Re: NOD32
16 October 2002, 22:46, you wrote: CW Everytime I receive a mail with an attachment, I get this pop up that CW tells me that the 'memory has been tested and some file has been CW diagnosed'. I've used NOD for 18 months now and never seen this message ever. Which OS/version of NOD are you using? -- Clive Taylor Using The Bat! v1.61 Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Attachments aren't removed from 'attach' folder
Dear Bat users, From my account properties panel I chose to keep the file attachments of my incoming and outgoing emails in a separate folder (\MAIL\Account\Attach). What I've found out later is that when I delete an email (from my Inbox, Send Mail or any other folder), its associated attachment stored in 'Attach' folder still remains there instead of being removed automatically together with the message. I've tried to use different combinations of configurations in folder and account properties as: Empty trash folder on exit, Compress all folders on exit, Delete attached files when the message is deleted from Trash but I did not succeed. Does this lack of coordination, between messages and their attachments stored in separate folders, has a solution ? I'm using Bat 1.61 Salva Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Printing Page Numbers.
Dear Chris, Thursday, October 17, 2002 at 7:46:08 AM you wrote: CW How do I add page numbers to the bottom of each page printed? Message - Print setup - Mark the field: Print page numbers. -- Kind regards, Britt Malka |\/| | \__/ | \/\/ | | \\ // \ / \/ ... I'll be right back ... www.malka.it - www.malka.dk - www.supermalka.dk ... Mailer: Ritlabs SecureBat! v1.61 (7BA406E8D52) under Windows 2000 5.0 Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[4]: Getting rid of unwanted messages
Hello Joseph, On Wed, 16 Oct 2002 at 17:51:18[GMT -0500](which was 23:51 where I live) you wrote: JN If the filter is in your read section, then it will only act on JN messages after you have read them. No, I filter after they've been marked read. JN the PGP messages: you haven't read them yet. Try putting it in your JN incoming section. Tried that as well, that's the first thing I did and it still didn't work un fortunately. I know I must be doing something very basically wrong but can't see what at the moment :-( -- Best regards, Richard Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Attachments aren't removed from 'attach' folder
Hello Salvador, On Thu, 17 Oct 2002 at 10:03:10[GMT +0300](which was 08:03 where I live) you wrote: SE Dear Bat users, From my account properties panel I chose to keep the file attachments of SE my incoming and outgoing emails in a separate folder SE (\MAIL\Account\Attach). What I've found out later is that when I delete an SE email (from my Inbox, Send Mail or any other folder), its associated SE attachment stored in 'Attach' folder still remains there instead of being SE removed automatically together with the message. Does Account/properties/Files and folders/Delete attached files when message is deleted from Trash folder help, not that I've tried it myself but may well do. -- Best regards, Richard Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Attachments aren't removed from 'attach' folder
Thursday, October 17, 2002, 10:27:19 AM, you wrote: RW Does Account/properties/Files and folders/Delete attached files when RW message is deleted from Trash folder help, not that I've tried it RW myself but may well do. No, it doesn't help. Attachments still remain there... -- Salva Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Attachments aren't removed from 'attach' folder
Hi, Salvador Esque wrote in msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : No, it doesn't help. Attachments still remain there... AFAIK this bug is known and will be addressed in the next release (whenever that may be). Regards, Markus -- Using The Bat! 1.62/Beta5 under Windows NT 4.0 Build 1381 Service Pack 6 Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Charset ISO-8859-6 (Arabic) - how?
Hi, I need to be able to recognize email written in Arabic. How can I achieve that? Regards, Markus -- Using The Bat! 1.62/Beta5 under Windows NT 4.0 Build 1381 Service Pack 6 Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: MAPI
Hi, mm Meister wrote in msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : So, the current status is this: mailto: links call The Bat! if it is online. I haven't tested to see if it will initiate dialup. mailto: handling is independent from MAPI handling, AFAIK. Regards, Markus -- Using The Bat! 1.62/Beta5 under Windows NT 4.0 Build 1381 Service Pack 6 Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Smart Bat (was Re[2]: Bat newbies list?)
Hello Roelof! On Wednesday, October 16, 2002 at 11:58:05 PM you wrote: This is a shameless copy and paste from a message written by Dierk Haasis [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Since you've mentioned the copyright holder, no harm done. ;-) -- Dierk Haasis http://www.Write4U.de http://Zoo.Write4U.de PGP keys available: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=SendMyPGPkeys The Bat 1.62/Beta6 on Windows 95 4.0 1212 C That's what Love will make you do ... (Little Milton) Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Getting rid of unwanted messages
On Thursday, October 17, 2002, 09:08, Richard Wakeford wrote: I know I must be doing something very basically wrong but can't see what at the moment :-( I repeat what I've already said; post the filter here and let us evaluate it. -- Regards, Marcus Ohlström Using The Bat! v1.60q on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 3 PGP Public Key at http://www.canit.se/~marcus/pgp.asc Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Problem sharing a mailbox
Hallo David, On Thu, 17 Oct 2002 01:26:02 +0200GMT (17-10-02, 1:25 +0200GMT, where I live), you wrote: DC Here's the situation: I have a group of 4 people (a small company) who DC share a common address with the same username. I can't create aliases DC on the server, and the solution of forwarding all the mails from the DC main account to their personal ones isn't a possibility. TB! is DC configured to leave the messages on the server for 2 weeks so they all DC get the same e-mails, regardless of what each person does in its own DC inbox. A few questions. Is everyone of them using TB? And if so, do all copies of TB show the same behaviour? In the latter case you could try to ask the ISP about changes in the server. Does TB every time download all messages, or did it only once and afterwards only when you killed the dupes. That might point to a change on the server side. A solution for the current situation would be to let the four of them download their mail with the last of them to delete it immediately on the server. Unless their flow is real high, this action shouldn't cause more than one or two messages not to be distributed to the four of them (but only to the last). Since you've been working this way for months, the idea behind it is sound. However with a real high flow the storage on the server or the buffer that TB uses might overrun and cause something like this. Possible solutions: 1) Kill messages after a week 2) If your four are on a LAN and use TB, you could configure one copy of TB as server to collect and send the mail. Look at the TB help file for: The Bat! Networking Course to get more info on this subject. Now TB can delete mail on the server. 3) Install a real server on your LAN, this enables everyone to mail among themselves and with my server (I'm using Mailtraq) it's easy to distribute the mail to all four of them. Or if you'd like to spread the workload, to send every message only to one of them. And I expect the same functionality in other servers like Mercury or MDaemon. In my message I presumed four copies of TB, I'm not sure whether that's correct, but you didn't give lots of info. ;-) To do more possible error hunting: 1) Four copies of the same version of TB? 2) Do all copies experience the same problem? 3) Do other mua's have the same problem? 4) How often did the problem occur (without killing dupes, that only repeats the whole problem): once, once a month, once a half year, once per 65536 messages. 5) Was their a setup/version change before TB started to behave erroneously? (This includes other software, OS, hardware, ISP, internet connection) 6) Did something else change with the computers or the people that use them? (One of them taking the kids to office could prove disastrous. g) -- Groetjes, Roelof Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Handy option?
On Wednesday, October 16, 2002, 23:47, Jonathan Angliss wrote: 6? What happened to 2? Or the rest of them in between for that matter? ;) g Beta 2-5 has been out since late august/early september. At least some of them has been discussed on TBBETA. -- Regards, Marcus Ohlström Using The Bat! v1.60q on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 3 PGP Public Key at http://www.canit.se/~marcus/pgp.asc Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Smart Bat (was Re[2]: Bat newbies list?)
Hallo Dierk, On Thu, 17 Oct 2002 10:05:35 +0200GMT (17-10-02, 10:05 +0200GMT, where I live), you wrote: This is a shameless copy and paste from a message written by Dierk Haasis [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: DH Since you've mentioned the copyright holder, no harm done. ;-) I thought you might like it. Actually it was to emphasize the advantages of local archives that I discussed in another thread. ;-) -- Groetjes, Roelof Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Charset ISO-8859-6 (Arabic) - how?
Hallo Markus, On Thu, 17 Oct 2002 09:52:02 +0200GMT (17-10-02, 9:52 +0200GMT, where I live), you wrote: MG I need to be able to recognize email written in Arabic. How can I MG achieve that? Do you need to recognize the fact that an e-mail is written in Arabic or do you need to view the message in an Arabic character set? In the first case, you could filter on a string that mentions the correct charset in the kludges. In the latter case you'd need an Arabic font and I'm not sure whether they are fixed width like TB needs. -- Groetjes, Roelof Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Charset ISO-8859-6 (Arabic) - how?
Hi, Roelof Otten wrote in msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Do you need to recognize the fact that an e-mail is written in Arabic or do you need to view the message in an Arabic character set? In the first case, you could filter on a string that mentions the correct charset in the kludges. In the latter case you'd need an Arabic font and I'm not sure whether they are fixed width like TB needs. I need to prove that the sender announces the body wrongly as iso-8859-1 while it should be iso-8859-6 (if I'm not mistaken). I need to see the characters. I'll find out if the Bat can display it once I can get it to recognize the charset. I have some unicode fonts installed. Regards, Markus -- Using The Bat! 1.62/Beta6 under Windows NT 4.0 Build 1381 Service Pack 6 Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Getting rid of unwanted messages
Hello Marcus, On Thu, 17 Oct 2002 at 10:22:04[GMT +0200](which was 09:22 where I live) you wrote: MO I repeat what I've already said; post the filter here and let us MO evaluate it. I should have done what you said the first time and saved a lot of trouble. I have continually checked all the settings in the filter and thought I had them set up correctly but, when I pasted it into a message ready to send to you, I found that I had screensaver set as active. I really thought I'd checked it as inactive so I feel suitably humbled. The only excuse I can make is that I've found, when making settings, if you don't take the focus off the input box and then scroll with the mouse wheel to move down in the main window, you can inadvertently change the setting. I normally notice but didn't this time. Again humble apologies and I'll triple check everything next time. -- Best regards, Richard Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Getting rid of unwanted messages
On Thursday, October 17, 2002, 10:48, Richard Wakeford wrote: Again humble apologies and I'll triple check everything next time. :-) So, is your filter working like expected now? -- Regards, Marcus Ohlström Using The Bat! v1.60q on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 3 PGP Public Key at http://www.canit.se/~marcus/pgp.asc Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Getting rid of unwanted messages
Hello Marcus, On Thu, 17 Oct 2002 at 10:57:57[GMT +0200](which was 09:57 where I live) you wrote: MO So, is your filter working like expected now? Yup :-) -- Best regards, Richard Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: ATT Broadband connections problems
On Wednesday, October 16, 2002, 6:57:22 PM, Gary wrote: G Might try Netscape, Eudora, or Opera mail. All of these provide for a G mail user, sending and receiving mail, *however* I do not know if they now G provide for you to POP (get) your mail directly off their server now via G using TB! (or any mail client). Yahoo for example at one time allowed G this, but now *charge* for it. If you go to the sites mentioned above, you G can find out. Eudoramail does allow pop access, but it takes a lot of digging through their help-pages to find that out! You use pop.eudoramail.com as the pop server, and your own ISP's smtp server (or whatever smtp you have installed) for outgoing mail. -- Deborah Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Charset ISO-8859-6 (Arabic) - how?
Hi, Roelof Otten wrote in msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Export the message to .msg and edit the content-type header to show the right number. As it's plain text you can edit it with notepad. See if it helps. I already did that. I still need iso-8859-6 support in the Bat. Regards, Markus -- Using The Bat! 1.62/Beta6 under Windows NT 4.0 Build 1381 Service Pack 6 Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Feature request: Message folder showing
Hello TBUDL Members! That's quite an enigmatic subject. What I want is the following: In the View menu an item to show (or not show) the folder a specific message is in. Background: I use the MT to read all my incoming mail, but most of it is filtered beforehand into specific folders. To see if a message resides in the correct folder - filters not always work correct - I now have to context menu the message, choose Move to Folder ... and have a look. Wouldn't be much more convenient to see it in the grey header panel. -- Dierk Haasis http://www.Write4U.de http://Zoo.Write4U.de PGP keys available: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=SendMyPGPkeys The Bat 1.62/Beta6 on Windows 95 4.0 1212 C America is the only nation in history which miraculously has gone from barbarism to degeneration without the usual interval of civilization. (Georges Clemenceau) Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Feature request: Message folder showing
On Thursday, October 17, 2002, 11:33, Dierk Haasis wrote: Background: I use the MT to read all my incoming mail, but most of it is filtered beforehand into specific folders. To see if a message resides in the correct folder - filters not always work correct - I now have to context menu the message, choose Move to Folder ... and have a look. Wouldn't be much more convenient to see it in the grey header panel. You can add a column in the MT showing the folder. Right click the column header and make sure Folder is in the right box. -- Regards, Marcus Ohlström Using The Bat! v1.60q on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 3 PGP Public Key at http://www.canit.se/~marcus/pgp.asc Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Feature request: Message folder showing
Hello Marcus! On Thursday, October 17, 2002 at 11:50:02 AM you wrote: You can add a column in the MT showing the folder. Right click the column header and make sure Folder is in the right box. That doesn't actually work very good. I do already own a big screen (17) with a 1280 resolution, but still the complete path TB uses for folders (correctly so) doesn't show completely without moving other important fields of my screen estate ... OTOH, the header panel sorts in lines not rows, there is plenty of room. -- Dierk Haasis http://www.Write4U.de http://Zoo.Write4U.de PGP keys available: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=SendMyPGPkeys The Bat 1.62/Beta6 on Windows 95 4.0 1212 C Aim Low, Reach Your Goals, Avoid Disappointment. Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Charset ISO-8859-6 (Arabic) - how?
Hallo Markus, On Thu, 17 Oct 2002 10:46:34 +0200GMT (17-10-02, 10:46 +0200GMT, where I live), you wrote: MG I need to prove that the sender announces the body wrongly as MG iso-8859-1 while it should be iso-8859-6 (if I'm not mistaken). I MG need to see the characters. Export the message to .msg and edit the content-type header to show the right number. As it's plain text you can edit it with notepad. See if it helps. -- Groetjes, Roelof Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[3]: ATT Broadband connections problems
On Wednesday, October 16, 2002, 6:57:22 PM, Gary wrote: G Yahoo for example at one time allowed this, but now *charge* for it. Just for reference yahoo.co.uk still allows free pop mail access via your mail client. I use this for my genealogy lists. For some reason they didn't introduce the charge like yahoo.com did. -- Cheers, Anne Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: MAPI
Hello Markus, Thursday, October 17, 2002, 3:55:26 AM, you wrote: MG Hi, MG mm Meister wrote in msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : So, the current status is this: mailto: links call The Bat! if it is online. I haven't tested to see if it will initiate dialup. MG mailto: handling is independent from MAPI handling, AFAIK. OK. It's still not working quite right. After one successful emailing, the two other programs cease responding. Must go now. Will try to solve problem. In the meantime thank you Tim, and Marck. -- MMeister mmmailto:mmeister;sprintmail.com Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: MAPI
Hey mm, My MUA believes 'The Bat! (v1.61) Personal' was used to write mid:1725806757.20021016145716;sprintmail.com on Wednesday, October 16, 2002 at 2:57:16 PM. mM I can type faster than that! :-) agreed, but it works. the other problem is that a lot of support lists don't allow attachments (ya, you can get around that by putting it on a url and a link in your doc, but...) g -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Flying with The Bat! eMail v1.61 Windows 2000 5.0.2195 (Service Pack 2) Why don't you ever see the headline Psychic Wins Lottery? Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Cancelling a job before closing The Bat!
Hello Anne, On Wed, 16 Oct 2002 21:59:37 +0100 GMT (17/10/02, 03:59 +0700 GMT), Anne wrote: TF Under Option / Network Admin, I have ticked the radio button for TF Dial-Up, and then marked all the tickboxes under that. A A I wonder if this is why I get a problem? I don't use a dial A up setting - I'm on a LAN so it's set to use the Network connection A always. That should be the difference. On a DUN connection, TB will know that it may break. On a LAN, TB expects the connection to be stable, so you'll have to wait for timeout. Makes sense to me. TF None of my accounts have any tickmarks at Account / Properties / TF Network / [ ] Use account-specific... A Same here - it connects fine anyhow so I left it unticked. I'll try A it ticked and see if that solves the problem - it may tie in with A the above - i.e. telling The Bat! that it is on a Network here. No need to try it. If you had any settings there, I would have recommended you take them off. -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. When you smell an odorless gas, it is probably carbon monoxide. Message reply created with The Bat! 1.62/Beta1 under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build A using an AMD Athlon K7 1.2GHz, 128MB RAM Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: MAPI limits
Hi, Markus Gloede wrote in msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : It appears that the Bat's MAPI acceptor has limits regarding body size. I haven't counted it but it is likely that only 256 or so characters make it into the body. Sorry, false alert. Something is wrong with my query. Regards, Markus -- Using The Bat! 1.62/Beta6 under Windows NT 4.0 Build 1381 Service Pack 6 Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Cancelling a job before closing The Bat!
Thursday, October 17, 2002, 6:18:19 PM,Thomas wrote: TF That should be the difference. On a DUN connection, TB will know that TF it may break. On a LAN, TB expects the connection to be stable, so TF you'll have to wait for timeout. Makes sense to me. It does to me too now I know what it's supposed to be doing! TF No need to try it. If you had any settings there, I would have TF recommended you take them off. Off they will stay, thanks Thomas :-) -- Cheers, Anne Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
I was just Eicar test virus testing, when.....
I think I found a weakness in NOD32 pop3 scanning. At the moment, I'm running pop3 scanning and AVG with the plug-in. I thought I'd give this little set-up a test run. So; 1. I sent the test file as a notepad attachment using another of my e-mail address through e-mailanywhere.com directly to my address. I saved this sent message. Not a problem, pop3 and AVG picked up the files. 2. I then went in and forwarded the message using the e-mailanywhere. I needed to re-attach the file and again sent it to my address. This time pop3 missed it and AVG with the plug-in caught it! On checking the log in pop3, it appears it only checked the message text in the forwarded message and not the attached file aswell! Why would this happen? Has anyone else experienced this? Have I got something wrong in the set-up? Open to suggestions, as very confused! Cheers, Chris Weaven -- E-Mail - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Created Using The Bat! V1.61 and Virus Checked by NOD32 AVG. Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
question how to tell if a message has norton file attached?
Hello tbudl, is there a way to tell if norton antivirus detected a virus in a message and filter it to some other folder based on the attachment name containing norton antivirus? thanks!! -- Best regards, Laura mailto:alists;wildpetals.com Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Need help unsubscribing
Could someone please assist me with unsubscribing from this list? I've emailed what I thought was the unsubscribe address, but the mail came back. Any help appreciated. Thanks, Steve Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Need help unsubscribing
On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 07:48:23PM -0400 or thereabouts, Steven M. Sawczyn wrote: Could someone please assist me with unsubscribing from this list? I've emailed what I thought was the unsubscribe address, but the mail came back. Any help appreciated. Read your headers from any TBUDL email. -- Best regards, Gary Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Need help unsubscribing
Hi Steven! In message mid:003a01c27637$b0a0eb10$1758728d;arnold on Thursday, October 17, 2002, 6:48:23 PM, you wrote: SMS Could someone please assist me with unsubscribing from this list? I've SMS emailed what I thought was the unsubscribe address, but the mail came SMS back. Any help appreciated. Click Specials | Mailing List | Unsubscribe. -- --Scott. mailto:Wizard;local.nu Using The Bat! 1.61 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 on an AMD Athlon XP 1900 (1.6G real, 1.9G effective) with 512MB. Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: question how to tell if a message has norton file attached?
Hallo Laura, On Thu, 17 Oct 2002 16:04:15 -0700GMT (18-10-02, 1:04 +0200GMT, where I live), you wrote: awc is there a way to tell if norton antivirus detected a virus in awc a message and filter it to some other folder based on the awc attachment name containing norton antivirus? It seems highly unlikely to me that any virus scanner should react on the name of an attachment. However it seems even more unlikely to me that somebody in his right mind should send you an attachment called 'norton antivirus', unless the sender is somebody who often sends you illegal copies of software without prior notice. So it's probably a hoax or a virus and as norton triggers on it, it's likely to be a virus. That's my 2 cts. -- Groetjes, Roelof Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: question how to tell if a message has norton file attached?
Hello Roelof, Thursday, October 17, 2002, 5:28:20 PM, you wrote: RO Hallo Laura, RO On Thu, 17 Oct 2002 16:04:15 -0700GMT (18-10-02, 1:04 +0200GMT, where RO I live), you wrote: RO awc is there a way to tell if norton antivirus detected a virus in RO awc a message and filter it to some other folder based on the RO awc attachment name containing norton antivirus? RO It seems highly unlikely to me that any virus scanner should react on RO the name of an attachment. oh perhaps i didn't make myself clear. when norton finds a virus in the email, it puts an attachment on the document named norton antivirus when it does the quaranteen.. so i was hoping that there was some way to do something based on an attachment name, etc. I can think of countless other ways to utilize this... but this one is most important. I get tons of this and want to force a delete...if it had a virus. thanks! -- Best regards, alistsmailto:alists;wildpetals.com Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: I was just Eicar test virus testing, when.....
On Thursday, October 17, 2002, Chris Weaven wrote in mid:1527670089.20021017154635;Surfcity.net: CW I think I found a weakness in NOD32 pop3 scanning. Hmmm... This is troubling I downloaded the most fully nested EICAR test file. When NOD32 scanned it after GetRight pulled it in, it came up positive. I then emailed it from one account to another as an attachment. (My attachments are kept within the message envelope.) I also took that sent message (from the sent folder) and forwarded it to the same other address. Both messages came in fine and lodged in my Inbox, despite the fact that I have the NOD32 BAV active. When I scanned the Inbox Windows folder from Explorer with NOD32, there was no positive hit, either. Just to be sure that the attached ZIP files remained active and were not cleaned by the first scanning, on download, I extracted them from the messages and scanned each one. They came up positive on the NOD32 scanner, but neither one had a problem being saved as a separate file, although all AMON options are enabled. As I said, this is troubling. Anyone have a compelling explanation for this behavior? -- JN Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Need help unsubscribing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Steven, @17-Oct-2002, 19:48 -0400 (00:48 UK time) Steven M. Sawczyn said: Could someone please assist me with unsubscribing from this list? I've emailed what I thought was the unsubscribe address, but the mail came back. Any help appreciated. To unsubscribe, use the Specials | Mailing list | Unsubscribe option (oops - you're not running The Bat!, so that's not an option for you - oh well). Or you can log into the web interface to manage your list membership information. The address of the list interface can be found on the list information web page that appears as a link on list messages - www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLinfo.html (which also includes instructions about how to leave the list). Or you could send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED], wait for the Confirm response. Reply to that. That should do it. - -- Cheers -- .\\arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator TB! v1.62/Beta6 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2 ' -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.0-nr2 (Windows 2000) iD8DBQE9r1ieOeQkq5KdzaARAnDNAJ9e/YF0MJ919YWKaU8M9T4pbYSqcQCgyin2 86B2+avrJ4APpSrodt6MthU= =+96E -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: question how to tell if a message has norton file attached?
Hi Laura! In message mid:10331470372.20021017160415;wildpetals.com on Thursday, October 17, 2002, 6:04:15 PM, you wrote: A is there a way to tell if norton antivirus detected a virus in A a message and filter it to some other folder based on the A attachment name containing norton antivirus? Due to a bug in filtering mime headers (apparently can't do it), this apparently cannot be done in a direct manner. The best that I could do is this, which seems to catch both BugBear and Klez: BeginFilter Name: Maybe Virus Active: 1 Source: Inbox Target: Maybe Virus MainSet: 40Content-Type: multipart/alternative Actions: faoAdvIsAttach EndFilter Remember to fix the Target directory, and remember to move the rule up to the top of the list. -- --Scott. mailto:Wizard;local.nu Using The Bat! 1.61 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 on an AMD Athlon XP 1900 (1.6G real, 1.9G effective) with 512MB. Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: question how to tell if a message has norton file attached?
Hi! In message mid:138252794109.20021017200212;local.nu on Thursday, October 17, 2002, 8:02:12 PM, you wrote: SM Due to a bug in filtering mime headers (apparently can't do it), this SM apparently cannot be done in a direct manner. The best that I could do SM is this, which seems to catch both BugBear and Klez: Interestingly, I tried it on my spam, a total of 1815 messages, and it pulled out 12 messages, all of which were Klez or BugBear. I took a quick glance through the spam and wasn't able to find any more messages that had been stomped by Norton, so it appears to be 100% effeective. Chances are that it will work with messages stomped by other scanners, as well as messages with live BugBear and Klez. -- --Scott. mailto:Wizard;local.nu Using The Bat! 1.61 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 on an AMD Athlon XP 1900 (1.6G real, 1.9G effective) with 512MB. Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: I was just Eicar test virus testing, when.....
Hi Joseph, On Thursday, October 17, 2002 19:54 your local time, which was 17:54 my local time, Joseph N. [JN] wrote; JN I downloaded the most fully nested EICAR test file. When NOD32 JN scanned it after GetRight pulled it in, it came up positive. I then JN emailed it from one account to another as an attachment. (My JN attachments are kept within the message envelope.) I also took that JN sent message (from the sent folder) and forwarded it to the same JN other address. JN Both messages came in fine and lodged in my Inbox, despite the fact JN that I have the NOD32 BAV active. When I scanned the Inbox Windows JN folder from Explorer with NOD32, there was no positive hit, either. JN Just to be sure that the attached ZIP files remained active and were JN not cleaned by the first scanning, on download, I extracted them from JN the messages and scanned each one. They came up positive on the NOD32 JN scanner, but neither one had a problem being saved as a separate file, JN although all AMON options are enabled. JN As I said, this is troubling. Anyone have a compelling explanation JN for this behavior? Phew, it's not only me then! Surprises me that it even got through with the .bav plug-in! Allie sent me a mail with it on twice, once in a zip and another PGP encrypted, and both came through pop3 without a problem, but was picked up by AVG with the .bav plug-in! Maybe it's just the Eicar file or am I being kind? Still worrying though! Anyone with any comments, suggestions or anything? Chris. -- E-Mail - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Created Using The Bat! V1.61 and Virus Checked by NOD32 AVG. Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: I was just Eicar test virus testing, when.....
Hi Chris! In message mid:1417360232.20021017182805;Surfcity.net on Thursday, October 17, 2002, 8:28:05 PM, you wrote: CW Maybe it's just the Eicar file or am I being kind? The EICAR file should always be caught, otherwise the purpose of it is defeated. -- --Scott. mailto:Wizard;local.nu Using The Bat! 1.61 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 on an AMD Athlon XP 1900 (1.6G real, 1.9G effective) with 512MB. Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Printing Page Numbers.
Thanks Britt, On Thursday, October 17, 2002 09:04 your local time, which was 00:04 my local time, Britt Malka [BM] wrote; CW How do I add page numbers to the bottom of each page printed? Message - Print setup - Mark the field: Print page numbers. I knew it was something simple and I can't believe I missed it! Chris walks off holding his head in shame! :-) -- E-Mail - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Created Using The Bat! V1.61 and Virus Checked by NOD32 AVG. Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: I was just Eicar test virus testing, when.....
In mid:1417360232.20021017182805;Surfcity.net, Chris Weaven [CW] wrote:' CW Maybe it's just the Eicar file or am I being kind? CW Still worrying though! CW Anyone with any comments, suggestions or anything? I sent it to you zipped. This is why. If you try to unzip eicar.com then Amon will stop you. -- Allie C Martin \ TB! v1.62/Beta6 WinXP Pro (SP1) List Moderator/ PGP Key - http://pub-key.ac-martin.com Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: I was just Eicar test virus testing, when.....
Hi Allie, On Thursday, October 17, 2002 20:51 your local time, which was 18:51 my local time, Allie Martin wrote; I sent it to you zipped. This is why. If you try to unzip eicar.com then Amon will stop you. But I thought it had a function to check zipped files/compressed files? Chris. -- E-Mail - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Created Using The Bat! V1.61 and Virus Checked by NOD32 AVG. Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: On read filter.
Hi Peter, On Wednesday, October 16, 2002 12:29 your local time, which was 03:29 my local time, Peter Palmreuther wrote; Simply tell the 'Read message' filter to filter only message 'not flagged' and you're done. Is there a quick key combination to do this? If you want to delete a message set the flag (e.g. by using Ctrl+G) and _than_ delete it. The 'Read messages' filter won't be applied as the message is flagged and the normal 'Delete' operation is done. Also, what does Ctrl+G do? Thanks Chris. -- E-Mail - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Created Using The Bat! V1.61 and Virus Checked by NOD32 AVG. Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: I was just Eicar test virus testing, when.....
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In mid:198914835.20021017195450;qwest.net, Joseph N. [JN] wrote:' JN As I said, this is troubling. Anyone have a compelling JN explanation for this behavior? The thing is that neither Amon or the incoming plugin scanner will check archives. However, the plugin immediately detects the virus when you try to open the archive. A manual scan of the archive will also detect the virus. - -- Allie C Martin \ TB! v1.62/Beta6 WinXP Pro (SP1) List Moderator/ PGP Key - http://pub-key.ac-martin.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1-cvs (Win32) - GPGshell v2.60 iD8DBQE9r252V8nrYCsHF+IRAm/pAKCGZxouG2dG6N0VIPfMoVzydvyQPgCeIPqW 9RNckil1+HWVmFqM3QfpHJ0= =PN/p -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: I was just Eicar test virus testing, when.....
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In mid:18819068298.20021017185633;Surfcity.net, Chris Weaven [CW] wrote:' CW But I thought it had a function to check zipped files/compressed CW files? It does. Scan it manually and you'll see. Trying to open the archive from TB! also results in an archive check which will stop you from opening the archive. - -- Allie C Martin \ TB! v1.62/Beta6 WinXP Pro (SP1) List Moderator/ PGP Key - http://pub-key.ac-martin.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1-cvs (Win32) - GPGshell v2.60 iD8DBQE9r278V8nrYCsHF+IRAmePAJwNYFH8GDPwEX62G646VlArm1UDuACg+Rrs j9pt2hTWYOg+fhjxb5hPjfM= =5K5t -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: On read filter.
Hello Chris, On Thu, 17 Oct 2002 19:00:13 -0700 GMT (18/10/02, 09:00 +0700 GMT), Chris Weaven wrote: Simply tell the 'Read message' filter to filter only message 'not flagged' and you're done. Is there a quick key combination to do this? You can assign a hotkey to that filter. Also, what does Ctrl+G do? It toggles the flag on and off. Try it with this message (you'll see it only if you have the flag column visible in your folder headers). -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. Auf Tiefkuehlkost von Swansons: Serviervorschlag: Auftauen. Message reply created with The Bat! 1.62/Beta6 under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build A using an AMD Athlon K7 1.2GHz, 128MB RAM Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Which .exe is correct?
Hi Bats, This must have gotten lost in the other email on MAPI: I have discovered in the middle of all my confusion that I have two .exe files in The Bat! directory: the_bat.exe 2,43K 7/24/2002 and thebat.exe 4,580K 7/09/2002 Could this be the cause of the MAPI not working consistently? I just sent another email from one of the programs in question and it sent beautifully. No crash. Earlier today. Feh! I wonder if we'll get a Santa Bat again this year? Thanks all, MMeister -- mm mailto:mmeister;sprintmail.com Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Which .exe is correct?
Hi mm! In message mid:3645170605.20021017225407;sprintmail.com on Thursday, October 17, 2002, 9:54:07 PM, you wrote: MM I have discovered in the middle of all my confusion that I have two MM .exe files in The Bat! directory: MMthe_bat.exe 2,43K 7/24/2002 and thebat.exe 4,580K 7/09/2002 I have this: 07/09/2002 05:53 pm 4,689,408 thebat.exe -- --Scott. mailto:Wizard;local.nu Using The Bat! 1.61 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 on an AMD Athlon XP 1900 (1.6G real, 1.9G effective) with 512MB. Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Which .exe is correct?
Hello mm, On Thu, 17 Oct 2002 22:54:07 -0400 GMT (18/10/02, 09:54 +0700 GMT), mm Meister wrote: I have discovered in the middle of all my confusion that I have two .exe files in The Bat! directory: the_bat.exe 2,43K 7/24/2002 This is the downloaded file, a self-extracting full install. and thebat.exe 4,580K 7/09/2002 This is your .exe file. Your link or shortcut points to this file. Could this be the cause of the MAPI not working consistently? No. ;-) -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. Pray: To ask that the laws of the universe be annulled in behalf of a single petitioner confessedly unworthy. (Ambrose Bierce) Message reply created with The Bat! 1.62/Beta6 under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build A using an AMD Athlon K7 1.2GHz, 128MB RAM Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Which .exe is correct?
Hello Bats, Thursday, October 17, 2002, 10:59:08 PM, you wrote: SM Hi mm! SM In message mid:3645170605.20021017225407;sprintmail.com SM on Thursday, October 17, 2002, 9:54:07 PM, you wrote: MM I have discovered in the middle of all my confusion that I have two MM .exe files in The Bat! directory: MMthe_bat.exe 2,43K 7/24/2002 and thebat.exe 4,580K 7/09/2002 SM I have this: SM 07/09/2002 05:53 pm 4,689,408 thebat.exe I'm running version 1.61 personal. My 7.09.02 file is also 17.53 but the size is different. 4,580 KB Will I have to re-install The Bat! ? Can I just delete one of the exe's safely? Thank you, Scott. -- Kind regards, MMeister mmmailto:mmeister;sprintmail.com Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[3]: Which .exe is correct?
Hello mm, Thursday, October 17, 2002, 10:11:46 PM, you wrote: SM I have this: SM 07/09/2002 05:53 pm 4,689,408 thebat.exe mM I'm running version 1.61 personal. My 7.09.02 file is also 17.53 but mM the size is different. 4,580 KB Right-click and select Properties; it should show the real file size there instead of the approximate size that Windows usually shows. -- Best regards, Scottmailto:Wizard;local.nu Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: I was just Eicar test virus testing, when.....
On Thursday, October 17, 2002, Allie C Martin wrote in mid:154275702148.20021017211416;landscreek.net: The thing is that neither Amon or the incoming plugin scanner will check archives. However, the plugin immediately detects the virus when you try to open the archive. A manual scan of the archive will also detect the virus. Confidence restored. It would be nice, though, if there were some type of notice when trying to open the archive. All I get (with NOD32 and WinRAR 3.00) is a WinRAR window telling me that access is denied. If I didn't already know it was due to the presence of a virus, I wouldn't find out from trying to open the file. -- JN Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
How do I install the bet rar file?
Hello, Sorry to seem so thick but how do I install the beta with the .rar extension? -- Best regards, Richard mailto:rwakeford;cix.co.uk Using The Bat! 1.61 under Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: How do I install the bet rar file?
Hi Richard! In message mid:3017709404.20021018043545;cix.co.uk on Thursday, October 17, 2002, 10:35:45 PM, you wrote: RW Sorry to seem so thick but how do I install the beta with the .rar RW extension? http://www.rarlab.com/ -- --Scott. mailto:Wizard;local.nu Using The Bat! 1.61 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 on an AMD Athlon XP 1900 (1.6G real, 1.9G effective) with 512MB. Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: How do I install the bet rar file?
Hello Scott, On Thu, 17 Oct 2002 at 22:40:10[GMT -0500](which was 04:40 where I live) you wrote: RW Sorry to seem so thick but how do I install the beta with the .rar RW extension? SM http://www.rarlab.com/ Oh heck I really can't be bothered :-) I'll wait for the proper programme release. -- Best regards, Richard Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: I was just Eicar test virus testing, when.....
Hi Joseph, On Thursday, October 17, 2002 22:27 your local time, which was 20:27 my local time, Joseph N. [JN] wrote; JN Confidence restored. It would be nice, though, if there were some JN type of notice when trying to open the archive. All I get (with NOD32 JN and WinRAR 3.00) is a WinRAR window telling me that access is denied. JN If I didn't already know it was due to the presence of a virus, I JN wouldn't find out from trying to open the file. To go one step further, it would be a nice touch if scanners did check compressed files also. Would be a bummer if you forwarded it to someone, without even opening it, who hasn't got a virus scanner, and wam, payload dropped on their machine! Mind you, everyone should have a virus scanner! Can you believe, on my old PC, I didn't run a virus scanner for atleast a year! Wouldn't go a day now! Chris. -- E-Mail - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Created Using The Bat! V1.61 and Virus Checked by NOD32 AVG. Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Which .exe is correct?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday, October 17, 2002, mm Meister wrote... MM I have discovered in the middle of all my confusion that I have MM two .exe files in The Bat! directory: MMthe_bat.exe 2,43K 7/24/2002 and thebat.exe 4,580K 7/09/2002 SM I have this: SM 07/09/2002 05:53 pm 4,689,408 thebat.exe I'm running version 1.61 personal. My 7.09.02 file is also 17.53 but the size is different. 4,580 KB Will I have to re-install The Bat! ? Can I just delete one of the exe's safely? You don't have to touch either executable files. The first file is the self extracting setup program, while the second is the actual application. This won't cause you any problems :) - -- Jonathan Angliss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Comment: Fingerprint: 676A 1701 665B E343 E393 B8D2 2B83 E814 F8FD 1F73 iQA/AwUBPa+LFCuD6BT4/R9zEQI94ACgsbX5b4nU8hcrHl6/i941UxcC2NUAoNiY K4jBkeuz0+A9CkYM7XEfcyQa =xQ8g -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: How do I install the bet rar file?
On Thursday, October 17, 2002, 10:46:43 PM, Richard Wakeford wrote: I'll wait for the proper programme release. it will be a .rar file as well -- Dwight A. Corrin P O Box 47828 Wichita KS 67201-7828 316.263.9706 fax 316.263.6385 mailto:dcorrin;cox.net Using The Bat! 1.62/Beta6 on Windows XP version 5,1 Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: How do I install the bet rar file?
Hello Dwight, On Thu, 17 Oct 2002 at 23:34:11[GMT -0500](which was 05:34 where I live) you wrote: I'll wait for the proper programme release. DAC it will be a .rar file as well Surely not. It will either be a ZIP or EXE file? -- Best regards, Richard Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: I was just Eicar test virus testing, when.....
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday, 18 October 2002 at 2:51 p.m. Allie wrote: ACM I sent it to you zipped. This is why. If you try to unzip ACM eicar.com then Amon will stop you. OK, now I am interested. I have just done some playing around with the files myself out of interest and what you say above does not seem to be true, at least for me. Amon *let* me unzip both zipped files without warning me BUT when I attempted to open the unzipped files, it then gave me a warning as I would have expected. I am curious about your statement above - were you assuming that, or is that what happens for you? I am not using the plugin by the way, not that that should make any difference. - -- Carren PGP public key: mailto:MyPGPkey;myrealbox.com?subject=PGP_Key_Body=Please%20send%20key -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.0-nr2 (Windows 98) - GPGshell v2.60 iD8DBQE9r49RyogQhPvf03MRAp+LAKCLcdbteRajyaXKLYtXsVhpvykqgQCfYr9C vJIYg2AWZH4gIO9Vy4Nk7G4= =oJFH -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Handy option?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday, October 17, 2002, Marcus Ohlström wrote... 6? What happened to 2? Or the rest of them in between for that matter? ;) g Beta 2-5 has been out since late august/early september. At least some of them has been discussed on TBBETA. I think the joke was missed by a couple of people... No major version number was quoted, so was read as v6 of TB! was in Beta testing ;P I guess my unusual sense of humour is lost on most ;) - -- Jonathan Angliss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Comment: Fingerprint: 676A 1701 665B E343 E393 B8D2 2B83 E814 F8FD 1F73 iQA/AwUBPa+Q6iuD6BT4/R9zEQKKEQCcChuegKlnfZ/YoAjZsBwF+87C55EAoPUq DMe6rwGdMwurUsX4DiQRGF9V =iMZQ -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: I was just Eicar test virus testing, when.....
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In mid:1407572987.20021018174028;myrealbox.com, Carren Stuart [CS] wrote:' CS Amon *let* me unzip both zipped files without warning me BUT CS when I attempted to open the unzipped files, it then gave me a CS warning as I would have expected. I am curious about your CS statement above - were you assuming that, or is that what CS happens for you? You're correct on this. The same thing happens here. - -- Allie C Martin \ TB! v1.62/Beta6 WinXP Pro (SP1) List Moderator/ PGP Key - http://pub-key.ac-martin.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1-cvs (Win32) - GPGshell v2.60 iD8DBQE9r5GjV8nrYCsHF+IRAjXRAJ9vl5g1gB4nIU+vtHe4fq9iL3iorgCgmvib jdutH56G/wgFmmcjP06hn/E= =zZQ9 -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: I was just Eicar test virus testing, when.....
On Thursday, October 17, 2002, Chris Weaven wrote in mid:16826186323.20021017205511;Surfcity.net: CW To go one step further, it would be a nice touch if scanners did check CW compressed files also. Chris, This may be a terminology thing, but the NOD32 scanner does check compressed archive files. The AMON real-time monitor apparently does not, but it *does* check when an infected file is extracted from a compressed archive file. So, it does seem as though all doors are being guarded, although by different sentries in different ways. -- JN Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: I was just Eicar test virus testing, when.....
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday, October 17, 2002, Chris Weaven wrote... To go one step further, it would be a nice touch if scanners did check compressed files also. Some do... some don't. Some companies don't deem it necessary to waste system resources reading the contents of an archive when they really only need to do it when the contents are executed/extracted. The mail server scanning software I run scans all kinds of archives from the standard zip to sit (Mac Stuff-it files) and unix tar and gzip files. - -- Jonathan Angliss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Comment: Fingerprint: 676A 1701 665B E343 E393 B8D2 2B83 E814 F8FD 1F73 iQA/AwUBPa+VZCuD6BT4/R9zEQK0PgCePZJsadx4cO9Jqq2BpTcLqEvAsgkAoPR6 ZED6/via/b62bErZTWxjOEo5 =QW+g -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
