-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Peter,
On Monday, April 30, 2001 00:54:16 [ +0200 GMT], you wrote the
following in regards to '%NOSIGNCOMPLETE won't work':
JR>> I believe that if your account_option settings include 'Sign when
JR>> comp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday, April 30, 2001 at 17:14 (my local time), Jan Rifkinson wrote
about "%NOSIGNCOMPLETE won't work":
JR> I believe that if your account_option settings include 'Sign when
JR> completed', this macro will
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Peter,
On Tuesday, April 24, 2001 17:25:27 [ +0200 GMT], you wrote the
following in regards to '%NOSIGNCOMPLETE won't work':
Peter> Still, I'd like to know what %NOSIGNCOMPLETE should be good for...
I believe that
Hi Sergeant Thomas,
@ 2:15:09 AM on 4/25/2001, Thomas wrote:
...
BC>> It seems as if that were true (DLL and Registry entries needing
BC>> to be updated), that we'd be having big problems moving through
BC>> all of these betas that only come packed with a new executable.
T> Wrong. The betas nee
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Brian!
On Wednesday, April 25, 2001 at 12:58:13 AM you wrote:
> *shrug* Has the help file been updated?
1. As Thomas already pointed out, just make a full install of 1.51.
Then you will have the latest English help file.
2. If you can read G
Hello Brian,
On Wed, 25 Apr 2001 01:43:23 -0400 GMT (25/04/2001, 13:43 +0800 GMT),
Brian Clark wrote:
T>> Whenever a new release comes out, you have to do the full install.
T>> This will bring your help file (and others, like DLL's or reg
T>> entries) up to speed, too.
BC> It seems as if that w
Hello Jan,
On Tue, 24 Apr 2001 21:20:28 -0400 GMT (25/04/2001, 09:20 +0800 GMT),
Jan Rifkinson wrote:
Brian>> When you upgraded to the newest release, did you use the full install
Brian>> package or did you just grab the lone executable?
JR> I think I used the executable.
So don't be surpris
Hi Thomas,
@ 9:05:29 PM on 4/24/2001, Thomas wrote:
...
BC>> When you upgraded to the newest release, did you use the full
BC>> install package or did you just grab the lone executable?
T> I think this is your problem. Whenever a new release comes out, you
T> have to do the full install. This w
Hello Brian,
On Tue, 24 Apr 2001 20:11:33 -0400 GMT (25/04/2001, 08:11 +0800 GMT),
Brian Clark wrote:
BC> When you upgraded to the newest release, did you use the full install
BC> package or did you just grab the lone executable?
I think this is your problem. Whenever a new release comes out, y
Hi Jan,
@ 9:20:28 PM on 4/24/2001, Jan Rifkinson wrote:
...
JR> From the Help Menu
JR> Help Topics -> Contetns -> Message Template ->
JR> The Complete List of Template Macros
Yep, that's the place.
JR> NoSignComplete is nestled between 'signcomplete' &
JR> 'encryptcomplete'.
Nope, not i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Brian,
On Tuesday, April 24, 2001 20:11:33 [ -0400 GMT], you wrote the
following in regards to my comment on '%NOSIGNCOMPLETE won't work':
JR>> Honestly, I think you are using a later version of TB! than I am.
I am
Hi Jan,
@ 8:03:59 PM on 4/24/2001, Jan Rifkinson wrote:
...
JR> Honestly, I think you are using a later version of TB! than I am.
Yes, because you were one of the first people I talked to on TBUDL
when I entered the game around 1.47 Halloween. And you say this is in
the "Template Macros" page
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Brian,
On Tuesday, April 24, 2001 19:49:49 [ -0400 GMT], you wrote the
following in regards to '%NOSIGNCOMPLETE won't work':
Brian> I take it the help file has been updated. There's no telling what else
Brian> I
Hi Jan,
@ 7:28:33 PM on 4/24/2001, Jan Rifkinson wrote:
...
Brian>> Is there actually a macro called %NoSignComplete? If it is, it must be
Brian>> new because I don't see it in the help file
JR> From the help file "template macros"
JR> NOSIGNCOMPLETE - message editor only disables automati
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Brian,
On Tuesday, April 24, 2001 02:43:22 [ -0400 GMT], you wrote the
following in regards to '%NOSIGNCOMPLETE won't work':
Brian> Is there actually a macro called %NoSignComplete? If it is, it must be
Brian> new beca
Hi Dierk,
@ 3:47:09 AM on 4/24/2001, Dierk Haasis wrote:
...
BC>>> Is there actually a macro called %NoSignComplete? If it is, it
BC>>> must be new because I don't see it in the help file with the
BC>>> other PGP related
DH> I don't think it is that new. And it is in the help file.
*shrug* Has
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday, April 24, 2001 at 15:37 (my local time), Jan Rifkinson wrote
about "%NOSIGNCOMPLETE won't work":
Peter>> I just got help from the german TB! list: the macro %NOUSEPGP does the job!
JR> I'm glad you got th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Peter,
On Tuesday, April 24, 2001 14:51:07 [ +0200 GMT], you wrote the
following in regards to '%NOSIGNCOMPLETE won't work':
Peter> I just got help from the german TB! list: the macro %NOUSEPGP does the job!
I'm gl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday, April 24, 2001 at 13:45 (my local time), Jan Rifkinson wrote
about "%NOSIGNCOMPLETE won't work":
JR> It's not a direct answer to your question but you could use the
JR> %SIGNCOMPLETE macro in the AB entry
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday, April 24, 2001 at 08:43 (my local time), Brian Clark wrote
about "%NOSIGNCOMPLETE won't work":
BC> Is there actually a macro called %NoSignComplete? If it is, it must be
BC> new because I don't see it in the he
Hi Peter,
On Tue, 24 Apr 2001, at 08:32:33 +0200 you wrote:
PM> I entered %NOSIGNCOMPLETE in the templates of that particular
PM> folder, but to no result.
Maybe you have defined an Address Book template for that list?
The AB template has a higher priority, therefore your settings on
folder leve
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Peter,
On Tuesday, April 24, 2001 08:32:33 [ +0200 GMT], you wrote the
following in regards to '%NOSIGNCOMPLETE won't work':
Peter> I have set my account properties to PGP-sign all my messages. Now there's a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Brian!
On Tuesday, April 24, 2001 at 8:48:39 AM you wrote:
BC>> Is there actually a macro called %NoSignComplete? If it is, it must be
BC>> new because I don't see it in the help file with the other PGP related
I don't think it is that new. A
@ 2:43:22 AM on 4/24/2001, Brian Clark wrote:
...
BC> Is there actually a macro called %NoSignComplete? If it is, it must be
BC> new because I don't see it in the help file with the other PGP related
.."macros"
BC> (yes, I know the help file macros is ancient history.. ).
Make that, "(yes, I k
Hi Peter,
@ 2:32:33 AM on 4/24/2001, Peter Meyns wrote:
...
PM> I have set my account properties to PGP-sign all my messages. Now
PM> there's a mailing list I'm participating in where signatures are
PM> not wanted. I entered %NOSIGNCOMPLETE in the templates of that
PM> particular folder, but to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
I have set my account properties to PGP-sign all my messages. Now there's a
mailing list I'm participating in where signatures are not wanted. I
entered %NOSIGNCOMPLETE in the templates of that particular folder, but to
no result. I still hav
26 matches
Mail list logo
