[no subject]

(cross-posted to TBUDL, TBBETA) Hello, What do you think about the screenshots of the upcoming The Bat! v9 which is currently in development? You can see the screenshots at https://www.facebook.com/emailman/posts/10157552017414120 If you like them, please put "Like". If you don't, please put

Re: No subject in replies

Hello MAU, On Saturday, September 14, 2013 you wrote: M> Hello Jack, >> Is there a macro to generate a thread subject? M> Try this in your reply template: M> %SUBJ=""%SUBJ=%OFULLSUBJ Thank you Miguel, that works perfectly. -- Best Regards, Jack LaRosa :usflag: Central Alabama Using The B

Re: No subject in replies

Hello Jack, > Is there a macro to generate a thread subject? Try this in your reply template: %SUBJ=""%SUBJ=%OFULLSUBJ -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v5.4.8 My photos at: http://www.Rancho-K.com My photoblog: http://mau.aminus3.com ___

Re: No subject in replies

Hello Roelof, On Friday, September 13, 2013 you wrote: RO> Hallo Jack, RO> On Thu, 12 Sep 2013 09:16:05 -0500GMT (12-9-2013, 16:16 , where I RO> live), you wrote: JSL>> Ok, here's the NEW template: RO> Nothing in your templates that should empty the subject header. RO> Though I'd use %SetEdit

Re: No subject in replies

Hallo Jack, On Thu, 12 Sep 2013 09:16:05 -0500GMT (12-9-2013, 16:16 , where I live), you wrote: JSL> Ok, here's the NEW template: Nothing in your templates that should empty the subject header. Though I'd use %SetEditor="1"%- in both templates. -- Groetjes, Roelof Of course, you know that th

Re: No subject in replies

Hello Rick, On Thursday, September 12, 2013 you wrote: JSL>> Hello TBUD Listers, JSL>> I just recently discovered that I could add the line "%SetEditor=1" to JSL>> my NEW and REPLY templates to guarantee that Plain Text would always be used in JSL>> those instances. I just noticed that when I

Re: No subject in replies

JSL> Hello TBUD Listers, JSL> I just recently discovered that I could add the line "%SetEditor=1" to JSL> my NEW and REPLY templates to guarantee that Plain Text would always be used in JSL> those instances. I just noticed that when I reply to a list message, the JSL> subject line is empty when

No subject in replies

Hello TBUD Listers, I just recently discovered that I could add the line "%SetEditor=1" to my NEW and REPLY templates to guarantee that Plain Text would always be used in those instances. I just noticed that when I reply to a list message, the subject line is empty when it should contain the thre

[no subject]

Wednesday, March 09, 2011 2:44:33 AM remove my name and email address. howard b. schwartz mailto:howa...@comcast.net Current version is 4.2.42 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

[no subject]

Wednesday, March 09, 2011 1:57:52 AM please remove my name and email address. howard b. schwartz mailto:howa...@comcast.net Current version is 4.2.42 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

[no subject]

-- With best regards Lars Sölter mailto:lars.soel...@eanschrift.de The Bat! Version 4.2.36.4 Windows 7 / (Build 7600) Current version is 4.2.23 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

[no subject]

Dear all, Could you please look at this filter? It doesn't work as it should. My idea is to filter the "TBUDL Mission Statement" based on Subject and Recipient. Any idea why it doesn't do as intended? Many thanks ',- [ Filter for "TBUDL Mission Statement" ] '| TB! Message Filter '|

[no subject]

Hello tbudl, For many years I have shared TheBat across several computers on a small domestic network by installing a separate copy on each computer. I then set up appropriate accounts on each machine for all of the users who wanted to see each other users' email traffic in addition to t

Re: (no subject)

Hello Thomas, you wrote: TF> On Sun, 3 Feb 2008 21:00:53 +0100 TF> Marek Mikus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hello, >> >> >> TF> Hello, too. TF> -- TF> Cheers, TF> Thomas. Hello, three. -- Cheers, Maurice Current version is 3.99.27.2

Re: (no subject)

On Sun, 3 Feb 2008 21:00:53 +0100 Marek Mikus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > > Hello, too. -- Cheers, Thomas. Current version is 3.99.27.2 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

(no subject)

Hello, -- Thanks and Bye, Marek Mikus Czech support of The Bat! http://www.thebat.cz Using the best The Bat! 4.0.0.17 (ALPHA) under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Notebook Acer, Pentium4-M 2.2 GHz, 512 MB RAM, ADSL line Curre

Re: (no subject)

Hi On Tuesday 10 October 2006 at 7:49:24 PM, in , Roelof Otten wrote: > Could not connect to the server is an odd error. You tried this: > smtp.googlemail.com TLS to port 465 > pop.googlemail.comTLS to port 995 > smtp authentication enabled of course, but don't select 'secure > authenticat

Re[2]: (no subject)

Hello Alexander, Tuesday, October 10, 2006, 1:00:49 PM, you wrote: ASK> Hello MikeD (2) & everyone else, ASK> on 10-Okt-2006 at 13:35 you (MikeD (2)) wrote: >> I suspect that the problem is that it is a 'hosted' email, that is, it >> is not an '@gmail.com' address, but a different 'domain' that

Re[2]: (no subject)

Hello Roelof, Tuesday, October 10, 2006, 2:49:24 PM, you wrote: RO> Hallo MikeD, RO> On Tue, 10 Oct 2006 13:18:49 -0400GMT (10-10-2006, 19:18 , where I RO> live), you wrote: RO>>> You're not able to connect, is that with pop3, smtp or both? M>> Both. When I try to receive or send email with TB

Re: (no subject)

Hallo MikeD, On Tue, 10 Oct 2006 13:18:49 -0400GMT (10-10-2006, 19:18 , where I live), you wrote: RO>> You're not able to connect, is that with pop3, smtp or both? M> Both. When I try to receive or send email with TB, it goes out and M> begins the process ... after about 20 seconds I get a "coul

Re[2]: (no subject)

Hello Mary, Tuesday, October 10, 2006, 7:58:44 AM, you wrote: MB> Hello MikeD! MB> On Tuesday, October 10, 2006, 6:35 AM, you wrote: >>OK ... this is related to this thread: >>http://www.ritlabs.com/en/forum/read.php?FID=4&TID=2349 >>I have been through that one, but I am still not

Re[2]: (no subject)

Hello Roelof, Tuesday, October 10, 2006, 8:36:41 AM, you wrote: RO> Hallo MikeD, RO> On Tue, 10 Oct 2006 07:35:52 -0400GMT (10-10-2006, 13:35 , where I RO> live), you wrote: M>>I have been through that one, but I am still not able to connect. M>>I suspect that the problem is that it is

Re: (no subject)

Hello MikeD (2) & everyone else, on 10-Okt-2006 at 13:35 you (MikeD (2)) wrote: > I suspect that the problem is that it is a 'hosted' email, that is, it > is not an '@gmail.com' address, but a different 'domain' that is being > serviced by gmail. I have no idea what you mean with this. As far as

Re: (no subject)

Hallo MikeD, On Tue, 10 Oct 2006 07:35:52 -0400GMT (10-10-2006, 13:35 , where I live), you wrote: M>I have been through that one, but I am still not able to connect. M>I suspect that the problem is that it is a 'hosted' email, that is, M>it is not an '@gmail.com' address, but a differ

Re: (no subject)

Hello MikeD! On Tuesday, October 10, 2006, 6:35 AM, you wrote: >OK ... this is related to this thread: >http://www.ritlabs.com/en/forum/read.php?FID=4&TID=2349 >I have been through that one, but I am still not able to connect. >I suspect that the problem is that it is a 'hosted'

(no subject)

Hello all, OK ... this is related to this thread: http://www.ritlabs.com/en/forum/read.php?FID=4&TID=2349 I have been through that one, but I am still not able to connect. I suspect that the problem is that it is a 'hosted' email, that is, it is not an '@gmail.com' address, but a d

Re: (no subject)

Oops. That one escaped. Sorry. -- Best regards, MFPA No matter where you go, there you are. Using The Bat! v3.80.06 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.80.06 | 'Using TBUDL' informatio

(no subject)

Hi -- Best regards, MFPA Ultimate consistency lies in being consistently inconsistent Using The Bat! v3.80.06 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.80.06 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http:/

Re: (no subject)

Hello rich, On Fri, 14 Jul 2006 22:01:01 -0400 GMT (15/07/2006, 09:01 +0700 GMT), rich gregory wrote: rg> Hello Bat-Folk! Hallo folder template! -- Cheers, Thomas. "Reason for leaving last job: They insisted that all employees get to work by 8:45 am every morning. I couldn't work under tho

(no subject)

Hello Bat-Folk! -- Beautiful Butterfly Displays http://FramedButterflyArt.com Random tagline: I'd hate to be a teetotaller. Imagine getting up and knowing that's as good as you're going to feel all day. - Dean Martin Current version is

Re: (no subject)

Hi On Tuesday 18 October 2005 at 9:21:48 PM, in , MFPA wrote: > Hi Oops! -- Best regards, MFPA The truth is out there. Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.

(no subject)

Hi -- Best regards, MFPA You can't build a reputation on what you are going to do Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.60.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www

Re: (no subject) (was: Query current spell check language)

> I don't even have any signature, but I will put at least a delimiter > in the future. Not much fair to oblige people to have a signature, but > if it's the law, I'll comply... :-) And sorry for this one (I forgot the Subject). I'm behind a firewall, and I'm using Web2Pop to receive my mails fr

(no subject)

> The only way would be by cheating. > Make the templates that set your language also set a header, > X-Language: for instance. > Now you can query the X-Language: header and set the language and the > header the other way. Thanks for the tip. It's quite contorted, but I will give it a try. > BT

Re[5]: Apologies for no subject(s)

Howdy Marten, Wednesday, August 31, 2005, 8:31:48 PM, Marten wrotened: >> Now OT, but. >> Where were you, I notice you had the same time offset I have. I am in >> Manitoba, just outside of Winnipeg. Marten> Vancouver Island, Vancouver, Nakusp, Osoyoos, Lake Louise, Banff, Penticton, Nelson,

Re[6]: Apologies for no subject(s)

> Hello Marten, > Wednesday, August 31, 2005, 2:31:48 PM, you wrote: MG>> Vancouver Island, Vancouver, Nakusp, Osoyoos, Lake Louise, Banff, Penticton, Nelson, then MG>> Niagara on the Lake, Toronto. > You skipped right over the best part. ;) MG>> You don;t have a Tim Hortons and a Mail etc near

Re[5]: Apologies for no subject(s)

Hello Marten, Wednesday, August 31, 2005, 2:31:48 PM, you wrote: MG> Vancouver Island, Vancouver, Nakusp, Osoyoos, Lake Louise, Banff, Penticton, Nelson, then MG> Niagara on the Lake, Toronto. You skipped right over the best part. ;) MG> You don;t have a Tim Hortons and a Mail etc near you do y

Re[4]: Apologies for no subject(s)

> Hello Marten, > Wednesday, August 31, 2005, 1:20:18 PM, you wrote: MG>> I have been away in Canada, just got back, last place I was at was five hours behind. MG>> But now I realise I just changed the clock not the time zone! > Well there's your problem you've been to Canada. Oh wait a minute

Re[3]: Apologies for no subject(s)

Hello Marten, Wednesday, August 31, 2005, 1:20:18 PM, you wrote: MG> I have been away in Canada, just got back, last place I was at was five hours behind. MG> But now I realise I just changed the clock not the time zone! Well there's your problem you've been to Canada. Oh wait a minute that's w

Re[2]: Apologies for no subject(s)

> Hello admin, > A reminder of what [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed on: > Wednesday, August 31, 2005 at 16:43:03 GMT -0400 aacu>> Apologies for recent mails to list not having subjects apart from [The Bat]. > Just a question. Is your clock set properly to the local time? Your > messages always show

Re: Apologies for no subject(s)

Hallo Stuart, On Wed, 31 Aug 2005 12:00:44 -0500GMT (31-8-2005, 19:00 +0200, where I live), you wrote: SC> Just a question. Is your clock set properly to the local time? Your My guess is that his timezone is five hours off. -- Groetjes, Roelof Error 99: Dead mouse in hard drive. The Bat! 3.6

Re: Apologies for no subject(s)

Hello admin, A reminder of what [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed on: Wednesday, August 31, 2005 at 16:43:03 GMT -0400 aacu> Apologies for recent mails to list not having subjects apart from [The Bat]. Just a question. Is your clock set properly to the local time? Your messages always show up as being

Apologies for no subject(s)

Apologies for recent mails to list not having subjects apart from [The Bat]. My address book template was deleting the typed subject when sending. Have amended to subject in the template to not have [The Bat] at the beginning - that was from some request a while ago which seems not to have been

Re: (no subject)

Hallo Vladimir, On Fri, 5 Aug 2005 01:14:27 +0400GMT (4-8-2005, 23:14 +0200, where I live), you wrote: VP> http://rapidshare.de/files/3658285/uptime03.rar.html It works VP> I don't know, how long it would be available, but... According to the faq it'll be dumped when it isn't downloaded for 30

Re[2]: (no subject)

Good day, Roelof. VP :) There is macro plugin called "uptime". I just formatted it's VP output... RO>>> And where would one find that plug-in? VP>> I have no www link, but I have a FIDO address of developer - VP>> 2:5054/66.29. His name Alexander Zykov. RO> That's too lat

Re[2]: (no subject)

Hello Roelof, Thursday, August 4, 2005, 4:54:35 PM, you wrote: > That would be nice. VP>> Or I can mail it to you (~25 kb). > Yep, but that wouldn't help Chuck, who started the thread. Vladimir e-mailed it to me direct. Works great as you can see and is easy to configure. -- Best regards,

Re: (no subject)

Hallo Vladimir, On Fri, 5 Aug 2005 00:42:53 +0400GMT (4-8-2005, 22:42 +0200, where I live), you wrote: VP>>> :) There is macro plugin called "uptime". I just formatted it's VP>>> output... RO>> And where would one find that plug-in? VP> I have no www link, but I have a FIDO addre

Re[2]: (no subject)

Good day, Roelof. CS How do you get the uptime (i.e. [uptime :: 0d 8h 29m]) in your message templates? RO>>> Maybe this helps? RO>>> http://www.microsoft.com/ntserver/nts/downloads/management/uptime/default.asp VP>> :) There is macro plugin called "uptime". I just formatted it's VP>>

Re: (no subject)

Hallo Vladimir, On Thu, 4 Aug 2005 23:43:42 +0400GMT (4-8-2005, 21:43 +0200, where I live), you wrote: CS>>> How do you get the uptime (i.e. [uptime :: 0d 8h 29m]) in your message templates? RO>> Maybe this helps? RO>> http://www.microsoft.com/ntserver/nts/downloads/management/uptime/default.as

Re[2]: (no subject)

Good day, Roelof. RO> Hallo Chuck, RO> On Thu, 4 Aug 2005 13:06:39 -0400GMT (4-8-2005, 19:06 +0200, where I RO> live), you wrote: CS>> How do you get the uptime (i.e. [uptime :: 0d 8h 29m]) in your message templates? RO> Maybe this helps? RO> http://www.microsoft.com/ntserver/nts/downloads/ma

Re: (no subject)

Hallo Chuck, On Thu, 4 Aug 2005 13:06:39 -0400GMT (4-8-2005, 19:06 +0200, where I live), you wrote: CS> How do you get the uptime (i.e. [uptime :: 0d 8h 29m]) in your message templates? Maybe this helps? http://www.microsoft.com/ntserver/nts/downloads/management/uptime/default.asp -- Groetjes

(no subject)

Hello Bat Lovers, Off list question: How do you get the uptime (i.e. [uptime :: 0d 8h 29m]) in your message templates? -- Best regards, Chuck Smith Using The Bat! 3.5.30 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4 Profanity: the single language in which all programmers are expert. ___

Re: Instant Address Pop-Up Was: (no subject)

Hello Stuart, Friday, July 29, 2005, 11:53:39 AM, you wrote: CS>> I have run across an annoyance. On the create a message button, CS>> when I select favorites (arrow to the right ) it seems that TB! CS>> totally ignores the favorites and groups listed in the address CS>> book. This worked beauti

Instant Address Pop-Up Was: (no subject)

Hello Chuck, Friday, July 29, 2005, 10:43:45 AM, you wrote: CS> CS> Hello Bat Lovers, CS> First let me introduce my self. I have used TB! since 1.3x. I CS> haven't been on the discussion list in a long while and have just CS> updated to 3.5x for 2.x (totally missed 3.0). CS> I have run across a

(no subject)

Hello Bat Lovers, First let me introduce my self. I have used TB! since 1.3x. I haven't been on the discussion list in a long while and have just updated to 3.5x for 2.x (totally missed 3.0). I have run across an annoyance. On the create a message button, when I select favorites (arrow to th

Re: (no subject) Re: TB & GnuPG

Hi On Friday 18 February 2005 at 8:02:16 PM, in , Alexander S. Kunz wrote: >> Let's see how it behaves regarding the sig delimiter. I think you would have to inline sign, not PGP/MIME for the sig delimiter to be affected. > Much better if you ask me, because its PGP/MIME

Re: (no subject) Re: TB & GnuPG

Hi On Friday 18 February 2005 at 8:54:23 PM, in , David Calvarese wrote: > My only real issue with buying it is that I need to use it on 2 > PCs. my work PC (for personal email) and my home PC (for the > same). But I'm only ever going to be signing on one at a time. As fa

(no subject) Re: TB & GnuPG

On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 at 21:54:32 +0100, Alexander S. Kunz wrote: ASK> on 18-Feb-2005 at 20:31 you (David Calvarese) wrote: >> Hrm... Would PGP V8 be any better for that? I wouldn't object to >> buying it if I had to. ASK> Buy? Do you need to use it commercially? If not: ASK> http://www.pgp.com/d

Re: (no subject) Re: TB & GnuPG

Hello David Calvarese & everyone else, on 18-Feb-2005 at 20:31 you (David Calvarese) wrote: > Hrm... Would PGP V8 be any better for that? I wouldn't object to > buying it if I had to. Buy? Do you need to use it commercially? If not: http://www.pgp.com/downloads/freeware/index.html -- Best reg

Re: (no subject) Re: TB & GnuPG

Hi David Calvarese, On 18/02/2005 03:11 PM, you wrote: > I suppose I'll have to up and buy it then. I was hoping to avoid > having to do that.Ummm... What exactly does it do different > anyway? TB! can generate PGP/MIME signatures using GnuPG. You don't need to get PGP v8 for that. Additio

(no subject) Re: TB & GnuPG

On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 at 21:02:16 +0100, Alexander S. Kunz wrote: ASK> on 18-Feb-2005 at 20:47 you (Peter Meyns) wrote: >> Let's see how it behaves regarding the sig delimiter. ASK> Much better if you ask me, because its PGP/MIME instead of inline signing, ASK> and the sig delimiter is also totall

(no subject) Re:

On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 at 20:50:31 +0100, Henk de Bruijn wrote: HdB> live), Peter Meyns wrote: PM>> on Fri, 18 Feb 2005 13:54:20 -0500GMT, you wrote: DC>>> I've got a little problem... Using TB! along with GnuPG, it messes DC>>> up my sig delimter so that it's only -- instead of --. Any DC>>

Re: (no subject) Re: TB & GnuPG

Hello Peter Meyns & everyone else, on 18-Feb-2005 at 20:47 you (Peter Meyns) wrote: > Let's see how it behaves regarding the sig delimiter. Much better if you ask me, because its PGP/MIME instead of inline signing, and the sig delimiter is also totally normal. :-) -- Best regards, Alexander (

Re: (no subject) Re: TB & GnuPG

Hi David, on Fri, 18 Feb 2005 14:31:58 -0500GMT, you wrote: DC>>> I've got a little problem... Using TB! along with GnuPG, it messes DC>>> up my sig delimter so that it's only -- instead of --. Any DC>>> way to fix that? PM>> Not that I know of. TB! recognizes sig delimiters defected by

Re: (no subject)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 20:14:40 +0100GMT (18-2-2005, 20:14 +0100, where I live), Peter Meyns wrote: PM> on Fri, 18 Feb 2005 13:54:20 -0500GMT, you wrote: DC>> I've got a little problem... Using TB! along with GnuPG, it messes DC>> up my sig delimte

(no subject) Re: TB & GnuPG

On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 at 20:14:40 +0100, Peter Meyns wrote: PM> Hi David, PM> on Fri, 18 Feb 2005 13:54:20 -0500GMT, you wrote: DC>> I've got a little problem... Using TB! along with GnuPG, it messes DC>> up my sig delimter so that it's only -- instead of --. Any DC>> way to fix that? PM

Re: (no subject)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi David, on Fri, 18 Feb 2005 13:54:20 -0500GMT, you wrote: DC> I've got a little problem... Using TB! along with GnuPG, it messes DC> up my sig delimter so that it's only -- instead of --. Any DC> way to fix that? Not that I know of. TB! r

(no subject)

Hey All, I've got a little problem... Using TB! along with GnuPG, it messes up my sig delimter so that it's only -- instead of --. Any way to fix that? -- Best regards, David Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 __

Re: (no subject)

Hello Ralph, Tuesday, November 16, 2004, 10:19:08 AM, you wrote: > Hello, Hi there :) Sean -- Sean Rima <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ICQ: 679813 YAHOO: thecivvie Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] AIM: tcobone O2 +353863868343 Vodafone +353872628431 Having only one spouse is called monotony. pgp2WSTm8FgwE.

(no subject)

Hello, -- Regards, Ralph The Bat! 3.0.1.33 Windows XP 5.1.2600 SP2 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: (no subject)

Hello Zeynel, Monday, September 20, 2004, 5:31:18 PM, you wrote: ZAO> Hello Elena, ZAO> Monday, September 20, 2004, 4:22:15 PM, you wrote: EM>> I want to unsubscribe from here, how can I do this? ZAO> While this message open (or any TBUDL message), go specials menu | ZAO> mailing list | unsu

(no subject)

Hello TBUDL, I want to unsubscribe from here, how can I do this? -- Best regards, Elena Using The Bat! 3.0.0.15 on Windows XP 5 Build 2600 Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.h

Re: (no subject)

> On Wednesday, September 01, 2004, Doug Weller wrote... > >> I tried out the 3 beta and saw the tick box in Account   >> properties, but I'm pretty sure it wasn't there always, and it >> isn't  in my 3 final. Now you see it now you don't?  How do I get >> NFS in  version 3? >> > > The NFS is no

Re: (no subject)

> How do I get NFS in version 3? NFS? What's that? -- Marten Gallagher Annery Kiln Web Design www.annerykiln.co.uk Using The Bat! 3.0 with POPFile 0.21.1 on Windows XP 5.1 Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.si

Re: (no subject)

Hello Doug, > I tried out the 3 beta and saw the tick box in Account properties, but I'm pretty > sure > it wasn't there always, and it isn't in my 3 final. Now you see it now you don't? > How do > I get NFS in version 3? Just open the Sorting Office. NFS is the only option in v3.0. -- Best

Re: (no subject)

Hello Doug, On Wed, 1 Sep 2004 you wrote in DW> How do I get NFS in version 3? The filters are NFS. You now have no option and so far they seem to be working better than in version 2 or maybe I'm lucky. -- Regards, Richard | Using The Bat! 3.0 & SpamPal | Windows XP (b

Re: (no subject)

On Wednesday, September 01, 2004, Doug Weller wrote... > I tried out the 3 beta and saw the tick box in Account > properties, but I'm pretty sure it wasn't there always, and it isn't > in my 3 final. Now you see it now you don't? How do I get NFS in > version 3? The NFS is no longer optional as

(no subject)

I tried out the 3 beta and saw the tick box in Account properties, but I'm pretty sure it wasn't there always, and it isn't in my 3 final. Now you see it now you don't? How do I get NFS in version 3? Doug Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBU

Re[2]: (no subject)

Hello Darrin, receiving is v2.12.0 Tuesday, August 3, 2004, 8:41:30 PM, you wrote: > Hi pk, > On 8/3/2004 7:59 AM my time, pk wrote: pr>> have been sending cc to one of my other accounts in other location pr>> using thebat v2.12, > Is the receiving e-mail program V2.12 or just the one your se

Re: (no subject)

Hi pk, On 8/3/2004 7:59 AM my time, pk wrote: pr> have been sending cc to one of my other accounts in other location pr> using thebat v2.12, Is the receiving e-mail program V2.12 or just the one your sending it from? -- Darrin WinXP Home Service Pack 1 Tbat! 2.12.00 "On a clear disk you can se

(no subject)

hi all, have been sending cc to one of my other accounts in other location using thebat v2.12, the images are not visible there though same rogue.zip is properly installed.. what could be the probable reasons ? with best regards -- pk roy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- :[EMAIL PROTECTED]: TB v2.12.0

Re: (no subject)

Hello Mike, Thursday, July 29, 2004, 10:02:41 AM, you wrote: > I can't seem to get IMAP emails to be deleted off the IMAP server. Is > there an account feature I have missed that lets me do this?? Try: Folder / Purge+Compress -- Dave Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Servic

(no subject)

Hi I can't seem to get IMAP emails to be deleted off the IMAP server. Is there an account feature I have missed that lets me do this?? THanks mike -- Mike Smith Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.c

Re: (no subject)

==Original message text=== From: M.Laue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: TheBat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Saturday, July 10, 2004, 9:57:45 AM Subject: (no subject) ML> Hi ! ML> I just installed BayesIT plugin. Since yesterday the Bat gives me the following error m

Re: (no subject)

Hallo M.Laue, On Sat, 10 Jul 2004 09:57:45 +0200GMT (10-7-2004, 9:57 +0200, where I live), you wrote: ML> I just installed BayesIT plugin. Since yesterday the Bat ML> gives me the following error message as ML> soon as I try to declare a message as Spam: Reinstall the plug-in If that doesn't hel

(no subject)

Hi ! I just installed BayesIT plugin. Since yesterday the Bat gives me the following error message as soon as I try to declare a message as Spam: #QUOTE# ACCESS VIOLATION AT ADDRESS 7788206B IN MODULE NTDLL.DLL - READ OF ADDRESS0018 #UNQUOTE# Can anyone help me on this? greets, Markus

Re: (no subject)

On Thu 1 July 2004, 15:06:20 +1000, Jan Rifkinson wrote: > [new msg IDT template] > , Was that an "oops I didn't mean to send that" moment? :) -- Robin Anson Using The Bat! v2.11.02 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version

(no subject)

[new msg IDT template] , -- Current version is 2.11.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

(no subject)

Regards -- Manfred ___ [ TheBat 2.11.02 (43946CE3), Windows 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2, v.2096 ] NOTE: The information contained in this Ema

Re: bayesit (was: (no subject))

Hello Arnaud, On 2 Jun 2004 at 19:32:30 +0200 GMT [19:32 CEST] you wrote: AL> Yop, AL> I've found the problem ! When i go in Options menu and then plugin, i AL> can find information about Bayesit! And here is what it tells me : AL> ° C:\Program Files\The Bat!\MAIL\bayesit\base\spamdict.bye AL>

Re: bayesit (was: (no subject))

Yop, I've found the problem ! When i go in Options menu and then plugin, i can find information about Bayesit! And here is what it tells me : ° C:\Program Files\The Bat!\MAIL\bayesit\base\spamdict.bye ° Error loading file. May be it is corrupted or lost. How come this file doesn't exist ? AW> H

bayesit (was: (no subject))

Hello Arnaud, On 1 Jun 2004 at 13:33:06 +0200 GMT [13:33 CEST] you wrote: AL> Hi AL> I'm testing the Bat! and what a great program ! AL> I'm trying to use Bayesit filter... but it doesn't seem to work very AL> well. I'l tagging as junk every Spam I receive but until now spam are AL> always inco

(no subject)

Hi I'm testing the Bat! and what a great program ! I'm trying to use Bayesit filter... but it doesn't seem to work very well. I'l tagging as junk every Spam I receive but until now spam are always incoming to my inbox and not to the junk box. Can anyone help with the settings of this filter plea

(no subject)

How can I change the font size a html message is displayed in? I have a big screen and the html messages display with a tiny font. All other messages display with the fonts I set in the viewer/editor options of the preferences. Regards -- Manfred ___

(no subject)

Current version is 2.02.3 CE | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: (no subject)

Monday, December 15, 2003, 3:52:56 PM, you wrote: MDP> Doubtful. The listserver doesn't read commands sent to the MDP> list. You MDP> have to send them not to TBUDL@ but to [EMAIL PROTECTED] It seems to have worked ... messages are no longer coming to the other address. It didn't come out quit

Re: (no subject)

Hi Lynn, @15-Dec-2003, 11:42 -0800 (15-Dec 19:42 UK time) The.Limit said to Roelof: RO>> Folder template? > Following unsub instructions ... > I wonder if it worked??? lol! Doubtful. The listserver doesn't read commands sent to the list. You have to send them not to TBUDL@ but to [EMAIL PROTE

Re[2]: (no subject) - unsub

Monday, December 15, 2003, 12:12:20 PM, you wrote: RO> Depends on your folder template. RO> If it contains %to="[EMAIL PROTECTED]" it will work, if it RO> contains %to=""%to="[EMAIL PROTECTED]" it won't. There's no template involved ... I just sent a *bare* mail, apart from the commands ... bu

Re: (no subject)

Hallo Lynn, On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 11:42:09 -0800GMT (15-12-03, 20:42 +0100, where I live), you wrote: RO>> Folder template? TL> Following unsub instructions ... With the focus (in TB) on your tbudl folder, I presume. TL> I wonder if it worked??? lol! Depends on your folder template. If it conta

Re[2]: (no subject)

Monday, December 15, 2003, 11:05:21 AM, you wrote: RO> Folder template? Following unsub instructions ... I wonder if it worked??? lol! Lynn -- TheBat 2.02.3 CE Win2kPro SP2 [EMAIL PROTECTED] * * *Aun Aprendo I'd rather be WARP'ed* * * Team OS/2

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >