Hello TBUDL,
I have noticed that when replying to messages sent to me by people using
Microsoft Office Outlook my replies aren't threaded. That is, the reply
isn't 'attached' to the original replied to message and appears as a
separate email in the message list.
I sort the 'standard way'
Hallo Simon,
On Fri, 12 Sep 2008 08:38:08 +0100GMT (12-9-2008, 9:38 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
P I have noticed that when replying to messages sent to me by people using
P Microsoft Office Outlook my replies aren't threaded. That is, the reply
P isn't 'attached' to the original replied
Hello Roelof,
On Fri, 12 Sep 2008 11:14:42 +0200 your time, you said:
P [...snip...] when replying to messages sent to me by people using
P Microsoft Office Outlook my replies aren't threaded. [...snip...]
That's because the replies sent to you don't contain a References or
an In-Reply-To
Hallo Simon,
On Fri, 12 Sep 2008 11:19:39 +0100GMT (12-9-2008, 12:19 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
P Yes, you're correct. I just checked and the emails and they don't contain
P those normal headers. However, they do contain Thread-Index:, which seems
P to be a Microsoft specific header that
Hello Roelof,
On Fri, 12 Sep 2008 13:18:47 +0200 your time, you said:
Might be a configuration issue, when my brother used Outlook 11, his
messages contained In-Reply-To, References and Thread-Index. These
days he's using MSO 12 and he's still using the same headers.
Some confusion here I
Hallo Simon,
On Fri, 12 Sep 2008 12:51:43 +0100GMT (12-9-2008, 13:51 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
P So, this is my take on how this breaks threading:
P 1. (i) A new email with a new 'subject' is sent from an Outlook client.
P(ii) Outlook does not add a message-ID: header to the email.
Hi
On Friday 12 September 2008 at 12:51:43 PM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Privateofcourse
wrote:
I can of course thread by References and subject and received time
How? The Bat! only gives me the following 6 choices for threading:-
None
References (standard)
Subject
From
To
References +
Hi
I have just encountered the re-vamped QT editor and cannot read my QTs
in it because the text and background are now the same colour and I
cannot find a way to change the background colour.
In my viewer/editor preferences I have white text on a black
background, which is much easier on the
Hello MFPA,
On Fri, 12 Sep 2008 15:05:03 +0100 your time, you said:
I can of course thread by References and subject and received time
How? The Bat! only gives me the following 6 choices for threading:-
Okay, more accurately, to get around it I meant this:
View Menu -
| Sort by:
Hi
On Friday 12 September 2008 at 3:51:15 PM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Privateofcourse
wrote:
Okay, more accurately, to get around it I meant this:
View Menu -
| Sort by:
- Received time
| View Threads by:
- References + Subject
Hallo MFPA,
On Fri, 12 Sep 2008 15:48:23 +0100GMT (12-9-2008, 16:48 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
M I have just encountered the re-vamped QT editor and cannot read my QTs
M in it because the text and background are now the same colour and I
M cannot find a way to change the background colour.
On Friday, September 12, 2008, 16:48:23, MFPA wrote:
Does anybody know if there is a new, hidden setting for the QT editor
background setting?
I don't think so, but I don't have this problem in the current beta
(4.0.34), so it was probably fixed (unfortunately, the account
templates still
Hi
On Friday 12 September 2008 at 2:53:22 PM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Roelof Otten wrote:
Ouch! Not only does Outlook 'forget' to insert the msg-id, but the
intermediate servers also forget about that, according to the relevant
RFCs that should be done.
Anyway there's nothing you can do
Hi
On Friday 12 September 2008 at 5:28:59 PM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Roelof Otten wrote:
Upgrade to the most recent version.
I've just downloaded 4.0.34 and will backup and install
Create a new viewer profile (never mind the actual settings)
Just tried that in my current version to see
Hi
On Friday 12 September 2008 at 5:30:01 PM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Jernej Simoncic wrote:
I don't have this problem in the current beta (4.0.34), so it was
probably fixed
Thanks. I'll try 4.0.34, which is currently the release version.
(unfortunately, the account templates still
Hi
On Friday 12 September 2008 at 8:31:07 PM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], MFPA wrote:
Hi
On Friday 12 September 2008 at 5:30:01 PM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Jernej Simoncic wrote:
I don't have this problem in the current beta (4.0.34), so it was
probably fixed
Thanks. I'll try 4.0.34,
Hi
On Friday 12 September 2008 at 8:45:57 PM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], I wrote:
I've just downloaded 4.0.34 and will backup and install
Done that
Create a new viewer profile (never mind the actual settings)
Just tried that in my current version to see how to do it. I could
only switch my
On Friday, September 12, 2008, 3:31:07 PM, MFPA wrote:
M Which reminds me: anybody know a good, free Notepad replacement that
M can be set up to use pale text on a dark background?
___
Jarte has a free edition which might suit your
On Friday, September 12, 2008, 22:50:10, MFPA wrote:
And which still exhibits the problem here.
There must be something wrong with your colour settings then - the
QT editor looks fine in my colour scheme:
http://img366.imageshack.us/my.php?image=image1hc9.png
Which reminds me: anybody know a
Hi
On Friday 12 September 2008 at 10:13:18 PM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Jernej Simoncic wrote:
On Friday, September 12, 2008, 22:50:10, MFPA wrote:
And which still exhibits the problem here.
There must be something wrong with your colour settings then
Problem solved: once I realised the
Hi
On Friday 12 September 2008 at 10:10:58 PM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Jon Polish wrote:
Jarte has a free edition which might suit your requirements.
http://www.jarte.com/
Thanks, I'll check it out.
--
Best regards,
MFPA
An idealist is a person who helps
Hallo MFPA,
On Fri, 12 Sep 2008 20:10:04 +0100GMT (12-9-2008, 21:10 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
Ouch! Not only does Outlook 'forget' to insert the msg-id, but the
intermediate servers also forget about that, according to the relevant
RFCs that should be done.
Anyway there's nothing you
22 matches
Mail list logo
