Re: The Bat! keeps trying to dowload deleted messages.

2006-01-20 Thread Bob Morris
G'day Roelof, Friday, January 20, 2006, 6:57:33 PM, you wrote: > Hallo Bob, > Close TB and delete the account.m_r and account.m_d files matching > with the problem account. When you're using OTFE the extensions are > .emr and .emd > I'm not sure whether this solves the problem so I'd appreciate

Re: TB, Nod32 and email tags

2006-01-20 Thread John Phillips
Hi Ted, On Fri, 20 Jan 2006, at 17:45:30 [GMT+1100] (which was 17:45:30 Australian Eastern Time) you wrote: > Anyone out there that is using TB with Nod32 as AV? > I just noticed that while most of my emails are obviously scanned by > NOD and do show their proper tag at the bottom, some other emai

Re: Best way to "mark" an email in a flexible way for filtering in VF's

2006-01-20 Thread Martin Schuster
Hello Richard, MS>> Of course I know, how would a memo start its life otherwise > Sorry. It's just that, from the way you replied about wishing to be able > to edit the memos "there" (as I suggested, in the memo column) seemed > that you didn't know you could do it that way. I'll go back into my

Re: Best way to "mark" an email in a flexible way for filtering in VF's

2006-01-20 Thread Stuart Cuddy
Hello Martin, Thursday, January 19, 2006, 8:59:08 AM, you wrote: MS> Any other suggestions? Thanks a lot for your time! I had an idea that might work for this, but I am having trouble testing it and need some help. My idea was to use manual filters with hotkeys to set a User Parameter for

Deleting duplicate addresses and returned addresses

2006-01-20 Thread monsell
Dear List, Have 2 Questions:- 1. I have a lot of duplicate email addresses running into thousands of them. No, i do not do network marketing. How do i find these duplicates and delete only the ones that does not have a HANDLE? 2. Have a lot of addresses bouncing back. How can i select them all a

Re: Best way to "mark" an email in a flexible way for filtering in VF's

2006-01-20 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Martin, On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 you wrote in MS> Of course I know, how would a memo start its life otherwise Sorry. It's just that, from the way you replied about wishing to be able to edit the memos "there" (as I suggested, in the memo column) seemed that you didn't know you could do it that

Re: Deleting duplicate addresses and returned addresses

2006-01-20 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Vernon, On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 17:18:07 +0600GMT (20-1-2006, 12:18 +0100, where I live), you wrote: M> 1. I have a lot of duplicate email addresses running into thousands of M> them. No, i do not do network marketing. How do i find these M> duplicates and delete only the ones that does not hav

Re[4]: TB, Nod32 and email tags

2006-01-20 Thread Graham Smith
Hello Ted, Friday, January 20, 2006, 12:48:04 PM, you wrote: > On 1/20/06, Graham Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> That is strange, because the contents of that message contains a >> signature: >> >> "Tom >> using TB 3.6503 Home on XP with NOD32" > Sorry, did not want to confuse you. I am us

Re: Re[2]: TB, Nod32 and email tags

2006-01-20 Thread Ted Dane
On 1/20/06, Graham Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That is strange, because the contents of that message contains a > signature: > > "Tom > using TB 3.6503 Home on XP with NOD32" Sorry, did not want to confuse you. I am using TB but not when writing to this list. I have not yet properly config

Re: TB, Nod32 and email tags

2006-01-20 Thread Ted Dane
On 1/20/06, Alexander S. Kunz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Could it be that these messages are multiparted (with attachments, signed, > html format)? If so, the scanner may not be able to add its tagline to the > readable part of the message. Not sure how to answer this. Most of my emails (A) onl

Re[2]: TB, Nod32 and email tags

2006-01-20 Thread Graham Smith
Hello Roelof, Friday, January 20, 2006, 12:39:18 PM, you wrote: > Hallo Graham, > On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 11:32:53 +GMT (20-1-2006, 12:32 +0100, where I > live), you wrote: GS Ok, the the message that started the thread off from Ted isn't tagged. >>> And that was the only non TB message. GS

Mod: Reply for new thread (was: Deleting duplicate addresses and returned addresses)

2006-01-20 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Vernon, On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 17:18:07 +0600GMT (20-1-2006, 12:18 +0200, where I live), you wrote: M> Have 2 Questions:- Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not just to the person being replied to, even if their post may have instigated this reply. Please don't

Re: TB, Nod32 and email tags

2006-01-20 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Graham, On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 11:32:53 +GMT (20-1-2006, 12:32 +0100, where I live), you wrote: GS>>> Ok, the the message that started the thread off from Ted isn't tagged. >> And that was the only non TB message. GS> That is strange, because the contents of that message contains a GS> sig

Re: Best way to "mark" an email in a flexible way for filtering in VF's

2006-01-20 Thread Peter Fjelsten
Martin, On 20-01-2006 13:18, you [MS] wrote in : >> I'd prefer them to be in external files (and not the index) and >> linked to messages using message-ids. MS> I'd say "yes", but I guess that would cause quite some overhead when MS> viewing and deleting messages, in case the number of memos is b

Re: Best way to "mark" an email in a flexible way for filtering in VF's

2006-01-20 Thread Martin Schuster
Hello Richard, > Hello Martin, > On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 you wrote in > >>> It's available as column in the message list. MS>> Yeah, wish I could edit them there... > You can. CTRL+SHFT+I Of course I know, how would a memo start its life otherwise ;-) ? But as I stated before the steps to open t

Re: The Bat! keeps trying to dowload deleted messages.

2006-01-20 Thread Mica Mijatovic
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 ***^\ ."_)~~ ~( __ _"o Was another beautiful day, Fri, 20 Jan 2006, @ @ at 10:39:09 +0100, when MAU wrote: > Hello Bob, >> As a check I have accessed the offending account both via web-mail >> and by PocoMail, both of which re

Deleting duplicate addresses and returned addresses

2006-01-20 Thread monsell
Dear List, Have 2 Questions:- 1. I have a lot of duplicate email addresses running into thousands of them. No, i do not do network marketing. How do i find these duplicates and delete only the ones that does not have a HANDLE? 2. Have a lot of addresses bouncing back. How can i select them all a

Re: Best way to "mark" an email in a flexible way for filtering in VF's

2006-01-20 Thread Martin Schuster
Hello Peter, MS>> I would wish the memo auto view would be a dockable window, just MS>> like the attachment window or a header field (the way it's displayed MS>> while composing the email), just some kind of a small area that is MS>> always available if I wish to see it, instead of a separate wind

Re: Best way to "mark" an email in a flexible way for filtering in VF's

2006-01-20 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Martin, On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 you wrote in >> It's available as column in the message list. MS> Yeah, wish I could edit them there... You can. CTRL+SHFT+I -- Regards, Richard | The Bat! 3.65.04 with SpamPal & POP3 account and no Plug-ins | Windows XP (build 2600), version 5. 1 Service P

Re: Best way to "mark" an email in a flexible way for filtering in VF's

2006-01-20 Thread Martin Schuster
Hello Roelof, > Hallo Martin, > On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 12:05:12 +0100GMT (20-1-2006, 12:05 +0100, where I > live), you wrote: MS>> I would wish the memo auto view would be a dockable window, just like MS>> the attachment window or a header field (the way it's displayed while MS>> composing the emai

Re[2]: Dual address books

2006-01-20 Thread Jack S. LaRosa
Hello Bob, Thursday, January 19, 2006, 11:15:14 PM, you wrote: BM> G'day Jack, BM> Friday, January 20, 2006, 1:20:39 PM, you wrote: BM> >> I see where my wording on this question may have caused you to >> misunderstand. If we assume there are no parked messages but only >> saved, ready-to-sen

Re: Best way to "mark" an email in a flexible way for filtering in VF's

2006-01-20 Thread Peter Fjelsten
Martin, On 20-01-2006 12:05, you [MS] wrote in : MS> I would wish the memo auto view would be a dockable window, just MS> like the attachment window or a header field (the way it's displayed MS> while composing the email), just some kind of a small area that is MS> always available if I wish to se

Re[2]: TB, Nod32 and email tags

2006-01-20 Thread Graham Smith
Hello Roelof, Friday, January 20, 2006, 11:09:24 AM, you wrote: > Hallo Graham, > On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 10:58:54 +GMT (20-1-2006, 11:58 +0100, where I > live), you wrote: GS>> Ok, the the message that started the thread off from Ted isn't tagged. > And that was the only non TB message. And i

Re: Best way to "mark" an email in a flexible way for filtering in VF's

2006-01-20 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Martin, On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 you wrote in MS> I would wish the memo auto view would be a dockable window, just like MS> the attachment window or a header field (the way it's displayed while MS> composing the email), just some kind of a small area that is always MS> available if I wish to se

Re: Best way to "mark" an email in a flexible way for filtering in VF's

2006-01-20 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Martin, On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 12:05:12 +0100GMT (20-1-2006, 12:05 +0100, where I live), you wrote: MS> I would wish the memo auto view would be a dockable window, just like MS> the attachment window or a header field (the way it's displayed while MS> composing the email), just some kind of a

Re: TB, Nod32 and email tags

2006-01-20 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Graham, On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 10:58:54 +GMT (20-1-2006, 11:58 +0100, where I live), you wrote: GS> Ok, the the message that started the thread off from Ted isn't tagged. And that was the only non TB message. And it was carrying these headers: ,- [ ] | Content-Type: text/plain; chars

Re: Best way to "mark" an email in a flexible way for filtering in VF's

2006-01-20 Thread Martin Schuster
Hello MAU, > Yes, I also use colour (or colourless) groups and they are a good > solution when a message can only belong to one category. But if a message > can belong to 2 or more, there is no way to do it with groups. And the > only alternative I've found for that is to use the memo. Well, you

Re[2]: TB, Nod32 and email tags

2006-01-20 Thread Graham Smith
Hello Roelof, Friday, January 20, 2006, 10:25:20 AM, you wrote: > Hallo Graham, > On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 10:11:57 +GMT (20-1-2006, 11:11 +0100, where I > live), you wrote: GS>> I haven't set NOD32 to do anything specific, but of this thread, two GS>> messages aren't tagged (including the root

Re: TB, Nod32 and email tags

2006-01-20 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Graham, On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 10:11:57 +GMT (20-1-2006, 11:11 +0100, where I live), you wrote: GS> I haven't set NOD32 to do anything specific, but of this thread, two GS> messages aren't tagged (including the root message) and the rest are. Be more specific please. Of this thread only m

Re[2]: TB, Nod32 and email tags

2006-01-20 Thread Graham Smith
Hello Mark, Friday, January 20, 2006, 10:05:02 AM, you wrote: > Hello Graham, > Friday, January 20, 2006, 9:33:12 AM, you wrote: >>> Anyone out there that is using TB with Nod32 as AV? >>> I just noticed that while most of my emails are obviously scanned by >>> NOD and do show their proper tag

Re: TB, Nod32 and email tags

2006-01-20 Thread Mark Partous
Hello Graham, Friday, January 20, 2006, 9:33:12 AM, you wrote: >> Anyone out there that is using TB with Nod32 as AV? >> I just noticed that while most of my emails are obviously scanned by >> NOD and do show their proper tag at the bottom, some other emails seem >> to be either ignored or do no

Re: Option "allow local delivery" disapeared

2006-01-20 Thread Gerard
ON Friday, January 20, 2006, 10:36:19 AM, you wrote: M> You are right, I had not noticed it. What I don't know is if this is M> intentional or a bug. M> I'm CCing this to TBBeta to see if anyone there knows. Thx. I hope someone knows how to get it back. I noticed that it said it the Help File th

Re: Option "allow local delivery" disapeared

2006-01-20 Thread Marek Mikus
Hello all, Friday, January 20, 2006, MAU wrote: >> On my just installed latest version of TB! the option under >> Option-Network&Admin "allow local delivery" seems to be missing. > You are right, I had not noticed it. What I don't know is if this is > intentional or a bug. > I'm CCing this to TB

Re: The Bat! keeps trying to dowload deleted messages.

2006-01-20 Thread MAU
Hello Bob, > As a check I have accessed the offending account both via > web-mail and by PocoMail, both of which report that there is no mail > currently in the account. Have you tried with TB's Dispatcher? -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v3.65.04 _

Re: Option "allow local delivery" disapeared

2006-01-20 Thread MAU
Hello Gerard, > On my just installed latest version of TB! the option under > Option-Network&Admin "allow local delivery" seems to be missing. You are right, I had not noticed it. What I don't know is if this is intentional or a bug. I'm CCing this to TBBeta to see if anyone there knows. -- Be

Re: Best way to "mark" an email in a flexible way for filtering in VF's

2006-01-20 Thread MAU
Hello Martin, >>> a special "keyword" in the memo-field: not very comfortable: I have >>> to hit Shift-Ctrl-I for Autoview-Memo, type in the key, press the >>> save-button and close the autoview-memo-window > >> You are right, it is not very comfortable but it is the only solution >> I've fo

Re: TB, Nod32 and email tags

2006-01-20 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello Ted Dane & everyone else, on 20-Jan-2006 at 07:45 you (Ted Dane) wrote: > Anyone out there that is using TB with Nod32 as AV? > I just noticed that while most of my emails are obviously scanned by > NOD and do show their proper tag at the bottom, some other emails seem > to be either ignore

Re: The Bat! keeps trying to dowload deleted messages.

2006-01-20 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Bob, On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 16:23:24 +1000GMT (20-1-2006, 7:23 +0100, where I live), you wrote: BM> I figure that there must be some sort of cache that The Bat! is BM> referring to and that it thinks that there is still mail to retrieve. Close TB and delete the account.m_r and account.m_d fil

Re: TB, Nod32 and email tags

2006-01-20 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Ted, On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 17:45:30 +1100GMT (20-1-2006, 7:45 +0100, where I live), you wrote: TD> Btw, is there a security issue of reading emails in HTML when using TD> TB. No. TB doesn't execute any included scripts nor does it display any files that aren't sent along with the message as

Re: TB, Nod32 and email tags

2006-01-20 Thread Graham Smith
Hello Ted, Friday, January 20, 2006, 6:45:30 AM, you wrote: > Anyone out there that is using TB with Nod32 as AV? > I just noticed that while most of my emails are obviously scanned by > NOD and do show their proper tag at the bottom, some other emails seem > to be either ignored or do not have t