP/MIME doesn't seem to be working as it should, does
> it?
Works perfectly here and always has. In fact, I use it on this list
all the time. But then I
Hello Lourdes,
On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 03:10:40 -0500 your time, you said:
LJ> ...Have you tried using the built in support for PGP 5,6,7,8 rather than
LJ> the external plugin?
Yes, I did try using the built in support as well, but ecountered the same
problems unfortunately.
--
Slán,
Simon @ i
Hello Simon,
Wednesday, October 22, 2003, 2:53:23 AM, you wrote:
> When signing messages with PGP 6.58ckt (external plugin) in The Bat!
> Ver.2.01.3 the messages get stuck in the outbox and TB! then generates lots
> of errors. The errors seem to occur only when PGP/MIME i
Hello TBUDL,
When signing messages with PGP 6.58ckt (external plugin) in The Bat!
Ver.2.01.3 the messages get stuck in the outbox and TB! then generates lots
of errors. The errors seem to occur only when PGP/MIME is on auto, which it
defaults to. To change this behaviour you have
Hi Melissa,
on Mon, 20 Oct 2003 23:25:41 -0700GMT (21.10.03, 08:25 +0200GMT here),
you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
MR> I seem to be able to sign messages using PGP/MIME (we'll see if this
MR> message turns out okay in that regard), but I seem quite unable to
MR> encrypt any
Hello Melissa,
Tuesday, October 21, 2003, 2:25:41 AM, you wrote:
> I seem to be able to sign messages using PGP/MIME (we'll see if this
> message turns out okay in that regard),
Signature is fine here!
> but I seem quite unable to
> encrypt any message using PGP/MIME. When I
Hello Andrew!
On Thursday, September 25, 2003, 1:55 AM, you wrote:
MB>> ... I get a double-spaced post on TBOT. ...
A> Yes, I had the same problem also. I used the following "%NOPGPMime"
A> in my Yahoo list templates, which solved the problem - I still sign
A> messages but the messages d
Hello Mary,
Wednesday, September 24, 2003, 9:07:32 PM, you wrote:
MB> When I don't do both of these things, I get a double-spaced post on
MB> TBOT. I know, it is an old Yahoo! problem, and PGP/Mime may not always
MB> be the cause. But it seems to be, in my case. No post of mi
IGNCOMPLETE%-
MDP> Hold it - either %NOUSEPGP or %NOSIGNCOMPLETE is enough.
MDP> %NOPGPMIME is only of use to programmatically turn off PGP/MIME when
MDP> using PGP or signing with it. By signalling no signing or no PGP,
MDP> it's redundant to turn off PGP/MIME too.
MDP> Maybe
Hello Martin!
On Wednesday, September 24, 2003, 3:47 PM, you wrote:
MB>> Is there an expression like %NOUSEPGP that I can put into the address
MB>> book for TBOT such that I won't have to turn PGP/Mime off in the
MB>> Privacy menu of the Edit Mail Message window and,
%NOPGPMIME is only of use to programmatically turn off PGP/MIME when
using PGP or signing with it. By signalling no signing or no PGP,
it's redundant to turn off PGP/MIME too.
Maybe a tad pedantic, but helps to clarify the logic.
--
Cheers -- .\\arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator
TB! v
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Mary,
On 24 September 2003, 15:07 -0500 (21:07 local time) Mary Bull [MB] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
MB> Is there an expression like %NOUSEPGP that I can put into the address
MB> book for TBOT such that I won't have to turn P
Hello Everyone!
Is there an expression like %NOUSEPGP that I can put into the address
book for TBOT such that I won't have to turn PGP/Mime off in the
Privacy menu of the Edit Mail Message window and, in addition, uncheck
the boxes related to PGP in Account/Properties/Options?
When I don
Deborah W, [DW] wrote:
DW> What does the option in Account Properties - Options do then? Or is
DW> it different in v2?
Those are the options to enable S/MIME, OpenPGP and sign/encrypt when
complete options. Those options have nothing to do with PGP/MIME
specifically.
--
-= allie_M =-
On Sunday, September 21, 2003, 10:30:37 AM, Allie Martin wrote:
AM> No, there isn't.
AM> TB! is stuck in auto-PGP/MIME mode.
What does the option in Account Properties - Options do then? Or is it
different in v2?
--
Deborah
Current
Andrew Hodgson, [AH] wrote:
MDP>> Use the %NOPGPMIME macro in your template for those lists.
AH> Thanks, is there any way to disable it globally?
No, there isn't.
TB! is stuck in auto-PGP/MIME mode.
--
-= allie_M =- | List Moderator
PGPKeys: http://www.ac-martin.co
Hello Marck,
Sunday, September 21, 2003, 3:13:35 PM, you wrote:
MDP> Hi Andrew,
MDP> @21-Sep-2003, 15:02 Andrew Hodgson [AH] in
MDP> mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
AH>> I need to disable PGP mime support in v 2.00.6 as some mailing
AH>> lists are removing the PGP
Hi Andrew,
@21-Sep-2003, 15:02 Andrew Hodgson [AH] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
AH> I need to disable PGP mime support in v 2.00.6 as some mailing
AH> lists are removing the PGP parts of the message (i.e,
AH> Yahoogroups not allowing attachments on some lists). I
Hello tbudl list,
I need to disable PGP mime support in v 2.00.6 as some mailing lists
are removing the PGP parts of the message (i.e, Yahoogroups not
allowing attachments on some lists). Is this possible?
Thanks,
Andrew.
--
Best regards,
Andrew Hodgson, Bromyard, Herefordshire
Thanks Marck,
MDP> Use %NOPGPMIME in your template.
That worked fine. I hoped there would be something like that, and
poked around in the help for it. Anyway, thanks again.
K>> very well be a PGP / Gnupg issue rather than a TB2 problem, but
K>> it did work perfectly before I upgraded to TB2.
MD
Hi Kittyboy,
@6-Sep-2003, 22:46 -0400 (03:46 UK time) Kittyboy [K] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
K> I'd like to be able to clear sign with GnupG (Nullify v1.2.2-nr2)
K> as before, the way I did with 1.6x. Has anyone figured out a way
K> to prevent TB2 from attaching the signature as a binary
K>
I'd like to be able to clear sign with GnupG (Nullify v1.2.2-nr2) as
before, the way I did with 1.6x. Has anyone figured out a way to
prevent TB2 from attaching the signature as a binary attachment? It
works well, but if I send to a Netscape mail user, Netscape strips
away the attachment completely
port list and we are supporting v2. Besides, they're a lot tidier
than non-MIME signatures.
Oh yes, and you can set PGP-Mime options manually in the Privacy
menu of the editor.
--
Cheers -- .\\arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator
TB! v2.00 on Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 1
pgp0
Hello Paul,
Wednesday, September 3, 2003, 2:04:43 PM, you wrote:
PH> I'm clueless as to how I enable PGP-MIME signatures. Googling
PH> didn't help nor could I find in the TBUDL archives. Is it possible
PH> with GnuGP?
I do this in each of my "moderated" replie
Hello Peter,
Wednesday, September 3, 2003, 9:22:01 PM, you wrote:
PM> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
PM> Hash: SHA1
PM> Hi Paul,
PM> on Wed, 3 Sep 2003 21:04:43 +0100GMT (03.09.03, 22:04 +0200GMT here),
PM> you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
PH>> I'm clueless a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Paul,
on Wed, 3 Sep 2003 21:04:43 +0100GMT (03.09.03, 22:04 +0200GMT here),
you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
PH> I'm clueless as to how I enable PGP-MIME signatures. Googling didn't help nor
PH> could I find in the TBUDL
I'm clueless as to how I enable PGP-MIME signatures. Googling didn't help nor
could I find in the TBUDL archives. Is it possible with GnuGP?
Paul
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Current version is 2.00 | "Using TBUDL&quo
Hello Eddie!
On Wednesday, December 4, 2002 at 7:47:17 PM you wrote:
> Thanks Dierk. Do you know if it in the pipe for v2?
Not sure. It is high on the wish list, though.
--
Dierk Haasis
The Bat 1.62/Beta16 on Windows XP 5.1 2600Service Pack 1
In politics, stupidity is not a handicap. (Napo
Hello Eddie!
On Wednesday, December 4, 2002 at 2:19:23 PM you wrote:
>- is this normal?
Yes, that's actually the point of MIME.
> - what is PGP/MIME?
A standard used by some mailers (i.e. Eudora) to sign and encrypt a
message (and its attachments), and then not showing it in
Hello Damian,
On Wednesday, July 10, 2002 at 10:45:05 -0400, you wrote concerning
'PGP/MIME':
...
I got a bad signature from your PGP-signed message:
***[11/07/02 1:32:54] PGP Signature Status: bad
***[11/07/02 1:32:54] Hash: RIPEMD160
***[11/07/02 1:32:54] Signer: Damian Ger
Spake Dierk Haasis on 7/10/2002, at 19:17:07 +0200:
> Sorry, you are mixing something up. PGP and OpenPGP do (more or less)
> exactly the same. PGP/MIME is a standard for sending messages and
> attachments decrypted.
Ummm... yep, that' exactly what I'm asking about. As far
Hello Damian!
On Wednesday, July 10, 2002 at 4:45:05 PM you wrote:
> The main difference I see between OpenPGP and PGP/MIME is that the PGP
> signatures are attached as .ATT attachments, and the following is specified
> in the headers:
Sorry, you are mixing something up. PGP and O
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Some time ago, I asked about a standard as having PGP signatures be sent as
an attachment. Well, I finally found out what I was talking about --
PGP/MIME.
The main difference I see between OpenPGP and PGP/MIME is that the PGP
signatures are
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On November 2, 2000, at 3:15:23 AM, Marek Mikus Wrote:
MM> Max working now on S/MIME options and SSL encryption. He told me, then
MM> will be possible to implement PGP/MIME. But I don't know when, because
MM> Max want to implement
Hi there Marek,
Going back 13:12 02.11.2000. when you uttered the following thoughts:
> Not yet, wait. We have too many wishes, too many requests and 2
> programmers only. :-))
;)) Allright!
Cheers,
Johannesmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Die Zukunft wird wegen Mangel
Hello all,
Thursday, November 02, 2000, Johannes M. Posel wrote:
>> Max working now on S/MIME options and SSL encryption. He told me, then
>> will be possible to implement PGP/MIME. But I don't know when, because
>> Max want to implement right OpenPGP standard :-))
>
Hi there Marek,
Going back 12:15 02.11.2000. when you uttered the following thoughts:
> Max working now on S/MIME options and SSL encryption. He told me, then
> will be possible to implement PGP/MIME. But I don't know when, because
> Max want to implement right OpenPGP standa
Hello all,
Thursday, November 02, 2000, Johannes M. Posel wrote:
> Going back 11:58 02.11.2000. when you uttered the following thoughts:
>> PGP/MIME is not supported by TB at the moment. Thus, do not set this
>> option.
> *sad* :(
Max working now on S/MIME options and SSL e
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Johannes,
On 02 November 2000 at 11:48:02 GMT +0100 (which was 10:48 where I
live) Johannes M. Posel wrote and made these points:
JMP> Do you happen to know if TB 1.47 (Halloween Edition) supports
JMP> PGP/Mime?
Not yet.
- --
Cheers,
.
Hi there Christian,
Going back 11:58 02.11.2000. when you uttered the following thoughts:
> PGP/MIME is not supported by TB at the moment. Thus, do not set this
> option.
*sad* :(
> HTH
Cheers,
Johannesmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
A consultant is a p
Johannes M. Posel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do you happen to know if TB 1.47 (Halloween Edition) supports
> PGP/Mime? I'm using PGP 6.58, and set in the PGP-Preferences to use
> PGP/Mime. Did I forget something? It doesnt seem to work :/ Thanks
> for any tips!
PGP/MIME
Dear Batters :)
Do you happen to know if TB 1.47 (Halloween Edition) supports
PGP/Mime? I'm using PGP 6.58, and set in the PGP-Preferences to use
PGP/Mime. Did I forget something? It doesnt seem to work :/ Thanks for
any tips!
Cheers,
Johannesmailto:[EMAIL PROT
99 matches
Mail list logo
