-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: RIPEMD160 Hi Miguel, In a message with mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 21 Feb 2003 21:37:09 , you typed:
>> Have you guys used SpamPal ? MAU> Yes, for a couple of days and decided to stay with POPFile. May i ask why? Is Spampal harder to set up? Less ackurate? I also want to use the best, so am curious as to why folks prefer one thing over the other, but it's also of course a matter of preference. - -- - -- /Krister mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This mail brought to you by The bat! V1.63 Beta/5, on Windows 98 4 10 build 2222 Pgp keys available here: Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 6.5.8ckt iQA/AwUBPldTsjg5SXqDEzkLEQM30ACgqeswsY0PXXO7ewsSx9P3QVNjuDgAoOM4 1TroeFK91UJoESGByqLBxnMV =wvjH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ________________________________________________ Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
