Re: disable parallel mail catchup of all accounts

dAniel hAhler wrote: > thebat should put all accounts into the connection center stack and > process it account by account. Wouldn't that go against one of TheBat's main features over other clients (fast multi-threading)? When you say "should" do you mean give the user an option to do this? Perso

Re: upgrade: WARNING!

>> Anyone know where I can download v1.62r? I inadvertently >> kept 1.61 and discarded 1.62r > http://www.thegoat.net/public/TheBat/ Also at http://www.ritlabs.com/the_bat/download.html Elaine Current version is 2.02.3 CE | "Using TBUDL" info

Re: upgrade: WARNING!

Paul Berger wrote: > Anyone know where I can download v1.62r? I inadvertently kept 1.61 and > discarded 1.62r http://www.thegoat.net/public/TheBat/ (I assume this is OK since all require registration keys) -- Ken Green Using The Bat! v1.62r on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4 ___

Re[2]: upgrade: WARNING!

Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED], Thursday, January 29, 2004, 6:04:02 AM, you wrote: kg> Jonathan Angliss wrote: >> I can give you hope Anyone know where I can download v1.62r? I inadvertently kept 1.61 and discarded 1.62r -- Paul -

Re: Automatically retrieving email

On Wednesday, January 28, 2004 at 10:50:19 PM, Robin H. wrote in the message "Automatically retrieving email" : > I have that checked. It isn't the periodic checking that isn't > working, it is when I startup. I have the box checked to get email > on startup but it doe

Re: Passwords

On Wednesday, January 28, 2004 at 10:23:39 PM, Robin H. wrote in the message "Passwords" : > I am still trying to figure out TheBat! I like to password protect > my email accounts. I selected the "select access password", but it > only asks me for my password if I am downloa

Re: To, BCC, basics

On Wednesday, January 28, 2004 at 6:22:25 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in the message "To, BCC, basics" : >> I could send you a message without a To: header and it'll still be >> delivered. Nor would I need a CC or a BCC, I couldn't do it with >> TB, but that's not the issue

Re[2]: Automatically retrieving email

Wednesday, January 28, 2004, 10:40:52 PM, you wrote: GS> Hello Robin, GS> Wednesday, January 28, 2004, 9:26:28 PM, Robin H. wrote: RH>> I have checked the box in preferences to automatically check for email RH>> upon startup, but I always have to manually check. What am I doing RH>> wrong? GS>

Re: Automatically retrieving email

Hello Robin, Wednesday, January 28, 2004, 9:26:28 PM, Robin H. wrote: RH> I have checked the box in preferences to automatically check for email RH> upon startup, but I always have to manually check. What am I doing RH> wrong? Account | Properties (Shft+Ctrl+P) | Options | select "Periodical che

Automatically retrieving email

I have checked the box in preferences to automatically check for email upon startup, but I always have to manually check. What am I doing wrong? Thanks -- Robin Current version is 2.02.3 CE | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.

Passwords

I am still trying to figure out TheBat! I like to password protect my email accounts. I selected the "select access password", but it only asks me for my password if I am downloading mail from my first account, not for my others. I also noticed if I select "download all", it doesn't ask me for my p

Re: Conflict in new version of Vet with POPFile and TheBat

A couple of days ago I wrote of a conflict between the new version of Vet anti-virus amd the POPFile and TheBat programs. I just received an email from Vet support in Australia (they are the Computer Associates company which produces the eTrust software among others) to say that as I was using The

Re: Bayesit: Sound on sucessful catch of Junk

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Thanks for that. I think that it it the fact that is the error sound that bothers me. - -- Stuart Using The Bat! v2.03 Beta/45 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Aided by BayesIt! 0.4gm PGP Key available from ldap://keyserver.pgp.com Ther

Test

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 A test for Allie. - -- Stuart Using The Bat! v2.03 Beta/45 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Aided by BayesIt! 0.4gm PGP Key available from ldap://keyserver.pgp.com The biggest problem with the younger generation these days is that I don'

Re: To, BCC, basics

On Wednesday, January 28, 2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote... > Telnet to port 25, or whatever you like, and send me a message > without a To/CC/BCC header. I want to see what the headers of this > message look like. As a note... if you're seeing emails with a BCC header appearing, then the sending

Re: To, BCC, basics

On Wednesday, January 28, 2004 at 5:09:38 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in the message "To, BCC, basics" : > Aside from using BCC, which is stripped by the server, in what other > instances might there be no To: header in a delivered e-mail message? Using telnet to access the

Re: To, BCC, basics

Hallo tb, On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 17:22:25 -0600GMT (29-1-04, 0:22 +0100, where I live), you wrote: tko> Telnet to port 25, or whatever you like, and send me a message without a tko> To/CC/BCC header. I want to see what the headers of this message look like. Okay, I'll try it telnetting -- Gro

Re: New spam plugin

--> Wednesday, January 28, 2004, 6:02:24 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Wednesday, January 28, 2004 at 5:43:03 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in > the message "New spam plugin" > : >> This is further complicated by a bug I recently discovered in filtering, >> allowing some

Re: New spam plugin

On Wednesday, January 28, 2004 at 5:43:03 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in the message "New spam plugin" : > This is further complicated by a bug I recently discovered in filtering, > allowing some spam authors to author spam in such a way as to trip up > TB's Kludge tokenizat

Re: To, BCC, basics

--> Wednesday, January 28, 2004, 5:01:35 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 16:09:38 -0600GMT (28-1-04, 23:09 +0100, where I > live), you wrote: tko>> Aside from using BCC, which is stripped by the server, in what other tko>> instances might there be no To: header in a delivered

Re: To, BCC, basics

Hallo tb, On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 16:09:38 -0600GMT (28-1-04, 23:09 +0100, where I live), you wrote: tko> Aside from using BCC, which is stripped by the server, in what other tko> instances might there be no To: header in a delivered e-mail message? You could use a CC:, that'll show in the delivered

Re: New spam plugin

--> Wednesday, January 28, 2004, 3:11:07 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hello tb, > Wednesday, January 28, 2004, 2:08:00 PM, you wrote: tko>> I'm fed up with all the crap and have decided to write a spam tko>> plugin today. Where's the SDK? > Don't any of the existing solutions work for you?

To, BCC, basics

Aside from using BCC, which is stripped by the server, in what other instances might there be no To: header in a delivered e-mail message? Can anyone think of anything? -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 2.02.3 CE | "Using TBUDL" informati

From column format

At one point, I seem to recall having changed the From column in the message list listview so that it did not display anything but [EMAIL PROTECTED] How do I do this, or is my memory mistaking another client? Current version is 2.02.3 CE | "Using

Re: New spam plugin

Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED], on Wednesday, 28. January 2004, at 15:08:00 [GMT -0600] you wrote: > I'm fed up with all the crap and have decided to write a spam plugin > today. A new Spam Plugin? There are several which work perfectly. By the way, IMO the list for Plugin development is TheBat! DEV

Re: New spam plugin

Dear Tb, @28-Jan-2004, 15:08 -0600 (28-Jan 21:08 UK time) [EMAIL PROTECTED] [T] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: T> I'm fed up with all the crap and have decided T> to write a spam plugin today. Where's the SDK? T> And, why is the SDK download so well hidden? Wrong list. Please refer to the TBUD

Re: New spam plugin

Hello tb, Wednesday, January 28, 2004, 2:08:00 PM, you wrote: tko> I'm fed up with all the crap and have decided to write a spam tko> plugin today. Where's the SDK? Don't any of the existing solutions work for you? -- Leif (TB list moderator and fellow end user). Using The Bat! 2.03.47 unde

New spam plugin

I'm fed up with all the crap and have decided to write a spam plugin today. Where's the SDK? And, why is the SDK download so well hidden? -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 2.02.3 CE | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com

Address book reliability

Greetings, If I have posted this several times please accept my apologies. I have had no reply, and I suspect I may have done something wrong and (whisper) unspeakable, like (tiny whisper) trying to post in html. I am posting the same message, but this time, I hope, in good ol' plain text. Plea

my solution

Well my "saga", as Marck so aptly described it, is coming to an end. I realized that upgrading my main account - that I depend on for business - wasn't the best idea on my part. I knew there were issues with IMAP and tried it anyway. I gotta take responsibility for that. I have reverted back to

Re: upgrade: WARNING!

Jonathan Angliss wrote: > I can give you hope Thank you for your post. I have come to a workable solution for now, while I anxiously await the stability and feature set that The Bat's potential hints at. -- Ken Green Using The Bat! v1.62r on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4 _

Re: Problems Installing K9

Hi dAniel, Monday, January 26, 2004, 12:22:40 AM, you wrote: > on Sun, 25 Jan 2004 21:17:10 + Doug Weller wrote: DW>> My wife is trying to install K9 on 1.63. It looks set up correctly, DW>> but she gets the message 'Cannot connect to server'. DW>> Any suggestions as to where we may h

Re: Keyboard shortcut

Hello P.Johnson, > I have forgotten how to configure a keyboard shortcut-- could > someone please help with this? I would like if possible to > combine the ALT + L command (which I use a lot) into one stroke. Try Alt+F12 -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v2

Keyboard shortcut

Hello, I have forgotten how to configure a keyboard shortcut-- could someone please help with this? I would like if possible to combine the ALT + L command (which I use a lot) into one stroke. Thanks in advance. -- Pat A Canadian in Houston Using The Bat! v2.02.3 CE on Windows XP 5.1 Build 26

Re: Moving a thread?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 SM> I just expand the thread and highlight all the messages then drag and SM> drop that lot. Don't know if it's the most efficient way of doing this SM> but it works. Indeed it does, but the Ctrl+Shift+V method has the advantage of not requiring you to

Re: Moving a thread?

Hallo jwayne, On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 09:56:51 -0500GMT (28-1-04, 15:56 +0100, where I live), you wrote: j> How does one move an entire thread to another folder? Everything I try with j> dragging just moves the top-most message. Select the root message Right mouse click Thread Move or Select the r

Re: Moving a thread?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 j> How does one move an entire thread to another folder? Everything I try with j> dragging just moves the top-most message. Highlight the root message, press Ctrl+Shift+V, select the destination, /et voila/. - -- Stuart Using The Bat! v2.03 Beta/45

Re: Moving a thread?

Hi Jon > How does one move an entire thread to another folder? Everything I try with > dragging just moves the top-most message. I just expand the thread and highlight all the messages then drag and drop that lot. Don't know if it's the most efficient way of doing this but it works. -- Steve

Re: Moving a thread?

Hello jwayne, Wednesday, January 28, 2004, 7:56:51 AM, you wrote: j> How does one move an entire thread to another folder? Everything I j> try with dragging just moves the top-most message. The only thing I can think of is to Highlight the topmost message in the thread, press CTRL * to expand t

Moving a thread?

How does one move an entire thread to another folder? Everything I try with dragging just moves the top-most message. jon -- Jonathan Wayne [EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 2.02.3 CE | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/t

Re: upgrade: WARNING!

Dear Jean, @28-Jan-2004, 10:50 +0100 (28-Jan 09:50 UK time) Jean Site [JS] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck: >> is may indeed work, but make sure you switch the accounts to POP3 >> first and backup the messages you want to keep safe from any IMAP >> accounts. JS> you switch the accounts to

Test for Allie - Please Ignore

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 A quick test of Allie's new filters. - -- Stuart Using The Bat! v2.03 Beta/45 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Aided by BayesIt! 0.4gm PGP Key available from ldap://keyserver.pgp.com Change is inevitable, except from a vending machine. -

Re[2]: upgrade: WARNING!

Hello Marck, > is may indeed work, but make sure you switch the accounts to POP3 > first and backup the messages you want to keep safe from any IMAP > accounts. you switch the accounts to POP3 first! How can I do that? Thanks for help. -- Best regards, Jeanmail

Re: More problems - and serious!

On Tuesday, January 27, 2004, 9:34:45 PM, MAU wrote: >> I must admit if I weren't already committed to TB this would be >> enough to send me running towards...oh, Pegasus or something. I >> nearly put "Incredimail" there, but then I thought, nah, never LOL M> Incredimail ?!?! Why would a beautifu