Re: Posting messages problem

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Sergey, @22-Feb-2003, 15:45 -0600 (21:45 UK time) Sergey Kalabekov [SK] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: SK> I just wanted to notify you that I found the problem with SK> posting messages to the group. Well, it's obviously working now . SK> Do you

Re: Wrapping Taglines ?

Hello John, On Sat, 22 Feb 2003 12:21:54 -0600 GMT (23/02/03, 01:21 +0700 GMT), John Morse wrote: > Thanks, I was able to add the "\n" to the text file where I wanted it > to wrap. But I never could get the %Wrapped="%Cookie" to work. > How do I use it when the cookie is calling up a certain file

Re: AOL From: and Date: anomalies.

Dear Daniel, On 15:25 21.02.2003, you [Daniel Grunberg ([EMAIL PROTECTED])] wrote... > Does anyone know if the problem is with AOL, or with the AOL users? These problems arise because AOL "internally" uses a non-Internet mail system. Messages send from AOL to AOL never have headers or so. Messag

Re: Plug-in/Feature Request to allow one to define a plugin to dosomething on a message or group of messages

Hello John, > I looked over the manual, but it was way to vague for me. > Especially when all I ever seen from the program was a DOS program. A DOS program If you have installed POPFile you should have aPOPFile Program group in Star/Programs. There you have access to two versions of the manu

POPFile setup

Hello John, Saturday, February 22, 2003, 3:11:33 PM, you wrote: JM> I looked over the manual, but it was way to vague for me. JM> Especially when all I ever seen from the program was a DOS program. The DOS console you saw running was not POPFile, it was the Perl interpreter. POPFile is written i

Re: Plug-in/Feature Request to allow one to define a plugin to dosomething on a message or group of messages

On Saturday, February 22, 2003, 22:11, John Morse wrote: M>> | Installing POPFile M>> | Setting up Buckets for mail classification M>> | Getting your email program to work with POPFile M>> | Training POPFile > I looked over the manual, but it was way to vague for me. > Especially when all I ev

Posting messages problem

Hello Marck, I just wanted to notify you that I found the problem with posting messages to the group. Do you remember I was torturing you with this problem about three months ago? Iwasusingtemplate %FROM="Sergey Kalabekov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" whenIpostedmessagesu

Re: POPFile Question

Hello Miguel, Saturday, February 22, 2003, 2:57:58 PM, you wrote: MAU> If you are using POPFile v0.18.0 and leave subject modification MAU> enabled globally in Configuration, you can then go to the Buckets MAU> screen and disable it for specific buckets. Cool! Yes, I see now, that I can do that,

Re: Plug-in/Feature Request to allow one to define a plugin to dosomething on a message or group of messages

Miguel A. Urech wrote: M> | Installing POPFile M> | Setting up Buckets for mail classification M> | Getting your email program to work with POPFile M> | Training POPFile I looked over the manual, but it was way to vague for me. Especially when all I ever seen from the program was a DOS program.

Re: Email restrict

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Allister, @23-Feb-2003, 09:22 +1300 (20:22 UK time) Allister Jenks [AJ] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: >> Could be. As I said, it worked here, but YMMV and that's a very >> good suggestion. AJ> Can someone point me to the list of *common*, *accep

Re: Plug-in/Feature Request to allow one to define a plugin to dosomething on a message or group of messages

Hello John, > I never could figure out how to setup Popfile. Once installed the Manual is available: ,- [ ] | To learn how to set up POPFile, please choose one of the following options. | | Installing POPFile | Setting up Buckets for mail classification | Getting your email program to wo

Re: Plug-in/Feature Request to allow one to define a plugin to dosomething on a message or group of messages

Hello Krister, > May i ask why? Is Spampal harder to set up? Less ackurate? I also want > to use the best, so am curious as to why folks prefer one thing over > the other, but it's also of course a matter of preference. I'm only interested in Bayesian classification and that is only one of the op

Re: POPFile Question

Hello Robert, > I also figured out, that in order for this to be done, and allow the > spam to still be sorted properly, I had to add a new filter, based on > the Kludge string 'X-Text-Classification: spam', because my original > filter had been based on the Subject line prepend [spam]. If you ar

Re: Email restrict

> Could be. As I said, it worked here, but YMMV and that's a very good > suggestion. Can someone point me to the list of *common*, *accepted* abbreviations for use in emails? BTW, OTOH, IMHO, LOL (even ROTFL) are all old and well used. YMMV? Gimme a break. (GAB?) Regards, Allister. -- Using

Re: POPFile Question

Hello Sean, Saturday, February 22, 2003, 12:34:04 PM, you wrote: S> Go to the Popfile Control Center and click on the "configuration" tab. S> Find the item that says "subject line modification" and switch the S> option to off. Thanks! I also figured out, that in order for this to be done, and a

Re: AOL From: and Date: anomalies.

Sat, 22 Feb 2003 19:11:58 [GMT +0100] (1:11 PM EST here) Roelof Otten wrote: > Hallo Daniel, > On Sat, 22 Feb 2003 11:56:14 -0500GMT (22-2-03, 17:56 +0100, where I > live), you wrote: DG>> That's true, but I'm trying to generate automatically a DG>> compilation of replies by name (and not by ema

Re:POPFile Question

Saturday, February 22, 2003, 10:31:32 AM, Robert wrote: RCW> I want to get rid of the 'ok', in the Subject line. TIA for any RCW> suggestions. Go to the Popfile Control Center and click on the "configuration" tab. Find the item that says "subject line modification" and switch the option to off.

Re: Wrapping Taglines ?

Januk Aggarwal wrote: J> No, you need to use the %Wrapped macro around the text you want J> wrapped. Ie: J> %Wrapped="%Cookie" J> Alternately, you can add "\n" (without quotes) any place you want a J> line break in your cookie file. Thanks, I was able to add the "\n" to the text file where I wan

Re: AOL From: and Date: anomalies.

Hallo Daniel, On Sat, 22 Feb 2003 11:56:14 -0500GMT (22-2-03, 17:56 +0100, where I live), you wrote: DG> That's true, but I'm trying to generate automatically a DG> compilation of replies by name (and not by email address). Toward DG> that end, I can use a template to capture the reply's DG> orig

Re: **SPAM** Re[2]: Macros and MAPI

Thomas, On 22-02-2003 13:43, you [T] wrote in : T> What if a TBUDL member from these countries sends a posting? I used T> to live in Taiwan, and one TBUDL member never received my postings, T> because he deleted all incoming mails with the .tw TLD. ;-) If it goes through th

Re: Plug-in/Feature Request to allow one to define a plugin to dosomething on a message or group of messages

Krister Ekstrom wrote: MAU>> Yes, for a couple of days and decided to stay with POPFile. I never could figure out how to setup Popfile. -- Regards, John Morse "Pride is what we have, vanity is what others have" Current version is 1.62 | "Using TB

Re: AOL From: and Date: anomalies.

Sat, 22 Feb 2003 15:59:23 [GMT +0100] (9:59 AM EST here) Andre Wichartz wrote: > On Friday, February 21, 2003, 09:25:00 -0500 GMT (which was 15:25 > local time), Daniel Grunberg wrote: DG>> 1. Our AOL using memberts' messages are time tagged with the DG>> abbreviation for their time zone, rat

POPFile Question

I am relatively new to The Bat (a couple months). I just installed POPFile, and it is up and running great. I set two Buckets... 'spam', and 'ok'. I want to get rid of the 'ok', in the Subject line. TIA for any suggestions. ...also, because I am a The Bat newbie... I am curious to know if there

Re: AOL From: and Date: anomalies.

Hello Daniel, On Friday, February 21, 2003, 09:25:00 -0500 GMT (which was 15:25 local time), Daniel Grunberg wrote: DG> 1. Our AOL using memberts' messages are time tagged with the DG> abbreviation for their time zone, rather than with their time DG> zone's offset from UTC (which I thought

Re: **SPAM** Re[2]: Macros and MAPI

Hello Peter, On Sat, 22 Feb 2003 11:10:18 +0100 GMT (22/02/03, 17:10 +0700 GMT), Peter Fjelsten wrote: > In my view, SpamCop is too hard. Actually, banning Korean and Chinese > IPs get me a long way (I don't know anyone there). What if a TBUDL member from these countries sends a posting? I used

Re: Plug-in/Feature Request to allow one to define a plugin to dosomething on a message or group of messages

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 Hi Miguel, In a message with mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 21 Feb 2003 21:37:09 , you typed: >> Have you guys used SpamPal ? MAU> Yes, for a couple of days and decided to stay with POPFile. May i ask why? Is Spampal harder to set up? Less ackurate

Re: Email restrict

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Januk, @22-Feb-2003, 00:55 -0800 (08:55 UK time) Januk Aggarwal [JA] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: JA> It was foretold that on Friday, February 21, 2003 at 12:19 GMT JA> +, Marck Pearlstone would type: >> %if:"%SETPATTREGEXP='(?i)sat|sun'%RE

Re: **SPAM** Re[2]: Macros and MAPI

Allie, On 22-02-2003 01:06, you [A] wrote in : A> In , A> Peter Fjelsten [PF] wrote:' PF>> Actually, I only get false negatives with Bayesian and no false PF>> positives with blacklists. A> No false positives with BlackLists? Wow! :) Nevertheles

Re: Plug-in/Feature Request to allow one to define a plugin to dosomething on a message or group of messages

~John, On 22-02-2003 01:25, you [~] wrote in : ~> Peter Fjelsten wrote: M>>> But that is also because Spampal has the option to "bounce" (actually M>>> a reply) spam messages which, to my knowledge, is completely wrong in M>>> concept. If bounce (or reply to) real spam it wi

Re: Email restrict

Hi Marck, It was foretold that on Friday, February 21, 2003 at 12:19 GMT +, Marck Pearlstone would type: > %if:"%SETPATTREGEXP='(?i)sat|sun'%REGEXPMATCH='%DOW'"="":%- > "%if:_%TIME_>_08:30_:%- > _%if:+%TIME+<+17:30+:%- > +%To=''%To='Fred at Work <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>'+_"%- > That does it. Satu