Coyle306-
Thursday, June 26, 2003, 3:13:24 PM, you wrote:
snippage happens
C spammer had inserted _my address_, which _is_ in my address book.
Of course, at this point I suppose I should bring up the question of
why your own address is in your address book? If it weren't then the
correct
Hello Mark,
Thursday, June 26, 2003, 11:34:52 PM, you wrote:
MW Of course, at this point I suppose I should bring up the question of
MW why your own address is in your address book? If it weren't then the
MW correct filtering event would have occurred...
well I have to admit i send stuff to
On 27 June 2003, 04:54, Greg Strong wrote:
,- [ 4 line from the bottom of your headers ]
| X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
`-
Looks like a forgery to me.
~~~
However, these headers guarantee that the message is spam. FWIW, I've
just set up a filter to delete without downloading anything
On Fri 27-Jun-03 2:34am -0400, Mark Wieder wrote:
Of course, at this point I suppose I should bring up the question of
why your own address is in your address book? If it weren't then the
correct filtering event would have occurred...
Well I have to admit that I have my address in my Family
On Fri 27-Jun-03 1:23am -0400, Dave Kennedy wrote:
On Thursday, June 26, 2003 7:54 PM, Bill wrote:
I don't like the Know filter at all and don't use it because of its
bugs on replying from Inbox-Known.
What bugs?
There's an inconvenience (no folder templates). The bugs are related.
(1) It
On Fri 27-Jun-03 1:44am -0400, Jonathan Angliss wrote:
On Friday, June 27, 2003, Jurgen Haug wrote...
[..] I guess TB has a problem with multi-user XP?
I don't think so... I run it here just fine... and same on Win2k as
well.
Do you use separate mail stores for each XP user?
If you use a
Hello Jonathan,
Friday, June 27, 2003, 7:44:33 AM, you wrote:
On Friday, June 27, 2003, Jurgen Haug wrote...
I still have this problem with TB getting stuck when cleaning the
folders at shut-down. It's not happening on my user (Win XP, two
users), it's on my girlfriends side (which makes
MW Of course, at this point I suppose I should bring up the question of
MW why your own address is in your address book? If it weren't then the
MW correct filtering event would have occurred...
I bcc: myself all the time. Doesn't everybody?
I appreciate the responses on this subject, and I
Hello Greg,
Thursday, June 26, 2003, 8:08:02 PM, you wrote:
GS Funny thing is there is a certificate there on the web that I
GS fetched, but it doesn't have a private key when I try to export. I
GS suppose this has to be added by Thawte?
So when you go to export it, you're checking the Export
Hello Francis,
Thursday, June 26, 2003, 8:15:22 PM, you wrote:
FM Isn't there an add on for The Bat for filtering? Has anyone used
FM it? Is it available?
moderator
Please don't top post (meaning that when you reply you reply above the
quoted text of the original message). This is in the list
Hello Leif,
On Fri, 27 Jun 2003, at 08:24:39 GMT -0600 (6/27/2003, 9:24 AM -0500 GMT
here), you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
GS Funny thing is there is a certificate there on the web that I
GS fetched, but it doesn't have a private key when I try to export. I
GS suppose this has to be added
Bill-
I test-send myself stuff all the time, too, but I never considered
putting myself in the AB. Since I have local delivery turned on,
sending mail to my local accounts is instantaneous. Then I have some
external webmail accounts so I can see the kludges.
-Mark Wieder
Using The Bat! v1.63
Hello,
What is the best / most conveniant way to reply to a message ..but.. start a
new thread ?
For example in many mailing list many people just hit reply to start a new
thread. I want for example answer to sutch mail with same subject and with
quotes, but at the same time start a
27-Jun-2003 20:39, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is the best / most conveniant way to reply to a message ..but.. start a
new thread ?
I usually go CTRL-A (mark all) CTRL-C (copy) then CTRL-N (new message) and
ALT-INS (paste as quotation). Have to manually add the TO: field (and
subject,
I used to use mutt for a mail client, and it has some really cool
abilities. For one thing, it is the fastest mail client I've ever
used when it came to opening up a large mailbox (no separate
index file, to boot). It also has the nice ability to forcibly
open an attachment as a text file.
For
On Fri 27-Jun-03 1:09pm -0400, Mark Wieder wrote:
I test-send myself stuff all the time, too, but I never considered
putting myself in the AB. Since I have local delivery turned on,
sending mail to my local accounts is instantaneous. Then I have some
external webmail accounts so I can see the
On Fri 27-Jun-03 2:39pm -0400, Wilfried Mestdagh wrote:
What is the best / most conveniant way to reply to a message ..but.. start a
new thread ?
I think you're stuck with the method neurowerx outlined. Or, you
could modify a hot-key activate filter to remove the references and
in-reply-to
Hello Bill,
BM With the 1.63 Beta, here's another method:
I only can find 1.62r to download. Where can I find the beta version ?
--
Rgds, Wilfried
http://www.mestdagh.biz
Using The Bat! v1.62r on Windows NT 4.0 Build 1381 Service Pack 6
Hi Wilfried,
on Fri, 27 Jun 2003 20:39:15 +0200GMT (27.06.03, 20:39 +0200GMT here),
you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
WM What is the best / most conveniant way to reply to a message ..but.. start a
WM new thread ?
I hit reply on the message. Then I copy the text to clipboard, open a
new
On Fri 27-Jun-03 4:00pm -0400, Wilfried Mestdagh wrote:
BM With the 1.63 Beta, here's another method:
I only can find 1.62r to download. Where can I find the beta version ?
ftp.ritlabs.com/pub/the_bat/beta
Quite a few things have changed. Variables have been introduced and
some old QTs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday, June 27, 2003, Bill McCarthy wrote...
I only can find 1.62r to download. Where can I find the beta
version ?
ftp.ritlabs.com/pub/the_bat/beta
Quite a few things have changed. Variables have been introduced and
some old QTs need to
On Fri 27-Jun-03 4:31pm -0400, Jonathan Angliss wrote:
On Friday, June 27, 2003, Bill McCarthy wrote...
Let me know if you want a summary of the changes in each of the
betas by private email.
Or read the respective text files in the same location
That's what my summaries are - those text
Hello Jonathan,
JA it's a beta, use at your own risk ;)
Whell I'm software developper myself. Each beta is improvement where old bugs
are solved, new bugs are introduced, as it it for every official realeas :)
But still thanks for warning me ;-)
--
Rgds, Wilfried
http://www.mestdagh.biz
Hello Wilfried,
On Jun 27, 2003, 20:39 +0200 GMT (1:39 PM CST) you [WM] typed:
WM What is the best / most conveniant way to reply to a message ..but.. start a
WM new thread ?
Have you tried removing the Follow-Up content in the message editor?
--
Regards,
Sergey
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Bill,
@27-Jun-2003, 15:45 -0400 (20:45 UK time) Bill McCarthy [BM] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Wilfried:
What is the best / most conveniant way to reply to a message
..but.. start a new thread ?
... snip
BM With the 1.63 Beta, here's
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Wl, [W] wrote:
W For instance, if somebody sends me a batch script as an attachement,
W ``opening'' the file would actually run the file. Mutt has the
W ability to ``open as text for viewing'' the file, as well as ``open
W for running'' the file.
Hello neurowerx,
On Fri, 27 Jun 2003, at 20:48:34 GMT +0200 (6/27/2003, 1:48 PM -0500 GMT
here), you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I usually go CTRL-A (mark all) CTRL-C (copy) then CTRL-N (new message)
and ALT-INS (paste as quotation). Have to manually add the TO: field
(and subject, but
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Greg,
@27-Jun-2003, 21:43 -0500 (03:43 UK time) Greg Strong [GS] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
While I think this is already pretty good, I would be glad to
know an even more comfortable way. :-)
... snip
GS However according to Marck per
GS
Hello Coyle306,
On Fri, 27 Jun 2003 07:07:12 -0400 GMT (27/06/03, 18:07 +0700 GMT),
Coyle306 wrote:
I bcc: myself all the time. Doesn't everybody?
I used to. Namely when I was replying to private mails while I was in
the office; when I bcc'ed myself, I could download my replies at home
as
Bill-
Friday, June 27, 2003, 12:21:56 PM, you wrote:
BM We all work a little differently, Mark.
grin
BM I have AutoCompletion turned
BM off. I only occasionally use local delivery (I use Alt-N to get me
BM to the setting page, so Alt-NAenter toggles it) - and I often like
BM to edit the
30 matches
Mail list logo