TB 3.02.10 won't start
Registret Home Edition crashes at the splash screen with the following message: Instruction at 0x0097e34e referring to memory at 0x0018. Memory could not read. Repairing the installation has not helped. I get the same error with subsequent betas. As best can be determined, this occurred after I tried to export a mailboxes. Any suggestions? -- Mogens Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB 3.02.10 won't start
Hallo Mogens, On Thu, 03 Mar 2005 13:27:45 +0100GMT (3-3-2005, 13:27 +0100, where I live), you wrote: MH Any suggestions? Please take this to to the beta list. Any discussions about beta versions are off topic here. When you post to the beta list, please mention your OS, plug-ins, account types, etc. -- Groetjes, Roelof He says a thousand pleasant things, but never Adieu. The Bat! 3.0.2.10 Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 1 pop3 account, server on LAN pgpvtscxMxLoY.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Problems with GnupG and PGP integration
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi David, On Wed, 02 Mar 2005 14:40:13 -0500 (2:40 PM here), David Calvarese [DC] wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: gpg: conversion from `utf-8' to `CP0' not available DC Upgrade to the 1.4.1rc2, it fixes that problem. This does resolve the problem. DC Note that there are other GnuPG issues, especially when wanting to DC encrypt to multiple keys for one email address (As is the case DC with the PGPNET Yahoo group. This is more of a function of GPG. Basically you need to create a group entry in your gpg.conf file with the e-mail address of PGPNET followed by the long keyids of the group members. - -- Kevin Coates Dewitt, NY USA Using TB! v3.0.2.10 under Windows XP 5.1.2600 SP2 (see kludges for my pgp key) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iD8DBQFCJqvUvZSrVDqOXK0RAh8QAKDVfYKQs/57vasJ0y3ZrTJgqfv3TQCgzCP0 smmCglNV0LxS8CHZ1Zvsw5Y= =xQeV -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: no UTF-8 support in TB?
Hello Roman, On Wed, 2 Mar 2005 23:26:32 +0700 GMT (02/03/2005, 23:26 +0700 GMT), Thomas Fernandez wrote: TF Can you send me the message as MIME-attachment by PM? I want to play TF with the settings a bit. I received it. It is a multipart message. The first part: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 displays correctly in TB. It is shown when using the Text tab in my viewer. The second part: Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 displays incorrectly, as in your screenshot. TB will show it when clicking on the HTML tab. RK Is this worth a bug report? Yes, but to the list pertaining to the mailer the sender used: X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 6.5 18. September 2003 The reason is that TB uses the same module, namely the RTV, for displaying either part, so I don't think TB can be the problem. So I guess it's an incorrect translation into HTML that causes the problem. I don't have a tool to show the Base64-encoded message parts in plain text, otherwise I could pinpoint any wrong HTML umlaut encodings further. But I think this is exactly what is happening. On a side remark, this message uses only plain text, so there is no need for HTML anyway, but that's of cause not the point and very OT. ;-) -- Cheers, Thomas. Unter dem Einfluss von Alkohol griff eine naechtliche Polizeistreife einen Pkw-Fahrer aus Minden. Message reply created with The Bat! 3.0.2.10 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB 3.02.10 won't start
Roelof Otten wrote: Hallo Mogens, On Thu, 03 Mar 2005 13:27:45 +0100GMT (3-3-2005, 13:27 +0100, where I live), you wrote: MH Any suggestions? Please take this to to the beta list. Any discussions about beta versions are off topic here. When you post to the beta list, please mention your OS, plug-ins, account types, etc. I think you misunderstood me, and I respectfully want to point out, that the problem occurred on a regular installation of TheBat and the beta was only installed subsequent to the error message in an attempt to solve the problem. The system information folows: OS=WinXP 5.1 (2600) Service Pack 2 CPU=AMD Athlon,2153 PhysicalMem=61%-1023,47 MB VirtualMem=97%-2,00 GB PageMem=93%-3,91 GB Display=1024x768 32b 96dpi Country=DNK-DNK Language=DAN-DAN Keyboard=0406 Timezone=[STD] Rom, normaltid -1h00m Flags=Network [Drives] C:=M-FAT32,FAT32,34,1% 5,85 GB D:=M-Windows,NTFS,37,4% 19,53 GB E:=M-DATA,FAT32,21,9% 24,39 GB F:=M-Originals,NTFS,34,1% 35,00 GB G:=IDE-Sam_G,NTFS,94,5% 130,00 GB T:=,CD/DVD,0,0% 0 B U:=,CD/DVD,0,0% 0 B [SystemDirs] AppDir=D:\Programmer\The Bat! Working directory=E:\The Bat! Windows=D:\WINDOWS System=D:\WINDOWS\system32 Programs=D:\Programmer Personal=E:\Documents and Settings\Mogens\Dokumenter AppData=D:\Documents and Settings\MogensH\Application Data [Applications] TheBat! (Home Edition) v. 3.02.10 Windows XP Hotfix - KB834707 Windows XP Hotfix - KB867282 Windows XP Hotfix - KB87 Windows XP Hotfix - KB873339 Windows XP Hotfix - KB885250 Windows XP Hotfix - KB885835 Windows XP Hotfix - KB885836 Windows XP Hotfix - KB885884 Windows XP Hotfix - KB886185 Windows XP Hotfix - KB887472 Windows XP Hotfix - KB887742 Windows XP Hotfix - KB887797 Windows XP Hotfix - KB888113 Windows XP Hotfix - KB888302 Windows XP Hotfix - KB890047 Windows XP Hotfix - KB890175 Windows XP Hotfix - KB891781 [DLL Versions] advapi32.dll=5.1.2600 (2180) comctl32.dll=6.0.2900 (2180) comdlg32.dll=6.0.2900 (2180) gdi32.dll=5.1.2600 (2180) jcrypt0.dll=1.0.0 (0) jcrypt1.dll=NOT FOUND kernel32.dll=5.1.2600 (2180) msvcrt.dll=7.0.2600 (2180) ntdll.dll=5.1.2600 (2180) ole32.dll=5.1.2600 (2595) oleaut32.dll=5.1.2600 (2180) pcre.dll=3.9.0 (0) riched20.dll=5.30.23 (1221) riched32.dll=5.1.2600 (0) shdocvw.dll=6.0.2900 (2573) shell32.dll=6.0.2900 (2578) shfolder.dll=6.0.2900 (2180) shlwapi.dll=6.0.2900 (2573) tapi32.dll=5.1.2600 (2180) urlmon.dll=6.0.2900 (2574) user32.dll=5.1.2600 (2180) version.dll=5.1.2600 (2180) wininet.dll=6.0.2900 (2577) zlib.dll=1.1.4 (0) There are no plugins, and I have two POP accounts on a 2.5 MB ADSL connection. As can be seen, I have Windows installed on drive D: with all programs in the folder programmer and the Bat-data on Drive E: in the folder The Bat! If nobody has any suggestions, I would like to hear if the easiest would be to delete and reinstall the program, assumin that I can access the old data on dive E: -- Mogens Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Problems with GnupG and PGP integration
Kevin Coates wrote: Hi David, On Wed, 02 Mar 2005 14:40:13 -0500 (2:40 PM here), David Calvarese [DC] wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: gpg: conversion from `utf-8' to `CP0' not available DC Upgrade to the 1.4.1rc2, it fixes that problem. This does resolve the problem. DC Note that there are other GnuPG issues, especially when wanting to DC encrypt to multiple keys for one email address (As is the case DC with the PGPNET Yahoo group. This is more of a function of GPG. Basically you need to create a group entry in your gpg.conf file with the e-mail address of PGPNET followed by the long keyids of the group members. Never did get that to worth with TB!, even using the group line with and without the around the email address. Even with that, I should be able to manually select multiple keys to encrypt an email to from within TB! with GnuPG... -- Dave Calvarese Member of E-mailaholics International PGP Key Available at http://www.myopicdragon.com/pgp.html signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: no UTF-8 support in TB?
Hello MFPA, On Thu, 3 Mar 2005 02:21:26 + GMT (03/03/2005, 09:21 +0700 GMT), MFPA wrote: it really is a shortcoming of MicroEd, which cannot display UTF. So it's not really a TB bug. M Is MicroEd not part of TB!? Since it is integrated the answer must be: Yes. You are right, then. For the user that is transparent, but I understand the programmers too. For me it is an annoyance and not a bug, but I'm not religious about the terminology. I too would like to display UTF in the PTV. M Select Reply | View | Original Text and the original text window M uses the PTV. (Perhaps depending on your settings) It uses the PTV, but it loses the UTF-encoding. TB's editor is not capable of creating UTF-encoded messages. So MicroEd is used, but not UTF. That's why it displays fine when replying. It also means that MicroEd is able to translate from UTF into supported encodings, and basically, this is all we ask for the Viewer as well. M You might wish to support this one I submitted previously:- M https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4067 I added a bugnote. -- Cheers, Thomas. When nobody is looking, Power Users pretend their mouse is a toy car, and race it around the desk. Message reply created with The Bat! 3.0.2.10 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Problems with GnupG and PGP integration
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi David, on Thu, 03 Mar 2005 11:21:24 -0500GMT, you wrote: [encrypting to multiple keys] This is more of a function of GPG. Basically you need to create a group entry in your gpg.conf file with the e-mail address of PGPNET followed by the long keyids of the group members. DC Never did get that to worth with TB!, even using the group line with and DC without the around the email address. DC Even with that, I should be able to manually select multiple keys to DC encrypt an email to from within TB! with GnuPG... I'd like that too, but for the time being, TB!'s support of GnuPG 1.4x is not too great... :-( I get along well with GPGshell though. :-) - -- Cheers Peter Prediction is very difficult, especially about the future Niehls Bohr -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1rc2 (MingW32) - GPGshell v3.30 Comment: Gossamer Spider Web of Trust: http://www.gswot.org Comment: My key: https://www.biglumber.com/x/web?qs=0xE10774CE iD8DBQFCJ0cNAzZSBuEHdM4RAnBYAKC6BuqXoK+4FqRZe1EzJt9f2KzGMQCgs0ZV B3XqRMYeQcGz8BV2cXxqpbo= =fpL+ -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Problems with GnupG and PGP integration
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 ***^\ ._)~~ ~( __ _o Was another beautiful day, Wed, 02 Mar 2005, @ @ at 19:25:18 -0500, when David Calvarese wrote: gpg: WARNING: signature digest conflict in message gpg: BAD signature from David Calvarese And for this message of yours is same. I don't know if this relates to something specific to TB or not. I'm not sure either... They're showing good sigs on my end when I look in my sent items folder. Maybe because I'm using something other than SHA-1 as a digest... I'll do this one with SHA and see. This one is OK, but also many of yours with RIPEMD160 digest. Digest conflict...interesting term... - -- Mica PGP key uploaded at: http://pgp.mit.edu/ once just before breakfast [Earth LOG: 183 day(s) since v3.0 unleashing] OS: Windows 98 SE Micro Lite Professional IVa Enterprise Millennium with nestled ZipSlack(tm) 9.1 UMSDOS Linux, and with Bochs 2.1.1 with a small DLX Linux; and, for TB sometimes, Gentoo and Vector via Wine... -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iD8DBQFCJ1EA9q62QPd3XuIRAidHAJ9N6iL6/ns/wZ0qu/9f5Zhpak39IQCeOFTy bYnBekSdbzz7L/Bq/2dm7DY= =81h3 -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: no UTF-8 support in TB?
On Thursday, March 3, 2005, 11:11:34, Thomas Fernandez wrote: Yes, but to the list pertaining to the mailer the sender used: X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 6.5 18. September 2003 On a side remark, this message uses only plain text, so there is no need for HTML anyway, but that's of cause not the point and very OT. Hey, we're talking about re-educating my sister here. Forget it ;) Regards, Roman -- It has ever been my experience that folks who have no vices have very few virtues. Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
