Re: Unexpected Behavior of Known Filter

2003-06-27 Thread Mark Wieder
Coyle306- Thursday, June 26, 2003, 3:13:24 PM, you wrote: snippage happens C spammer had inserted _my address_, which _is_ in my address book. Of course, at this point I suppose I should bring up the question of why your own address is in your address book? If it weren't then the correct

Re: Unexpected Behavior of Known Filter

2003-06-27 Thread alists
Hello Mark, Thursday, June 26, 2003, 11:34:52 PM, you wrote: MW Of course, at this point I suppose I should bring up the question of MW why your own address is in your address book? If it weren't then the MW correct filtering event would have occurred... well I have to admit i send stuff to

Re: Spammers Using TheBat

2003-06-27 Thread Geoff Lane
On 27 June 2003, 04:54, Greg Strong wrote: ,- [ 4 line from the bottom of your headers ] | X-MSMail-Priority: Normal `- Looks like a forgery to me. ~~~ However, these headers guarantee that the message is spam. FWIW, I've just set up a filter to delete without downloading anything

Re: Unexpected Behavior of Known Filter

2003-06-27 Thread Bill McCarthy
On Fri 27-Jun-03 2:34am -0400, Mark Wieder wrote: Of course, at this point I suppose I should bring up the question of why your own address is in your address book? If it weren't then the correct filtering event would have occurred... Well I have to admit that I have my address in my Family

Re: Unexpected Behavior of Known Filter

2003-06-27 Thread Bill McCarthy
On Fri 27-Jun-03 1:23am -0400, Dave Kennedy wrote: On Thursday, June 26, 2003 7:54 PM, Bill wrote: I don't like the Know filter at all and don't use it because of its bugs on replying from Inbox-Known. What bugs? There's an inconvenience (no folder templates). The bugs are related. (1) It

Re: still problem with TB cleaning up when shutting down

2003-06-27 Thread Bill McCarthy
On Fri 27-Jun-03 1:44am -0400, Jonathan Angliss wrote: On Friday, June 27, 2003, Jurgen Haug wrote... [..] I guess TB has a problem with multi-user XP? I don't think so... I run it here just fine... and same on Win2k as well. Do you use separate mail stores for each XP user? If you use a

Re:still problem with TB cleaning up when shutting down

2003-06-27 Thread Jurgen Haug
Hello Jonathan, Friday, June 27, 2003, 7:44:33 AM, you wrote: On Friday, June 27, 2003, Jurgen Haug wrote... I still have this problem with TB getting stuck when cleaning the folders at shut-down. It's not happening on my user (Win XP, two users), it's on my girlfriends side (which makes

Unexpected Behavior of Known Filter

2003-06-27 Thread Coyle306
MW Of course, at this point I suppose I should bring up the question of MW why your own address is in your address book? If it weren't then the MW correct filtering event would have occurred... I bcc: myself all the time. Doesn't everybody? I appreciate the responses on this subject, and I

Re: S/MIME X.509 Thawte Certificate for TB?

2003-06-27 Thread Leif Gregory
Hello Greg, Thursday, June 26, 2003, 8:08:02 PM, you wrote: GS Funny thing is there is a certificate there on the web that I GS fetched, but it doesn't have a private key when I try to export. I GS suppose this has to be added by Thawte? So when you go to export it, you're checking the Export

Re: Detecting HTML Spam

2003-06-27 Thread Leif Gregory
Hello Francis, Thursday, June 26, 2003, 8:15:22 PM, you wrote: FM Isn't there an add on for The Bat for filtering? Has anyone used FM it? Is it available? moderator Please don't top post (meaning that when you reply you reply above the quoted text of the original message). This is in the list

Re: S/MIME X.509 Thawte Certificate for TB?

2003-06-27 Thread Greg Strong
Hello Leif, On Fri, 27 Jun 2003, at 08:24:39 GMT -0600 (6/27/2003, 9:24 AM -0500 GMT here), you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: GS Funny thing is there is a certificate there on the web that I GS fetched, but it doesn't have a private key when I try to export. I GS suppose this has to be added

Re: Unexpected Behavior of Known Filter

2003-06-27 Thread Mark Wieder
Bill- I test-send myself stuff all the time, too, but I never considered putting myself in the AB. Since I have local delivery turned on, sending mail to my local accounts is instantaneous. Then I have some external webmail accounts so I can see the kludges. -Mark Wieder Using The Bat! v1.63

reply as a new thread

2003-06-27 Thread Wilfried Mestdagh
Hello, What is the best / most conveniant way to reply to a message ..but.. start a new thread ? For example in many mailing list many people just hit reply to start a new thread. I want for example answer to sutch mail with same subject and with quotes, but at the same time start a

Re: reply as a new thread

2003-06-27 Thread neurowerx
27-Jun-2003 20:39, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What is the best / most conveniant way to reply to a message ..but.. start a new thread ? I usually go CTRL-A (mark all) CTRL-C (copy) then CTRL-N (new message) and ALT-INS (paste as quotation). Have to manually add the TO: field (and subject,

treating an attachment as a text file

2003-06-27 Thread WL
I used to use mutt for a mail client, and it has some really cool abilities. For one thing, it is the fastest mail client I've ever used when it came to opening up a large mailbox (no separate index file, to boot). It also has the nice ability to forcibly open an attachment as a text file. For

Re: Unexpected Behavior of Known Filter

2003-06-27 Thread Bill McCarthy
On Fri 27-Jun-03 1:09pm -0400, Mark Wieder wrote: I test-send myself stuff all the time, too, but I never considered putting myself in the AB. Since I have local delivery turned on, sending mail to my local accounts is instantaneous. Then I have some external webmail accounts so I can see the

Re: reply as a new thread

2003-06-27 Thread Bill McCarthy
On Fri 27-Jun-03 2:39pm -0400, Wilfried Mestdagh wrote: What is the best / most conveniant way to reply to a message ..but.. start a new thread ? I think you're stuck with the method neurowerx outlined. Or, you could modify a hot-key activate filter to remove the references and in-reply-to

Re[2]: reply as a new thread

2003-06-27 Thread Wilfried Mestdagh
Hello Bill, BM With the 1.63 Beta, here's another method: I only can find 1.62r to download. Where can I find the beta version ? -- Rgds, Wilfried http://www.mestdagh.biz Using The Bat! v1.62r on Windows NT 4.0 Build 1381 Service Pack 6

Re: ly as a new thread

2003-06-27 Thread Peter Meyns
Hi Wilfried, on Fri, 27 Jun 2003 20:39:15 +0200GMT (27.06.03, 20:39 +0200GMT here), you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : WM What is the best / most conveniant way to reply to a message ..but.. start a WM new thread ? I hit reply on the message. Then I copy the text to clipboard, open a new

Re: reply as a new thread

2003-06-27 Thread Bill McCarthy
On Fri 27-Jun-03 4:00pm -0400, Wilfried Mestdagh wrote: BM With the 1.63 Beta, here's another method: I only can find 1.62r to download. Where can I find the beta version ? ftp.ritlabs.com/pub/the_bat/beta Quite a few things have changed. Variables have been introduced and some old QTs

Re: ly as a new thread

2003-06-27 Thread Jonathan Angliss
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday, June 27, 2003, Bill McCarthy wrote... I only can find 1.62r to download. Where can I find the beta version ? ftp.ritlabs.com/pub/the_bat/beta Quite a few things have changed. Variables have been introduced and some old QTs need to

Re: ly as a new thread

2003-06-27 Thread Bill McCarthy
On Fri 27-Jun-03 4:31pm -0400, Jonathan Angliss wrote: On Friday, June 27, 2003, Bill McCarthy wrote... Let me know if you want a summary of the changes in each of the betas by private email. Or read the respective text files in the same location That's what my summaries are - those text

Re[2]: ly as a new thread

2003-06-27 Thread Wilfried Mestdagh
Hello Jonathan, JA it's a beta, use at your own risk ;) Whell I'm software developper myself. Each beta is improvement where old bugs are solved, new bugs are introduced, as it it for every official realeas :) But still thanks for warning me ;-) -- Rgds, Wilfried http://www.mestdagh.biz

Re: reply as a new thread

2003-06-27 Thread Sergey Kalabekov
Hello Wilfried, On Jun 27, 2003, 20:39 +0200 GMT (1:39 PM CST) you [WM] typed: WM What is the best / most conveniant way to reply to a message ..but.. start a WM new thread ? Have you tried removing the Follow-Up content in the message editor? -- Regards, Sergey

Re: reply as a new thread

2003-06-27 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Bill, @27-Jun-2003, 15:45 -0400 (20:45 UK time) Bill McCarthy [BM] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Wilfried: What is the best / most conveniant way to reply to a message ..but.. start a new thread ? ... snip BM With the 1.63 Beta, here's

Re: treating an attachment as a text file

2003-06-27 Thread Allie Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Wl, [W] wrote: W For instance, if somebody sends me a batch script as an attachement, W ``opening'' the file would actually run the file. Mutt has the W ability to ``open as text for viewing'' the file, as well as ``open W for running'' the file.

New thread

2003-06-27 Thread Greg Strong
Hello neurowerx, On Fri, 27 Jun 2003, at 20:48:34 GMT +0200 (6/27/2003, 1:48 PM -0500 GMT here), you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: I usually go CTRL-A (mark all) CTRL-C (copy) then CTRL-N (new message) and ALT-INS (paste as quotation). Have to manually add the TO: field (and subject, but

Re: New thread

2003-06-27 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Greg, @27-Jun-2003, 21:43 -0500 (03:43 UK time) Greg Strong [GS] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: While I think this is already pretty good, I would be glad to know an even more comfortable way. :-) ... snip GS However according to Marck per GS

Re: Unexpected Behavior of Known Filter

2003-06-27 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Coyle306, On Fri, 27 Jun 2003 07:07:12 -0400 GMT (27/06/03, 18:07 +0700 GMT), Coyle306 wrote: I bcc: myself all the time. Doesn't everybody? I used to. Namely when I was replying to private mails while I was in the office; when I bcc'ed myself, I could download my replies at home as

Re: Unexpected Behavior of Known Filter

2003-06-27 Thread Mark Wieder
Bill- Friday, June 27, 2003, 12:21:56 PM, you wrote: BM We all work a little differently, Mark. grin BM I have AutoCompletion turned BM off. I only occasionally use local delivery (I use Alt-N to get me BM to the setting page, so Alt-NAenter toggles it) - and I often like BM to edit the