Hello Jast,
On Thursday, February 03, 2000 at 06:47:25 GMT +0100 (which was
03/02/2000 12:47 GMT +0700 my Local Time) you told to the list:
>> WOW Thanx for this swallow of fresh air!;-) I've been waiting
>> for this fix literally _for_years_!
J> Sorry, but this still isn't fixed a
Morning Alexander V. Kiselev,
> WOW Thanx for this swallow of fresh air!;-) I've been waiting for this fix
> literally _for_years_!
Sorry, but this still isn't fixed actually.. I just tried it; still uses
semicolon. Syafril must have looked wrongly or maybe he has a totally
different vers
Hello Angel,
On Wed, 2 Feb 2000 09:30:00 -0800 GMT your local time,
which was Thursday, February 03, 2000, 12:30:00 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Angel wrote:
> Give that a shot and see if it works... you didn't mention sending MIME so that is
>why I
> wrote... :D
If you happen to have adobe w
Hello Allie Martin,
On Wed, 2 Feb 2000 13:39:43 -0500 GMT your local time,
which was Thursday, February 03, 2000, 1:39:43 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Allie Martin wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Feb 2000 15:18:15 +0100, Wieland Belka wrote:
>> ... you are using WinNT 4.0 with Service Pack 6 ?! I'm using W
Hello Alexander V. Kiselev,
On Wed, 2 Feb 2000 23:10:09 +0300 GMT your local time,
which was Thursday, February 03, 2000, 3:10:09 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Alexander V. Kiselev wrote:
> Hi there!
> On 2 Feb 00, at 9:34, Syafril Hermansyah wrote
> about "Re: OT: Mailers that support MIME.
Hello Alexander V. Kiselev,
On Wed, 2 Feb 2000 23:02:53 +0300 GMT your local time,
which was Thursday, February 03, 2000, 3:02:53 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Alexander V. Kiselev wrote:
> Hi there!
> On 2 Feb 00, at 0:13, Steve Lamb wrote
> about "Re: Fwd: More The Bat! features [si":
>>
Hello Jast,
On Wed, 2 Feb 2000 18:12:19 +0100 GMT your local time,
which was Thursday, February 03, 2000, 12:12:19 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Jast wrote:
> Morning tracer,
>>> Well, typing it in works for me even in the WPC font, although all sizes
>>> aren't shown.
>>
>>
>> But what abou
Hi,
WCP is the second font that I've used which doesn't appear
whenever I'm composing new messages. Sometimes when replying to some
messages (I can't seem to detect the pattern), I don't get it to use
as well. Courier New appears in its place. Reading all messages is
fine in that they ap
Hello Andrew,
Sunday, January 30, 2000, you wrote:
Just switched to The Bat 1.39 from 1.35. In 1.35 folders with unread
mail were red as is indicated now by blue folders.
AKL> Hello, The Bat Users!
>>> I think this question may have been asked before, but I've never
>>> read an answer. I was j
This message: 02/02/2000 18:27 GMT.
Hello Nick,
Wednesday, February 02, 2000, 5:18:16 PM, you wrote:
NA> but
NA> when you look at your folder tree and see a red folder, then I would think
NA> the high priority message inside the closed red folder would be one of the
NA> first read
O
Hello Marck,
you wrote on Wednesday, the 02.02.2000, at 18:09 :
= Original message text =
Hi tracer,
On 02 February 2000 at 20:03:24 GMT +0700 (which was 13:03 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points:
t> sofar we only manag
On Wed, 2 Feb 2000 23:10:09 +0300, Alexander V. Kiselev wrote:
>> Hi, this is already fixed, the current The Bat! I am using, use comma
>> to separate mail address. I don't know precisely since when, but 1.39
>> use comma (,) as address separator.
> WOW Thanx for this swallow of fresh air!
Hi there!
On 2 Feb 00, at 9:34, Syafril Hermansyah wrote
about "Re: OT: Mailers that support MIME":
> AVK> TB performs;- ) Which makes me think that TB developers have
> AVK> borrowed a good bit from LookOut (just remember the address
> AVK> separator issue: _every_ other pr
Hi there!
On 2 Feb 00, at 0:13, Steve Lamb wrote
about "Re: Fwd: More The Bat! features [si":
> > I'm a Canadian.
>
> I'm sorry. ;)
Aha, you've got such a gang of neighbours to the south from you that
*everybody* simply _must_ feel sorry for you;-)) I have seen a joke on this
once u
Hello Listmembers,
On Wed, 2 Feb 2000 at 13:39:43 [GMT -0500] Allie Martin wrote:
>> ... you are using WinNT 4.0 with Service Pack 6 ?! I'm using WinNT 4.0, too, but
>> with SP 5. Is this SP only an American version ? Or is there a German one, too ?
> I don't know. Tracer? Anyone? Do
Morning tracer,
>> Well, typing it in works for me even in the WPC font, although all sizes
>> aren't shown.
>
>
> But what about reading???
I was talking about typing in the font size in the dialog so it would show
in that size in the editor/viewer even if this size isn't given for
selec
\\\|///
/ ~ _ \
(- O o -)
--oOOo-(_)-oOOo---
Hello Allie,
>> ... you are using WinNT 4.0 with Service Pack 6 ?! I'm using WinNT
>> 4.0, too, but with SP 5. Is this SP only an American version ? O
On Wed, 2 Feb 2000 15:18:15 +0100, Wieland Belka wrote:
> ... you are using WinNT 4.0 with Service Pack 6 ?! I'm using WinNT 4.0, too, but
> with SP 5. Is this SP only an American version ? Or is there a German one, too ?
I don't know. Tracer? Anyone? Do you know anything on this?
--
This message: 02/02/2000 16:44 GMT.
Hello tracer,
Wednesday, February 02, 2000, 12:33:26 PM, you wrote:
t> 9 and 14 is all I get and its a nice font so how to get a 12???
Well all I do is right click on a message, Preferences, Display and
Change and I get every size from 8 to 72.
This message: 02/02/2000 16:49 GMT.
Hello tracer,
Wednesday, February 02, 2000, 3:20:57 PM, you wrote:
t> deleting about 10 gb of data..
t> I know I got them somewhere but not sure where.
You must have one hell of a hard drive if you can misplace 10Gb ?
--
Hello Wieland Belka,
On Wednesday, February 02, 2000 at 15:18:15 GMT +0100 (which was
03/02/2000 21:18 GMT +0700 my Local Time) you told to the list:
WB> ... you are using WinNT 4.0 with Service Pack 6 ?! I'm using WinNT
WB> 4.0, too, but with SP 5. Is this SP only an American version ? O
Hello Allie,
you wrote on Wednesday, 02.02.2000, at 05:51 Uhr:
= Original message text =
.
.
.
--
CU, Allie ...
Using The Bat! v1.39 «» Windows NT4.0 (Service Pack 6)
---
** Never underestimate the power of human stupidity. **
--
On Monday, January 31, 2000 at 18:44:53 ,dMb scribbled:
>> (a) attach the HTML file to the message;
>> (b) clear *everything* from the message editor, that is, leave your message
>> blank in TB.
>> TB will send the message as if it were just HTML, i.e. it won't attach the HTML,
>> it will rather
On Tuesday, February 01, 2000, 2:33:15 AM, Tony Boom wrote:
> It's fine having the envelope turn red just as long as that folder is
> open for you to see it. It would be nice for the folder itself to turn
> red should a message be filtered into an un open folder.
> Just what is the purpose of me
Hi tracer,
On 02 February 2000 at 20:03:24 GMT +0700 (which was 13:03 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points:
t> sofar we only managed to bread a load of dead horses and this one
t> is going that way..
t> Phil you post something nobody can read in an email newsletter, yo
This message: 02/02/2000 15:00 GMT.
Hello Derek,
Wednesday, February 02, 2000, 12:33:22 PM, you wrote:
DC> Okay okay, you got me ;)
DC> I forget about offline reading now that I have ADSL :)
I downloaded it last night and had a play. As soon as I sussed out
I couldn't download ev
Hello Steve Lamb,
On Tue, 1 Feb 2000 23:47:20 -0800 GMT your local time,
which was Wednesday, February 02, 2000, 2:47:20 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Steve Lamb wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 01, 2000 at 11:41:28PM -0800, Nick Andriash wrote:
>> NO!! He is _NOT_ partially right Alexander... not in ANY sen
Hello Nick Andriash,
On Tue, 1 Feb 2000 23:41:28 -0800 GMT your local time,
which was Wednesday, February 02, 2000, 2:41:28 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Nick Andriash wrote:
> On Tuesday, February 01, 2000, 3:27:29 PM, Alexander V. Kiselev wrote:
>>> * I thought that numbered replies went out
Hello John De Hoog,
On Wed, 02 Feb 2000 13:06:55 +0900 GMT your local time,
which was Wednesday, February 02, 2000, 11:06:55 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
John De Hoog wrote:
> Hello, Batmen and women,
> tracer wrote...
>>I had recently due to a clean install and hard disk reorganisation a
>>si
Hello Tony Boom,
On Tue, 1 Feb 2000 10:33:15 + GMT your local time,
which was Tuesday, February 01, 2000, 5:33:15 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Tony Boom wrote:
> This message: 01/02/2000 10:13 GMT.
> Hello Nick,
> Tuesday, February 01, 2000, 5:55:03 AM, you wrote:
NA>> My apologies Tony
Hello Jast,
On Tue, 1 Feb 2000 19:46:19 +0100 GMT your local time,
which was Wednesday, February 02, 2000, 1:46:19 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Jast wrote:
> Morning phil,
> Moderators here usually only notify people that are close to breaking the
> rules of that. More never was necessary.
>
Hello Thomas Fernandez,
On Tue, 1 Feb 2000 14:22:02 +0800 GMT your local time,
which was Tuesday, February 01, 2000, 1:22:02 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Thomas Fernandez wrote:
> Hi Roel,
> On Tue, 1 Feb 2000 05:41:53 +0100GMT (01/02/2000, 12:41 +0800GMT),
> Roel wrote:
> Saves on disk spac
Hello Jast,
On Tue, 1 Feb 2000 19:49:19 +0100 GMT your local time,
which was Wednesday, February 02, 2000, 1:49:19 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Jast wrote:
> Morning Allie Martin,
>> Actually I was referring to the WPC font that Phil posted. I have no
>> problems with courier new either. With r
Hello Thomas Fernandez,
On Tue, 1 Feb 2000 14:39:12 +0800 GMT your local time,
which was Tuesday, February 01, 2000, 1:39:12 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Thomas Fernandez wrote:
PF
> That's an idea, I'll let them log in via AOL and then have them open
> Netscape Mail. Do you happen to know whe
Hello Thomas Fernandez,
On Tue, 1 Feb 2000 21:28:52 +0800 GMT your local time,
which was Tuesday, February 01, 2000, 8:28:52 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Thomas Fernandez wrote:
> Hello TBUDL!
> I received this request from a new user; I think TBUDL is the correct
> forum for it. Please reply h
Hello Tony Boom,
On Tue, 1 Feb 2000 10:45:10 + GMT your local time,
which was Tuesday, February 01, 2000, 5:45:10 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Tony Boom wrote:
> This message: 01/02/2000 10:42 GMT.
> Hello all,
> Tuesday, February 01, 2000, 3:14:44 AM, you wrote:
AM>> I see only a size
Hello Allie Martin,
On Tue, 1 Feb 2000 07:33:30 -0500 GMT your local time,
which was Tuesday, February 01, 2000, 7:33:30 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Allie Martin wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Feb 2000 00:34:11 -0800, Tom Plunket wrote:
>> Again a fan of the way Agent does it. I just mark the threads th
Hello John De Hoog,
On Wednesday, February 02, 2000 at 20:31:54 GMT +0900 (which was
02/02/2000 18:31 GMT +0700 my Local Time) you told to the list:
TF "Could not connect to server" is quite common when I'm at home.
TF Yes. TB stops trying after you hit "cancel" once. However, when
Hello Tony,
Okay okay, you got me ;)
I forget about offline reading now that I have ADSL :)
Best regards,
Derek
In response to your message fromWednesday, February 02, 2000, 3:05:52 AM:
Tony> This message: 02/02/2000 08:04 GMT.
Tony> Hello cid,
Tony> Tuesday, February 01, 2000, 5:47
Thomas Fernandez wrote...
TF>>> "Could not connect to server" is quite common when I'm at home. Yes.
TF>>> TB stops trying after you hit "cancel" once. However, when you hit
TF>>> "check mail" again, it will resume the normal pattern.
JDH>>I tried that, but it didn't resume automatic checkin
This message: 02/02/2000 08:04 GMT.
Hello cid,
Tuesday, February 01, 2000, 5:47:21 PM, you wrote:
cin> It's got scoring, filtering, smart binary downloads, you name it.
Off line reading ??
--
_
Best regards,
Hello Allie,
On Wednesday, February 02, 2000 you wrote:
>>> I managed to get my inbox red. I copied two high priority messages
>>> to it and then marked them unread. What use is that? I don't know.
>> Come on, here the folder is blue in that case! Do you really mean
>> inbox??? Here only OUTbo
On Wed, Feb 02, 2000 at 04:04:39PM +0800, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
> I just only now saw your wording "... I could be blowing ...". At first, I
> had read "... that could be blowing ..." and (wrongly) assumed you were
> going to smooth things down for once. As if I didn't know you any better.
> ;-)
On Tue, Feb 01, 2000 at 11:59:31PM -0800, Nick Andriash wrote:
> I'm a Canadian.
I'm sorry. ;)
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
ICQ: 5107343 | main connection to the switchboard of souls.
---+--
Hi Steve,
On Tue, 1 Feb 2000 23:47:20 -0800GMT (02/02/2000, 15:47 +0800GMT),
Steve Lamb wrote:
SL> Obviously I'm missing some argument I could be greatly blowing out of
SL> perportion. Could someone please fill me in?
I just only now saw your wording "... I could be blowing ...". At
first,
Hi Steve,
On Tue, 1 Feb 2000 23:47:20 -0800GMT (02/02/2000, 15:47 +0800GMT),
Steve Lamb wrote:
SL> Obviously I'm missing some argument I could be greatly blowing out of
SL> perportion. Could someone please fill me in?
Since you didn't seem to get the postings while you were off-line, I
hav
On Tuesday, February 01, 2000, 11:47:20 PM, Steve Lamb wrote:
>Obviously I'm missing some argument I could be greatly blowing out of
>perportion. Could someone please fill me in?
ROTFLMAO :o)
Oh, it's nothing really Steve... John's original post mentioned some Bozo
that associated some Sof
47 matches
Mail list logo
