I have only just joined the list. I have downloaded avgbat9us.exe
but cannot get it to work. I keep getting the message that my version
(1.62) of TB is obsolete and I need version 1.60 or later. Can anyone
suggest a solution to this problem?
Thank you,
Hilton M
Hello hmeyer,
h I have only just joined the list.
Welcome Hilton :) You're going to love this ;)
h I have downloaded avgbat9us.exe but cannot get it to work.
Is that the Avast Anti-Virus? You can get it from here
http://www.webattack.com/newapp.php?id=105009 It was just
released on 12/07/2002
Good afternoon hmeyer,
It was foretold that on 8-12-2002 @ 22:09:10 GMT+1300 (which was
10:09:10 where I live) hmeyer would mumble:
snipped a bit
h I have downloaded avgbat9us.exe but cannot get it to work. Can
h anyone suggest a solution to this problem?
Have you installed it
Hello Luc,
Many thanks for that info, which worked fine. Now, how does one know
if AVG is actually checking the mail?
Sorry about the mumbles, just couldn't work out how to get into the
system at first. 8^)
Regards,
Hilton Meyer
Current
Hello hmeyer,
Sunday, December 8, 2002, 11:38:04 PM, you wrote (possibly edited):
Many thanks for that info, which worked fine. Now, how does one know
if AVG is actually checking the mail?
Try this site:
http://www.gfi.com/emailsecuritytest/
I tweaked The Bat! so that it passed all tests
Good evening hmeyer,
It was foretold that on 8-12-2002 @ 10:38:04 GMT+1300 (which was
22:38:04 where I live) hmeyer would mumble:
snipped a bit
h Many thanks for that info, which worked fine.
I'm glad it worked out :-)
h Now, how does one know if AVG is actually checking the mail?
Hmm,
Hello Nick!
On Sunday, September 8, 2002 at 11:05:42 PM you wrote:
He's not talking about an either/or situation. Rather, he inquired as to
TB's much talked about NewsReader support via Plugin... if memory serves.
I know that he doesn't write about either/or. I was and am against
TB!
Hello Sudip,
On Mon, 9 Sep 2002 08:06:58 +0545 GMT (09/09/02, 09:21 +0700 GMT),
Sudip Pokhrel wrote:
SP http://www.hackfix.org/miscfix/icons-av-all.shtml --- Test page
Wow. My virus scanner (PC-Cillin) got 100%. I'll stick with it. :-)
I only wonder why TB has no plugin for PC-Cillin.
--
Hello Dierk,
Sunday, September 8, 2002, 9:54:37 PM, you wrote:
Yeah, sorry about that, I thought I was replying individually,
apologies to all.
DH Hello Jim!
DH On Sunday, September 8, 2002 at 7:44:18 PM you wrote:
Thanks for the info, much appreciated.
DH Jim, it's nice to see someone
Hello Dierk,
On Sunday, 8. September 2002 at 20:49:44 [GMT +0200] you wrote:
AFAIR similar tests in German computer magazines the number for AVG
seems right, although Kaspersky and NAV usually don't score that high
- virtually no virus scanner does. that's why F-Secure uses two
(three)
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Thomas Martin [TM] wrote:'
TM Its interesting, always Norton, Kapersky. What about Nod32. If
TM you look at the vBulletin Page it has over the last years
TM impressive results and by the way better than Norton and
TM Kapersky. The only thing is the
Hi Allie,
On Monday, September 9, 2002 07:28 your local time, (18:13 my local
time), you wrote:
TM Its interesting, always Norton, Kapersky. What about Nod32.
TM vBulletin Page it has over the last years impressive results and
TM by the way better than Norton and Kapersky. The only thing is the
Hello Allie,
On Monday, 9. September 2002 at 07:28:32 [GMT -0500] you wrote:
Agreed. NOD32's checker window flickers into view with each
attachment check (just a glitch) and *steals the window focus every
time* (this is annoying).
do you know if there will be a development of the Nod32
On Mon, 9 Sep 2002, Thomas Martin wrote:
AFAIR similar tests in German computer magazines the number for AVG
seems right, although Kaspersky and NAV usually don't score that high
- virtually no virus scanner does. that's why F-Secure uses two
(three) *different* scan engines.
BTW,
Sh'mae Nick,
On Sun, 08 Sep 2002, at 14:07:20 [GMT -0700] (or 22:07 in Wales)
regarding 'AVG virus checker and TB' you wrote:
NA Hello Adam Rykala,
NA On Sunday, September 08 2002 at 08:45 AM PDT, you wrote:
And if you mean turning TB! into OE then ugghhh.
NA No, the only one
Hello Marek,
On Monday, 9. September 2002 at 17:31:41 [GMT +0200 (CEST)] you wrote:
I'm in contact with developers from Eset, developer of Nod32. I have sent
them source code for plugin and free licence, so please wait. They told
me, they have a little time, but they will try to find
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Thomas Martin [TM] wrote:'
TM do you know if there will be a development of the Nod32 plugin.
TM I like that AV , but i need a working plugin. I like the
TM posibilty to filter a Mail with a virus in a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Sudip Pokhrel [SP] wrote:'
SP Besides this one, AVG, and Kaspersky, what other AV progs have
SP plug-ins for TB! ?
Dr Web: http://www.dials.ru/english/inf/thebat.htm
SophosNT:
Hello ,
Just installed TB and have found it to excellent (this from OE). I
would like to continue using AVG virus checker for my E-mail and
cannot find a way to do this. Help or advice on another Virus
checker would be gratefully received.
--
bat Jim
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Jim,
@8-Sep-2002, 10:54 Jim Lanyon [JL] in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
JL Just installed TB and have found it to excellent (this from
JL OE). I would like to continue using AVG virus checker for my
JL E-mail and cannot
Sunday, September 8, 2002, 10:54:30 AM, you wrote:
Hello ,
Just installed TB and have found it to excellent (this from OE). I
would like to continue using AVG virus checker for my E-mail and
cannot find a way to do this. Help or advice on another Virus
checker would be gratefully
Sh'mae Jim,
On Sun, 8 Sep 2002, at 10:54:30 [GMT +0100] (or 10:54 in Wales)
regarding 'AVG virus checker and TB' you wrote:
JL Hello ,
JL Just installed TB and have found it to excellent (this from OE). I
JL would like to continue using AVG virus checker for my E-mail and
JL cannot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sunday, September 08, 2002
8:07:40 AM
RE: AVG virus checker and TB
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Greetings Jim,
On Sunday, September 8, 2002, 5:54:30 AM, you wrote:
Jim Just installed TB and have found it to excellent (this from OE). I
Jim
Hi Jim,
On Sun, 8 Sep 2002 10:54:30 +0100 (08/09/2002, 10:54 my time),
you [JL] wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
JL Hello ,
JL Just installed TB and have found it to excellent (this from OE). I
JL would like to continue using AVG virus checker for my E-mail and
JL
Good afternoon Jim,
It was foretold that on 8-9-2002 10:54:30 GMT+0100 (which was
11:54:30 where I live) Jim Lanyon spread these wise comments:
snipped a bit
JL I would like to continue using AVG virus checker for my E-mail and
JL cannot find a way to do this. Help or advice on
Hi Marck,
On Sun, 8 Sep 2002 12:20:03 +0100 (08/09/2002, 12:20 my time),
you [MDP] wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
MDP Once you have the plug-in, configure TB to use it under Options |
MDP Virus protection and all will be better than perfect.
...I think perfect is a bit
Hi Jim,
on Sun, 8 Sep 2002 10:54:30 +0100 GMT (which was Sunday, September 8,
2002, 11:54 where I live) Jim Lanyon wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] among others:
Just installed TB and have found it to excellent (this from OE). I
would like to continue using AVG
Hello Ben!
On Sunday, September 8, 2002 at 2:29:52 PM you wrote:
...I think perfect is a bit too far! Where is TBs newgroup support?
No. TB! is an e-mail client, *not* a newsreader.
What about the Expand/Collapse All Threads command?
Expansion is supported; only collapsing is a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Ben,
@8-Sep-2002, 13:29 Ben Kennish [BK] in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
MDP ... all will be better than perfect.
BK ...I think perfect is a bit too far! Where is TBs newgroup
BK support? What about the Expand/Collapse All
Sh'mae Ben,
On Sun, 8 Sep 2002, at 13:29:52 [GMT +0100] (or 13:29 in Wales)
regarding 'AVG virus checker and TB' you wrote:
BK ...I think perfect is a bit too far! Where is TBs newgroup support?
BK What about the Expand/Collapse All Threads command? And what about
BK the transparent mail
Hi Ben,
on Sun, 8 Sep 2002 13:29:52 +0100GMT (08.09.02, 14:29 +0200GMT here),
you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
MDP Once you have the plug-in, configure TB to use it under Options |
MDP Virus protection and all will be better than perfect.
BK ...I think perfect is a bit
Hi Marck,
On Sun, 8 Sep 2002 12:20:03 +0100 GMT (Sep 08, 17:05 my local time),
you [MDP] wrote:
MDP Once you have the plug-in, configure TB to use it under Options |
MDP Virus protection and all will be better than perfect.
Marck, the AV test results of hackfix.org (with random trojans) seem
Hello Adam,
Sunday, September 8, 2002, 12:24:01 PM, you wrote:
Thanks for the info, much appreciated.
--
Best regards,
Jimmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information:
Hello Adam,
Thanks for the info, much appreciated.
--
Best regards,
Jimmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Hello Luc,
Sunday, September 8, 2002, 12:52:47 PM, you wrote:
Thanks for the info, much appreciated.
--
Best regards,
Jimmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information:
Hello Ben,
Sunday, September 8, 2002, 1:25:32 PM, you wrote:
Thanks for the info, much appreciated.
--
Best regards,
Jimmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information:
Hello Sudip!
On Sunday, September 8, 2002 at 6:20:50 PM you wrote:
Marck, the AV test results of hackfix.org (with random trojans) seem
to suggest that AVG has rather low, 64% to be precise, detection rate.
Comparatively Kaspersky and NAV have 100 and 95 percent detection rate
respectively.
Hello Jim!
On Sunday, September 8, 2002 at 7:44:18 PM you wrote:
Thanks for the info, much appreciated.
Jim, it's nice to see someone thanking others as you do, but for one
it is not necessary - I think we all agree that thanks is - most of
the time - implicit. And even if you want to thank
Hello Adam Rykala,
On Sunday, September 08 2002 at 08:45 AM PDT, you wrote:
And if you mean turning TB! into OE then ugghhh.
No, the only one mentioning OE was you. ;o) What he was inquiring about
is the NewsReader Plugin... no more... no less. ;o)
--
Nick Andriash
Creston, B.C. Canada
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Jim Lanyon [JL] wrote:'
JL Thanks for the info, much appreciated.
moderator
There's no need to publicly thank others for help like this. A
single reply thanking everyone would have been much better.
Hi Dierk,
On Sun, 8 Sep 2002 20:49:44 +0200 GMT (Sep 09, 00:34 my local time),
you [DH] wrote:
DH AFAIR similar tests in German computer magazines the number for
DH AVG seems right,
...snip
What scared me about the hackfix.org tests is that few trojans in
their petri dish seemed familiar.
41 matches
Mail list logo
