Hello Alexander,
Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
ASK In the meantime, I asked the Ritlabs programmer that does most of the
ASK filtering stuff (9Val) that question. He told me that once the message has
ASK passed all filters, the user params are cleared/dropped and NOT preserved.
Wow, thanks for making
Hello list,
Playing around with the filters I have come across an a filter action
called 'set user param'. It is not clear to me what this is supposed
to do.
I have set it on a filter and I somewhat expected a header field to be
added but does not seem to be the case.
Can you some explain a
Hello Alexander
Thanks for your response. As often, one answer leads to more
questions. Sorry for that ;-)
You wrote:
ASK That user parameter is transported, you could say, internally with the
ASK message (like the color group setting, or a message flag). It can be used
ASK by further filters
I have set up a common virtual folder that lists all messages that are
Flagged. The folder is set to autofresh and I use the fast search
option. The flagged messages are found.
However, when I toggle the flag attribute for one message, the
attribut changes not only for the selected message, but
Joseph N. wrote:
JN It would be easier to scan, store, read, and otherwise manage the
JN growing volume if it were on the Usenet. What do others think of
JN managing the volume of this list?
I welcome the idea. I prefer a newsgroup to a mailing list.
My newsreader is better equipped to handle
Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
MDP Although newsgroups have their benefits, I'm still reluctant to
MDP reflect the list that way while there is strong resistance. I don't
MDP see anyone threatening to leave *unless* it becomes a newsgroup or
MDP gains a newsgroup echo. So a mailing list it will stay
Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
FDB Threatening to leave is not a very strong argument, is it?
MDP Of course it is - when it's existing members saying no to a
MDP newsgroup. It's called not alienating the existing user base.
MDP Threatening to leave if a certain change *does* take place is a fair
MDP
Mark wrote:
M Any attempt to use the search facility (F7) brings the
M Bat to a grinding halt (never-ending hourglass and then
M a crash).
I experience the same problem.
Frank de Bruin
--
The Bat! version: 2.04.4 on Windows XP
Current version
Adam wrote:
A Yes. Right click on any Column Header (right above the message
A listing). Under Available Items, click on Priority. Drag it to
A Selected Items if it is not already there. Place it where it suits
A you. The order of items is represented. Click OK.
Wow, that's the bit of info I
Is there a way to have a folder only show messages of a certain
priority?
I have been looking for this in the display and the sort options but
without success. Perhaps I have overlooked something.
I can do a work-around involving assign colour groups to priority
levels and use those to filter,
Allie Martin wrote:
AM With your version of TB!, there's only one way and that is to hold the
AM Alt button down while left clicking on the message flag icon of any
AM message showing the priority which you wish to have displayed alone.
I tried that, and it doesn't seem to work. I guess this is
without error message.
Afterwards I set the normal deletion back to the default.
Frank
--
Best regards,
Frank J de Bruin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Current version is 2.01.3 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
even conflicting) user requirements while keeping
it affordable and delivered on time.
Frank
--
Best regards,
Frank J de Bruin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Current version is 2.01.3 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat
at all.
Frank
--
Best regards,
Frank J de Bruin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Current version is 2.01.3 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Hello tbudl,
I have installed 2.01.00 and while it seems to run okay, the
connection centre is extremely slow.
I notice transfer speeds of 310 CPS. Anyone else sees this?
Frank de Bruin
Current version is 2.01 | Using TBUDL information:
FJdB I have installed 2.01.00 and while it seems to run okay, the
FJdB connection centre is extremely slow.
I think I solved the mystery: a CDROM left in its drive. After
removing it, system behaves normal again.
Frank
--
Best regards,
Frank J de Bruin [EMAIL PROTECTED
issues'? That would have saved me some time. I am reading this e-mail
list but following all threads is a all most a day time job.
I will look at the sounds, but it is a partial work-around since I am
not 24/7 at my PC.
Frank
--
Best regards,
Frank J de Bruin [EMAIL PROTECTED
17 matches
Mail list logo