On Thursday, June 17, 2004, 11:31:37 AM, Dave wrote:
> Hello Leif,
> Thursday, June 17, 2004, 10:11:20 AM, you wrote:
>> You know.. this rouges smileys thing has actually worked out better
>> than I anticipated. I really, really like being able to put a face to
>> a name immediately while reading
On Friday, June 25, 2004, 2:57:00 PM, Peter wrote:
scc>> I have used The Bat very happily for a few years on our PC-type computers.
scc>> Now that we are in the market for a Mac/Apple computer, is The Bat
scc>> compatible with Mac/Apple computers?
> I guess not as it is, but I'm not sure. It's ju
On Friday, June 11, 2004, 2:35:22 PM, Michael wrote:
AE>> FYI, I am using KAV Personal 5.0.124.
> I always vote for NOD32 from www.eset.com. It is external, hyper-fast
> and small in memory use. It also costs, but worth every penny.
Based on your email, I asked around the office and it seems a
On Friday, June 11, 2004, 12:29:54 PM, Thomas wrote:
AE>> It seems that since moving to the 2.11.x versions, my installation of
AE>> TheBat! has become very slow on POP retrieval.
> I cannot confirm it, niether under Win98 nor XP Pro. However, TB is
> known to slow down under these conditions:
>
It seems that since moving to the 2.11.x versions, my installation of
TheBat! has become very slow on POP retrieval.
The first thing that I tried was disabling all anti-virus and
anti-spam plugins. That didn't work.
Then I tried to delete and rebuild my spam databases. That didn't
work.
Lastly,
On Monday, May 24, 2004, 12:46:16 PM, Michael wrote:
> For Anti-Virus and anti-Spam, I have settled on nod32 from eset
> (nod32.com)for anti-virus and popfile for anti-spam. Both are
> external to The Bat, and work very, very well together and with the
> bat.
> Any other ideas or comme
On Friday, May 21, 2004, 6:00:44 AM, Andre wrote:
> But 0.4 is pretty old and 0.5 works much better. From my experience you
> have to retrain when you upgrade to 0.5, though.
When I upgraded to 0.5, I not only had to retrain, but I ended up
tanking all the files from any previous BayesIT installa
On Wednesday, May 5, 2004, 5:04:15 PM, Samuel wrote:
> 2/ marking messages junk or not junk doesn't work anymore : if I
> receive the same message it has the same status it had before being
> classified as junk or not junk.
First, close TheBat!.
Then, remove (delete) the spambases located in X:\
On Thursday, April 29, 2004, 4:32:12 PM, Simon wrote:
> Just became aware that a service release has now become available from
> the Ritlabs website
> --- Changes in the maintenance release 2.10.03
It also includes 0.5.4 of the BayesIT! plug-in.
--
Alex
http://www.spittingllamas.com
"Formal Re
On Thursday, April 29, 2004, 11:52:09 AM, Samson wrote:
> http://www.ritlabs.com/kb/idx/0/064/article/
> first, make sure you download 0.5.3 from above address.
A combination of updating as you suggest and renewing the databases as
Marek suggested seems to have solved the problem.
Thanks!
--
A
On Thursday, April 29, 2004, 11:32:34 AM, Marek wrote:
> as I know, some changes in databases structure was made in 0.5 version
> and developer recommended to create database from zero.
Thanks. I have just done this. We will see how it works. Luckily, I
have saved several thousand good and bad ma
As BayesIT! is now bundled with TheBat!, I assume it is OK to ask
about it on this list.
I was having great success with the 0.45gm (or whatever version) of
BayesIT. But with the latest version of TheBat!, I see BayesIT is up
to 0.5 and it's success has severely dropped off.
It seems to classify
12 matches
Mail list logo
