Monday, February 12, 2001, 9:11:21 PM, you wrote:
MK I cannot access the RIT Labs web site:
MK http://www.ritlabs.com
MK http://198.78.172.135
MK by Host Name and IP address.
MK Is anyone else experiencing a problem?
It's must be down. I get no response on cablemodem.
--
Ben
Monday, February 12, 2001, 10:37:34 PM, you wrote:
MY -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
MY Hash: SHA1
MY On Mon, 12 Feb 2001, at 21:11:21 [GMT -0500], Mark Knipfer wrote:
MK I cannot access the RIT Labs web site:
MK http://www.ritlabs.com
MK http://198.78.172.135
MK by Host Name and IP
Friday, February 16, 2001, 7:50:40 PM, you wrote:
JR Hello Listers.
JR On Friday, February 16, 2001 23:53:58 [ +0100 GMT], Lija wrote the
JR following in regards to 'Peter, DO NOT OVERQUOTE! (was: Importing
JR Outlook Contacts)':
/Snip/
Lija To Moderators:
Lija I know, I was too rude, but
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Friday, February 16, 2001, 7:26:59 PM, you wrote:
MY I'm more inclined to go with "confused Outlook Express user" than
MY jerk. The Bat! will allow you to bottom post and, more importantly[1],
MY trim the quotes by selecting a block and hitting F4. Lookout
Friday, February 16, 2001, 8:25:42 PM, you wrote:
NA Ben, it sounds like you have already hit the Reply button, and *then*
NA you are highlighting the text you want to quote. In that case, F4 will
NA indeed spell check the highlighted text. Try just reading the message in
NA the preview pane,
This is a resend--it appears my original isn't going to make it. I'm
pleased that the server is back up.
Earlier today I visited the German Bat site. I found a bunch of
interesting articles, and I agree that someone did a fine good of
compiling documentation on TB. Even though I speak a locally
Thursday, February 22, 2001, 1:03:23 PM, you wrote:
NA Is it just me, or does the address for the List Archives in the footer
NA message have to be changed. I cannot connect to:
NA http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com or http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
NA but I can connect to:
NA
Friday, February 23, 2001, 9:13:09 PM, you wrote:
BC I'm not known to regularly defrag my hard disk. :) I think I've done
BC it 3 times in 2 years or so, maybe longer. I'd rather leave that sort
BC of thing alone. It seems like in the past, when I tried to do more
BC house-cleaning, it
Friday, March 30, 2001, 10:51:02 AM, you wrote:
RB Hi,
RB as you see below there are problems to send messages to this list:
Roland,
I haven't posted here in so long I'm just giving it a test. I'll watch
my log.
Ben
--
Benmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Sat
day, March 31, 2001, 8:07:28 AM, you wrote:
GFS Hello Bat_Users,
GFS I've been getting "DNS error" whenever I try to check the
GFS ritlabs.
www.ritlabs.com works here. If all else fails you can try
http://198.63.208.135 .
--
Benmailto:[EMAIL
Saturday, March 31, 2001, 8:20:02 PM, you wrote:
GFS Yeah, the IP works, so I wonder why my Nameserver is not keeping it.
Maybe it's just too slow or something. If you're using an ISP, maybe a
little nudge might get some results. You can always use another
provider's DNS server, just edit
Saturday, April 28, 2001, 10:22:11 PM, you wrote:
/snipped entire cigar/
Get off your high horse! Many of us don't make a profession of reading
all the posts that come through these lists, and I happen to be one of
them!
The post was informative for me, as I wasn't aware of any TB specific
Sunday, April 29, 2001, 4:55:05 AM, you wrote:
DH I don't know if the moderators - since you specifically targeted them
DH - - will answer to you. If you have read the rules of this list you
DH would at least have refrained from your tone, which is way out of
DH line.
We've all talked about
Sunday, April 29, 2001, 10:43:19 AM, you wrote:
PP TB! included a closing bracket to much into the link ... so double click the
PP link and remove the last bracket in the address bar or use this link (which is
PP identically to the first, but without any special character at it's side)
Sunday, April 29, 2001, 9:39:30 PM, you wrote:
Ai Is it possible to set TB not to execute attachment at all? I mean not
Ai to ask even...
I don't believe so. Under properties I would suggest that you set up
an attachment dir...maybe something like C:\attach. The default
settings leave the
Tuesday, May 01, 2001, 9:42:55 AM, you wrote:
Ai I always am...
Ai I'm asking because more and more people I know are using TB!
But the problem is Ritlabs lack of response to known security issues.
Hackers will have a heyday with TB if Ritlabs continues to bury its
head in the sand instead
Tuesday, May 01, 2001, 9:38:26 PM, you wrote:
z If they do this, they will become a major target as well. It would be
z good for the security strengths, including fast patches, to keep up
z with the popularity - we'll need more, and faster, as it get more
z popular.
We both agree on this
Thursday, May 03, 2001, 4:35:19 AM, you wrote:
AV The Bat! 1.51, OS Windows 2000
AV Dear List:
AV I'm new to The Bat! - so probably a Newbie question:
AV I often receive unwanted mail from senders that I would like to block
AV completely.
AV - How can I do this most effectively?
That's a
Sunday, May 20, 2001, 7:11:13 AM, you wrote:
SM I had no problem with The Bat! running Win98SE and WinMe. I just
SM migrated to Windows 2000 and now I have terrible problems contacting
SM mail servers. Time-outs, failure to send, etc.
ACM Be careful with Win2k and firewalls. TB! is one of
Sunday, May 20, 2001, 10:10:34 PM, you wrote:
JR -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
JR Hash: SHA1
JR Hello Ben,
JR On Sunday, May 20, 2001 13:11:39 [ -0400 GMT], you wrote the
JR following in regards to 'The Bat! and Windows 2000':
Ben OTOH, Sygate's free firewall works fine with TB and
Wednesday, June 13, 2001, 8:05:51 AM, you wrote:
JR Do you know if the send hang was addressed in this new version?
Jan,
I'm curious as to what you mean by send hang. Thanks!
Regards,
Ben
--
Benmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Wednesday, June 13, 2001, 12:25:56 PM, you wrote:
Ben I'm curious as to what you mean by send hang.
JR In earlier versions, TB! would attempt to send if it couldn't, it
JR wouldn't disengage from the server.
It must depend on the server. Mine is on a win2k machine setting less
than a
Saturday, June 16, 2001, 1:58:33 AM, you wrote:
P Hi all,
P I have a friend who downloaded TB today, thinking to replace his NS 4.7.
P Only thing is he has over 60,000 messages in Netscape that he tried to
P import into TB. He said the import seemed to work, but TB locked up and
P locks up
Saturday, June 16, 2001, 4:05:55 PM, you wrote:
KS Same thing. Whether it's new mail or old, forwarded or
KS original, I invariably have this problem. And it's
KS independant of the folder that I am in, which rules out
KS templates and AB-entries.
Karen,
Which OS are you using? I've tried
Wednesday, April 24, 2002, 8:40:57 AM, you wrote:
DC Recipient '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' in message 'Food receipts' cannot be sent to. The
reply given by the service
DC provider was '550 relaying to [EMAIL PROTECTED] prohibited by administrator
DC '.
I'd email the postmaster at impro and see what
Wednesday, April 24, 2002, 11:54:57 AM, you wrote:
I use www.dnsstuff.com for a bunch of reasons. It has a lot of great
tools.
Here's the URL to the span database lookup for his ISP's server:
http://www.dnsstuff.com/tools/ip4r.ch?ip=194.73.73.92 .
You can go back to www.dnsstuff.com and
Thursday, April 25, 2002, 9:38:18 AM, you wrote:
GS Hello TBUL,
GS How do I archive messages on an account that is no longer active?
GS I have a Yahoo account that no longer provides pop access and is
GS generating errors. I like to keep the messages, but get rid of the
GS connection
Thursday, May 2, 2002, 5:46:48 PM, you wrote:
MLW How can I keep an email program that must be setup from scratch every time
MLW I use it? Are you willing to use a mail program that takes 30 minutes of
MLW setup and recover every time you want to send and read mail?
I understand your
Thursday, May 2, 2002, 6:54:19 PM, you wrote:
MLW Sarcasm
MLW What a great idea. Every time I want to check my mail or send some mail, I
MLW can import stuff into my registry, re-import all my data, send the mail,
MLW then delete it all. I think this idea will make a million or more people
Friday, May 3, 2002, 10:18:20 PM, you wrote:
JA Isn't there an option in the menus somewhere to view the log files? I
JA think TB! keeps a 'temp' log file. Maybe that is what you are looking
JA for? I'd give you a menu to where it is... but I'm at home, using Pine.
JA ;)
At the top your
Friday, May 3, 2002, 11:42:32 PM, you wrote:
Nope. That isn't the Log that appears in Connection Centre. View log
just views addresses. That one has an icon, BTW, easy to locate.
JA Ahh... I cannot validate this from here... using pine. I thought that log
JA option showed the
Saturday, May 4, 2002, 12:30:33 AM, you wrote:
At the top your your screen, click account then click view log.
A Nope. That isn't the Log that appears in Connection Centre. View log
A just views addresses. That one has an icon, BTW, easy to locate.
Bring up your log and look towards
Saturday, May 4, 2002, 4:37:39 PM, you wrote:
MR Today, I downloaded the TB! 1.60j .rar file from the TB! beta ftp site
MR (twice - just to be sure that it wasn't a problem caused during
MR download). When I try to extract the executable from the .rar archive,
MR nothing shows up in the
Sunday, May 5, 2002, 5:10:40 AM, you wrote:
LL I have a copy, if you want me to e-mail it to you let me know.
Sure. Send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so it won't get lost in my list
account.
Thanks,
Ben
--
Benmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Saturday, May 4, 2002, 5:20:38 PM, you wrote:
MDP -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
MDP Hash: SHA1
MDP Hi Ben,
MDP @04 May 2002, 17:03:21 -0400 (22:03 UK time) Ben Mills wrote in
MDP [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MR Testing file: thebat.exe -- CRC ERRO
Monday, May 6, 2002, 12:45:10 PM, you wrote:
t get latest Winrar or 1.90, works ok.
Can't find where to get latest Winrar, or Beta files for 1.60j.
t http://www.ritlabs.com/ftp/pub/the_bat/beta/tb160j.rar
t Presumably latest winrar is on the rar website or on sites like Fosi.
t Not sure
Saturday, May 4, 2002, 9:31:26 PM, you wrote:
A Nope. What Connection Centre shows is number of mailboxes, number of
A messages, how many messages in each mailbox, time elapsed. I found you
A could try Printscreen. But that only gives you the log 'up to that point'
A in the mailcheck. If
Monday, May 6, 2002, 1:19:32 PM, you wrote:
Maybe somebody else can come up with more creative way of capturing
your connection center activity. But the print screen method isn't
likely a good approach.
Good luck,
JA I don't know about this... but I just got unusual behavior from my
JA
Monday, May 6, 2002, 2:42:45 PM, you wrote:
MAU Hello Ben,
Maybe it's an XP thing.
MAU Nope. I've seen that in WinNT and Win2000.
Well, I guess I should consider myself fortunate. Of course it could
be a bug that was fixed in the j version that I'm using. Either way, I
can't dupe the
Hello,
Has anyone successfully used TB in TLS secure connection?
My server is TLS capable, and will operate in TLS protocol when relaying
to other TLS compliant servers. But I've never been able to connect in
TLS mode to my server with TB. There's not much in the archives
concerning this
Hello Jonathan,
Saturday, June 14, 2003, 2:59:24 PM, you wrote:
JA On Saturday, June 14, 2003, Ben Mills wrote...
Has anyone successfully used TB in TLS secure connection?
JA TLS on what? SMTP? IMAP? POP3? I'm running TLS on POP3 quite
JA successfully. What problems are you having?
I've
Hello Jonathan,
Saturday, June 14, 2003, 3:27:55 PM, you wrote:
JA On Saturday, June 14, 2003, Ben Mills wrote...
Has anyone successfully used TB in TLS secure connection?
JA TLS on what? SMTP? IMAP? POP3? I'm running TLS on POP3 quite
JA successfully. What problems are you having?
I've
Hello ,
Following up on TB and TLS, here's a small portion of the TB log. My
cert is valid from june of 2003 to june 0f 2006. However TB interprets
it to be valid from 2013-2016, therefore it considers it not yet
valid.
I installed a copy of Eudora and it set up fine with TLS protocol.
Also, the
Hello Maurice,
Monday, June 16, 2003, 7:04:00 AM, you wrote:
algorithm: RSA (1024 bits), issued from 15 Jun 2013 to 14 Jun 2016,
for 1 host(s): mail.hwy39.net. 6/15/2003, 09:46:46: FETCH - Owner:
Ohio, Nashville, mail, mail.hwy39.net, mail.hwy39.net,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 6/15/2003, 09:46:46:
At 01:14 AM 6/17/2003 +0200, you wrote:
OK, that had me jumping through some hoops as for (imho good) reason
of security Opera refuses https-connections to port 80. Had to use
Internet Explorer to get to this site; imported the certificate and it
displays OK. Exported it to DER-encoded X.509 so I
Hello Allie,
Monday, June 30, 2003, 4:31:12 AM, you wrote:
TF Just recommend to the user you try to contact that his company needs
TF to drop that piece of software. It is dangerous for their business,
TF as it obviously loses all mail sent by this professional email
TF client. What other
Hello Rafi,
Sunday, July 20, 2003, 12:48:28 AM, you wrote:
RA I admit this is exactly what happens when I try to verify this with
RA GPG.EXE on the command line. However, this kind of verification works
RA perfectly with Eudora.
RA (I am not looking for trouble or advertizing Eudora, in fact I
At 01:29 AM 7/22/2003 +0200, you wrote:
On Monday, July 21, 2003, 23:51:48, Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
It might, but I can be as childish as the next guy when riled. I've
put the guy on moderated and written him a shirty private mail
Be careful, he might complain at your ISP... I've had problems
At 06:42 PM 7/21/2003 -0500, you wrote:
Folks,
Excuse me, but I have NEVER sent the message referenced under the
title re Rafi Avital - I know better than that.
Besides I have just subscribed a few days ago, still find quite a lot
of useful info in this list, I have no reason to unsubscribe.
My
At 04:51 PM 8/4/2003 +0100, you wrote:
novice question:
where is 'the FTP site' (RE: English Dictionary 3/8/03) and how does
one use it?
ftp://ftp.ritlabs.com/pub/the_bat/
I believe you want to download intpack.exe.
Current version is 1.62r |
At 04:43 PM 8/4/2003 +0200, you wrote:
Hi Bat! people,
As i am thinking about getting a domain i also think about getting my
own mail server software. Could anyone advice on a free or low cost
solution that could work under Win XP?
If you don't think this belongs here, please feel free to email
Michael Acklin wrote:
Hello Thorvald,
Can anybody confirm using this list (or TBBETA) AND a Gmail account
that his mails to the list do not get resend to oneself?
Yes I can confirm. I see this all the time and I am on a lot of
different list. Gmail does not send they mail you sent to the
52 matches
Mail list logo
