Re: tbudl member question

2001-02-18 Thread Thomas
Hello Linda, your problem is indeed unusual, and off the top of my head, I don't know the reason. I am copying you full mail to the list, and anybody who has a reply, kindly do send a cc to Linda's address as well. Linda, are you sure you are still subscribed? -- Cheers, Thomas.

TB Lists down?

2001-02-18 Thread Thomas
Hi TBUDL, are the lists down? I would have thought there is no traffic, but I send a posting over an hour ago, and it has not appeared. In fact, the last posting I received dates back to last Friday, 17:13 my local time (my own posting). -- Cheers, Thomas Message created with The Bat! 1.49e

Re: TB Lists down?

2001-02-18 Thread Lija
Hi Thomas, On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, at 12:01:27 [GMT +0800, your local time] (19.2.2001. at 05:01 was my local time), you wrote: T are the lists down? I would have thought there is no traffic, but I T send a posting over an hour ago, and it has not appeared. In fact, the T last posting I received

Fwd: Re: tbudl member question

2001-02-18 Thread Thomas
Dear Linda, it appears nobody received any postings from TBUDL, but now the list is up and running again. Please let me know if you receive this message. This is a forwarded message From: Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Monday, February 19, 2001, 10:52:32 AM Subject: tbudl

Re: TB Lists down?

2001-02-18 Thread Thomas
Hi Lija, On Mon, 19 Feb 2001 05:15:30 +0100GMT (19/02/2001, 12:15 +0800GMT), Lija wrote: T are the lists down? [...] L Yes, it appears there is some malfunction. I checked the mail-archive and it's L also the same... Right now I've sent msg to Marck and wait for the response. L I'm also carbon

Re: Moderators: Point of Order

2001-02-18 Thread Brian Clark
Hi Marck, @ 12:08:53 AM on 2/17/2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: (sleep? wassat?). Apparently, some curious people "lie down" and "drift into a state of unconsciousness." Sometimes I walk through the house and notice others practicing this so called "sleep." They get mad when I ask them

Message list window configuration and settings

2001-02-18 Thread Yuki Taga
Re-send of a message that seems to have never made it: All: At present, I have my message list window (and font size) set so that about 11 or 12 messages in the list display at one time. Given that the most recently arrived, viewed message has the focus, and that messages are sorted in that

Re[2]: tbudl member question

2001-02-18 Thread Lija
Hi Thomas, On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, at 10:52:32 [GMT +0800, your local time] (19.2.2001. at 03:52 was my local time), you wrote to Linda and TBUDL: T your problem is indeed unusual, and off the top of my head, I don't T know the reason. I am copying you full mail to the list, and anybody T who has

Re[2]: Address book / Groups

2001-02-18 Thread Quin Selman
Hello Marck, Thursday, February 15, 2001, 5:17:17 PM, you wrote: MDP This is because the group has the property "Hide items if not MDP explicitly selected". If you un-check that, the group members reappear MDP at the PAB root level. Am I the only one who wonders what is the purpose of hiding

149e ??

2001-02-18 Thread Ben Mills
This is a resend--it appears my original isn't going to make it. I'm pleased that the server is back up. Earlier today I visited the German Bat site. I found a bunch of interesting articles, and I agree that someone did a fine good of compiling documentation on TB. Even though I speak a locally

Re: Message list window configuration and settings

2001-02-18 Thread Thomas
Hi Yuki, On Mon, 19 Feb 2001 14:11:11 +0900GMT (19/02/2001, 13:11 +0800GMT), Yuki Taga wrote: YT What I would like to know is if there is way to adjust this. I would like YT to have the message window show me only about 2 read messages, and see more YT of the unread list in the window at one

Re: tbudl member question

2001-02-18 Thread Thomas
Hi Lija, On Mon, 19 Feb 2001 06:19:38 +0100GMT (19/02/2001, 13:19 +0800GMT), Lija wrote: L Problem with DutaInt server, I guess. L BTW, maybe the answer lies in this sample header I got from your message: [...] L Well! What a weird bunch of, practicaly the same Received: lines... Any clue?

Re: Cannot Download

2001-02-18 Thread Mark Aston
Re-sent Hi Dierk, Saturday, February 17, 2001, 5:48:43 PM, you wrote: I hope I remember that right, I think MSN uses a proprietary password mechanism (like Hotmail?!) which is implemented only in - want to try yourself? - right, OE and its cousin. You are correct, they use SPA (Secure

Re: 149e ??

2001-02-18 Thread Lija
Hi Ben, On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, at 00:54:32 [GMT -0500, your local time] (19.2.2001. at 06:54 was my local time), you wrote: BM Question: Maybe I've missed something, or haven't read all my e-mail, BM but what is version 149e? I downloaded it, unzipped it and noticed it BM was well over three