Hello Ron,
Sunday, August 22, 2004, 5:00:48 PM, you wrote:
RC Hello:
RC I asked a question about folders not being emptied when existing. I've
RC since learned that The Bat deletes messages that are only marked as
RC read. For example, messages from The Bat list are filtered to a folder.
Good afternoon list,
On a list i'm subscribed to, i have the lists mail address set up for a
reply by way of a quick template. The part i'm using for it is:
%TO=%TO=list address%CC= which is invoked with %Qinclude=Cds
in the template. Still, i'm always getting my mail address in the
Hello Luc,
On Mon, 23 Aug 2004 16:13:38 +0200 GMT (23/08/2004, 21:13 +0700 GMT),
Luc wrote:
L %TO=%TO=list address%CC= which is invoked with %Qinclude=Cds
L in the template. Still, i'm always getting my mail address in the
L reply to field.
You are not setting the Reply-To field.
L Is
On 8/23/2004, at 8:56 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
RC Is this the correct behavior? If so, is their a way to automatically
RC mark all messages as 'read'. I know the keyboard shortcut but can The
RC Bat automate this command?
Since you don't leave messages around for very long, you
Good afternoon Thomas,
It was foretold that on 23-8-2004 @ 21:24:34 GMT+0700 (which was
16:24:34 where I live) Thomas Fernandez would write:
snipped a bit
TF No, but you might want to add %Reply=[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sorry for my ignorance but is it like this in that case:
%TO=%TO=list
Hello M i c C u l l e n,
23-Aug-2004 00:34, you wrote:
with bandwidth increasing at the rate it is, HTML email isn't the scourge
it once was
Never mind the bandwidth. Its a security and privacy issue.
Greetings from netsky.p - or was it .q? :-P
--
Best regards,
Alexander
Hello Luc,
On Mon, 23 Aug 2004 17:18:29 +0200 GMT (23/08/2004, 22:18 +0700 GMT),
Luc wrote:
TF No, but you might want to add %Reply=[EMAIL PROTECTED]
L Sorry for my ignorance but is it like this in that case:
L %TO=%TO=list address%CC=
This has nothing to do with your reply-to address.
L
Hi,
How do I turn off the feature that automatically adds addresses to my
address book?
--
Regards,
Matt
Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Hello tbudl,
I'm wondering about the threading of TB! in connection with GMX's web
interface.
I sent a mail about the my backup problem from my computer so I used
TB to do that. (msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
At work I saw a response from Chris and answered it from work
(msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]).
Hello Raymund,
On Mon, 23 Aug 2004 18:07:06 +0200 GMT (23/08/2004, 23:07 +0700 GMT),
Raymund Thomas Tump wrote:
RTT I sent a mail about the my backup problem from my computer so I used
RTT TB to do that. (msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
RTT At work I saw a response from Chris and answered it from work
Hello Thomas Fernandez,
23-Aug-2004 18:15, you wrote:
It does over here.
Dito. :-)
--
Best regards,
Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981)
I would like to hear Elliot Carter's Fourth String Quartet, if only to
discover what a cranky prostate does to one's polyphony. -- James
Hi Raymund and list,
On Monday, August 23, 2004 at 18:07:06 GMT +0200 (which was 18:07
where I live) Raymund Thomas Tump wrote (at least in parts) and made
these valuable points on the subject of Threading question:
I sent a mail about the my backup problem from my computer so I used
TB to do
On Mon, 2004-08-23 at 08:23:42, Thomas Fernandez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, that's where you can include the %reply macro.
Reading the help file shows me that the macro is actually %replyto. How accurate
this may be is another question. ;-)
--
Bill McQuillan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using The
Hallo Raymund,
On Mon, 23 Aug 2004 18:07:06 +0200GMT (23-8-2004, 18:07 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
RTT At work I saw a response from Chris and answered it from work
RTT (msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]). Now this mail contains a
RTT reference to the mail from Chris but it doesn't thread with it (at
Hello Bill,
On Mon, 23 Aug 2004 09:43:48 -0700 GMT (23/08/2004, 23:43 +0700 GMT),
Bill McQuillan wrote:
Yes, that's where you can include the %reply macro.
BM Reading the help file shows me that the macro is actually
BM %replyto. How accurate this may be is another question. ;-)
I thought it
Hallo Ron,
On Sun, 22 Aug 2004 18:00:48 -0400GMT (23-8-2004, 0:00 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
RC I asked a question about folders not being emptied when existing. I've
RC since learned that The Bat deletes messages that are only marked as
RC read.
Account - Properties - Mail
Hello Roelof Otten,
23-Aug-2004 19:08, you wrote:
'WWW-Mail 1.6 (Global Message Exchange)' that appears to provide
broken threading headers.
...just like the majority of webmailers, I want to add...
--
Best regards,
Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981)
Hallo Alexander,
On Mon, 23 Aug 2004 19:29:51 +0200GMT (23-8-2004, 19:29 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
'WWW-Mail 1.6 (Global Message Exchange)' that appears to provide
broken threading headers.
ASK ...just like the majority of webmailers, I want to add...
I didn't feel the need to state
Good evening Bill,
It was foretold that on 23-8-2004 @ 09:43:48 GMT-0700 (which was
18:43:48 where I live) Bill McQuillan would write:
snipped a bit
BM Reading the help file shows me that the macro is actually %replyto. How accurate
this
BM may be is another question. ;-)
Txn guys for
Hello Roelof,
For some reason your reply doesn't contain an In-Reply-To header and
it's been mentioned before on this list that TB doesn't thread without
In-Reply-To when you're using IMAP.
It's on my IMAP account. Seems that ritlabs wrote a good portion of
code anew if even threading is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hallo Fledermäuse,
I have plenty of problems with TB! at work, where everyone else is using
Outlook and the mail server is Exchange. I think a few things might come from
TB!-settings but maybe others can be done by change something on
Jurgen Haug @ 2004-Aug-23 2:01:48 PM
someone out there having experience using TB! in a otherwise Outlook/Exchange office
environment mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have plenty of problems with TB! at work, where everyone else is
using Outlook and the mail server is Exchange. I think a few things
Hallo Luc,
On Mon, 23 Aug 2004 16:13:38 +0200GMT (23-8-2004, 16:13 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
L %TO=%TO=list address%CC= which is invoked with %Qinclude=Cds
L in the template. Still, i'm always getting my mail address in the
L reply to field.
TB inserts your address in the Reply-To
Roelof Otten @ 2004-Aug-23 2:11:14 PM
template problem mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
L %TO=%TO=list address%CC= which is invoked with %Qinclude=Cds
L in the template. Still, i'm always getting my mail address in the
L reply to field.
TB inserts your address in the Reply-To header when you've told it
Good evening Roelof,
It was foretold that on 23-8-2004 @ 20:11:14 GMT+0200 (which was
20:11:14 where I live) Roelof Otten would write:
snipped a bit
RO When you don't want to redirect your mail to a different address than
RO you're using in the From header, you don't need a Reply-To header
Hello Chris,
Monday, August 23, 2004, 8:04:27 PM, you wrote:
I have plenty of problems with TB! at work, where everyone else is
using Outlook and the mail server is Exchange. I think a few things
might come from TB!-settings but maybe others can be done by change
something on the Exchange
Hello Jurgen,
Monday, August 23, 2004, 11:01:48 AM, you wrote:
Anyone out there with some time/patience who could maybe help me
come up with the right things to say to the admin guy?
What kind of problems do you have?
I am using TB! at work where everyone else is using outlook and the
mail
Jurgen,
On 23-08-2004 20:01, you [JH] wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
JH I have plenty of problems with TB! at work, where everyone else is
JH using Outlook and the mail server is Exchange. I think a few things
JH might come from TB!-settings but maybe others can be done by change
JH something on
Good evening list,
I've some trouble finding out how to automatically remove locally deleted messages
from the IMAP server.
I use The Bat! from home to read my office mail. Every email I delete at home with The
Bat! is on the server the following morning, when I go to work and open my Outlook.
ON Monday, August 23, 2004, 5:47:39 PM, you wrote:
MT How do I turn off the feature that automatically adds addresses to my
MT address book?
Hi Matt,
That is not a feature of TB! but can be achieved by creating a special
filter. You either have done this yourself (by axident ?) or someone is
Hallo Luc,
On Mon, 23 Aug 2004 20:21:50 +0200GMT (23-8-2004, 20:21 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
RO When you don't want to redirect your mail to a different address than
RO you're using in the From header, you don't need a Reply-To header (nor
RO a setting for it)
L Ah but in this case i
Hello Chris,
23-Aug-2004 20:17, you wrote:
Finally, it changes the Reply-To address to Chris on the TBUDL
[EMAIL PROTECTED] to help make sure that replies get back to
the list.
But the listmailer overwrites any reply-to address anyway. (see F9)
--
Best regards,
Alexander
Hello Jurgen Haug,
23-Aug-2004 20:22, you wrote:
that would be great, may we take this off-list?
Maybe not, I'd be interested in that too... (having a really huge Exchange
mailbox, I only tried once and it took ages to synchronize so I left that
idea alone for now).
--
Best regards,
Hello Thomas,
Friday, July 30, 2004, 7:52:14 AM, you wrote:
TF Hello Dan,
TF On Fri, 30 Jul 2004 09:33:07 -0400 GMT (30/07/2004, 20:33 +0700 GMT),
TF Dan Grunberg wrote:
DG I can't seem to use |Shift| + |Ctrl| + |*| to expand all threads in a
DG list of messages. TB's Help says it should work,
Good evening Roelof,
It was foretold that on 23-8-2004 @ 21:59:46 GMT+0200 (which was
21:59:46 where I live) Roelof Otten would write:
snipped a bit
RO Depends on the configuration of the list. (And on the philosophy of
RO the list owner or the programmer of the list software)
Hello Bill,
Tuesday, August 3, 2004, 5:37:11 PM, you wrote:
BM On Tue 3-Aug-04 1:41pm -0400, Michael L. Wilson wrote:
I am trying to complete the following calculation
100*(x/x+y)
x = %STATSPAMLETTERS = 77
y = %STATNONSPAMLETTERS = 185
Using a calculator, I get 29.389
BM You appear to
I've just started using TB and I like it, but I have an issue with external links
(clicking on a url in a
message). One problem is that it opens the browser twice instead of just once.
The other is that I'd like to designate which browser it uses. I currently use firefox
for general browsing
Hallo Quin,
On Mon, 23 Aug 2004 15:13:41 -0600GMT (23-8-2004, 23:13 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
I am trying to complete the following calculation
100*(x/x+y)
x = %STATSPAMLETTERS = 77
y = %STATNONSPAMLETTERS = 185
Using a calculator, I get 29.389
BM You appear to be abusing your
Hi Jim,
Monday, August 23, 2004, 5:43:04 PM, you wrote:
JK I've just started using TB and I like it, but I have an issue with
JK external links (clicking on a url in a message). One problem is that
JK it opens the browser twice instead of just once.
First, welcome to the list, Jim.
The
Kovcs P. Gbor, [KPG] wrote:
I've some trouble finding out how to automatically remove locally
deleted messages from the IMAP server. I use The Bat! from home to
read my office mail. Every email I delete at home with The Bat! is
on the server the following morning, when I go to work and open
Hi Jim,
Monday, August 23, 2004, 6:30:37 PM, you wrote:
JK Excellent! Thanks. This also answered my other query because in the
JK same window there's a button to set the application, and I used it
JK to select Netscape.
Glad I could help.
--
Regards,
Perry
Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on
Hi Jurgen,
Like Alexander, I would be interested in hearing what settings work;
what the problem was.
--
Thanks,
David
Win][k sp4
TheBat 2.11
JH Hello Chris,
JH Monday, August 23, 2004, 8:04:27 PM, you wrote:
I have plenty of problems with TB! at work, where everyone else is
using Outlook
Hi Thomas,
I've seen this one. When I get the error message from TB, it's because an eMail
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] is sitting in the outbox of the [EMAIL PROTECTED] account.
GMX tests that the From field matches the account. The easy solution
is to drag the eMail over to the correct Outbox. That
Hello Roelof,
Monday, August 23, 2004, 3:51:52 PM, you wrote:
RO Hallo Quin,
RO On Mon, 23 Aug 2004 15:13:41 -0600GMT (23-8-2004, 23:13 +0200, where I
RO live), you wrote:
I am trying to complete the following calculation
100*(x/x+y)
x = %STATSPAMLETTERS = 77
y = %STATNONSPAMLETTERS = 185
ok im kinda confused here, I've checked these 3 macros out
1)
Spam Stats, last 7 days (%BAYESITVERSION)
Total Spam Emails: %STATSPAMLETTERS(168)
Total Clean Emails: %STATNONSPAMLETTERS(168)
BayesIT guessed right %calculate=100-(%STATSPAMERLETTERS(168)/%
STATSPAMLETTERS(168))%% of the time
My
Hello Drago,
On Tue, 24 Aug 2004, Drago mused about BayeIT Macros (at least in
part):
D if my total spam is 270 and total clean is 246, shouldn't my spam percentage
D be 51% - 52% since my overall spam percentage is greater than clean or is the
D 270 my complete mails, 246 clean and the 24
On Tue 24 August 2004, 12:30:49 +1000, Drago wrote:
ok im kinda confused here, I've checked these 3 macros out
...snip...
if my total spam is 270 and total clean is 246, shouldn't my spam percentage
be 51% - 52% since my overall spam percentage is greater than clean or is the
270 my
Hi,
It may have been covered before, but I cannot find the message thread:
How can I tell the score of individual messages using BayesIT 5.11? I
have looked in BayesIT.log and cannot figure it out. Any assistance
would be appreciated.
--
__ __ _ __
| \/ (_) ___|
Hello David et al,
Tuesday, August 24, 2004, 2:31:11 AM, you wrote:
Like Alexander, I would be interested in hearing what settings work;
what the problem was.
okay, thanks to everyone responding...
then let's do it on list.
Here are some of the problems I got:
The server changes my
On Monday, August 23, 2004 @ 12:25:18 PM [-0700], Zonnet wrote:
That is not a feature of TB! but can be achieved by creating a special
filter. You either have done this yourself (by axident ?) or someone is
playing a trick on you.
Look under the action tab in your filters if there is a tick
50 matches
Mail list logo
