Re: Attachments open with a different name

MFPA @ 2006-6-06 5:44:31 PM "Attachments open with a different name" >> Do you think that you could turn on PGP MIME for this list? > Why? I dislike it intensely. Since our e-mail client can handle it nicely (i.e., it knows it's there, but doesn't show it), it makes replying to your messages ea

Re: Order.txt file in \Program Files\The Bat!\Images

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hi On Tuesday 6 June 2006 at 3:35:18 PM, in , Mary Bull wrote: > I always did think you were a smart man! :) Flattery will get you everywhere (-; - -- Best regards, MFPA A closed mouth gathers no foot Using The Bat! v3.80.06 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 S

Re: Attachments open with a different name

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hi On Tuesday 6 June 2006 at 1:54:02 AM, in , Chris wrote: > Do you think that you could turn on PGP MIME for this list? Why? I dislike it intensely. - -- Best regards, MFPA The truth is out there. Using The Bat! v3.80.06 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Serv

Re: Storing spam emails for later training

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 Hi On Tuesday 6 June 2006 at 1:48:19 PM, in , Jernej Simoncic wrote: > and move the rest to Archive subfolder. I seem to remember hearing that if the archive folder is in a password-protected account, TB! does not even load the messagebase unl

Re: Storing spam emails for later training

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hi On Tuesday 6 June 2006 at 1:54:30 PM, in , Jenny Zonneveld wrote: > And if you were worried about loosing mail, you could get everything to go > though gmail. [OT] with the attendant privacy issues.. - -- Best regards, MFPA I think not, said Descartes,

Re: Storing spam emails for later training

Hello Admin, Tuesday, June 6, 2006, 1:52:31 PM, you wrote: > At the moment all i seem to be able to do is save them as single messages > as EML or MSG - since I can;t see thatTB will import a txt file (which is > theonly way I can seem to get a bunch of email messages sabved in one go. Export to

Re[3]: Storing spam emails for later training

Hello Marten, Tuesday, June 6, 2006, 2:19:20 PM, you wrote: MG> Keeping the boxes as empty as possible I believe reduces the risk of MG> crashes etc. That might apply to MS products, but not to The Bat! I switched about a year ago because of crashes in OE. I have thousands of e-mails stored i

Re: Order.txt file in \Program Files\The Bat!\Images

Hello MFPA! On Monday, June 05, 2006, 7:21 PM, you wrote: >> I guess if MFPA later turns out to feel a need for this file, he now >> has a way to set it up again. Since he deleted it, on advice from me >> and from Alexander. :) > I actually left it there but appended "probably not needed" to the

Re: Storing spam emails for later training

On Tuesday, June 6, 2006, 14:19:20, Marten Gallagher wrote: > Keeping the boxes as empty as possible I believe reduces the risk of > crashes etc. No need for that with The Bat! - I store all past messages from mailing lists directly in TB, and have around 400.000 messages currently (with the larg

Re[2]: Storing spam emails for later training

> Hallo Marten, > On Tue, 6 Jun 2006 12:52:31 +0100GMT (6-6-2006, 13:52 +0200, where I > live), you wrote: MG>> I want to start saving a store of junk email to use for later training. > That's why I've configured my junk folder to keep 1000 messages. Yes that's a way to do it but I prefer to ke

Re: Storing spam emails for later training

Hallo Marten, On Tue, 6 Jun 2006 12:52:31 +0100GMT (6-6-2006, 13:52 +0200, where I live), you wrote: MG> I want to start saving a store of junk email to use for later training. That's why I've configured my junk folder to keep 1000 messages. -- Groetjes, Roelof It is easy to propose impossibl

Storing spam emails for later training

I ma having decreasing success with AGAVA - as I did with BayesIT before that etc. I want to start saving a store of junk email to use for later training. What is the best way to save a whole bunch of junk mai,l in one file so tht I can breing them back into TB later when I uninstall and re-insta

Re: Virtual Memory overuse

On Tuesday, June 6, 2006, 2:13:41, MFPA wrote: > Based on ...? There was an excellent article from Mark Russinovitch about this on , but unfortunately they now require you to subscribe to read it in full (previously, the complete ver