Re: Gmail issues...
Michael Acklin wrote: Hello Thorvald, Can anybody confirm using this list (or TBBETA) AND a Gmail account that his mails to the list do not get resend to oneself? Yes I can confirm. I see this all the time and I am on a lot of different list. Gmail does not send they mail you sent to the list. There is a bunch of things you can't do with Gmail. It won't deliver responder messages either. Maybe they're concerned about loops. Current version is 3.60.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: where is the FTP site?
At 04:51 PM 8/4/2003 +0100, you wrote: novice question: where is 'the FTP site' (RE: English Dictionary 3/8/03) and how does one use it? ftp://ftp.ritlabs.com/pub/the_bat/ I believe you want to download intpack.exe. Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Ot: mail servers?
At 04:43 PM 8/4/2003 +0200, you wrote: Hi Bat! people, As i am thinking about getting a domain i also think about getting my own mail server software. Could anyone advice on a free or low cost solution that could work under Win XP? If you don't think this belongs here, please feel free to email me using the email address in the signature. TIA! Ipswitch has a free six user server. It's a stripped down version of their $1500 Imail server. This is OT for the list. But if you wish to talk about what all is involved in setting up a server, email me at [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Ben Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: I've Asked Several Times
At 01:29 AM 7/22/2003 +0200, you wrote: On Monday, July 21, 2003, 23:51:48, Marck D Pearlstone wrote: It might, but I can be as childish as the next guy when riled. I've put the guy on moderated and written him a shirty private mail Be careful, he might complain at your ISP... I've had problems with this a few times, and I once almost lost my account because I wrote a bit heated message to a guy who was spamming a mailing list. Unlikely. He was spamming the list and I doubt that his email provider would approve. As you can see, the domain grouppac.com is just a virtual domain on cp.net's mail server. For those in the US, cp.net has a toll-free number 877.441.PATH . I nearly called them myself to complain. inbound.grouppac.com.criticalpath.net claims to be host smtp.c011.snv.cp.net Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
RE:re Rafi Avital
At 06:42 PM 7/21/2003 -0500, you wrote: Folks, Excuse me, but I have NEVER sent the message referenced under the title re Rafi Avital - I know better than that. Besides I have just subscribed a few days ago, still find quite a lot of useful info in this list, I have no reason to unsubscribe. My apologies if this clarification causes even more confusion, just want to be clear, I have never sent that message. Thank you and best regards to all The spam was coming from Auke Beerschoten of mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]grouppac.com . At least that's what I saw here. Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Signature Verification in GnuPG seems to be useless
Hello Rafi, Sunday, July 20, 2003, 12:48:28 AM, you wrote: RA I admit this is exactly what happens when I try to verify this with RA GPG.EXE on the command line. However, this kind of verification works RA perfectly with Eudora. RA (I am not looking for trouble or advertizing Eudora, in fact I don't RA even like it that much which is why I'm considering TB. I am just RA reporting the facts as I see them). There are a few compliance issues with TB. In my case, it was necessary to use alternate port TLS for SMTP. This was because my dial-up ISP blocks port 25, so I couldn't connect to my own mail server. TB didn't read the server's certificate correctly, but Eudora and most other mail clients do fine with it. I've used TB for years and prefer it over Eudora and the MS products. Hopefully these issues get resolved in future TB versions. But for now, at least in my case, I usually read my mail on TB, then, in the case of replies, paste it over on Eudora to send. Maybe you'll come up with a better resolution to your problem than I have. TB is a very fine product with just a few rough edges. Be well, Ben Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: TB listed as Bulk Mailer
Hello Allie, Monday, June 30, 2003, 4:31:12 AM, you wrote: TF Just recommend to the user you try to contact that his company needs TF to drop that piece of software. It is dangerous for their business, TF as it obviously loses all mail sent by this professional email TF client. What other legitimate mail does it lose? AM The extremely annoying thing about this issue is that there are so many AM ways to fight spam that doesn't involve having to do sweeping filtering AM methods such as filtering out mail sent by a particular mail client. AM It's just ridiculous. The ignorance level among 'experts' who should AM know better is just stunning to behold. sigh Isn't there a program which will strip X-Mailer: from your outgoing mail? I do it here, but at the server. Many ISP's are taking draconian measures to deal with spam. AOL won't accept email from any dsl, adsl or cable account if the domain is in the pooled IP's--even if it's a static IP. If this, or a variant thereof, becomes a standard, It'll ruin a bunch of small businesses who can't afford service with vanity reverse lookup. I don't wish to stray off topic. But my point is that the war against spam will leave a bunch of casualties in its aftermath. -- Best regards, Benmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: TLS Connection
Hello Maurice, Monday, June 16, 2003, 7:04:00 AM, you wrote: algorithm: RSA (1024 bits), issued from 15 Jun 2013 to 14 Jun 2016, for 1 host(s): mail.hwy39.net. 6/15/2003, 09:46:46: FETCH - Owner: Ohio, Nashville, mail, mail.hwy39.net, mail.hwy39.net, [EMAIL PROTECTED] 6/15/2003, 09:46:46: FETCH - This certificate is self-issued. 6/15/2003, 09:46:46: FETCH - Invalid server certificate (This certificate is not yet valid). MS Here's your problem, the certificate the server is presenting isn't MS valid yet. It is reported to be valid from 15 June 2013 to 14 June MS 2016, and TB requires the certificate to be valid. The certificate is valid from June 2003-June 2006. You can view it at https://www.hwy39.net:80/mail . It doesn't match the site's name because it's for mail.hwy39.net, not www.hwy39.net . Anyhow Eudora and a couple of Linux mail clients ( Kmail maybe ) all work with it fine. But TB isn't reading it correctly, and that's a puzzler.. Ben -- Best regards, Benmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TLS Connection
At 01:14 AM 6/17/2003 +0200, you wrote: OK, that had me jumping through some hoops as for (imho good) reason of security Opera refuses https-connections to port 80. Had to use Internet Explorer to get to this site; imported the certificate and it displays OK. Exported it to DER-encoded X.509 so I could import in The Bat!, which does indeed show the dates you saw in the log earlier. Just for verification, I then imported the certificate that I exported from IE into Opera to see what it showed and Opera shows yet another set of dates: march 6, 15.01.47 2020 to june 6 14.01.47 2020. I cannot determine what was used to generate this certificate, but it would seem that the way the date is encoded in the certificate, is ambiguous. I'll be using [EMAIL PROTECTED] (24-hour format) below. Tool IEThe Bat! Opera From [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:01:47 To[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:01:47 It's almost as if bits of information got shifted around. Only Opera shows the time to be listed in GMT; this could account for the '2' difference in the time component. In the case of Opera, the year (omitting the century) seems to have migrated to the month, the month to the day, the day to the hours, the hours to the minutes and the minutes to the seconds, discarding the original seconds. The difference of 10 years in The Bat! eludes me, but I've never seen a certificate behave this way. The fact that Opera too displays (yet another set of) wrong dates for the certificate is in my opinion an indication that something weird is happening with the certificate. Anyhow Eudora and a couple of Linux mail clients ( Kmail maybe ) all work with it fine. Are they? I don't have either of these two handy so I can't check, but how do they see the dates of the certificate. It could be that they only check for expiration, which in the cases of both Opera and The Bat! is way into the future here, so if an application doesn't take the From date of the certificate into consideration, this could result in 'working fine' when it actually just displays a flaw in those applications. It displays fine in Eudora and IE. Those were the only two other programs I have to check it against. The cert was generated by a utility in the server program. I have a contract with Deerfield, so I'll let them figure it out. If they come up with nothing, I'll get into it and see what I can determine. I can't do much this time of day because this thing is running over a megabit of traffic. Thanks for your response, I do appreciate it. PS: I'm sending this on Eudora. I hope it doesn't go out in Html or some weird format Thanks, Ben Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TLS Connection
Hello , Following up on TB and TLS, here's a small portion of the TB log. My cert is valid from june of 2003 to june 0f 2006. However TB interprets it to be valid from 2013-2016, therefore it considers it not yet valid. I installed a copy of Eudora and it set up fine with TLS protocol. Also, the cert is fine with our webmail server. Do any of you folks have any idea regarding what's going on with TB? I'm at a loss, so thanks up front for any assistance. 6/15/2003, 09:46:46: FETCH - Initiating TLS handshake 6/15/2003, 09:46:46: FETCH - Certificate S/N: 17FBAD5B, algorithm: RSA (1024 bits), issued from 15 Jun 2013 to 14 Jun 2016, for 1 host(s): mail.hwy39.net. 6/15/2003, 09:46:46: FETCH - Owner: Ohio, Nashville, mail, mail.hwy39.net, mail.hwy39.net, [EMAIL PROTECTED] 6/15/2003, 09:46:46: FETCH - This certificate is self-issued. 6/15/2003, 09:46:46: FETCH - Invalid server certificate (This certificate is not yet valid). 6/15/2003, 09:46:46: FETCH - Server reports error. The response is: +OK Ready to start TLS -- Best regards, Ben mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
TLS Connection
Hello, Has anyone successfully used TB in TLS secure connection? My server is TLS capable, and will operate in TLS protocol when relaying to other TLS compliant servers. But I've never been able to connect in TLS mode to my server with TB. There's not much in the archives concerning this subject, so I'm soliciting help from you sharp cookies on the list. Be well, Ben -- Best regards, Ben mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: TLS Connection
Hello Jonathan, Saturday, June 14, 2003, 2:59:24 PM, you wrote: JA On Saturday, June 14, 2003, Ben Mills wrote... Has anyone successfully used TB in TLS secure connection? JA TLS on what? SMTP? IMAP? POP3? I'm running TLS on POP3 quite JA successfully. What problems are you having? I've tried to use TLS on SMTP and POP3. So far, I've been unable to connect with either. As you can see from the header, I relay to other compliant MTAs in TLS, but I haven't been able to connect from mail client (TB). Thanks, Ben -- Best regards, Benmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: TLS Connection
Hello Jonathan, Saturday, June 14, 2003, 3:27:55 PM, you wrote: JA On Saturday, June 14, 2003, Ben Mills wrote... Has anyone successfully used TB in TLS secure connection? JA TLS on what? SMTP? IMAP? POP3? I'm running TLS on POP3 quite JA successfully. What problems are you having? I've tried to use TLS on SMTP and POP3. So far, I've been unable to connect with either. As you can see from the header, I relay to other compliant MTAs in TLS, but I haven't been able to connect from mail client (TB). JA Have you looked at TBs log files to see why? If the certificate is a JA self signed certificate, TB will refuse to connect to it unless you JA import the certificate into your trusted root CA. I'm going to try it all over again. It's been a couple of months since I've worked with it. My cert is ok for this domain, and it's in the trusted root CA. I don't recall checking the TB log; actually I forget it had a log. I'll map the ports in the router, change TB settings, and see what I get back from the log. I realize the fault's not with TB, it's something in my setup. Thanks again, Ben -- Best regards, Benmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: 1.60j Rar file corrupted?
Monday, May 6, 2002, 12:45:10 PM, you wrote: t get latest Winrar or 1.90, works ok. Can't find where to get latest Winrar, or Beta files for 1.60j. t http://www.ritlabs.com/ftp/pub/the_bat/beta/tb160j.rar t Presumably latest winrar is on the rar website or on sites like Fosi. t Not sure where it is at present, as I havent been there for eges http://www.rarlab.com/download.htm -- Benmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current Ver: 1.60i FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Re[4]: connection centre
Saturday, May 4, 2002, 9:31:26 PM, you wrote: A Nope. What Connection Centre shows is number of mailboxes, number of A messages, how many messages in each mailbox, time elapsed. I found you A could try Printscreen. But that only gives you the log 'up to that point' A in the mailcheck. If you are quick enough to snapshot. Ok. I now understand what you want, but I don't know of any such logging feature in TB. My impression was that you were needing a log for debugging purposes. So when you mentioned that the account log was only showing email addresses, I assumed you had the highlights only option enabled. Maybe somebody else can come up with more creative way of capturing your connection center activity. But the print screen method isn't likely a good approach. Good luck, -- Benmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current Ver: 1.60i FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Re[2]: connection centre
Monday, May 6, 2002, 1:19:32 PM, you wrote: Maybe somebody else can come up with more creative way of capturing your connection center activity. But the print screen method isn't likely a good approach. Good luck, JA I don't know about this... but I just got unusual behavior from my JA log views for each account. If I open the log view from just after I JA have sent/received email, it displays just a short list. If I then JA click on Highlights Only I see older stuff, but only things like the JA person's email address that sent/posted the email, or I sent to... If JA I then click on the Highlights only button again... I get a full JA details log back to the time I started TB!. I don't know if this is JA just me/XP... or just a funny quirk. Maybe it's an XP thing. I'm using a win2000 box and I haven't been able to duplicate the action you describe. Mine works very consistently as I toggle the Highlights only button. Ben -- Benmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current Ver: 1.60i FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Re[2]: connection centre
Monday, May 6, 2002, 2:42:45 PM, you wrote: MAU Hello Ben, Maybe it's an XP thing. MAU Nope. I've seen that in WinNT and Win2000. Well, I guess I should consider myself fortunate. Of course it could be a bug that was fixed in the j version that I'm using. Either way, I can't dupe the problem on my setup. Ben -- Benmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current Ver: 1.60i FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Re: 1.60j Rar file corrupted?
Saturday, May 4, 2002, 4:37:39 PM, you wrote: MR Today, I downloaded the TB! 1.60j .rar file from the TB! beta ftp site MR (twice - just to be sure that it wasn't a problem caused during MR download). When I try to extract the executable from the .rar archive, MR nothing shows up in the folder I'm trying to extract it to. So... I MR open it up in PA, and run a Test on it. Here's what it's saying: MR # MR Testing archive: tb160j.rar -- 5/4/2002 1:17 PM MR # MR Testing file: thebat.exe MR -- CRC ERROR Both 160i and 160j are corrupted. No recovery record and Winrar can't fix it. -- Benmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current Ver: 1.60i FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Re[3]: 1.60j Rar file corrupted?
Sunday, May 5, 2002, 5:10:40 AM, you wrote: LL I have a copy, if you want me to e-mail it to you let me know. Sure. Send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so it won't get lost in my list account. Thanks, Ben -- Benmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current Ver: 1.60i FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Re[2]: 1.60j Rar file corrupted?
Saturday, May 4, 2002, 5:20:38 PM, you wrote: MDP -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- MDP Hash: SHA1 MDP Hi Ben, MDP @04 May 2002, 17:03:21 -0400 (22:03 UK time) Ben Mills wrote in MDP [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] MR Testing file: thebat.exe -- CRC ERROR Both 160i and 160j are corrupted. No recovery record and Winrar can't fix it. MDP You need to use the new WinRAR beta. These archives are created using MDP the shiny, new, tighter format, whiter-than-white beta RAR algorithm MDP and show up as corrupt on earlier versions. What will they think of next..G You're right, it was my copy of Winrar. I did have to do some digging to find the new 290 version, tho. The download link on winrar.com is down. Thanks, -- Benmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current Ver: 1.60i FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Re[2]: connection centre
Friday, May 3, 2002, 10:18:20 PM, you wrote: JA Isn't there an option in the menus somewhere to view the log files? I JA think TB! keeps a 'temp' log file. Maybe that is what you are looking JA for? I'd give you a menu to where it is... but I'm at home, using Pine. JA ;) At the top your your screen, click account then click view log. JA On Fri, 3 May 2002, Adam wrote: How could I review the Connection Centre stats after mail check? -- Benmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current Ver: 1.60i FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Re[3]: connection centre
Friday, May 3, 2002, 11:42:32 PM, you wrote: Nope. That isn't the Log that appears in Connection Centre. View log just views addresses. That one has an icon, BTW, easy to locate. JA Ahh... I cannot validate this from here... using pine. I thought that log JA option showed the connection logs. I'm sure I'd seen it somewhere anyway. JA If I am incorrect, I appologise for the confusion. Mine shows all events, such as connection to server, auth, articles received and connection closed. It shows all events for both pop and smtp server connections. It is an account based log tho. If you have more than one account, you have more than one log. I can't find any single log that contains all events for all accounts. Of course, that's not saying there isn't one somewhere;) -- Benmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current Ver: 1.60i FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Re[3]: connection centre
Saturday, May 4, 2002, 12:30:33 AM, you wrote: At the top your your screen, click account then click view log. A Nope. That isn't the Log that appears in Connection Centre. View log A just views addresses. That one has an icon, BTW, easy to locate. Bring up your log and look towards the bottom. I bet you have highlights only checked. Uncheck it and you should see all the connection details. -- Benmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current Ver: 1.60i FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Re[2]: TB! can not be a Virus (WAS: The bat is a virus. goodbye)
Thursday, May 2, 2002, 5:46:48 PM, you wrote: MLW How can I keep an email program that must be setup from scratch every time MLW I use it? Are you willing to use a mail program that takes 30 minutes of MLW setup and recover every time you want to send and read mail? I understand your frustration, but I have no idea why your TB registry file is being deleted. Until you can pinpoint the culprit, you can always export, before shutdown, the RIT reg file to your desktop ( or wherever), and import it back in after startup. I realize this isn't a fix, but it should have you up and running in a mere second or two, vs doing an entire 30 minute setup. -- Benmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current Ver: 1.60h FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re[3]: TB! can not be a Virus (WAS: The bat is a virus. goodbye)
Thursday, May 2, 2002, 6:54:19 PM, you wrote: MLW Sarcasm MLW What a great idea. Every time I want to check my mail or send some mail, I MLW can import stuff into my registry, re-import all my data, send the mail, MLW then delete it all. I think this idea will make a million or more people MLW download and buy the bat. MLW /sarcasm I'll admit it's no substitute for a fix, but it does work. I tried it -- Benmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current Ver: 1.60h FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Disable Yahoo Account on Check Mail for All?
Thursday, April 25, 2002, 9:38:18 AM, you wrote: GS Hello TBUL, GS How do I archive messages on an account that is no longer active? GS I have a Yahoo account that no longer provides pop access and is GS generating errors. I like to keep the messages, but get rid of the GS connection errors in the log when I Check Mail for All. It appears that you can go into account properties, then options and check ignore check all accounts request. I haven't tried it, but the option is there. Ben -- Benmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current Ver: 1.60c FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: e-mail geniuses figure this out!
Wednesday, April 24, 2002, 8:40:57 AM, you wrote: DC Recipient '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' in message 'Food receipts' cannot be sent to. The reply given by the service DC provider was '550 relaying to [EMAIL PROTECTED] prohibited by administrator DC '. I'd email the postmaster at impro and see what he has to say. Also, both your IP and your ISP's mail server's IP (194.73.73.92) are blackholed by one or more anti-spam databases. Maybe impro is using one of these services to filter spam?? Good luck. -- Benmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current Ver: 1.60c FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re[2]: e-mail geniuses figure this out!
Wednesday, April 24, 2002, 11:54:57 AM, you wrote: I use www.dnsstuff.com for a bunch of reasons. It has a lot of great tools. Here's the URL to the span database lookup for his ISP's server: http://www.dnsstuff.com/tools/ip4r.ch?ip=194.73.73.92 . You can go back to www.dnsstuff.com and find all sorts of good stuff. Take care, -- Benmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current Ver: 1.60c FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Import 60,000 messages from Netscape 4.7?
Saturday, June 16, 2001, 1:58:33 AM, you wrote: P Hi all, P I have a friend who downloaded TB today, thinking to replace his NS 4.7. P Only thing is he has over 60,000 messages in Netscape that he tried to P import into TB. He said the import seemed to work, but TB locked up and P locks up every time he tries to open it. Does anyone have near or more P than this number of messages stored in TB? If TB can handle, is it P likely to be able to handle an import of that many messages? I don't see why it wouldn't. I tend to delete messages when I have over 6000-7000, but it will import easily import that many, at least from other clients. P He also says that he has no uninstall option in Add/Remove Programs and P that there is not uninstall file. I saw a couple people complained of P the same on the cNet downloads.com reviews. What's with that? He may have had a bum installation. In the earlier versions, this was one of my complaints. However, the version I uninstalled to install 153bis had an undel in the folder that even offered the option to delete the reg entries. The 153bis doesn't seem to have an undel in its folder, but it does make an entry in my windows add/remove control panel option. I believe to do a good uninstallation you just need to pitch the TB! folder and delete the reg entries. They're all in one folder, I believe. I'd try a new installation of the bat and see if things don't work out better. Regards, Ben -- Benmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re[2]: Headers in 1.53bis
Saturday, June 16, 2001, 4:05:55 PM, you wrote: KS Same thing. Whether it's new mail or old, forwarded or KS original, I invariably have this problem. And it's KS independant of the folder that I am in, which rules out KS templates and AB-entries. Karen, Which OS are you using? I've tried to duplicate your problems using 153bis on win2000 and haven't met with success. Regards, -- Benmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re[2]: The Bat! v1.53 now released.
Wednesday, June 13, 2001, 8:05:51 AM, you wrote: JR Do you know if the send hang was addressed in this new version? Jan, I'm curious as to what you mean by send hang. Thanks! Regards, Ben -- Benmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re[4]: The Bat! v1.53 now released.
Wednesday, June 13, 2001, 12:25:56 PM, you wrote: Ben I'm curious as to what you mean by send hang. JR In earlier versions, TB! would attempt to send if it couldn't, it JR wouldn't disengage from the server. It must depend on the server. Mine is on a win2k machine setting less than a foot from my workstation. But TB! never exhibited the problem you described. I upgraded to 153 anyway, and thanks for the heads-up! Regards, -- Benmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re[2]: The Bat! and Windows 2000
Sunday, May 20, 2001, 7:11:13 AM, you wrote: SM I had no problem with The Bat! running Win98SE and WinMe. I just SM migrated to Windows 2000 and now I have terrible problems contacting SM mail servers. Time-outs, failure to send, etc. ACM Be careful with Win2k and firewalls. TB! is one of those apps that is ACM sensitive to firewalls especially ZoneAlarm's earlier versions. Yep! I've been down that road with ZoneAlarm. I wish to add that disabling ZA doesn't relieve the problem, it needs to be uninstalled. OTOH, Sygate's free firewall works fine with TB and all the other apps I use. -- Benmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re[4]: The Bat! and Windows 2000
Sunday, May 20, 2001, 10:10:34 PM, you wrote: JR -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- JR Hash: SHA1 JR Hello Ben, JR On Sunday, May 20, 2001 13:11:39 [ -0400 GMT], you wrote the JR following in regards to 'The Bat! and Windows 2000': Ben OTOH, Sygate's free firewall works fine with TB and all the other apps I Ben use. JR ok, how about ZoneAlarm's latest versions? And where would one JR get Sygate's firewall? TIA Jan, The last version of ZA I used was current around the first of the year. It killed TB!, PGP (key server lookup) and maybe one or two other apps. After the torment that thing put me through I wouldn't even consider trying it again...;) Here's a link for the Sygate download. Just register it for personal use and it's free. http://www.sygate.com/free/spf_download.htm Regards, -- Benmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: How to block unwanted senders
Thursday, May 03, 2001, 4:35:19 AM, you wrote: AV The Bat! 1.51, OS Windows 2000 AV Dear List: AV I'm new to The Bat! - so probably a Newbie question: AV I often receive unwanted mail from senders that I would like to block AV completely. AV - How can I do this most effectively? That's a tough one.. AV - Is it possible to automatically remove mail from blocked senders AV already on the server, before downloading it to the client software? If you have control of your server...it can easily be done from there. I have entire countries, ( hk, jp) blocked due to the amount of spam they generate. -- Benmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re[6]: Warning! First worm that hits TB! too...
Tuesday, May 01, 2001, 9:42:55 AM, you wrote: Ai I always am... Ai I'm asking because more and more people I know are using TB! But the problem is Ritlabs lack of response to known security issues. Hackers will have a heyday with TB if Ritlabs continues to bury its head in the sand instead of promptly addressing these issues. One poster mentioned an undocumented registry hack would eliminate the potential execution of the worm you brought to the list's attention. If this is the case ( and I have no first hand knowledge that it is) Ritlabs should have notified its clients and had a reg edit executable on its site for download. It would be a no-brainer for any programmer to crank out in a couple of minutes. BM This PR fiasco will haunt them for a long time. My company has over BM 100 computers with 30-35 running email clients (Eudora 303), I was BM ready to purchase a TB site license until you, I believe, posted the Ai And now, I'm sorry you thought that... ;( I'm very glad you did mention it. Your bringing this security issue out in the light of day could save many folks a bunch of grief. Ai As for security and a lot more TB! is something that I longed for some Ai time in the past... That's what I had in mind, TB is robust...I've sent 300MB attachments from home to my office, and TB handled it as well or better than Eudora 303. But Ritlabs clearly isn't supporting its products in a very aggressive manner at all. They need to break into the US corporate market to get much attention and become a major player. No matter if your selling paper clips or computer chips...you need a strong presence in the US to be successful. US corporations aren't exactly on a spending spree as it is; I still use some machines operating Windows 3.11, so we all are very leery of purchasing little known products from companies with questionable support policies. Ai I'm just sorry that some made too much of mine comments... I just Ai wanted to say to be careful... You did the right thingexactly what I would have done. Sometimes a few feathers get ruffled as the facts are put on the table, but that's life. Thanks again, Ben -- Benmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re[8]: Warning! First worm that hits TB! too...
Tuesday, May 01, 2001, 9:38:26 PM, you wrote: z If they do this, they will become a major target as well. It would be z good for the security strengths, including fast patches, to keep up z with the popularity - we'll need more, and faster, as it get more z popular. We both agree on this issue 100 percent. Ritlabs wishes to be successful and it indicates this on its web site. Under Partners it indicates that it's open to suggestions that involve penetrating new markets. I know of no entrepreneur that doesn't wish to gain market share and compete with the biggest in the industry. In our world economy, anything less than the most aggressive marketing strategies will result in a failed enterprise. And yes, Ritlabs must become very aggressive with customer support and get those patches and fixes out in a 24-48 hour time frame. A usenet group with developer involvement would be a cheap a dirty start. An unmoderated list server would also bring more issues in the open, resulting in a little pushing and shoving to get those fixes out more quickly. Warmest regards, Ben In short: I can't imagine Ritlabs wishes to remain an obscure little enterprise hoping to keep its deficiencies mum on a quiet little list. All software vendors have these very same issues to deal with. But the successful ones didn't become successful through obscurity. -- Benmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re[4]: Warning! First worm that hits TB! too...
Sunday, April 29, 2001, 9:39:30 PM, you wrote: Ai Is it possible to set TB not to execute attachment at all? I mean not Ai to ask even... I don't believe so. Under properties I would suggest that you set up an attachment dir...maybe something like C:\attach. The default settings leave the attachments embedded in the mailboxes. This would be an advantage if you do backups as you wouldn't be backing up an inadvertently undeleted virus or worm. Otherwise just be careful what you execute...;) Ai Yes... My ISP also fixed a few infected files and gave me a warning Ai about a virus... But its possible that their software is not Ai up-to-date... It depends on what your ISP is using. The scanning software my servers run will update several times daily. What concerns me more is Ritlabs apparent disregard for its customers regarding this latest security issue. If it (Ritlabs) has any ambition to becoming a major player in the mail client business; the way they've handled this exploit has set them back way back. Ritlabs must earn business accounts with site licenses, and they've proven to me that they don't understand the level of service a corporation demands and requires. This PR fiasco will haunt them for a long time. My company has over 100 computers with 30-35 running email clients (Eudora 303), I was ready to purchase a TB site license until you, I believe, posted the info regarding the security issue. Apparently it was kept pretty mum on this list and the sparks sure flew when you mentioned it. As it stands, I wouldn't purchase or recommend TB for all the tea in China. Ritlabs has a great deal of maturing to do before it's ready to compete with the incumbents such as Microsoft, Eudora etc. Regards, Ben -- Benmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re[2]: Warning! First worm that hits TB! too...
Sunday, April 29, 2001, 4:55:05 AM, you wrote: DH I don't know if the moderators - since you specifically targeted them DH - - will answer to you. If you have read the rules of this list you DH would at least have refrained from your tone, which is way out of DH line. We've all talked about it off-listand unless people wish to make an issue of it; I'd much rather like this dog die quietly. Warmest regards, -- Benmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re[2]: Warning! First worm that hits TB! too...
Sunday, April 29, 2001, 10:43:19 AM, you wrote: PP TB! included a closing bracket to much into the link ... so double click the PP link and remove the last bracket in the address bar or use this link (which is PP identically to the first, but without any special character at it's side) http://www.viruslist.com/eng/viruslist.asp?id=4188key=100013100072 Thanks, Peter. I should have caught that, but I didn't. BTW: The scanning software that operates on my mail servers at home and at my office catch Stator via its extension pif. With the amount of this stuff running loose on the Internet, many of the smaller ISP's are also using software on their servers to delete these sort of attachments. As more virus scanning becomes common at the ISP levelthe authors should be easier to catch, also. Thanks again, -- Benmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re[2]: Warning! First worm that hits TB! too...
Saturday, April 28, 2001, 10:22:11 PM, you wrote: /snipped entire cigar/ Get off your high horse! Many of us don't make a profession of reading all the posts that come through these lists, and I happen to be one of them! The post was informative for me, as I wasn't aware of any TB specific bugs in the wild. Also, the link is broken so I'm grateful to the poster for forwarding the entire article. Ben J. Mills Oh! If you really wish to save bandwidth...I suggest you dump that bloated signature. I couldn't care less what patched-up OS you're using. -- Benmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: Website
Sat day, March 31, 2001, 8:07:28 AM, you wrote: GFS Hello Bat_Users, GFS I've been getting "DNS error" whenever I try to check the GFS ritlabs. www.ritlabs.com works here. If all else fails you can try http://198.63.208.135 . -- Benmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re[3]: Website
Saturday, March 31, 2001, 8:20:02 PM, you wrote: GFS Yeah, the IP works, so I wonder why my Nameserver is not keeping it. Maybe it's just too slow or something. If you're using an ISP, maybe a little nudge might get some results. You can always use another provider's DNS server, just edit your tcp/ip advanced configuration. I've used alternate nameservers many times when mine are on the blink. Regards, -- Benmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: Messages to this list
Friday, March 30, 2001, 10:51:02 AM, you wrote: RB Hi, RB as you see below there are problems to send messages to this list: Roland, I haven't posted here in so long I'm just giving it a test. I'll watch my log. Ben -- Benmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re[2]: Ouch! Where Are My Messages?
Friday, February 23, 2001, 9:13:09 PM, you wrote: BC I'm not known to regularly defrag my hard disk. :) I think I've done BC it 3 times in 2 years or so, maybe longer. I'd rather leave that sort BC of thing alone. It seems like in the past, when I tried to do more BC house-cleaning, it did more harm that good (or so it seemed). BC I didn't mean to sound like I was terribly worried that TB! would BC trash the Operating System -- I'm far more worried about losing any BC archived mail. I do, however, backup all of my mail every other day, BC and as of a week ago I feel pretty prepared, should the worst happen. I've seen some third-party disk tools ( esp Norton Utilities) do some major damage. However I use w2k'2 defrag before I do my weekly drive backup and have never had a glitch. -- Benmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: Address for List Archives?
Thursday, February 22, 2001, 1:03:23 PM, you wrote: NA Is it just me, or does the address for the List Archives in the footer NA message have to be changed. I cannot connect to: NA http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com or http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com NA but I can connect to: NA http://www.mail-archive.com/tbudl@thebat.dutaint.com/ for TBUDL, and: NA http://www.mail-archive.com/tbbeta@thebat.dutaint.com/ for TBBETA. I connect to all just fine.. Ben -- Benmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
149e ??
This is a resend--it appears my original isn't going to make it. I'm pleased that the server is back up. Earlier today I visited the German Bat site. I found a bunch of interesting articles, and I agree that someone did a fine good of compiling documentation on TB. Even though I speak a locally used slang dialect of German I found it fairly easy to understand. Question: Maybe I've missed something, or haven't read all my e-mail, but what is version 149e? I downloaded it, unzipped it and noticed it was well over three megs! I've been under the impression that 149 was the latest version. Could someone explain? -- Ben mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re[7]: Peter, DO NOT OVERQUOTE! (was: Importing Outlook Contacts)
Friday, February 16, 2001, 7:50:40 PM, you wrote: JR Hello Listers. JR On Friday, February 16, 2001 23:53:58 [ +0100 GMT], Lija wrote the JR following in regards to 'Peter, DO NOT OVERQUOTE! (was: Importing JR Outlook Contacts)': /Snip/ Lija To Moderators: Lija I know, I was too rude, but please take some action against Lija cretins like this guy was! I apologize to other subscribers! JR You know there's something basically wrong with a person who resorts JR to this kind of explosive language over a misdemeanor. I'll give him to benefit of the doubt and assume he had a bad day. That sort of behavior is tolerated in many Usenet groups, but not in moderated lists. I'm new here so I'm just beginning to recognize some of the faces. Maybe the offending individual will cool off and things will work out.. -- Benmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re[2]: Peter, DO NOT OVERQUOTE! (was: Importing Outlook Contacts)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Friday, February 16, 2001, 7:26:59 PM, you wrote: MY I'm more inclined to go with "confused Outlook Express user" than MY jerk. The Bat! will allow you to bottom post and, more importantly[1], MY trim the quotes by selecting a block and hitting F4. Lookout and MY Lookout Distress allow neither action. Please elaborate: When I highlight a block to snip and hit F4TB spellchecks it. W What am I doing wrong??? - -- Benmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 7.0.1 iQIVAwUBOo3QjDAWOm/AU1JaAQHQCw/7BdK6xlUVIiVc2Rcc+GOjD52VTSGbsuWl BiCtTJXwlcOLZl0EPIcogN9rokBd8Lc5V43UvCDyN0n4uwK5l4iGAuLdpQ4lJ1tc F+leUgAFl/DWEsk9qx0Cloui6ZaahrgHujYoXQS6IMDVkPmf8T1lZirENYHHz+EW yvNVdNs0khBt+VLO+lIVEzhkomaGt9R+bLYb+MutdyvL1UDiuYlKl7Ro3e1tXTon s849uFhSIoVwb4A71svpeI8a1JQ/AMtjzCCxoUbjCaz+TY87B8fEgRtySu2ZTwF0 m2wheewcfhAYO3XRnmu39Ovb6kFXSGlQC2dz1mw+y31c5DRyZ5jOcqdK1jl+jDnm 5JXkaos6xrtFO37Y/OpXwXnOPO119i2OUXmrcWMgLPssMus9VL0QFSmVfG8bTMgR afHboSL2/Z3mHge/JB4bAxrlm1vbBWsRqAetvgW/fQKEz1s9YmEo94ZSSNYiPs88 UbJvgPEhKeleWske2H2trwASt4d6QTjisy8weipC09FI6ovYV8n8MrBfvvTUGi5p 67Ao5DQO/dQCZzE4WpQzJ+pz3syTV6ZfvLJ5L0q4ixHwCgNHhayMuuD9Xzh8rQPB NFERIiOxB3HpvBDPV5pp2nE0N7yjXomzD4AwBkGqi3vwBuEj+oAdq7ga3qh9Uo+i eaX666cj00c= =+JAf -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re[2]: Peter, DO NOT OVERQUOTE! (was: Importing Outlook Contacts)
Friday, February 16, 2001, 8:25:42 PM, you wrote: NA Ben, it sounds like you have already hit the Reply button, and *then* NA you are highlighting the text you want to quote. In that case, F4 will NA indeed spell check the highlighted text. Try just reading the message in NA the preview pane, and then highlight some text... hit F4... and that NA should bring up a properly addressed reply with just the quoted text you NA highlighted. Yep, that's what I was doing. Thanks, -- Benmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: Cannot access RIT Labs Web site
Monday, February 12, 2001, 9:11:21 PM, you wrote: MK I cannot access the RIT Labs web site: MK http://www.ritlabs.com MK http://198.78.172.135 MK by Host Name and IP address. MK Is anyone else experiencing a problem? It's must be down. I get no response on cablemodem. -- Ben[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re[2]: Cannot access RIT Labs Web site
Monday, February 12, 2001, 10:37:34 PM, you wrote: MY -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- MY Hash: SHA1 MY On Mon, 12 Feb 2001, at 21:11:21 [GMT -0500], Mark Knipfer wrote: MK I cannot access the RIT Labs web site: MK http://www.ritlabs.com MK http://198.78.172.135 MK by Host Name and IP address. MK Is anyone else experiencing a problem? MY I can't get to the web site and ping filed to ritlabs.com and the IP MY address. In addition a reverse DNS using Sam Spade came up with 'no MY such dns entry'. MY This is from the Albany, New York area for what that's worth. MY Mike Yetto I have no idea where Ritlabs'server is located. But I tried a few proxies, a couple in Europe and a couple in Asia, and ritlabs is unreachable from all of them. -- Ben[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
