Hello Lynn,
On Sun, 23 Jun 2002 21:00:08 -0700 GMT (24/06/02, 11:00 +0700 GMT),
Lynn Turriff wrote:
LT Is there any way, apart from intuitive deduction, to
LT identify which information is forged, and which genuine?
Yes, and sorry for my typo in the previous mail. It should have been:
TF In
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello tbudl,
On Saturday, my computer crashed for some reasons. Shortly before
the crash, I got the message from Kerio Firewall that the file
thebat.exe has been replaced with another file of the same name.
Today, after I
On Monday, June 24, 2002, 12:21, Robert Golovniov wrote:
Can somebody perhaps send me the MD5 sum of his thebat.exe file for
the 1.60q version? What I have now is this:
7fbf3470708874e539621680a539a509
Same here and everything works fine.
--
Regards,
Marcus Ohlström
Using The Bat! v1.60q
Hello!
On Mon, 24 Jun 2002 13:21:49 +0300 Robert Golovniov
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
RG Has any of you experienced something similar?
No.
RG Can somebody perhaps send me the MD5 sum of his thebat.exe file
for the
RG 1.60q version?
RG What I have now is this:
Hey Zachary,
My MUA believes you used The Bat! (v1.60q) Personal
to write [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Saturday, June 22, 2002 at 11:57:28 PM.
ZR I subscribe to a mailing list where almost all of the members send
ZR messages with HTML formatting. If you ask me, HTML in email is a
Hello Marcus,
Monday, June 24, 2002, 2:07:48 PM, you wrote:
MO Same here and everything works fine.
What, then, can be the reasons of such a strange behaviour of my
firewall?
--
Robert mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-=Robert Golovniov | Lviv, Ukraine=-
Bat List,
The auto-complete for the subject seems to complete too quickly and is
a bit annoying. The problem is I like having the auto-complete for the
addresses. Is there anyway to have The Bat set up to not auto-complete
the subject line, but to just auto-complete the address field. In
On Monday, June 24, 2002, 1:58:54 PM, Robert Golovniov wrote:
What, then, can be the reasons of such a strange behaviour of my
firewall?
Does the firewall keep track of applications to monitor for Trojans?
What it might be warning you is that the checksum of the original
version of TB
--
Rick
Current Ver: 1.60q
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug
On Monday, June 24, 2002, Robert Golovniov wrote...
Has any of you experienced something similar? Can somebody perhaps
send me the MD5 sum of his thebat.exe file for the 1.60q version?
What I have now is this: 7fbf3470708874e539621680a539a509
Is 1.60q a full install? Or just an
Spake [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 6/21/2002, at 17:12:42 -0700:
i-dle, adj., idler, idlest, v. idled, idling --adj.
1. unemployed, or doing nothing
2. unoccupied
3. not kept busy or in use or operation
4. habitually doing nothing or avoiding work
5. of no real worth, importance, or significance
Spake Thomas F on 6/21/2002, at 08:17:47 +0700:
And why would Windows care about the actual definition? MS could just
have redefined it... ;-)
And just for informational purposes...
I left my computer all weekend, but apparently, since I check my mail every
60 seconds, my computer is not
Hello everybody,
I sincerely hope one of you can help me with this riddle.
I've just installed TB and, after it performed perfectly well immediately
following the installation, I set it aside AS IS because I wanted to try another
software before deciding.
A week later - that is today - I
On Monday, June 24, 2002, 17:20, Joyce Sala wrote:
A week later - that is today - I came back to TB and suddenly I have a
very strange problem that prevents me from downloading my mail.
It recognizes the server and even tells me how many messages it's
going to download. Then during the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Rick,
@24 June 2002, 09:48:52 -0400 (14:48 UK time) Rick Reumann wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
... Is there anyway to have The Bat set up to not auto-complete the
subject line, but to just auto-complete the address field.
Hi Joyce,
On Monday, June 24, 2002 at 17:20:47 [GMT +0200], you wrote:
It recognizes the server and even tells me how many messages it's
going to download. Then during the actual process, it tells me:
Received message from X, subject Y, etc. etc. Could not store
message (file name:
On Monday, June 24, 2002, 10:21:28 AM, Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
MDP Why not just ignore it and keep typing? The auto-complete will let you
MDP carry on typing from where you left off and override the suggestion.
Well, it seems to auto-complete pretty quick. Not a big deal
though you
Hello Marck,
Why not just ignore it and keep typing? The auto-complete will let you
carry on typing from where you left off and override the suggestion.
The problem comes when you want to type a shorter subject. For
example, if I send a message with subject Test number 2 and later I
want to
On Monday, June 24, 2002, 16:39, Miguel A. Urech wrote:
The problem comes when you want to type a shorter subject. For
example, if I send a message with subject Test number 2 and later I
want to send one with subject Test, it is quite likely the it will
go out with Test number 2 also. It's
Subject: Not Have Subject Auto-Complete
From: Marcus Ohlström
~~
Hello Marcus,
The problem comes when you want to type a shorter subject. For
example, if I send a message with subject Test number 2 and later I
want to send one with
Hi Marcus,
Does C:\Windows\temp\ still exist?
Yes, with all the temp files it made from TB.
Do you have write priviliges to that directory?
Nope.
Is there space available on the C: drive?
Yep! 15GB free...
Any ideas?
Joyce
===
Location: Tel Aviv - Israel
Does C:\Windows\temp\ still exist?
Yes, with all the temp files it made from TB.
Do you have write priviliges to that directory?
Nope.
Looks like you'll be needing write access to that directory, as it needs to
create the temp file.
Is there space available on the C: drive?
Yep! 15GB
On Monday, June 24, 2002, Joyce Sala wrote...
Do you have write priviliges to that directory?
Nope.
Then find out how to get write privileges to it... Then hopefully this
should go away.
Is there space available on the C: drive?
Yep! 15GB free...
Any ideas?
Also when quoting, you appear
On Monday, June 24, 2002, 18:10, Joyce Sala wrote:
Do you have write priviliges to that directory?
Nope.
Any ideas?
Yes. If you do not have write privileges to your temp directory then TB!
can't write anything there which prevents it from processing your mails
(as Lars Geiger pointed out
Hi Lars,
Sorry for the caps I was just too tired fighting TB to notice.
One common reason for such behaviour is that one message in your
mailbox is infected with a virus and a virus scanner prevents TB!
from creating the temporary file. That way, the infected mail is
never deleted from the
Hi Weaven,
You are the 2nd person telling me that but I don't have ANY
access limitation on ANY of my directories! So how can that be?
Frankly I'm groping in the dark.
Help!
Joyce
===
Location: Tel Aviv - Israel
Phone : 972 - 3 - 649 1806
Fax :
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Joyce,
@24 June 2002, 18:10:00 +0200 (17:10 UK time) Joyce Sala wrote in
003501c21b99$98513400$920e08d5@joycesala">mid:003501c21b99$98513400$920e08d5@joycesala
Does C:\Windows\temp\ still exist?
Yes, with all the temp files it made from TB.
Hello Robert,
On Mon, 24 Jun 2002 13:21:49 +0300 GMT (24/06/02, 17:21 +0700 GMT),
Robert Golovniov wrote:
RG Today, after I reinstalled everything, including The Bat!, I again
RG received the same warning. I mean, for the first couple of hours
RG everything was OK, but then this
Hello Damian,
On Mon, 24 Jun 2002 10:08:47 -0400 GMT (24/06/02, 21:08 +0700 GMT),
Damian Gerow wrote:
DG I left my computer all weekend, but apparently, since I check my mail every
DG 60 seconds, my computer is not 'idle'. So I have to either re-define idle,
DG or take out the idle check.
I
Hello Joyce,
On Mon, 24 Jun 2002 17:20:47 +0200 GMT (24/06/02, 22:20 +0700 GMT),
Joyce Sala wrote:
JS It recognizes the server and even tells me how many messages it's
JS going to download. Then during the actual process, it tells me:
JS Received message from X, subject Y, etc. etc. Could not
Hello Rick,
On Mon, 24 Jun 2002 09:48:52 -0400 GMT (24/06/02, 20:48 +0700 GMT),
Rick Reumann wrote:
RR The problem is I like having the auto-complete for the addresses.
RR Is there anyway to have The Bat set up to not auto-complete the
RR subject line, but to just auto-complete the address
Sunday, June 23, 2002, 9:05:22 PM, you wrote:
JA Try looking at the Full headers for the email... The
JA From: header is easily forged, as you can tell, and
JA can also be guessed from the recent Klez virus (or 99%
JA of spam) ;)
Yeah, I see a lot of those too.
JA By tracing down the
Hey Joyce,
My MUA believes you used Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.
to write 004101c21b9c$31751500$920e08d5@joycesala">mid:004101c21b9c$31751500$920e08d5@joycesala
on Monday, June 24, 2002 at 12:28:36 PM.
One common reason for such behaviour is that one message in your
mailbox is
On Monday, June 24, 2002, 10:54:07 AM, Nick Danger wrote:
N
ND One spot where that won't even work is with letter case.
EXACTLY! That's where I was having major trouble as well. It one
point I typed [ot] and I want to switch it to [OT] and I had to
type that pretty darn fast in
Sunday, June 23, 2002, 9:11:06 PM, you wrote:
JA Hi Lynn,
JA On Sun, 23 Jun 2002 21:00:08 -0700, you wrote:
Thanks ..
Is there any way, apart from intuitive deduction, to
identify which information is forged, and which genuine?
JA Take a quick look at the headers... some (helpful) mail
Spake Thomas F on 6/24/2002, at 22:27:50 +0700:
I believe idle in compu-speak is measured in nanoseconds. Again, it
might have been redefined in Redmond.
Yep. I ask it to do it if it's been idle for 3 minutes.
But then, checking every 60 seconds is rather often... if I did get
mail every
On Monday, June 24, 2002, Lynn Turriff wrote...
It sounds reasonable, and I've apparently lost the mail,
(I would have sent the header) but there was no path .. no
received headers .. it was as though I really had sent the
mail directly from myself to myself.
I've got one or two emails that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Joyce,
@24 June 2002, 18:31:13 +0200 (17:31 UK time) Joyce Sala wrote in
004e01c21b9c$8f4977c0$920e08d5@joycesala">mid:004e01c21b9c$8f4977c0$920e08d5@joycesala
You are the 2nd person telling me that but I don't have ANY
access limitation
Subject: Not Have Subject Auto-Complete
From: Thomas F
~~
Hello Thomas,
The way I see it, you have to use an autocomplete option that does not
include history
I have mine set for just All Address Books but the subject line
still
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Rick,
@24 June 2002, 11:39:21 -0400 (16:39 UK time) Rick Reumann wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ND One spot where that won't even work is with letter case.
EXACTLY! That's where I was having major trouble as well. It one
Hello Damian,
On Mon, 24 Jun 2002 11:44:17 -0400 GMT (24/06/02, 22:44 +0700 GMT),
Damian Gerow wrote:
DG I usually get somewhere between two and ten messages every couple of
DG minutes. On a bad day, it's upwards of forty. On a good day (or a day
DG in which things are severely broken), I get
On Monday, June 24, 2002, Rick Reumann wrote...
I don't think an option to turn off auto-complete for the subject
field would be that big of a deal.
They have it for the addressing, but not for subjects... and the
history for both addressing and subject are stored in the same file :P
Rather
Hi Joyce,
On Monday, June 24, 2002 at 18:28:36 [GMT +0200], you wrote:
One common reason for such behaviour is that one message in your
mailbox is infected with a virus and a virus scanner prevents TB! from
creating the temporary file.
I think that's quite unlikely, as I have Norton updated
On Monday, June 24, 2002, Lars Geiger wrote...
Now, let's say that one of the messages in your mailbox (at your ISP) is
infected with, for example, KLEZ. TB! tries to download this message and
stores it in a file $TEMP$\bat456.tmp. This is intercepted by NAV, so
TB! has no way of importing
Hi Lars,
on Mon, 24 Jun 2002 16:24:24 +0200GMT (24.06.02, 16:24 +0200GMT here),
you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
...
LG BTW, the users on this list are usually very kind and help each other
LG without shouting in the subject or setting messages to high priority.
LG :-)
Hi Marck,
On Monday, June 24, 2002, 4:48:37 PM, you [MDP] wrote:
MDP Okay, then delete the offending entries from the history list. Use the
MDP Alt-Down key to drop down the whole list, cursor down to the entry you
MDP don't want to keep and press delete. That'll fix ya!
Yes it would fix it but
Hello!,
SEND warning, there were no compatible authentication
mechanism's detected mean in the log?
I think the email is going out, but that seems to be in my log
all the time.
Thanks! Laura
--
Best regards,
alists mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello Thomas,
In Reference to your Posting on Monday, June 24 2002 at 08:23 AM PDT,
Do you have an antivirus software running? I suspect that mail
contains a virus. The mail gets downloaded into the C:\Windows\temp
directory and will be quarantined right away. TB cannot import it, of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Joyce
On 24 June 2002 at 18:10:00 +0200 (which was 17:10 where I live) Joyce Sala
thoughtfully wrote the following
Does C:\Windows\temp\ still exist?
Yes, with all the temp files it made from TB.
Do you have write priviliges to that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hail Marcus
On 24 June 2002 at 17:12:25 +0200 (which was 16:12 where I live) Marcus
Ohlström wrote and made these points
I'm however a bit suspicious
So am I.
C:\Windows\Temp is normally only found on Windows 9x systems and if I
remember
Hi Jonathan,
On Monday, June 24, 2002 at 11:09:11 [GMT -0500], you wrote:
JA It depends on which version of NAV she's using. The latest version
JA does a pop/smtp check for you, and replaces infected attachments
JA with a nice warning, so that wouldn't be the problem here.
I silently assumed
Hi all,
I would REALLY like to see TB support Newsgroups and the like.
Anyone else?
--
Ben Kennish
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Current Ver: 1.60q
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives :
Hello List,
On Monday, June 24, 2002 at 9:04:35 PM [EMAIL PROTECTED] [awc]
wrote (at least in part):
awc SEND warning, there were no compatible authentication
awc mechanism's detected mean in the log?
This means you might have set up The Bat! to use SMTP-Auth but the
server did not offer any
Hello Nick,
On Monday, June 24, 2002 at 9:08:13 PM you [NA] wrote (at least in
part):
NA Are you suggesting that if NAV detects a virus in one of the messages to
NA be downloaded, that none of the remaining messages will be downloaded by
NA TB?
It's not 'NAV' it's The Bat!. If one mail fails
On the topic of auto-complete one other thing I find a bit of a
nuisance. I love being able to start out addressing the to field by
starting to type the name and then using CTRL-+ to autocomplete. The
problem is as I start to get near the end of the line you can't really
see what you are
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi [EMAIL PROTECTED],
@24 June 2002, 12:04:35 -0700 (20:04 UK time) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SEND warning, there were no compatible authentication
mechanism's detected mean in the log?
Sounds like you
Monday, June 24, 2002, 3:01:33 PM, Rick Reumann wrote:
RR On the topic of auto-complete one other thing I find a bit of a
RR nuisance. I love being able to start out addressing the to field by
RR starting to type the name and then using CTRL-+ to autocomplete. The
RR problem is as I start to get
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Daniel Grunberg [DG] wrote:
DG 1. I used my browser to go to http://www.e-mailanywhere.com/, a
DG Web-based site for accessing an existing pop-based e-mail account
DG that I had read about.
You
Current Ver: 1.60q
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Andrea Zuercher [AZ] wrote:
AZ Yes, I have run into that, and it annoys me as well. Something
AZ else that annoys me is that when an address does autocomplete, it
AZ stays highlighted, so I have
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Angel,
@24 June 2002, 13:58:19 -0700 (21:58 UK time) Angel wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Oh yes! Looks like you're back with us - you and Rick Reumann both.
Good.
- --
Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- List moderator
TB!
SEND warning, there were no compatible authentication
mechanism's detected mean in the log?
MDP Sounds like you have SMTP authentication set on when your server
MDP doesn't use it.
thanks to everyone! that was it.
Laura
--
Best regards,
alistsmailto:[EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Rick Reumann [RR] wrote:
RR On the topic of auto-complete one other thing I find a bit of a
RR nuisance. I love being able to start out addressing the to field
RR by starting to type the name and
Hi:
Since a newsreader might be integrated in TB 2.0, I have been
wondering how many members of this mailing list actively participate
in newsgroups and whether or not newsgroups as communication mediums
have become obsolete. For the past couple of weeks, I have been
following several newsgroups
KG So what are your views on newsgroups? Curse, blessing or both?
Well, that depends on the contents :-)
For instance, Cerious Software (of the ThumbsPlus image management
software) uses newsgroups on their own news server to communicate with
their users, and for users to talk to eachother.
Hello Kai,
24. junij 2002, 23:58:08, you wrote:
KG So what are your views on
KG newsgroups? Curse, blessing or both?
It really depends... I'm beta-testing a new newsreader, and I'm
regularly following about 20 newsgroups on 4 servers (aside from the
beta-version ng, newsgroups on
Hi Kai,
KG annoying on newsgroups was spam which is obviously something
KG subscribers of a closed mailing list or forum hardly ever have to
KG deal with. I understand that there are several thousand newsgroups
KG out there, but I find that bascially no newsgroup I have
KG subscribed to offers
Hi all,
I would REALLY like to see TB support Newsgroups and the like.
Anyone else?
Me too!
--
Jonathan E. Brickmanhttp://joshuacorps.org
Live forever. If you don't know how, or aren't sure,
please ask, and I will tell you.
So what are your views on newsgroups? Curse, blessing or both?
I was a huge fan of USENET in 1986. Now I find it almost useless.
But non-USENET NNTP newsgroups are sometimes excellent. The only
examples I have right now are through http://www.blarp.com .
--
Jonathan E. Brickman
Monday, 6/24/02, 6:13 PM
Hi Ben,
On Mon, 24 Jun 2002, at 20:31:59 [GMT +0100] (which was 12:31 PM where I live)
you wrote about: 'Please release BatNews!'
BK I would REALLY like to see TB support Newsgroups and the like.
BK Anyone else?
RANTI shall not rant, I shall not rant!
No thank you. I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Recently, Paul Wilson squawked:
No thank you. I use a browser to surf, a newsreader for newsgroups and
The Bat! for mail. Never the twain shall meet!!
Same configuration here. Same reasons. No NG in The Bat! please.
- --
Bye Now,
Robert D.
The
On Saturday, June 22, 2002, 5:09:10 PM, Allie C Martin wrote:
MA I think I saw somewhere in the archive or FAQ how to filter and
MA exclude spam whose Recipient field has been suppressed. Any
MA pointer appreciated.
As your string search, look for a recipient string using the regular
On Friday, June 21, 2002, 4:54:31 AM, Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
delete the existing history list
how?
--
Dwight A. Corrin
P O Box 47828
Wichita KS 67201-7828
316.263.9706 fax 316.263.6385
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using The Bat! 1.60i on Windows XP version 5,1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday, June 24, 2002 Robert D. stated:
RD Recently, Paul Wilson squawked:
No thank you. I use a browser to surf, a newsreader for newsgroups and
The Bat! for mail. Never the twain shall meet!!
RD Same configuration here. Same reasons. No
On Monday, June 24, 2002, 10:47 PM, you wrote:
DAC On Friday, June 21, 2002, 7:01:42 AM, Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
I'd like someone with a .his file that causes it to file a report on
the BugTraq and upload the file as evidence.
DAC Done. Assigned id # 895.
I forgot to turn back OFF
On Monday, June 24, 2002, Paul Wilson wrote:
BK Anyone else?
RANTI shall not rant, I shall not rant!
No thank you. I use a browser to surf, a newsreader for newsgroups and
The Bat! for mail. Never the twain shall meet!!
/RANT
Why? The world is moving to unified messaging - not just email,
Tuesday, June 25, 2002, 1:02:50 PM, PFord wrote:
P On Monday, June 24, 2002, Paul Wilson wrote:
BK Anyone else?
RANTI shall not rant, I shall not rant!
No thank you. I use a browser to surf, a newsreader for newsgroups and
The Bat! for mail. Never the twain shall meet!!
/RANT
P Why? The
Hi Paul,
PW No thank you. I use a browser to surf, a newsreader for newsgroups
PW and The Bat! for mail. Never the twain shall meet!! /RANT
News readers and mail readers have 90% of the same features built-into
them. The only real difference are the transfer protocols and, to a
lesser extent,
Many thanks to you, Allie and Syafril for all the hard work...
and patience! :)
*hugs*! to you all...
Blessings and light,
~~~Angel
Monday, June 24, 2002 9:25:05 PM
--
-={+}=-Senza fiduccia niente-={+}=-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | TheBat! 1.60q
|
On Monday, June 24, 2002, Ben Kennish wrote:
How many people find the autocomplete for subject useful? If so,
what do you use it for?
Good questions. I can't think of any use for it. I'd love to be able
to turn it off, too.
--
PFord
The Bat! 1.60h (reg)
Windows 98 4.10 Build
Hello Yuki Taga,
In Reference to your Posting on Monday, June 24 2002 at 09:06 PM PDT,
Vehemently disagree. The world is not moving to unified messaging.
The world is moving back to a Unix-like concept of small, tight
applications doing very specific tasks --
Not that I am in favour of a
Hello Nick
Thank you for your email dated Tuesday, June 25, 2002, 5:49:29 AM, in which you wrote:
NA but without the bloat... as the
NA wary consumer will not stand for that anymore.
Unfortunately 'wary' consumers are few and far between.
--
Regards
William
Flying with The Bat! 1.60q
Hello Blarp,
On Mon, 24 Jun 2002 17:42:56 -0700 GMT (25/06/02, 07:42 +0700 GMT),
Blarp wrote:
B Personally, I like having e-mail and news integrated. It's what kept
B me hooked to lookOut Express for so long.
Some users on the German TB list are reading/writing news with TB and
an additional
Hello Rick,
On Mon, 24 Jun 2002 16:01:33 -0400 GMT (25/06/02, 03:01 +0700 GMT),
Rick Reumann wrote:
RR The problem is as I start to get near the end of the line you
RR can't really see what you are autocompleting as it is hidden off
RR the address field.
For me, this problem is not with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Dwight A Corrin [DAC] wrote:
^To:.*
DAC I've been filtering everything which doesn't have a @ in the To:
DAC header
How? String: '@' Location: 'Recipient' Presence: No ?
If so, this
Hi Thomas,
TF Some users on the German TB list are reading/writing news with TB
TF and an additional software (news2mail or so it is called). You
TF want me to find out more?
My guess is they're doing it through Hamster which seems to be the
Swiss, er uh German Army Knife of news/mail gateways.
86 matches
Mail list logo
