-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Karin Spaink !
On Thu, 5 Oct 2000 23:08:38 +0200 GMT your local time,
which was 05.10.2000, 23:08 (GMT+0200) where I live, you wrote:
[...]
>>> Make sure that under the
>>> e-mail tab S/MIME is unckeched
>> I have seen this quite often in th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Gerd,
On 05 October 2000 at 17:53:58 GMT +0200 (which was 16:53 where I
live) Gerd Ewald wrote and made these points on the subject
of "privacy & encryption":
>> It's not like I'm emailing legal documents or an
On 05-10-2000 at 17:39, Gerd Ewald kindly wrote:
> Hello Karin Spaink !
>> Make sure that under the
>> e-mail tab S/MIME is unckeched
> I have seen this quite often in this list and always wondered why ?? When I
> tested S/MIME and PGP I tried to sign my messages both ways and it did work:
I do
Hello Gerd
On 05 October 2000, at 16:39, you wrote:
>> -- Wait. Have you installed PGP?
GE> Great, Karin !! I just imagine this had been the error: ROTFLMAO !
Ho Ho
--
have a good day
Charlie (ceejay)
--
--
View the TBUDL arc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Jan Rifkinson !
On Wed, 4 Oct 2000 17:53:21 -0400 GMT your local time,
which was 04.10.2000, 23:53 (GMT+0200) where I live, you wrote:
> It's not like I'm emailing
> legal documents or anything so is it still worth
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Karin Spaink !
On Thu, 5 Oct 2000 01:02:43 +0200 GMT your local time,
which was 05.10.2000, 01:02 (GMT+0200) where I live, you wrote:
[...]
> Make sure that under the
> e-mail tab S/MIME is unckeched
I have seen this quite often in this lis
Hello Charlie Turner (ceejay),
On Wed, 4 Oct 2000 19:12:40 +0100 GMT your local time,
which was Thursday, October 05, 2000, 1:12:40 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Charlie Turner (ceejay) wrote:
> Hello Graham
> On 04 October 2000, at 09:48, you wrote:
G>> Go to Tools/Privacy/Choose PGP Version an
On 04-10-2000 at 23:53, Jan Rifkinson kindly wrote:
> I'm totally naive when it comes to encryption, etc. As a
> practical matter, is PGP good for emailing my everyday
> email correspondents all over the world?
Yes, it is. But usually one only encrypys when one wants to
make sure that nobody but
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Karin
On 05 October 2000, at 00:02, you wrote:
KS> On 05-10-2000 at 00:18, Charlie Turner (ceejay) kindly wrote:
ACM>>> Unzip the DLL's into your TB! installation directory. Close and restart
ACM>>> TB!.
>> Ok done that, and still nothin
wrote and made these points on the subject
MDP> of "privacy & encryption":
ACM>>> Unzip the DLL's into your TB! installation directory. Close and
ACM>>> restart TB!.
CTc>> Ok done that, and still nothing! I've checked to confirm that the
CTc
Hello A
On 04 October 2000, at 23:52, you wrote:
ACM> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
ACM> On Wed, 4 Oct 2000 23:18:51 +0100, Charlie Turner (ceejay) wrote:
CTc>> Ok done that, and still nothing! I've checked to confirm that the
CTc>> batpgp60.dll is in the same directory as TB!
A
On 05-10-2000 at 00:18, Charlie Turner (ceejay) kindly wrote:
ACM>> Unzip the DLL's into your TB! installation directory. Close and restart
ACM>> TB!.
> Ok done that, and still nothing! I've checked to confirm that the
> batpgp60.dll is in the same directory as TB!
ACM>> You may then
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Charlie,
On 04 October 2000 at 23:18:51 GMT +0100 (which was 23:18 where I
live) Charlie Turner (ceejay) wrote and made these points on the subject
of "privacy & encryption":
ACM>> Unzip the DLL's into your TB! installa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Wed, 4 Oct 2000 23:18:51 +0100, Charlie Turner (ceejay) wrote:
CTc> Ok done that, and still nothing! I've checked to confirm that the
CTc> batpgp60.dll is in the same directory as TB!
You should be using batpgp65.dll and not batpgp60.dll. Make sur
Hello A
On 04 October 2000, at 22:54, you wrote:
ACM> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
ACM> On Wed, 4 Oct 2000 21:17:14 +0100, Charlie Turner (ceejay) wrote:
CTc>>I've downloaded the PGP Plugin DLL 98k file (v5.5, v6.0 & v.6.5)
CTc>>After unzipping it appears to be batpgp55.dll, when
Hi TBUDL
In a post time stamped 21:49:12 +0700 re: Re[2]: privacy & encryption
Graham wrote:
TBUDL> Quite easily Jan. PGP is a tried and trusted form of encryption
TBUDL> which allows you to encrypt BEFORE your electronic mail goes
TBUDL> through
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Wed, 4 Oct 2000 21:17:14 +0100, Charlie Turner (ceejay) wrote:
CTc>I've downloaded the PGP Plugin DLL 98k file (v5.5, v6.0 & v.6.5)
CTc>After unzipping it appears to be batpgp55.dll, when I believe I should
CTc>be installing batpgp60.dll.
CTc>
Hello Graham
On 04 October 2000, at 20:11, you wrote:
CT(>> I've been looking around for the .dll Graham. Do you have the URL for
CT(>> it by any chance?
G> Certainly, Charlie, its
G> http://www.ritlabs.com/the_bat/download.html
I've downloaded the PGP Plugin DLL 98k file (v5.5, v6.0 & v.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 4 Oct 2000 19:12:40 +0100
"Charlie Turner (ceejay)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
CT(> Hello Graham
CT(> On 04 October 2000, at 09:48, you wrote:
CT(>
CT(> G> Go to Tools/Privacy/Choose PGP Version and check the radio button
CT(> G> for "PGP 6
Hello Graham
On 04 October 2000, at 09:48, you wrote:
G> Go to Tools/Privacy/Choose PGP Version and check the radio button
G> for "PGP 6.x/6.5.x". You will have to download the .dll from the
G> Ritlabs web site as well, but it does work. As I understand it,
G> PGP 6.5.8 is basically PGP 6.5.3 w
Hi TBUDL
In a post time stamped 11:27:49 +0700 re: Re privacy &
encryption ClueBusDriver wrote:
TBUDL> The current version of pgp is 7. I tried it and found
TBUDL> numerous problems. NAI needs to make a few revisions before
TBUDL> it's worth in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 4 Oct 2000 00:15:54 +0100
Charlie Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
CT> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
CT> Hash: SHA1
CT>
CT> Hello Jan
CT> On 03 October 2000, at 21:57, you wrote:
CT>
CT> JR> Could someone explain the advantages/disa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Jan
On 03 October 2000, at 21:57, you wrote:
JR> Could someone explain the advantages/disadvantages of using a
JR> service like privacy.com VS PGP? And does the current version
JR> of TheBat! work with Version 6.5.8, the current v
Hello Jan,
Tuesday, October 03, 2000, 4:57:24 PM, you wrote:
JR> Hello BatListers,
JR> Could someone explain the advantages/disadvantages of using a
JR> service like privacy.com VS PGP? And does the current version
JR> of TheBat! work with Version 6.5.8, the current version of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Jan,
On 03 October 2000 at 16:57:24 GMT -0400 (which was 21:57 where I
live) Jan Rifkinson wrote and made these points on the subject
of "privacy & encryption":
JR> Could someone explain the advantages/disadvantages of using a
Hello BatListers,
Could someone explain the advantages/disadvantages of using a
service like privacy.com VS PGP? And does the current version
of TheBat! work with Version 6.5.8, the current version of
PGP?
Regards,
Jan Rifkinson
Ridgefield, CT USA
Reply to: [EMAIL PROTECTE
26 matches
Mail list logo
