character set like JIS or EUC-JP will draw
W the character correctly. The windows editor will draw the characters
correctly
W with utf-8. My preference, however, would be to use microed with utf-8.
AFAIK MicroEd doesn't support UTF (yet).
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
Atmen Sie bewusster: Jeweils zehn Minuten
Hello, all.
Coming back to a newer version of bat (3.71.03), and seeing if
I may have missed something before filing a bug.
I'm composing an email with japanese characters. Options-character set
is set to unicode (utf-8). I can create the characters, but the words are left
as ??? in the body
Hello,
I've found that mails which are not well viewed in TB when they are HTML are
those which are encoded in unicode UTF-8.
I see in preferences that I can add a set.
Someone could help me to find the table UTF-8 (web link or sending me the set
by e-mail off-list), in the format of TB (XLT
Hello Roman,
On Thu, 3 Mar 2005 22:38:47 -0500 GMT (04/03/2005, 10:38 +0700 GMT),
Roman Katzer wrote:
RK Hey, we're talking about re-educating my sister here. Forget it ;)
g
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
Schule (Tollwut! Gefaehrdeter Bezirk.) *
Message reply created with The Bat! 3.0.2.10
under
; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
displays correctly in TB. It is shown when using the Text tab in my viewer.
The second part:
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
displays incorrectly, as in your screenshot. TB will show it when
clicking
Hello MFPA,
On Thu, 3 Mar 2005 02:21:26 + GMT (03/03/2005, 09:21 +0700 GMT),
MFPA wrote:
it really is a shortcoming of MicroEd, which cannot display UTF.
So it's not really a TB bug.
M Is MicroEd not part of TB!?
Since it is integrated the answer must be: Yes. You are right, then.
For
On Thursday, March 3, 2005, 11:11:34, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
Yes, but to the list pertaining to the mailer the sender used:
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 6.5 18. September 2003
On a side remark, this message uses only plain text, so there is no
need for HTML anyway, but that's of cause not
Hello Roman,
On Wed, 2 Mar 2005 00:12:49 -0500 GMT (02/03/2005, 12:12 +0700 GMT),
Roman Katzer wrote:
RK Thanks for the suggestion. I had tried and not mentioned that.
RK It didn't help. As you suspected correctly, the encoding shown was none,
RK setting it to Auto made it choose Central
Hi
On Wednesday 2 March 2005 at 5:12:49 AM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Roman Katzer wrote:
Is this worth a bug report?
There are already several about UTF-8. Perhaps this is related to
one of them?
--
Best regards,
MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using The Bat
Hi
On Wednesday 2 March 2005 at 4:26:32 PM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Thomas Fernandez wrote:
I always saw UTF-support in the PTV as a feature request,
right-clicking and changing the encoding manually has always
helped over here.
From my point of view, switching to the rich text viewer to
Hello MFPA,
On Wed, 2 Mar 2005 21:56:16 + GMT (03/03/2005, 04:56 +0700 GMT),
MFPA wrote:
M From my point of view, switching to the rich text viewer to
M display certain message - against my wishes and contrary to the
M options I have set to view all messages as plain text - is a bug.
Fair
Hi
On Thursday 3 March 2005 at 1:56:17 AM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Thomas Fernandez wrote:
it really is a shortcoming of MicroEd, which cannot display UTF.
So it's not really a TB bug.
Is MicroEd not part of TB!?
For the user that is transparent, but I understand the
programmers too.
Is there no UTF-8 (Unicode) support in TB?
I got a mail encoded in UTF-8 and the special characters are displayed
wrongly.
Regards,
Roman
--
If you must drink, please don't drive. Don't even putt.
Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using
Hello Roman,
On Tue, 1 Mar 2005 09:25:53 -0500 GMT (01/03/2005, 21:25 +0700 GMT),
Roman Katzer wrote:
RK Is there no UTF-8 (Unicode) support in TB?
There is support but it is no good. What happens is that TB switches
from the PTV (plain-text viewer) to the RTV (rich-text viewer)
automatically
Hi Thomas,
On Tuesday, March 1, 2005, 09:40:56, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
RK I got a mail encoded in UTF-8 and the special characters are
RK displayed wrongly.
Check which font you have set under:
Options / Preferences / Viewer/Editor / HTML Viewer.
It appears that the font there does
On Tuesday, March 1, 2005, 17:13:20, Roman Katzer wrote:
I'll try to attach a screenshot. It's about 3KB in size.
*grrmbl*
I thought attachments up to 25KB could be sent? Seems that the list
software filters everything out.
Here it is:
http://home.comcast.net/~merlynzero/utf8bad.png
Regards,
Hello Roman,
On Tue, 1 Mar 2005 19:19:57 -0500 GMT (02/03/2005, 07:19 +0700 GMT),
Roman Katzer wrote:
RK Here it is:
RK http://home.comcast.net/~merlynzero/utf8bad.png
Richt-click in the message body and see which encoding is used. It
probably shows None. Change that to Central European (ISO or
On Tuesday, March 1, 2005, 21:11:30, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
Richt-click in the message body and see which encoding is used. It
probably shows None. Change that to Central European (ISO or
Windows) or to Latin-9. See whether that helps.
Thanks for the suggestion. I had tried and not mentioned
On Wednesday, March 2, 2005, 6:12:49, Roman Katzer wrote:
Is this worth a bug report?
Look at the message headers first. Unless the charset is declared there,
it's not a bug in TB, but a bug in whichever client generated that message.
--
Jernej Simoncic http://deepthought.ena.si/
Hello Jernej,
On Wednesday, March 2, 2005, at 08:47 Lithuanian Time, you wrote:
JS Look at the message headers first. Unless the charset is declared there,
JS it's not a bug in TB, but a bug in whichever client generated that message.
I've noticed that The Bat can't display UTF-8 encoded HTML
, 12:58 +0100, where
HdB I live), you wrote:
I'm having problem using built-in GnuPG starting from version
1.3.92. Now that the stable version 1.4.0 has been released, the
same error remains.
gpg: conversion from utf-8 to CPO not available
Anyone knows the work-around for this?
Clearsigned
. Now that the stable version 1.4.0 has been released, the
same error remains.
gpg: conversion from utf-8 to CPO not available
Anyone knows the work-around for this?
Clearsigned using gpgshel
HdB Confirmed, I already have mentioned this on TBBETA.
HdB AFAIK there is no work-around for this, I
Hi,
Tuesday, January 4, 2005, 4:34:26 AM, MPFA wrote:
Incoming messages that are encoded with the utf-8 character set and then
pgp-encrypted (inline) are are not recognised as PGP-encrypted messages by
TB!.
No button is provided to decrypt and so the message cannot be read
within TB
Hi
Incoming messages that are encoded with the utf-8 character set and then
pgp-encrypted (inline) are are not recognised as PGP-encrypted messages by
TB!.
No button is provided to decrypt and so the message cannot be read
within TB!
Anybody confirm this?
--
Best regards,
MFPA
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I'm having problem using built-in GnuPG starting from version
1.3.92. Now that the stable version 1.4.0 has been released, the
same error remains.
gpg: conversion from utf-8 to CPO not available
Anyone knows the work-around
Hello omn,
On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 19:58:45 +0800GMT (17-12-2004, 12:58 +0100, where
I live), you wrote:
I'm having problem using built-in GnuPG starting from version
1.3.92. Now that the stable version 1.4.0 has been released, the
same error remains.
gpg: conversion from utf-8 to CPO
Dear Henk,
@17-Dec-2004, 13:51 +0100 (17-Dec 12:51 UK time) Henk de Bruijn [HDB]
in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to omn:
gpg: conversion from utf-8 to CPO not available
Anyone knows the work-around for this?
Clearsigned using gpgshel
HDB Confirmed, I already have mentioned this on TBBETA
Hello omn,
A reminder of what omn on TBUDL typed on:
17 December 2004 at 13:28:08 GMT +0100
o Anyone knows the work-around for this?
Yes, use a different version of PGP.
--
Best regards,Tony.
_
Message
own, but one thing I
can't find info on is UTF-8 support. I have many friends using Linux, and they
write by default to UTF-8 encoding. Problem is that they use Cyrillic code set,
and this kind of conversion in Bat just won't work. I can read every mail
properly, but when trying to reply, I end up
Hallo Milan,
On Sat, 20 Nov 2004 02:14:45 +0100GMT (20-11-2004, 2:14 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
MG I pretty much manage to do everything related to Bat! on my own, but one
thing I
MG can't find info on is UTF-8 support.
That's because it's still a promise, not a feature.
--
Groetjes
Hello Cyrille,
On Wed, 16 Jun 2004 23:56:35 +0200 GMT (17/06/2004, 04:56 +0700 GMT),
Cyrille wrote:
C there are rumors that Ritlabs plans to make TB fully UTF-8
C compatible (not only Unicode decoding, but also encoding).
C Does anybody knows a bit more about what is planned ?
So far
Hello Tbudl,
there are rumors that Ritlabs plans to make TB fully UTF-8
compatible (not only Unicode decoding, but also encoding).
Does anybody knows a bit more about what is planned ?
--
Best regards,
Cyrille
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[ TB! 2.11.02, Windows ME 4.90 Build 3000, Pentium
Hæ!
Tuesday, September 30, 2003, 22:20, Marek Mikus wrote:
no, but Unicode should be supported very soon, AFAIK.
Soon? According to Bugtrack Unicode-support is open since January
2002... ;)
--
Kveðja!
Thorvald Neumann | aesir media
http://www.aesir.de/
[The Bat! v2.00.22 on Windows 2000
Hæ!
Wednesday, October 1, 2003, 11:36, Thorvald Neumann wrote:
Soon? According to Bugtrack Unicode-support is open since January
2002... ;)
It is in the Wishlist section...
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=234
--
Kveðja!
Thorvald Neumann | aesir media
Hæ!
Is there a XLAT-table available for UTF-8 encoding? I have tried
searching with Google, but I did not find any reasonable result. :(
--
Kveðja!
Thorvald Neumann | aesir media
http://www.aesir.de/
[The Bat! v2.00.22 on Windows 2000 Service Pack 3
Hello all,
Tuesday, September 30, 2003, Thorvald Neumann wrote:
Is there a XLAT-table available for UTF-8 encoding? I have tried
searching with Google, but I did not find any reasonable result. :(
no, but Unicode should be supported very soon, AFAIK.
--
Bye
Marek Mikus
Czech support
Hello all,
In the past few days I have received a few messages in UFT-8, the
headers include this line:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
To my surprise, when viewing these messages either in the preview pane
or message window, they are not displayed with the font and size
(Courier New
Hello MAU,
On Sun, 28 Sep 2003 10:47:01 +0200 GMT (28/09/2003, 15:47 +0700 GMT),
MAU wrote:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
To my surprise, when viewing these messages either in the preview pane
or message window, they are not displayed with the font and size
(Courier New, 12 bold
Hello Thomas,
TB is switching to the RTV, that's the font you are seeing. No tab or
other option to view this in the PTV.
Thanks for the info. It's no big deal, as long as it is already known I
can wait for next release :)
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The
said:
this problem was already fixed, please wait for next version.
Well, I have the next version (beta), and messages sent UTF-encoded
are still displayed in the RTV. I'll check again on the beta list...
I have answered to part but sometimes a UTF-8 messages generates the
already mentioned
Hello Marek,
On Sun, 28 Sep 2003 13:43:02 +0200 GMT (28/09/2003, 18:43 +0700 GMT),
Marek Mikus wrote:
Well, I have the next version (beta), and messages sent UTF-encoded
are still displayed in the RTV. I'll check again on the beta list...
I have answered to part but sometimes a UTF-8
Hi there,
I often receive e-mails that are displayed as an empty HTML page in
TheBat. Checking with F9 I found that all these have the following
settings:
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Unfortunately all I see when I switch the view window from
42 matches
Mail list logo
