Re: MicroEditor (was Re[2]: Bat Alternatives)

Rich Gregory, [RG] wrote: RG> Auto-format IS checked. Sometimes the editor wraps 1 way, sometimes RG> another, and sometimes not at all. If I just type it wraps, if I RG> paste text into a paragraph it doesn't. MicroEd doesn't soft wrap. When you paste text in an editor that behaves as you're fam

Re[2]: MicroEditor (was Re[2]: Bat Alternatives)

AM> auto-format enabled, fresh text will be wrapped as you type. Ensure that AM> autoformat is enabled by looking for the check mark beside it in the AM> Utilities menu of the editor. Auto-format IS checked. Sometimes the editor wraps 1 way, sometimes another, and sometimes not at all. If I just t

Move messages older than 30 days

I know you can do this, but my situation is problematic. I have 4 mailing lists, I want to filter them manually from time to time so that mail older than 30 days is moved to a subfolder called 'old'. I tried this and forgot that every filter I created for each subfolder actually runs on every sub

Re: MicroEditor (was Re[2]: Bat Alternatives)

Rich Gregory, [RG] wrote: RG> I was not referring to quoted text. Would that setting affect RG> "fresh" text I am inputting? Smartwrapping will wrap quoted material when the reply is generated. With auto-format enabled, fresh text will be wrapped as you type. Ensure that autoformat is enabled by

Re[2]: MicroEditor (was Re[2]: Bat Alternatives)

RG>> I have autoformat turned ON in the preferences and yet I STILL RG>> have to press ALT-L on each and every paragraph in any email I am RG>> composing that does not wrap by itself! AM> Try the 'smart wrapping of quoted text' option in the editor AM> preferences. I was not referring to quoted te

Re[2]: Security concerns

rg>> physical security ... access to your computer PO> something a user, has to take care of him/herself. rg>> warnings include X-Headers that identify the attachments directory, rg>> CR/LF mishandling, and other things. PO> Something new to me. Any references / explanations? Just a matter of curi

Re: MicroEditor (was Re[2]: Bat Alternatives)

Hello rich gregory, on Fri, 14 Nov 2003 20:54:31 -0500 (2003-11-15 02:54:31 in .nl) in the message with reference you wrote (at least in part): RG>>> Is there any way to make MicroEd default to that ALT-L more? RA>> Do you mean AutoFormat (Shift+Ctrl+F)? rg> Hi gang! I wa

Re: Mod: Dead Horse Alert (was: Bat Alternatives)

Hi Allie Friday, November 14, 2003, 9:32:17 PM, you wrote: AM> AM> Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not AM> just to the person being replied to, even if their post may have AM> instigated this reply. Please don't feel singled out Vishal. Interesting that you foun

Re[2]: Bat Alternatives

Hi Tony Friday, November 14, 2003, 7:37:04 AM, you wrote: TB> So all we need to do now is to tune Vishal to the same place on the TB> dial. We're already there Tony. We're talking about the same thing, only that Marck says that what I see cannot happen. Unfortunately it does. Or maybe not so u

Re[2]: Bat Alternatives

Hi Marck Thursday, November 13, 2003, 10:23:58 PM, you wrote: MDP> Okay - please understand me when I inform you that when it happens MDP> for you, then there is a specific reason for it. Obviously. >> TB does mangle some replies to messages. MDP> Not on its own. Sorry, but it does. MDP> Onl

Re: Security concerns

Hello rich gregory, on Fri, 14 Nov 2003 20:51:23 -0500 (2003-11-15 02:51:23 in .nl) in the message with reference you wrote (at least in part): rg> Hello Batters! For the past several months now I've seen how complex and rg> programmable The Bat! is. As with all technolog

Mod: Dead Horse Alert (was: Bat Alternatives)

Vishal, [V] wrote: V> Until then, stick to moderation and stop trying to act clairvoyant. And mind V> your accusations about my making false claims. I see a problem and state it. V> If it upsets your world where TB is perfect, that's your problem. Deal with V> it. I'm not misleading everyone - why

Re[2]: Bat Alternatives

Hi Marck I'm top posting because I'd rather not reply to every single statement with the same sentence. You're being ridiculous here in claiming what you do. When you can see and predict what happens on every single installation of TB on the planet, come to me and we'll talk. And then I'll accept

Re: MicroEditor (was Re[2]: Bat Alternatives)

Rich Gregory, [RG] wrote: RG> I DO have autoformat turned ON in the preferences and yet I STILL RG> have to press ALT-L on each and every paragraph in any email I am RG> composing that does not wrap by itself! Try the 'smart wrapping of quoted text' option in the editor preferences. -- -= alli

MicroEditor (was Re[2]: Bat Alternatives)

RG>> Is there any way to make MicroEd default to that ALT-L more? RA> Do you mean AutoFormat (Shift+Ctrl+F)? Hi gang! I was just editing an email (not this one!) and saw that I'd again have to press ALT-L to get the paragraph to wrap for me and not run off the edge of the screen. At this point I i

Security concerns

Hello Batters! For the past several months now I've seen how complex and programmable The Bat! is. As with all technology this is good and bad. Aside from those issues related to physical security of access to your computer (we went over this a while back already in this list) what is the state o

Re: Attachment Name Problems

On Friday, November 14, 2003, 5:12:31 PM, Roelof Otten wrote: JBL>> I am having problems with attachments I am receiving. The attachment JBL>> names are being truncated by TB at the first space in the file name so JBL>> that "The Full Filename.doc" becomes "The". > Haven't seen this before. > Co

Re: Unable to send without draft (was Re: Bat Alternatives)

Hello Marck, A reminder of what Marck D Pearlstone typed on: 14 November 2003 at 13:00:26 GMT + MDP> Somehow it had acquired a corrupt setting that MDP> couldn't be corrected through any configuration dialogs. Got it sussed. I had %SIGNCOMPLETE in my templates but don't have PGP instal

Re: Marking mail as Junk with Bayesit filter

On Friday, November 14, 2003 at 2:05:29 PM, Edgar wrote in the message "Marking mail as Junk with Bayesit filter" : > Is it wise to mark Spam mail that contains a lot of normal words > in it, as spam when using the Bayesit filter? > You probably seen one of these messages b

Marking mail as Junk with Bayesit filter

Hello All, Is it wise to mark Spam mail that contains a lot of normal words in it, as spam when using the Bayesit filter? You probably seen one of these messages by now. They look like this: Buy this, enlarge that. sid rnd top asp id technology type aff right asp sz loc soundoff sz html politic

Re: Memo Autoview (ctrl-shift-i)

--> Wednesday, November 12, 2003, 8:21:04 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Yep, I also like option #2. Maybe you can write a plugin for this ;-) I wish that was possible with TB. I would do it immediately. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is

Re: Memo Autoview (ctrl-shift-i)

On Friday, November 14, 2003, 1:12 PM, you wrote: >> ...unless you are running Mercury and create a local user named Memo, >> or change the To: to a local user...hm M> In my case, I am running Mercury and I have no local user named Memo. M> But any "ilegal" address will work work just the s

Re: Memo Autoview (ctrl-shift-i)

Yep, I also like option #2. Maybe you can write a plugin for this ;-) -- drifthat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Current version is 2.01.3 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Memo Autoview (ctrl-shift-i)

Hello Paul, > ...unless you are running Mercury and create a local user named Memo, > or change the To: to a local user...hm In my case, I am running Mercury and I have no local user named Memo. But any "ilegal" address will work work just the same. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Esc

Re: TB IMAP 101

--> Friday, November 14, 2003, 11:24:52 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Friday, November 14, 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote... >> I think there is an option to retrieve more than just the headers >> when retrieving messages. If not, I am fairly sure IMAP allows such >> a functionality. > Of co

Re: Memo Autoview (ctrl-shift-i)

Hello tb, > So you "Queue in Outbox" or "Save Draft" ? I queue in Outbox. The only difference is that if you Save Draft, when you want to move the msg to another folder you will be asked to confirm that you want to move Parked messages as well. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - S

Re: Memo Autoview (ctrl-shift-i)

--> Friday, November 14, 2003, 9:38:50 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> Who does the mail really go To: ? > Nobody. I just put it in the Outbox and from the Outbox, without > actually sending it, I move it to the appropriate folder. So you "Queue in Outbox" or "Save Draft" ? I think I'll just h

Re: Unable to send without draft (was Re: Bat Alternatives)

Hello Marck, A reminder of what Marck D Pearlstone typed on: 14 November 2003 at 13:00:26 GMT + MDP> Somehow it had acquired a corrupt setting that MDP> couldn't be corrected through any configuration dialogs. Got it sussed. I had %SIGNCOMPLETE in my templates but don't have PGP instal

Re: Memo Autoview (ctrl-shift-i)

On Friday, November 14, 2003, 10:38 AM, you wrote: M> Nobody. I just put it in the Outbox and from the Outbox, without M> actually sending it, I move it to the appropriate folder. to answer his question, I created your memo QT, created a message and hit SEND ( oh, of **course** by mistake:) and

Re: TB IMAP 101

On Friday, November 14, 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote... >>> As a matter of reference, does TB allow me to use IMAP in a manner >>> which is similar to POP saving all mail locally and deleting it >>> from the server. >> Yes and no. The emails are kept in a local cache to save loading on >> the se

Re: Attachment Name Problems

Hallo Julian, On Fri, 14 Nov 2003 10:06:49 +GMT (14-11-03, 11:06 +0100, where I live), you wrote: JBL> I am having problems with attachments I am receiving. The attachment JBL> names are being truncated by TB at the first space in the file name so JBL> that "The Full Filename.doc" becomes "T

Re: Sorting office: actions: Export message to file

Hallo Simon, On Fri, 14 Nov 2003 13:00:20 +GMT (14-11-03, 14:00 +0100, where I live), you wrote: S>> In the sorting office I chose the "Export message to file" option S>> under the actions tab, and set the export format to RFC-288(.MSG). S> Does anyone know about this feature? I've use

Re: Help me with a filter, please

Hello Peter, Thursday, November 13, 2003, 9:23:08 PM, you wrote (possibly edited): > I receive this kind of spam too. I don't know, if there's a way of > filtering it in The Bat!, but I'm doing fine with K9, which is based > on bayesian learning ( http://keir.net/k9.html ). I get three such mess

Re: Memo Autoview (ctrl-shift-i)

Hello tb, > Who does the mail really go To: ? Nobody. I just put it in the Outbox and from the Outbox, without actually sending it, I move it to the appropriate folder. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v2.01.3 Winamp OFF: _

Re: Memo Autoview (ctrl-shift-i)

--> Friday, November 14, 2003, 3:36:33 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hello MAU, >> Not perfect but good enough for me so far. > And I forgot to say something. With this method I can write or assign as > many memos as I may need to a single message (not just one) and the date > and time of each

Re: TB IMAP 101

--> Thursday, November 13, 2003, 10:22:57 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > On Tuesday, November 11, 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote... > [I know you said not to answer, but this is information sake] Cool, I appreciate it, it just wasn't a priority

Re: Sorting office: actions: Export message to file

Hello Simon, Friday, November 14, 2003, 6:00:20 AM, you wrote: S> Does anyone know about this feature? Is it not supposed to do what S> I am attempting to do with it? All I want to do is export the S> messages to .msg files as they are filtered into their TB! folder. S> I would have thought that t

Re: Unable to send without draft (was Re: Bat Alternatives)

Hello Marck, A reminder of what Marck D Pearlstone typed on: 14 November 2003 at 13:00:26 GMT + MDP> Somehow it had acquired a corrupt setting that MDP> couldn't be corrected through any configuration dialogs. Thanks Marck. It seems only to be TBUDL. If this reply doesn't go I'll recre

Re[2]: Sorting office: actions: Export message to file

On Friday, November 14, 2003 at 1:00 PM, Simon wrote: > Does anyone know about this feature? Is it not supposed to do what I > am attempting to do with it? All I want to do is export the messages > to .msg files as they are filtered into their TB! folder. I would have > thought that this wou

Re: Unable to send without draft (was Re: Bat Alternatives)

Hello Marck, Friday, November 14, 2003, 8:00:26 AM, you wrote: MDP> (Maggie: thanks for reminding me about changing the subject). Just afraid I might miss something, lol. -- mmmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current ve

Unable to send without draft (was Re: Bat Alternatives)

Hi Tony, @14-Nov-2003, 12:37 Tony Boom said to Marck: > Why can't I send replies to TBUDL? I always have to save as draft > first! Interesting question. Wasn't there an issue on TBBETA where there were such problems in sending? Kitty's problems with unwanted Base 64 sending turned out to be a f

Re: Sorting office: actions: Export message to file

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello again, On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 17:45:37 + my time, I said: <..snip..> S> In the sorting office I chose the "Export message to file" option S> under the actions tab, and set the export format to RFC-288(.MSG). S> I then chose a location for

Re: Bat Alternatives

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Peter, On Fri, 14 Nov 2003 03:17:39 +0100 your time, you said: PO> Create a TBPGP list perhaps? Or you could just sign up to the PGPBasics list? Mind you, I suppose a TBPGP list would be somewhere to dump, I mean test, PGP test sigs and keep

Re: Bat Alternatives

Hello Marck, A reminder of what Marck D Pearlstone typed on: 14 November 2003 at 12:00:18 GMT + MDP> You do and you are :-). So all we need to do now is to tune Vishal to the same place on the dial. (Why can't I send replies to TBUDL? I always have to save as draft first!) -- B

Re[3]: Bat Alternatives

Hello Peter, Thursday, November 13, 2003, 9:17:39 PM, you wrote: MDP>> PGP can introduce wrapping like you are talking about. TB cannot. PO> PO> Create a TBPGP list perhaps? That would be a wonderful idea. Another idea would be to start paying attention to the subject line - there're 15 dif

Re: Bat Alternatives

Hi Tony, @14-Nov-2003, 11:16 Tony Boom said to Marck: > Always assuming that I have the correct end of the stick and am > talking about the same thing as you two are... Or not as the case > maybe :) You do and you are :-). -- Cheers -- .\\arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator TB! v2.01.26 on Win

Re[2]: TB IMAP 101

Hello Jonathan, Thursday, November 13, 2003, 11:22:57 PM, you wrote: JA> As RitLabs doesn't seem to have defined an answer on this one yet, JA> here is what I have observed. JA> <*> means it is either fetching that folder, or is working with that JA> folder Do you know of any way to make

Re: Bat Alternatives

Hello Marck, A reminder of what Marck D Pearlstone typed on: 14 November 2003 at 03:23:58 GMT + MDP> Not on its own. Only if you have implemented some kind of wrapping MDP> macro in your reply template. It can do Marck. As an example the above was quoted from the very beginning of a line

Re: Bat Alternatives

Hello Vishal, A reminder of what Vishal typed on: 14 November 2003 at 22:09:03 GMT -0500 V> TB does mangle some replies to messages. And I fix it in a second. V> End of issue. Yes, it does, but only on highlighted, quoted text. That's the part that your talking about and that you can fix in

Attachment Name Problems

Hello TB! Users, I am having problems with attachments I am receiving. The attachment names are being truncated by TB at the first space in the file name so that "The Full Filename.doc" becomes "The". The messages are fine if downloaded in Outlook - the problem only appears to affect this one or

Re: Memo Autoview (ctrl-shift-i)

Hello MAU, > Not perfect but good enough for me so far. And I forgot to say something. With this method I can write or assign as many memos as I may need to a single message (not just one) and the date and time of each one is automatically logged. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial

Re: Memo Autoview (ctrl-shift-i)

Hello tb, >> But, also be aware of the following: >> http://www.ritlabs.com/bt/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=0001866 > > Ouch, well I hope to see some way to annotate or have useful memos per > message soon. Until Ritlabs does something, I am using a work-around that is good enough for me. I

Re: Bat Alternatives

On Fri 14 November 2003, 19:07:14 +1000, Rich Gregory wrote: V>> ... like I said, Alt+L fixes things so that I don't V>> worry too much about it. Plus, I kind of like seeing text get reflowed in front V>> of my eyes :) > > Is there any way to make MicroEd default to that ALT-L more? Do you mean

Re[3]: Bat Alternatives

V> ... like I said, Alt+L fixes things so that I don't V> worry too much about it. Plus, I kind of like seeing text get reflowed in front V> of my eyes :) Is there any way to make MicroEd default to that ALT-L more? Thx, -- Rich Current versio

Re: Message Finder

SM> I want to find a message in my TB! folders that has 'Bigfoot' in the SM> sender's address and 'Cairns' in the message body. SM> 1. Set "Search for" to "Bigfoot & Cairns" ... snip, snip ... Try these two search strings. I had the same problem & another list member suggest I try the first one b

Re: alt-click!

Hi Darrin, On Thursday, November 13, 2003, at 7:43:07 PM PST, you wrote: > After a year and a half of using TB, im still learning things. Its > great :) I've been using TB! for over two years, and I feel like I'm still just scratching the surface (in fact, I *know* I am!). :-) -- Melissa PGP

Re: alt-click!

MW> Hmmmpph! Well, I don't know about any of those, but *I* went to MW> View | Display | Advanced Filtering | Header | uncheck the filter MW> ...PITA if you ask me... I was hoping that shift-alt-click would do MW> it, but no... For me it also works Ctrl+=. ___